Understanding research engagement practices among engineering education stakeholders to promote the impact of research on practice

References

• Besterfield-Sacre, M., M. F. Cox, M. Borrego, K. Beddoes, and J. Zhu. 2014. “Changing Engineering Education: Views of U.S. Faculty, Chairs, and Deans.” Journal of Engineering Education. doi:10.1002/jee.v103.2.
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., J. E. Froyd, and T. S. Hall. 2010. “Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (3): 185–207. doi:10.1002/jee.2010.99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. 1998. The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University, Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities. 46. Brookhaven, NY: Stony Brook.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., M. R. Nixon, A. Gupta, and L. Hoshower. 2010. “Research Productivity of Accounting Faculty: An Exploratory Study.” American Journal of Business Education 3 (2): 101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, M. P., and K. J. Kaufman. 1999. “Improving Engineering Education : A Research-Based Framework For Teaching.” Journal of Engineering Education 527–534. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00481.x.
   Google Scholar
• Dancy, M. H., and C. Henderson. 2010. “Pedagogical Practices and Instructional Change of Physics Faculty.” American Journal of Physics 78: 1056–1063. doi:10.1119/1.3446763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, E. L., J. F. Milem, and J. B. Berger. 1997. “Changing Patterns of Publication Productivity: Accumulative Advantage or Institutional Isomorphism?” Sociology of Education 308–323. doi:10.2307/2673269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finelli, C. J., S. R. Daly, and K. M. Richardson. 2014. “Bridging the Research-To-Practice Gap: Designing an Institutional Change Plan Using Local Evidence.” Journal of Engineering Education 103 (2): 331–361. doi:10.1002/jee.v103.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, K. A., S. L. Sellers, and J. N. Burstyn. 2007. “Although “Diversity in the Sciences” Has Become a Common Topic of Discus-Sionamong University Administrators and at Funding Agencies, Inclusive Teaching Has Not Fully Made Its Way into the College Science Classroom. Several Scholars Have Suggested Directions for This Cultural Shift (Riley, 2003; Rosser, 1993). However, in Practice, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathemat-Ics (STEM) Disciplines Have Been Slow to Change.” To Improve the Academy: Resources for Faculty, Instructional, and Organizational Development 120: 133.
   Google Scholar
• Froyd, J. E., J. Layne, and K. Watson. 2006. “Issues regarding Change in Engineering Education.” Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, San Diego, CA
   Google Scholar
• Froyd, J. E., M. Borrego, S. Cutler, C. Henderson, and M. J. Prince. 2013. “Estimates of Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies in Core Electrical or Computer Engineering Courses.” IEEE Transactions on Education 56 (4): 393–399. doi:10.1109/TE.2013.2244602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddow, G., and J. E. Klobas. 2004. “Communication of Research to Practice in Library and Information Science: Closing the Gap.” Library and Information Science Research 26: 29–43. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2003.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handelsman, J., D. Ebert-May, R. Beichner, P. Bruns, A. Chang, R. DeHaan, J. Gentile,et al. 2004. Scientific Teaching. 521–522. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, Charles, and Melissa H. Dancy. Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 3, no. 2 (2007): 020102.
   Google Scholar
• Jesiek, B. K., M. Borrego, and K. Beddoes. 2010. “Advancing Global Capacity for Engineering Education Research (AGCEER): Relating Research to Practice, Policy, and Industry JESIEK2010.” Journal of Engineering Education 35 (2): 107–119. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01048.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. J., and P. D. Eckel. 2002. “The Effect of Institutional Culture on Change Strategies in Higher Education: Universal Principles or Culturally Responsive Concepts?” Journal of Higher Education 73 (4): 435–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, J. 2018. “A Content Analysis of How STEM Education Researchers Discuss the Impact of Their Publicly-Supported Research.” International Journal of Engineering Education 34 (3): 1120–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan, K., N. Elmqvist, M. Vorvoreanu, X. Chen, Y. Wong, H. Xian, Z. Dong, et al. 2014. “DIA2: Web-Based Cyberinfrastructure for Visual Analysis of Funding Portfolios.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20 (12): 1823–1832. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan, K. P., M. Vorvoreanu, N. Elmqvist, A. Johri, N. Ramakrishnan, G. A. Wang, and A. McKenna. 2012. “Portfolio Mining.” Computer 45 (10): 95–99. doi:10.1109/MC.2012.351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, W. F., and R. Zemsky. 1994. “Faculty Discretionary Time: Department and the Academic Ratchet.” Journal of Higher Education 65 (1994): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, P., C. Clark, J. Richardson, and J. E. Froyd. 2001. “Engineering Curricula Change across the Foundation Coalition: How They Succeeded, What They Learned.” Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Milem, J. F., J. B. Berger, and E. L. Dey. 2000. “Faculty Time Allocation: A Study of Change over Twenty Years.” The Journal of Higher Education 71 (4): 454–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeier, D., R. W. Boulanger, P. V. Bayly, S. R. Schmid, K. K. Muraleetharan, and A. Barros. 2001. “Integration of Engineering Education and Research: Perspectives from the NSF Civil and Mechanical Systems 1998 CAREER Workshop.” Journal of Engineering Education 90 (2): 199–202. doi:10.1002/jee.2001.90.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2015. Qualitative Research and Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rugarcia, A., R. M. Felder, D. R. Woods, and J. E. Stice. 2000. “The Future of Engineering Education: I. A Vision for A New Century. .” Chemical Engineering Education 34 (1): 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., K. DeWelde, and C. Fry. “Determining progress in improving undergraduate STEM education: The reformer’s tale” In Commissioned paper for National Academy of Engineering Forum–The Impact and Diffusion of Transformative Engineering Education Innovations, New Orleans, LA. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S., A. Colby, K. Macatangay, and W. Sullivan. 2007. “What Is Engineering Practice?” International Journal of Engineering Education 22 (3): 429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunal, Dennis W., Cynthia S. Jeanelle Hodges, Kevin W. Sunal, Whitaker, L. Michael Freeman, and Ronald A. Leo Edwards Johnston, and Michael Odell. "Teaching science in higher education: Faculty professional development and barriers to change."School Science and mathematics101, no. 5 (2001): 246-257.
   Google Scholar