472
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A study on knowledge structure and cognitive mapping of marketing using social network analysis

运用社交网络分析探究市场营销专业知识结构及认知绘图

Pages 39-64 | Received 22 May 2013, Accepted 24 Aug 2013, Published online: 25 Nov 2013

References

  • Ayersman, D. J. (1995). Effects of knowledge representation format and hypermedia instruction on metacognitive accuracy. Computers in Human Behavior, 11, 533–555. 10.1016/0747-5632(95)80,016-2.
  • Bae, S. J., & Cho, B. J. (2008). An investigation of the relationship marketing factors, relationship quality, and relationship marketing performance focusing on car sales business. Korea Consumption Culture Study, 11, 1–22. Retrieved from http://scholar.dkyobobook.co.kr/searchDetail.laf?barcode = 4010022323935.
  • Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 233–251. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199,105)42:4(233:AID-ASI1(3.0.CO;2-.
  • Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 15, 215–227. 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0264.
  • Batt, C. E., & Katz, J. E. (1998). Consumer spending behavior and telecommunications services. A multi-method inquiry. Telecommunications Policy, 22, 23–46. 10.1016/S0308-5961(97)00055-4.
  • Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 725–730. 10.1121/1.1906679.
  • Beatty, I. D., & Gerace, W. J. (2002). Probing physics student's conceptual knowledge structures through term association. American Journal of Physics, 70, 750–758. 10.1119/1.1482067.
  • Calantone, R., Benedetto, C. A., & Rubera, G. (2012). Launch timing and launch activities proficiency as antecedents to new product performance. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 22, 290–309. 10.1080/21639159.2012.717370.
  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22, 155–205. 10.1007/BF02019280.
  • Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: sociology of science in the real world. London: MacMillan.
  • Cambrosio, A., Limoges, C., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1993). Historical scientometrics? mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 27, 119–143. 10.1007/BF02016546.
  • Choi, S., Baek, J., & Kang, H. (2013). Customer contact employees' commitment to extra-role customer service: the effect of internal service quality perception. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 23, 144–158. 10.1080/21639159.2012.760922.
  • Collins, R. (1988). Theoretical Sociology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Coulter, N., Monarch, I., & Konda, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: a study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1206–1223. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1998)49:13(1206:AID-ASI7(3.0.CO;2-F.
  • Courtial, J. P., & Law, J. (1989). A co-word study of artificial intelligence. Social Studies of Science, 19, 301–311. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/285145.
  • Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management, 37, 817–842. 10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00051-0.
  • Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building. New York: The Free Press.
  • Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
  • Friedkin, N. E. (1984). Structural cohesion and equivalence explanations of social homogeneity. Sociological Methods and Research, 12, 235–261. 10.1177/0049124184012003001.
  • Fujigaki, Y. (2002). Analysis on dynamics of research sub-domains in interdisciplinary field. Scientometrics, 54, 63–74. 10.1023/A:1015632520964.
  • Fujigaki, Y., & Nagata, A. (1998). Concept evolution in science and technology policy: The process of change in relationship among university, industry, and government. Science and Public Policy, 25, 387–395. 10.1093/spp/25.6.387.
  • Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource re-combinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 1193–1201. 10.1093/icc/dts025.
  • Jun, M. Y., & Kim, N. D. (2010). Why do people wear shoes?: An exploratory study on the hierarchical structure of the meanings in products through the network theory. Korea Consumption Culture Study, 13, 31–51. Retrieved from http://www.kcca1997.org/02_study/study03.php.
  • Kim, E. Y., & Brandon, L. (2010). Modeling Brand Equity for Lifestyle Brand Extensions: A Strategic Approach into Generation Y vs. Baby Boomer. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 20, 35–48. 10.1080/12297119.2010.9707342.
  • Kim, Y. H. (2003). Social network. Seoul: Parkyourngsa.
  • Koh, Hwang, Oh, & Lee (2008). Forecasting substitution and competition among previous and new products using choice-based diffusion model with switching cost: Focusing on substitution and competition among previous and new fixed charged broadcasting services. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 18, 223–226. 10.1080/12297119.2008.9707254.
  • Krackhardt, D. (1994). Constraints on the interactive organization as an ideal type. In CHeckscher & ADonnellan (Eds.), The Post-Bureaucratic Organization (pp. 211–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. V., & Prensky, D. (1983). The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In R. S.Burt & M. J.Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis (pp. 18–34). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Law, J., & Whittaker, J. (1992). Mapping acidification research: A test of the co-word method. Scientometrics, 23, 417–461. 10.1007/BF02029807.
  • Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J. -., & Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics, 14, 251–264. 10.1007/BF02020078.
  • Lee, J. Y. (2006). A novel clustering method for examining and analyzing the intellectual structure of a scholarly field. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23, 215–231. 10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.215.
  • Lee, S. K. (2003). An empirical study of customer's repeat visit frequency on the internet. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 11, 129–146. 10.1080/12297119.2003.9707333.
  • Lee, Yun Kyung & Hwang, Sun Jin. (2005). Do consumers, buying apparel product postpone purchase in the belief of price break?Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 15, 81–103. 10.1080/12297119.2005.9707478.
  • Lee, Y. I. & Trim, PeterR. J. (2013). An explanation of how a collectivist culture underpins the marketing strategy process in Japanese and South Korean electronics companies. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 23, 314–337. 10.1080/21639159.2013.791551.
  • Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Why words and co-words cannot map the development of the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 418–427. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199705)48:5(418:AID-ASI4(3.0.CO;2-Y.
  • Loureiro, S. M., Koo, D. Mo., & Ribeiro, L. (2013). Effects of atmospherics on emotions and intention with respect to involvement in different shopping environments. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 23(4), 435–459. 10.1080/21639159.2013.820880.
  • Moon, B. J., Park, W., & Choi, S. C. (2010). Relationships among Brand Equity Components: An Exploratory Study of the Moderating Role of Product Type. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 20, 98–108. 10.1080/12297119.2010.9707348.
  • Moon, J. (2012). Factors influencing a manufacturer's opportunism towards small-and medium-sized suppliers. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 22, 131–144, 10.1080/12297119.2012.655141.
  • Mutschke, P., & Quan-Haase, A. Q. (2001). Collaboration and cognitive structures in social science research fields: Towards social-cognitive analysis in information systems. Scientometrics, 52, 487–502. 10.1023/A:1014256102041.
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167–256. 10.1137/S003614450342480.
  • Noyons, E. C. M., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: Self-organized structuring to map neural network research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 68–81. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1998)49:1(68:AID-ASI9(3.0.CO;2-1.
  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79–91. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/1990/05/the-core-competence-of-the-corporation/ar/1.
  • Oh, S. H., Lee, H. S., & Kim, S. J. (2011). The effects of service quality and relationship benefits on relationship commitment and customer loyalty in membership fitness club. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 21, 115–125. 10.1080/21639159.2011.9711018.
  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?Journal of Documentation, 24, 348–349. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn = 0022-0418.
  • Qin, H. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48, 133–159. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/8267.
  • Rikken, F., Kiers, H. A. L., & Vos, R. (1995). Mapping the dynamics of adverse drug reactions in subsequent time periods using INDSCAL. Scientometrics, 33, 367–380. 10.1007/BF02017337.
  • Rip, A., & Courtial, J. -. (1984). Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics, 6, 381–400. 10.1007/BF02025827.
  • Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.
  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship?Journal of Marketing, 58, 46–55. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1252250.
  • Svensson, G., & Svensson, G. (2008). The industrial / societal bullwhip effects and supply chain performance. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 18(2), 1–18. 10.1080/12297119.2008.9707240.
  • Turner, W. A., & Callon, M. (1986). State intervention in academic and industrial research: the case of macromolecular chemistry in France. In MCallon, JLaw, & ARip (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 142–162). London: The Macmillan Press.
  • Turner, W. A., Chartron, G., Laville, E., & abd Michelet, B. (1988). Packaging information for peer review: New co-word analysis techniques. In A. F. J.van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (pp. 291–323). Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.
  • Yoo (2009). The impact of the internet channel introduction depending on the ownership of the internet channel. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 37–46. 10.1080/12297119.2009.9707285.
  • Vaughan, L., & You, J. (2006). Comparing business competition positions based on web co-link data: the global market vs. The chinese market. Scientometrics, 68, 611–628. 10.1007/s11192-006-0133-x.
  • Wang, P. (1999). An empirical study of knowledge structures of research topics. In L.Woods (Ed.), Proceedings of the 62nd ASIS annual meeting (pp. 557–586). New Jersey: Information Today.
  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2008). Social network analysis: methods and applications (17th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Watts, D. J. (2003). Six degrees: the science of a connected age. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.