The gap statement and justification in higher education research: an analysis of published articles

References

• Alvesson, M., and J. Sandberg. 2011. “Generating Research Questions Through Problematization.” The Academy of Management Review 36 (no 2): 247–271. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0188.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and J. Sandberg. 2013. Constructing Research Questions: Doing Interesting Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barczak, G., and A. Griffin. 2021. How to Conduct an Effective Peer Review. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., J. Allan, and R. Edwards. 2011. “The Theory Question in Research Capacity Building in Education: Towards an Agenda for Research and Practice.” British Journal of Educational Studies 59 (no 3): 225–239. doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.599793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., and R. M. Davison. 2021. “The Need for Compelling Problematisation in Research: The Prevalence of the gap-Spotting Approach and its Limitations.” Information Systems Journal 31 (no 2): 227–230. doi:10.1111/isj.12316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culver, K. C., J. Braxton, and E. Pascarella. 2019. “Does Teaching Rigorously Really Enhance Undergraduates’ Intellectual Development? The Relationship of Academic Rigor with Critical Thinking Skills and Lifelong Learning Motivations.” Higher Education 78 (no 4): 611–627. doi:10.1007/s10734-019-00361-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, B. K., and T. Harland. 2018. Higher Education Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide to the Research Process. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danvers, E., T. Hinton-Smith, and R. Webb. 2019. “Power, Pedagogy and the Personal: Feminist Ethics in Facilitating a Doctoral Writing Group.” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (no 1): 32–46. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1456423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, O. J., F. F. Da Silva, F. Juliani, L. C. F. M. Barbosa, and T. V. Nunhes. 2019. “Bibliometric Method for Mapping the State-of-the-art and Identifying Research Gaps and Trends in Literature: An Essential Instrument to Support the Development of Scientific Projects.” In In Scientometrics Recent Advances, edited by S. Kunosic and E. Zerem, 47–66. London: IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, E., L. Geschwind, S. Levander, and W. Wermke. 2022. “Peer Review in Academia.” In In Peer Review in an era of Evaluation, edited by E. Forsberg, L. Geschwind, S. Levander, and W. Wermke, 3–36. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hanesworth, P., S. Bracken, and S. Elkington. 2019. “A Typology for a Social Justice Approach to Assessment: Learning from Universal Design and Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy.” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (no 1): 98–114. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1465405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, T. 2009. “People who Study Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 14 (no 5): 579–582. doi:10.1080/13562510903186824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, T. 2012. “Higher Education as an Open-Access Discipline.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (no 5): 703–710. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.689275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel, S., K. Gore, and B. Belsher. 2019. “Identifying Research Gaps and Prioritizing Psychological Health Evidence Synthesis Needs.” Medical Care 57 (no 10): S259–S264. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, R. L. 2011. “Developing a Research Problem and Purpose Statement.” In In The Handbook of Scholarly Writing and Publishing, edited by T. S. Rocco and T. G. Hatcher, 125–142. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, L. M. 2007. “Sitting in Your Reader's Chair.” Journal of Management Inquiry 16 (no 3): 290–294. doi:10.1177/1056492607307167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 2003. “Choosing a Research Question.” Asia Pacific Family Medicine 2 (no 1): 42–44. doi:10.1046/j.1444-1683.2003.00050.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. H. 2017. “Challenges of Finding and Filling a gap in the Literature.” Research in Nursing & Health 40 (no 5): 393–395. doi:10.1002/nur.21812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, F., A. G. Assaf, and M. G. Tsionas. 2020. “Developing Courageous Research Ideas.” Journal of Travel Research 59 (no 6): 1140–1146. doi:10.1177/0047287519900807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubicz-Nawrocka, T., and K. Bunting. 2019. “Student Perceptions of Teaching Excellence: An Analysis of Student-led Teaching Award Nomination Data.” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (no 1): 63–80. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1461620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbarika, V. W., C. Okoli, T. A. Byrd, and P. Datta. 2005. “The Neglected Continent of IS Research: A Research Agenda for Sub-Saharan Africa.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 6 (no 5): 6. doi:10.17705/1jais.00067.
   Google Scholar
• Mckenney, S., and T. C. Reeves. 2012. Conducting Educational Design Research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mosteller, F., B. Nave, and E. J. Miech. 2004. “Why we Need a Structured Abstract in Education Research.” Educational Researcher 33 (no 1): 29–34. doi:10.3102/0013189X033001029.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Bloch, C., and J. Kranz. 2015. “A Framework for Rigorously Identifying Research Gaps in Qualitative Literature Reviews.” Paper Presented at the Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, in Fort Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Nyanchoka, L., C. Tudur-Smith, R. Porcher, and D. Hren. 2020. “Key Stakeholders’ Perspectives and Experiences with Defining, Identifying and Displaying Gaps in Health Research: A Qualitative Study.” BMJ Open 10 (no 11): e039932. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyanchoka, L., C. Tudur-Smith, V. N. Thu, V. Iversen, A. C. Tricco, and R. Porcher. 2019. “A Scoping Review Describes Methods Used to Identify, Prioritize and Display Gaps in Health Research.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 109: 99–110. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G. 2009. “From the Editors: For the Lack of a Boilerplate: Tips on Writing Up (and Reviewing) Qualitative Research.” Academy of Management Journal 52 (no 5): 856–862. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.44632557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. A., I. J. Saldanha, and N. A. Mckoy. 2011. “Development of a Framework to Identify Research Gaps from Systematic Reviews.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64 (no 12): 1325–1330. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojon, C., and M. N. K. Saunders. 2012. “Formulating a Convincing Rationale for a Research Study.” Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 5 (no 1): 55–61. doi:10.1080/17521882.2011.648335.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J., and M. Alvesson. 2011. “Ways of Constructing Research Questions: Gap-Spotting or Problematization?” Organization 18 (no 1): 23–44. doi:10.1177/1350508410372151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, N. A., C. Moga, C. Harstall, and J. Magnan. 2008. “Using Health Technology Assessment to Identify Research Gaps: An Unexploited Resource for Increasing the Value of Clinical Research.” Healthcare Policy 3 (no 3): e109–ee27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snilstveit, B., M. Vojtkova, A. Bhavsar, J. Stevenson, and M. Gaarder. 2016. “Evidence & gap Maps: A Tool for Promoting Evidence Informed Policy and Strategic Research Agendas.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 79: 120–129. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.05.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tight, M. 2012. “Higher Education Research 2000–2010: Changing Journal Publication Patterns.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (no 5): 723–740. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.692361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tight, M. 2015. “Theory Application in Higher Education Research: The Case of Communities of Practice.” European Journal of Higher Education 5 (no 2): 111–126. doi:10.1080/21568235.2014.997266.
   Google Scholar
• Tight, M. 2019. “Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Higher Education Research.” European Journal of Higher Education 9 (no 2): 133–152. doi:10.1080/21568235.2018.1541752.
   Google Scholar
• Tight, M. 2022. “Is Peer Review fit for Purpose?” In In Peer Review in an era of Evaluation, edited by E. Forsberg, L. Geschwind, S. Levander, and W. Wermke, 223–241. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar