268
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The validity of the Spelling and Grammar Waiver as a reasonable accommodation in Leaving Certificate examinations in Ireland

&
Pages 138-147 | Received 06 Jun 2016, Accepted 01 Jan 2017, Published online: 09 Jun 2017

References

  • Cahalan, C., Mandinach, E. B., & Camara, W. J. (2002). Predictive validity of SAT I: Reasoning Test for test-takers with learning disabilities and extended time accommodations. (Research Report 2002-5). New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
  • Camara, W. J., Copeland, T., & Rothschild, B. (1998). Effects of extended time on the SAT 1: Reasoning test scores growth for students with learning disabilities. (Report No. 98-7). New York, NY: The College Board.
  • Cawthon, S., Ho, E., Patel, P., Potvin, D., & Trundt, K. (2009). Towards a multiple construct model of measuring the validity of assessment accommodations. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 14(21), 1–9.
  • Christensen, L. L., Braam, M., Scullin, S., & Thurlow, M. L. (2011). 2009 state policies on assessment participation and accommodations for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report 83). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
  • Cormier, D. C., Altman, J., Shyyan, V., & Thurlow, M. L. (2010). A summary of the research on the effects of test accommodations: 2007–2008. (Technical Report 56). Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Educational Outcomes.
  • Department of Education and Science. (1994). Circular S40/94 certificate examinations: Special arrangements for candidates with disabilities. Athlone, Ireland: Department of Education and Science.
  • Department of Education and Science. (2000). Circular S70/00: Information note regarding the Scheme of Reasonable Accommodations which will apply at the 2001 Certificate Examinations. Athlone, Ireland: Department of Education and Science.
  • Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Helping teachers formulate sound test accommodation decisions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(3), 174–181.
  • Johnstone, C. J., Altman, J., Thurlow, M. L., & Thompson, S. J. (2006). A summary of research on the effects of test accommodations: 2002 through 2004 (Technical Report 45). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
  • Kayapınar, U. (2014). Measuring essay assessment: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 57, 113–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.57.2
  • Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Yovanoff, P., & Tindal, G. (2007). Developing a new paradigm for conducting research on accommodations in mathematics testing. Exceptional Children, 73(3), 332–347.
  • Kettler, R. J., Niebling, B C., Mroch, A. A., Feldman, E. S., & Newell, M. L. (2003). Effects of testing accommodations on math and reading scores: An experimental analysis of the performance of fourth- and eighth-grade students with and without disabilities. (Working Paper 2003-7). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
  • Lewandowski, L., Lambert, T. L., Lovett, B. J., Panahon, C. J., & Sytsma, M. R. (2014). College students’ preferences for test accommodations. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 29(2), 116–126. doi:10.1177/0829573514522116
  • Madaus, G., Russell, M., & Higgins, J. (2009). The paradoxes of high stakes testing: How they affect students, their parents, teachers, principals, schools, and society. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • National Educational Psychological Service. (2007). Submission to Advisory Group on Reasonable Accommodations in Certificate Examinations. Retrieved May 4, 2012, from www.examinations.ie/advisory/neps-submission.doc
  • Olson, J. F., & Dirir, M. (2010). Technical report for studies of the validity of test results for test accommodations. Establishing the validity of test accommodations and score interpretations for students with disabilities: A collaboration of state-based research. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
  • Phillips, S. E. (1994). High stakes testing accommodations: Validity vs. disabled rights. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(2), 93–120.
  • Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2005). Beginning behavioural research: A conceptual primer (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Sireci, S. G., Scarpati, S., & Li, S. (2005). Test accommodations for students with disabilities: An analysis of the interaction hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 457–490.
  • State Examination Commission. (2000). Arrangements for the assessment of candidates with special needs in Certificate Examinations: Report of the Expert Advisory Group on Certificate Examinations, Athlone. Retrieved from http://examinations.ie/schools/Expert_Advisory_Group_Report_ev.pdf
  • State Examination Commission. (2010). Annual Report. Athlone. Retrieved from https://www.examinations.ie/about/2010_ Annual_Report_English_Web_version.pdf
  • State Examination Commission. (2013). Annual Report. Athlone. Retrieved from https://www.examinations.ie/about/20103_Annual_Report.pdf
  • Stretch, L. S. & Osborne, J. (2005). Extended time test accommodation: Directions for future research and practice. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(8). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=8
  • Thurlow, M. L., McGrew, K. S., Tindal, G., Thompson, S. J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Elliott, J. L. (2000). Assessment accommodations research: Considerations for design and analysis. (Technical Report 26). Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved from http://cehd.umn.edu.
  • Thurlow, M. L. (2012). Accommodation for challenge, diversity and variance in human characteristics: The Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. Princeton, NJ: Gordon Commission. Retrieved from http://www.gordoncommission.org
  • Tindal, G., Heath, B., Hollenbeck, K., Almond, P., & Harniss, M. (1998). Accommodating students with disabilities on large-scale tests: An empirical study of student response and test administration demands. Exceptional Children, 64(4), 439–450.
  • Tisi, J., Whitehouse, G., Maughan, S., & Burdett, N. (2013). A review of literature on marking reliability research (Report for Ofqual). Slough, England: NFER.
  • Zurcher, R., & Bryant, D. P. (2001). The validity and comparability of entrance examination scores after accommodations are made for students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 462–472.
  • Zuriff, G. E. (2000). Extra examination time for students with learning disabilities: An examination of the maximum potential thesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(1), 99–117.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.