Epistemic injustice in dementia and autism patient organizations: An empirical analysis

References

• Acton, G. J., P. A. Mayhew, B. A. Hopkins, and S. Yauk. 1999. Communicating with individuals with dementia: The impaired person's perspective. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 25 (2):6–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Annear, M. J., C. Toye, F. McInerney, et al. 2015. What should we know about dementia in the 21st century? A Delphi consensus study. BioMed Central Geriatrics 15 (5):1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4):216–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autismus Karlsruhe, E. V. 2014. Stellungnahme. Partizipation von Menschen mit Autismus in BW. No longer available (accessed August 15, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Autland Nürnberg. 2015. Offener Brief an die Vorsitzende von Autismus Deutschland. Available at: https://autlandnuernberg.wordpress.com/2015/09/25/offener-brief-an-die-vorsitzende-von-autismus-deutschland (accessed August 15, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Bagatell, N. 2010. From cure to community: Transforming notions of autism. Ethos 38 (1):33–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, H., C. Brownlow, and L. O'Dell. 2015. ‘An association for all’—Notions of the meaning of autistic self-advocacy politics within a parent-dominated autistic movement. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 25:219–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, S. 2016. In search of experiential knowledge. Innovation 30 (1):91–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carel, H., and G. Györffy. 2014. The art of medicine. Seen but not heard: Children and epistemic injustice. Lancet 384:1256–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamak, B. 2008. Autism and social movements: French parents' associations and international autistic individuals' organisations. Sociology of Health & Illness 30 (1):76–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, J. 2012. Comments on Elizabeth Anderson. “Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective May 16:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Clare, L., J. M. Rowlands, and R. Quin. 2008. Collective strength. The impact of developing a shared social identity in early-stage dementia. Dementia 7 (1): 9–30.
   Google Scholar
• de Boer, M. E., R.-M. Dröes, C. Jonker, J. A. Eefsting, and C. M.P.M Hertogh. 2012. Thoughts on the future: The perspectives of elderly people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease and the implications for advance care planning. American Journal of Bioethics Primary Research 3 (1):14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, L. E., and N. E. Kass. 2017. How are PCORI-funded researchers engaging patients in research and what are the ethical implications? American Journal of Bioethics Empirical Bioethics 8 (1):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2006. Powerlessness and social interpretation. Episteme 3 (1–2):96–108.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic injustice: Power & the ethics of knowing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geissler, J. 2011. Health policy in Germany: Consumer groups in a corporatist polity. In Democratizing health. Consumer groups in the policy process, ed. H. Löfgren, E. de Leew, and M. Leahy, 127–42. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gemeinsamer Bundesausschus. 2013. Gesetz zur Verbesserung der Rechte von Patientinnen und Patienten. In Bundesgesetzblatt. Bonn, February 25. Available at: https://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?start=//*%5B@attr_id=%27bgbl113s0277.pdf%27%5D#__bgbl__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27bgbl113s0277.pdf%27%5D__1492685235702 (accessed April 20, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Gilmour, J. A., and T. Brannelly. 2010. Representation of people with dementia—Subaltern, person, citizen. Nursing Inquiry 17 (3):240–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronemeyer, R. 2013. Das 4. Lebensalter. Demenz ist keine Krankheit. Munich, Germany: Pattloch.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, A., and J. Manthorpe. 2012. Developing theoretical understandings of dementia and their application to dementia care policy in the UK. Dementia 12 (6):682–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jongsma, K. R., and M. Sand. 2016. The usual suspects: Why techno-fixing dementia is flawed. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20:119–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, L., C. Hattersley, B. Molins, C. Buckley, C. Povey, and E. Pellicano. 2015. Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community. Autism 20 (4):442–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakeman, R. 2010. Epistemic injustice and the mental health service user. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 19:151–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law on Modernisation. 2003. GKV-Modernisierungsgesetz GMG—Gesetz zur Modernisierung der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung Vom 14. November 2003. In Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2003, Teil I Nr. 55, Bonn 19. November.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, L. C., and M. K. Cho. 2014. Focusing on cause or cure? Priorities and stakeholder presence in childhood psychiatry research. American Journal of Bioethics Empirical Bioethics 5 (1):44–55.
   Google Scholar
• Milte, R., W. Shulver, M. Killington, C. Bradley, J. Ratcliffe, and M. Crotty. 2016. Quality in residential care from the perspective of people living with dementia: The importance of personhood. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 63:9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, T., O. O'Donavan, and E. Howlett. 2014. Assembling dementia care: patient organisations and social research. BioSocieties 9 (2):173–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsini, M., and M. Smith. 2010. Social movements, knowledge and public policy: The case of autism activism in Canada and the US. Critical Policy Studies 4 (1):38–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, F. 2009. The cerebral subject and the challenge of neurodiversity. BioSocieties 4 (4):425–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phinney, A. 1998. Living with dementia from the patient's perspective. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 24 (6):8–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prorok, J. C., S. Horgan, and D. P. Seitz. 2013. Health care experiences of people with dementia and their caregivers: A meta-ethnographic analysis of qualitative studies. Canadian Association Medical Journal 185 (14):669–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabeharisoa, V. 2003. The struggle against neuromuscular diseases in France and the emergence of the “partnership model” of patient organisation. Social Science & Medicine 57 (11):2127–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, A., I. Jordan, and S. Schicktanz. 2014. Exploring the positions of German and Israeli patient organizations in the biomedical context of end-of-life policies. Health Care Analysis 22 (2):143–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schicktanz, S. 2015. The ethical legitimacy of patient organizations' involvement in politics and knowledge production: Epistemic justice as a conceptual basis. In The public shaping of medical research: patient associations, health movements and biomedicine, ed. P. Wehling, W. Viehöver, and S. Koenen, 246–64. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schicktanz, S., and I. Jordan. 2013. Kollektive Patientenautonomie. Theorie und Praxis eines neuen bioethischen Konzepts. In Patientenautonomie. Theoretische Grundlagen—Praktische Anwendungen, ed. C. Wiesemann, and A. Simon, 287–302. Münster, Germany: Mentis.
   Google Scholar
• Tappen, R. M., C. Williams-Burgess, J. Edelstein, T. Touhy, and S. Fishman. 1997. Communicating with individuals with Alzheimer's disease: Examination of recommended strategies. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 11 (5):249–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gennip, I. E., H. R. Pasman, M. G. Oosterveld-Vlug, D. L. Willems, and B. D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen. 2016. How dementia affects personal dignity: A qualitative study on the perspective of individuals with mild to moderate dementia. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences 71 (3):491–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, M., K. Van den Bosch, H. Ebben, L. Van Hal, and A. Schippers. 2015. Autism self-advocacy in the Netherlands: past, present and future. Disability & Society 30 (8):1174–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington State Developmental Disability Council. 2009. The missing page in your style book: Person-first language. Available at: http://ddc.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Respectful_Language.pdf accessed (September 12, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. 1990. Basis content analysis, 2nd ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wehling, P., W. Viehöver, and S. Koenen. 2015. The public shaping of medical research: Patient associations, health movements and biomedicine. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, P. J., and D. George. 2008. The myth of Alzheimer's: What you aren't being told about today's most dreaded diagnosis. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S. J., P. Higgs, and S. Katz. 2012. Neuroculture, active ageing and the ‘older brain’: Problems, promises and prospects. Sociology of Health & Illness 34 (1):64–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, L. 2014. Patient and citizen participation in health: The need for improved ethical support. American Journal of Bioethics 14 (6):4–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar