References

• Arkes, H. R. (2001). Overconfidence in judgmental forecasting. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting (pp. 495–515). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (1970). How to avoid exploratory research. Journal of Advertising Research, 10(4), 27–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (1978). Forecasting with econometric methods: Folklore versus fact. The Journal of Business, 51, 549–564.10.1086/jb.1978.51.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (1980). The seer-sucker theory: The value of experts in forecasting. Technology Review, 83, 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (1985). Long-Range Forecasting. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (Ed.). (2001a). Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (2001b). Judgmental bootstrapping: Inferring experts’ rules for forecasting. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting (pp. 171–192). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (2001c). Combining forecasts. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting (pp. 417–439). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (2001d). Evaluating forecasting methods. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting (pp. 443–472). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (2006). Findings from evidence-based forecasting: Methods for reducing forecast error. International Journal of Forecasting, 22, 583–598.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (2007a). Significance tests harm progress in forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 23, 321–327.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (2007b). Statistical significance tests are unnecessary even when properly done and properly interpreted: Reply to commentaries. International Journal of Forecasting, 23, 335–336.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (2010). Persuasive advertising: Evidence-based principles. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230285804
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (2012a). Predicting job performance: The moneyball factor. Foresight, 25, 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (2012b). Illusions in regression analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 28, 689–694.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Andress, J. G. (1970). Exploratory analysis of marketing data: Trees vs. regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 487–492.10.2307/3149642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Collopy, F. (1992). Error measures for generalizing about forecasting methods: Empirical comparisons. International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 69–80.10.1016/0169-2070(92)90008-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Collopy, F. (1993). Causal forces: Structuring knowledge for time series extrapolation. Journal of Forecasting, 12, 103–115.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-131X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Collopy, F. (2001). Identification of asymmetric prediction intervals through causal forces. Journal of Forecasting, 20, 273–283.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-131X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Cuzán, A. G. (2006). Index methods for forecasting: An application to American presidential elections. Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, 3, 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Green, K. C. (2018). Guidelines for science: Evidence and checklists. Working paper, ResearchGate.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1971). Brief vs. comprehensive descriptions in measuring intentions to purchase. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 114–117.10.2307/3149740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402.10.2307/3150783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Pagell, R. (2003). Reaping benefits from management research: Lessons from the forecasting principles project. Interfaces, 33, 89–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Patnaik, S. (2009). Using quasi-experimental data to develop empirical generalizations for persuasive advertising. Journal of Advertising Research., 49, 170–175.10.2501/S0021849909090230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Yokum, J. T. (1994). Effectiveness of monetary incentives: Mail surveys of multinational professional groups. Industrial Marketing Management, 23, 133–136.10.1016/0019-8501(94)90014-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., Denniston, W. B., & Gordon, M. M. (1975). The use of the decomposition principle in making judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14, 257–263.10.1016/0030-5073(75)90028-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., Morwitz, V., & Kumar, V. (2000). Sales forecasts for existing consumer products and services: Do purchase intentions contribute to accuracy? International Journal of Forecasting, 16, 383–397.10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00058-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., Adya, M., & Collopy, F. (2001). Rule-based forecasting: Using judgment in time-series extrapolation. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting (pp. 259–282). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., Collopy, F., & Yokum, J. T. (2005). Decomposition by causal forces: A procedure for forecasting complex time series. International Journal of Forecasting, 21, 25–36.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2004.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., Green, K. C., & Graefe, A. (2015). Golden rule of forecasting: Be conservative. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1717–1731.10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., Du, R., Green, K. C., & Graefe, A. (2016). Predictive validity of evidence-based persuasion principles. European Journal of Marketing, 50, 276–293.10.1108/EJM-10-2015-0728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babst, D. V., Gottfredson, D. M., & Ballard, K. B., Jr (1968). Comparison of multiple regression and configural analysis techniques for developing base expectancy tables. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 5, 72–80.10.1177/002242786800500107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor, R., & Dua, P. (1995). Forecaster diversity and the benefits of combining forecasts. Management Science, 41, 68–75.10.1287/mnsc.41.1.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belvedere, V., & Goodwin, P. (2017). The influence of product involvement and emotion on short-term product demand forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 33, 652–661.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2017.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-David, I., Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2013). Managerial miscalibration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128, 1547–1584.10.1093/qje/qjt023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boylan, J. E., Goodwin, P., Mohammadipour, M., & Syntetos, A. A. (2015). Reproducibility in forecasting research. International Journal of Forecasting, 31, 79–90.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradburn, N. M., Sudman, S., & Wansink, B. (2004). Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design – For market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. G. (1959). Statistical forecasting for inventory control. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. G. (1962). Smoothing, forecasting and prediction of discrete time series. London: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, W. (1986). Election predictions: An empirical assessment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 222–227.10.1086/268976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunn, D. W., & Vassilopoulos, A. I. (1999). Comparison of seasonal estimation methods in multi-item short-term forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 431–443.10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00005-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, E. W. (1936). Protecting the public by parole and by parole prediction. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 27, 491–502.
   Google Scholar
• Cerf, C., & Navasky, V. (1998). The experts speak. New York, NY: Villard.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, T. C. (1890/1965). The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science, 148, 754–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatfield, C. (2001). Prediction intervals for time series. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting (pp. 475–494). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Twycross, J., & Garibaldi, J. M. (2017). A new accuracy measure based on bounded relative error for time series forecasting. PLoS ONE, 12(3), e0174202. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collopy, F., & Armstrong, J. S. (1992). Rule-based forecasting: Development and validation of an expert systems approach to combining time series extrapolations. Management Science, 38, 1394–1414.10.1287/mnsc.38.10.1394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collopy, F., Adya, M., & Armstrong, J. S. (2001). Expert systems for forecasting. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting (pp. 285–300). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3
   Google Scholar
• Cox, J. E., & Loomis, D. G. (2001). Diffusion of forecasting principles through books. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting (pp. 633–649). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3
   Google Scholar
• Czerlinski, J., Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). How good are simple heuristics? In G. Gigerenzer & P. M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 97–118). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dana, J., & Dawes, R. M. (2004). The superiority of simple alternatives to regression for social science predictions. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(3), 317–331.10.3102/10769986029003317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, R. M. (1971). A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. American Psychologist, 26, 180–188.10.1037/h0030868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision-making. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95–106.10.1037/h0037613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dielman, T. E. (1986). A comparison of forecasts from least absolute value and least squares regression. Journal of Forecasting, 5, 189–195.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-131X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dielman, T. E. (1989). Corrections to a comparison of forecasts from least absolute value and least squares regression. Journal of Forecasting, 8, 419–420.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-131X
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Edmundson, R. H. (1990). Decomposition; A strategy for judgmental forecasting. Journal of Forecasting, 9, 305–314.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-131X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einhorn, H. J. (1972). Alchemy in the behavioral sciences. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 367–378.10.1086/268019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. (1975). Unit weighting schemes for decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 171–192.10.1016/0030-5073(75)90044-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fildes, R., & Goodwin, P. (2007). Against your better judgment? How organizations can improve their use of management judgment in forecasting. Interfaces, 37, 570–576.10.1287/inte.1070.0309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fildes, R., & Hastings, R. (1994). The organization and improvement of market forecasting. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45, 1–16.10.1057/jors.1994.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fildes, R., Goodwin, P., Lawrence, M., & Nikolopoulos, K. (2009). Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: An empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planning. International Journal of Forecasting, 25, 3–23.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2008.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franses, P. H. (2014). Expert adjustments of model forecasts: Theory, practice and strategies for improvement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139963329
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics, from Essays in Positive Economics reprinted in D. M. Hausman (Ed.), The philosophy of Economics: An anthology (3rd Ed., pp. 145–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, E. S., Jr (2006). Exponential smoothing: The state of the art – Part II. International Journal of Forecasting, 22, 637–666.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & The ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorr, W., Olligschlaeger, A., & Thompson, Y. (2003). Short-term forecasting of crime. International Journal of Forecasting, 19, 579–594.10.1016/S0169-2070(03)00092-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graefe, A. (2011). Prediction market accuracy for business forecasting. In L. Vaughan-Williams (Ed.), Prediction markets (pp. 87–95). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graefe, A. (2014). Accuracy of vote expectation surveys in forecasting elections. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(S1), 204–232.10.1093/poq/nfu008
   Google Scholar
• Graefe, A. (2015). Improving forecasts using equally weighted predictors. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1792–1799.10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graefe, A. (2017a). Political markets. In K. Arzheimer & M. S. Lewis-Beck (Eds.), The Sage handbook of electoral behavior (pp. 861–882). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Graefe, A. (2017b). Prediction market performance in the 2016 U. S. presidential election. Foresight – The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, 45, 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Graefe, A., & Armstrong, J. S. (2012). Predicting elections from the most important issue: A test of the take-the-best heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 41–48.10.1002/bdm.710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graefe, A., & Armstrong, J. S. (2013). Forecasting elections from voters’ perceptions of candidates’ ability to handle issues. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 295–303. doi:10.1002/bdm.174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graefe, A., Armstrong, J. S., & Green, K. C. (2014). Improving causal models for election forecasting: Further evidence on the Golden Rule of Forecasting. APSA 2014, Washington DC, Annual Meeting Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Graefe, A., Armstrong, J. S., Jones, R. J., & Cuzán, A. G. (2014). Combining forecasts: An application to elections. International Journal of Forecasting, 30, 43–54.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2013.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graefe, A., Armstrong, J. S., Jones, R. J., Cuzán, A. G.(2017). Assessing the 2016 U.S. presidential election popular vote forecasts. In A Cavari, R. J. Powell, & K. R. Mayer (Eds.), The 2016 Presidential Election: The causes and consequences of an Electoral Earthquake (pp. 137–159). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Green, K. C. (2005). Game theory, simulated interaction, and unaided judgement for forecasting decisions in conflicts: Further evidence. International Journal of Forecasting, 21, 463–472.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2005.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, K. C., & Armstrong, J. S. (2007a). Structured analogies for forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 23, 365–376.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, K. C., & Armstrong, J. S. (2007b). Global warming: Forecasts by scientists versus scientific forecasts. Energy and Environment, 18, 995–1019.
   Google Scholar
• Green, K. C., & Armstrong, J. S. (2011). Role thinking: Standing in other people’s shoes to forecast decisions in conflicts. International Journal of Forecasting, 27, 69–80.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, K. C., & Armstrong, J. S. (2015). Simple versus complex forecasting: The evidence. Journal of Business Research, 68(8), 1678–1685.10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, K. C., Armstrong, J. S., & Graefe, A. (2007). Methods to elicit forecasts from groups: Delphi and prediction markets compared. Foresight, 8, 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Green, K. C., Armstrong, J. S., & Soon, W. (2009). Validity of climate change forecasting for public policy decision making. International Journal of Forecasting, 25, 826–832.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, K. C., Armstrong, J. S., & Graefe, A. (2015). Golden rule of forecasting rearticulated: Forecast unto others as you would have them forecast unto you. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1768–1771.10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, K. C., Armstrong, J. S., Du, R., & Graefe, A. (2016). Persuasion principles index: Ready for pretesting advertisements. European Journal of Marketing, 50, 317–326. doi:10.1108/EJM-12-2015-0838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19–30.10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafenbrädl, S., Waeger, D., Marewski, J. N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2016). Applied decision making with fast-and-frugal heuristics. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5, 215–231.10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hales, B. M., & Pronovost, P. J. (2006). The checklist – a tool for error management and performance improvement. Journal of Critical Care, 21, 231–235.10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauer, E. (2004). The harm done by tests of significance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 495–500.10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00036-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. P., Jr (1936). The inter-relations of political attitudes: IV. Political attitudes and party regularity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 503–552.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., Lipsitz, S. R., Breizat, A.-H. S., Dellinger, E. P., Herbosa, T., … Barraclough, B. (2009). A surgical checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New England Journal of Medicine, 360( January 29), 491–499.10.1056/NEJMsa0810119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarth, R. M. (1978). A note on aggregating opinions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 40–46.10.1016/0030-5073(78)90037-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, R. (2016). Corrupt research: The case for reconceptualizing empirical management and social science. New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. J., Armstrong, J. S., & Cuzán, A. G. (2007). Forecasting elections using expert surveys: An application to U. S. presidential elections, MPRA Paper No. 5301.
   Google Scholar
• Keogh, E., & Kasetty, S. (2003). On the need for time series data mining benchmarks: A survey and empirical demonstration. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 7, 349–371.10.1023/A:1024988512476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. S., & Hunter, J. E. (1993). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research. Communication Research, 20, 331–364.10.1177/009365093020003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrick, R. P., & Soll, J. B. (2006). Intuitions about combining opinions: Misappreciation of the averaging principle. Management Science, 52(1), 111–127.10.1287/mnsc.1050.0459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, V. S., Goodwin, P., & Song, H. (2014). Accuracy and bias of experts’ adjusted forecasts. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 156–174.10.1016/j.annals.2014.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A. (1986). Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lott, J. R., Jr (2010). More guns, less crime (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226493671.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lott, J. R., Jr (2016). The war on guns. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lovallo, D., Clarke, C., & Camerer, C. (2012). Robust analogizing and the outside view: Two empirical tests of case-based decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 496–512.10.1002/smj.962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, D. G. (2001). Decomposition for judgmental forecasting and estimation. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting (pp. 107–123). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3
   Google Scholar
• Makridakis, S., & Hibon, M. (1979). Accuracy of forecasting: An empirical investigation (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 142, 97–145.10.2307/2345077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makridakis, S., & Hibon, M. (2000). The M3-competition: Results, conclusions and implications. International Journal of Forecasting, 16, 451–476.10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00057-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makridakis, S. G., Andersen, A., Carbone, R., Fildes, R., Hibon, M., Lewandowski, R., … Winkler, R. (1982). The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition. Journal of Forecasting, 1, 111–153.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-131X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makridakis, S. G., Andersen, A., Carbone, R., Fildes, R., Hibon, M., Lewandowski, R., … Winkler, R. (1984). The forecasting accuracy of major times series methods. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Makridakis, S., Hibon, M., Lusk, E., & Belhadjali, M. (1987). Confidence intervals: An empirical investigation of time series in the M-competition. International Journal of Forecasting, 3, 489–508.10.1016/0169-2070(87)90045-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makridakis, S., Chatfield, C., Hibon, M., Lawrence, M., Mills, T., Ord, K., & Simmons, L. F. (1993). The M2-competition: A real-time judgmentally based forecasting study. International Journal of Forecasting, 9, 5–22.10.1016/0169-2070(93)90044-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannes, A. E., Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2014). The wisdom of select crowds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 276–299.10.1037/a0036677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNees, S. K. (1992). The uses and abuses of “consensus” forecasts. Journal of Forecasting, 11, 703–710.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-131X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McShane, B. B., & Gal, D. (2015). Blinding us to the obvious? The effect of statistical training on the evaluation of evidence. Management Science, 62, 1707–1718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McShane, B. B., & Gal, D. (2017). Rejoinder: Statistical significance and the dichotomization of evidence. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112(519), 904–908. doi:10.1080/01621459.2017.1323642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical vs. statistical prediction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. M., & Williams, D. (2003). Shrinkage estimators of time series seasonal factors and their effect on forecasting accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting, 19, 669–684.10.1016/S0169-2070(02)00077-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. M., & Williams, D. (2004). Damping seasonal factors: Shrinkage estimators for the X-12-ARIMA program. International Journal of Forecasting, 20, 529–549.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2004.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morwitz, V. G. (2001). Methods for forecasting from intentions data. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting (pp. 33–56). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3
   Google Scholar
• Morwitz, V. G., Steckel, J. H., & Gupta, A. (2007). When do purchase intentions predict sales? International Journal of Forecasting, 23, 347–364.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. H., & Winkler, R. L. (1984). Probability forecasting in meteorology. Journal of the American Statistical Association., 79, 489–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namboodiri, N. K., & Lalu, N. M. (1971). The average of several simple regression estimates as an alternative to the multiple regression estimate in postcensal and intercensal population estimates: A case study. Rural Sociology, 36, 187–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos, K., Litsa, A., Petropoulos, F., Bougioukos, V., & Khammash, M. (2015). Relative performance of methods for forecasting special events. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1785–1791.10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. J. (2017). 18 spectacularly wrong predictions made around the time of first Earth Day in 1970, expect more this year. AEIdeas, April 20.
   Google Scholar
• Pool, I. de S., Abelson, R. P., & Popkin, S. L. (1965). Candidates, issues and strategies: A computer simulation o f the 1960 and 1974 presidential elections. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhode, P. W., & Strumpf, K. S. (2004). Historical presidential betting markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 127–142.10.1257/0895330041371277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2001). Expert opinions in forecasting role of the Delphi technique. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting (pp. 125–144). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L. (1971). The relative efficiency of regression and simple unit predictor weights in applied differential psychology. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 699–714.10.1177/001316447103100310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115–129.10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1997). Eight common but false objections to the discontinuation of significance testing in the analysis of research data. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 35–60). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir, J. (1986). Pre-election polls in Israel: Structural constraints on accuracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 62–75.10.1086/268959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. L. (1996). The Ultimate Resource II: People, Materials, Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soyer, E., & Hogarth, R. M. (2012). The illusion of predictability: How regression statistics mislead experts. International Journal of Forecasting, 28, 695–711.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashman, L. J. (2000). Out-of-sample tests of forecasting accuracy: An analysis and review. International Journal of Forecasting, 16, 437–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashman, L. J., & Hoover, J. (2001). Diffusion of forecasting principles through software. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting (pp. 651–676). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3
   Google Scholar
• Tessier, T. H., & Armstrong, J. S. (2015). Decomposition of time-series by level and change. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1755–1758.10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trapero, J. R., Pedregal, D. J., Fildes, R., & Kourentzes, N. (2013). Analysis of judgmental adjustments in the presence of promotions. International Journal of Forecasting, 29, 234–243.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. (1962). The future of data analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33, 1–67.10.1214/aoms/1177704711
   Google Scholar
• Vokurka, R. J., Flores, B. E., & Pearce, S. L. (1996). Automatic feature identification and graphical support in rule-based forecasting: A comparison. International Journal of Forecasting, 12, 495–512.10.1016/S0169-2070(96)00682-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, C. (1993). Economic deregulation: Days of reckoning for microeconomists. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 1263–1289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, M., & Armstrong, J. S. (2008). The ombudsman: Verification of citations: Fawlty towers of knowledge?. Interfaces, 38, 125–139.10.1287/inte.1070.0317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokum, J. T., & Armstrong, J. S. (1995). Beyond accuracy: Comparison of criteria used to select forecasting methods. International Journal of Forecasting, 11, 591–597.10.1016/0169-2070(95)00615-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziliak, S. T., & McCloskey, D. N. (2004). Size matters: The standard error of regressions in the American Economic Review. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33, 527–546.10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.024
   Google Scholar
• Ziliak, S. T., & McCloskey, D. N. (2008). The cult of statistical significance: How the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar