References

• Alderson, W. (1965). Dynamic marketing behavior. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. F. (1982). Comments on current issues in the philosophy of science: Implications for marketing – a panel discussion. In J. P. Peter, R. F. Bush, & S. D. Hunt (Eds.), Marketing theory: Philosophy of Science Perspective (pp. 11–16). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. F. (1983). Marketing, scientific progress, and scientific method. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 18–31.10.2307/1251395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. F. (1986). On method in consumer research: A critical relativist perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 155–173.10.1086/jcr.1986.13.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blachowiez, J. (1989). Discovery and ampliative inference. Philosophy of Science, 56(3), 438–462.10.1086/289500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, R. N. (1984). The current status of scientific realism. In J. Leplin (Ed.), Scientific realism (pp. 41–82). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brodbeck, M. (1982). Recent developments in the philosophy of science. In R. F. Bush & S. D. Hunt (Eds.), Marketing theory: Philosophy of science perspectives (pp. 1–6). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bunge, M. (1967). Scientific research. vol. 2: The search for truth. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-48135-2
   Google Scholar
• Bunge, M. (1984). What is pseudoscience? The Skeptical Inquirer, 9(1), 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Causey, Robert L. (1979). Theory and observation. In P. D. Asquith & H. E. Kyburg (Eds.), Current research in philosophy of science (pp. 187–206). East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, G. (2002). Marketing: A critical realist approach. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 103–109.10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00145-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M. G. (2012). Reassessing discovery: Rosalind Franklin, scientific visualization, and the structure of DNA. Philosophy of Science, 79(1), 63–80.10.1086/663241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünbaum, A. (1976). Is the method of bold conjectures and attempted refutations justifiably the method of science? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 27, 105–136.10.1093/bjps/27.2.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (1983). General theories and the fundamental explananda of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 9–17.10.2307/1251394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (1990). Truth in marketing theory and research. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 1–15.10.2307/1251812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (1991). Positivism and paradigm dominance in consumer research: Toward critical pluralism and rapprochement. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 32–44.10.1086/jcr.1991.18.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (1993). Objectivity in marketing theory and research. Journal of Marketing, 57(2), 76–91.10.2307/1252028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (1994). On rethinking marketing: Our discipline, our practice, our methods. European Journal of Marketing, 28(3), 13–25.10.1108/03090569410057263
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (2002). Foundations of marketing theory: Toward a general theory of marketing. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (2003). Controversy in marketing theory: For reason, realism, truth, and objectivity. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (2010). Marketing theory: Foundations, controversy, strategy, resource-advantage theory. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (2011a). Theory status, inductive realism, and approximate truth: No miracles, no charades. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25(2), 159–178.10.1080/02698595.2011.574858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S.D. (2011b). The inductive realist approach to science. Working paper. Marketing Department, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (2012). Explaining empirically successful marketing theories: The inductive realist model, approximate truth, and market orientation. AMS Review, 2(1), 5–18.10.1007/s13162-012-0023-8
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Shelby D. (2013). The inductive realist model of theory generation: Explaining the development of a theory of marketing ethics. AMS Review, 3(2), 61–73.10.1007/s13162-013-0040-2
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (2014). Understanding marketing’s philosophy debates: A retrospective on seven key publication events. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 6(3), 351–378.10.1108/JHRM-04-2013-0020
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (2015). Explicating the inductive realist model of theory generation. AMS Review, 5(1–2), 20–27.10.1007/s13162-015-0064-x
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers, T. A. F. (2000). From instrumentalism to constructive realism. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-017-1618-5
   Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leplin, J. (1984). Scientific realism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lugg, A. (1985). The process of discovery. Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 207–220.10.1086/289240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manicas, P. T. (1987). A history and philosophy of the social sciences. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McMullin, E. (1984). A case for scientific realism. In J. Leplin (Ed.), Scientific realism (pp. 8–40). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meheus, J. & Nickles, T. (Eds.). (2009). Models of discovery and creativity. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1974). Popper’s qualitative theory of verisimilitude. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 47, 69–81.
   Google Scholar
• Nickles, T. (1980a). Scientific discovery, logic, and rationality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.10.1007/978-94-009-8986-3
   Google Scholar
• Nickles, T. (1980b). Scientific discovery: Case studies. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.10.1007/978-94-009-9015-9
   Google Scholar
• Nickles, T. (1985). Beyond divorce: Current status of the discovery debate. Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 177–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niiniluoto, I. (1999). Critical scientific realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, J. P. (1992). Realism or relativism for marketing theory and research: A comment on Hunt’s scientific realism. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 72–79.10.2307/1252043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1983). Is science marketing? Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 111–125.10.2307/1251404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific realism: How science tracks truth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (1975). Mathematics, matter and method. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, P. (2016). The trouble with macroeconomics. Delivered January 5, 2016, as the Commons Memorial Lecture of the Omicron Delta Epsilon Society. Forthcoming in the American Economist.
   Google Scholar
• Savary, C. (1995). Discovery and Its Logic: Popper and the "Friends of Discovery". Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 25(3), 318–344.10.1177/004839319502500303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schickore, J., & Steinle, F. (Eds.). (2006). Revisiting discovery and justification: Historical and philosophical perspectives on the context distinction. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapere, D. (1985). Objectivity, rationality, and scientific change. In P. P. Asquith Kitcher (Eds.), PSA: Proceedings of the 1984 biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association (Vol. 2, pp. 637–663). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, H. (1983). Brown on epistemology and the new philosophy of science. Synthese, 56(1), 61–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, H. (1987). Relativism refuted. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.10.1007/978-94-015-7746-5
   Google Scholar
• Stove, D. (1982). Popper and after. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suppe, F. (1977). The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tichý, P. (1974). On Popper's definitions of verisimilitude 1. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25, 155–160.10.1093/bjps/25.2.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichý, P. (1978). Verisimilitude revisited. Synthese, 38, 175–196.10.1007/BF00486149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, J. (1984). Science and skepticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar