An empirical assessment of the short-term impacts of a reading of Deborah Zoe Laufer's drama Informed Consent on attitudes and intentions to participate in genetic research

References

• Acuna, L. E. 2000. Don't cry for us Argentinians: Two decades of teaching medical humanities. Medical Humanities 26 (2):66–70.[https://doi.org/10.1136/mh.26.2.66]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arveklev, S. H., L. Berg, H. Wigert, M. Morrison-Helme, and M. Lepp. 2017. Nursing students experiences of learning about nursing through drama. Nurse Education in Practice 28:60–65.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.09.007]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arveklev, S. H., H. Wigert, L. Berg, B. Burton, and M. Lepp. 2015. The use and application of drama in nursing education—An integrative review of the literature. Nurse Education Today 35 (7):e12–17.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.025]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Botkin, J. R., J. W. Belmont, J. S. Berg, et al. 2015. Points to consider: Ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. American Journal of Human Genetics 97 (1):6–21.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.05.022]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botkin, J. R., E. Rothwell, R. Anderson, L. A. Stark, and J. Mitchell. 2014. Public attitudes regarding the use of electronic health information and residual clinical tissues for research. Journal of Community Genetics 5 (3):205–13.[https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-013-0175-8]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, K. M., B. F. Drake, S. Gehlert, et al. 2016. Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women. Journal of Community Genetics 7 (1):41–49.[https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-015-0248-y]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. E., and M. B. Delatycki. 2006. Predictive genetic testing in young people for adult-onset conditions: Where is the empirical evidence? Clinical Genetics 69 (1):8–16.[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2005.00505.x]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, A., S. Rosenthal, and Y. R. Schlussel. 2015. Medicine as a performing art: What we can learn about empathic communication from theater arts. Academic Medicine 90 (3):272–76.[https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000626]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., and H. Kyngas. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (1):107–15.[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Final rule. 2017. Federal Register 82 (12):7149–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrison, N. A., N. A. Sathe, A. H. Antommaria, et al. 2016. A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States. Genetics in Medicine 18 (7):663–71.[https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.138]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, C., L. Eckstein, B. Berkman, et al. 2015. Broad consent for research with biological samples: Workshop conclusions. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):34–42.[https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1062162]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrini, C. J., A. L. McGuire, and M. A. Majumder. 2016. Clearing complexity from the Common Rule NPRM. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 3 (2):257–80.[https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw026]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M., F. Camacho, J. Lawlor, V. DePuy, J. Sugarman, and K. Weinfurt. 2006. Measuring trust in medical researchers. Medical Care 44 (11):1048–53.[https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000228023.37087.cb]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayeems, R. Z., F. A. Miller, C. J. Barg, et al. 2016. Using newborn screening bloodspots for research: Public preferences for policy options. Pediatrics:e20154143. [https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-4143]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrix, K. S., E. M. Meslin, A. E. Carroll, and S. M. Downs. 2013. Attitudes about the use of newborn dried blood spots for research: A survey of underrepresented parents. Academic Pediatrics 13 (5):451–57.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.010]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health and Human Services. 2015. NPRM for federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Holleman, W. L. 2000. The play's the thing: Using literature and drama to teach about death and dying. Family Medicine 32 (8):523–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isherwood, C. 2015. Review: Informed consent tests the ethics of genetic research. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/19/theater/review-informed-consent-tests-the-ethics-of-genetic-research.html?_r=0 (accessed August 18, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Javitt, G. H. 2013. Take another little piece of my heart: Regulating the research use of human biospecimens. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 41 (2):424–39.[https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12053]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and Y. M. Baek. 2017. Medical drama viewing and healthy lifestyle behaviors: Understanding the role of health locus of control beliefs and education level. Health Communication November 22: 1–10. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1405483]
   Google Scholar
• Kirklin, D. 2001. Humanities in medical training and education. Clinical Medicine (London) 1 (1):25–27.[https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.1-1-25]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matharu, K. 2009. Using Indigenous Australian drama to break cultural barriers in healthcare relationships. Medical Humanities 35 (1):47–53.[https://doi.org/10.1136/jmh.2008.000364]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, M. M., and L. E. Wolf. 2010. The Havasupai Indian tribe case–lessons for research involving stored biologic samples. New England Journal of Medicine 363 (3):204–7.[https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1005203]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pentz, R., and R. Theriault. 2001. Clincial trial abuse and public trust. Breast Disease Quarterly 12:141–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pentz, R. D., L. Billot, and D. Wendler. 2006. Research on stored biological samples: Views of African American and White American cancer patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 140 A (7):733–39.[https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.31154]
   Google Scholar
• Perry, M., N. Maffulli, S. Willson, and D. Morrissey. 2011. The effectiveness of arts-based interventions in medical education: A literature review. Medical Education 45 (2):141–48.[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03848.x]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, V. 1996. Salvery, segregation and racism: Trusting the health care system ain't always easy. St. Louis University Public Law Review XV:191–235.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, S. 2011. In whose interests? Hastings Center Report 41 (2):40–47.[https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2011.0025]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, M. E., and C. Kreiter. 2002. Teaching delivery of bad news using experiential sessions with standardized patients. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 14 (3):144–49.[https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1403_2]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, E., E. Johnson, A. Mathiesen, et al. 2016. Experiences among women with positive prenatal expanded carrier screening results. Journal of Genetic Counseling 26 (4):690–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, E., B. Wong, R. A. Anderson, and J. R. Botkin. 2016. The influence of education on public trust and consent preferences with residual newborn screening dried blood spots. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 11 (3):231–36.[https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616656976]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. 2000. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health 23:334–40.[https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4%3c334::AID-NUR9%3e3.0.CO;2-G]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. 2010. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health 33 (1):77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J., and L. Hunt. 2003. All the world's a stage: The use of theatrical performance in medical education. Medical Education 37 (10):922–27.[https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01634.x]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, C. M., J. L'Heureux, J. C. Murray, et al. 2011. Active choice but not too active: Public perspectives on biobank consent models. Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 13 (9):821–31.[https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821d2f88]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skye, E. P., H. Wagenschutz, J. A. Steiger, and A. K. Kumagai. 2014. Use of interactive theater and role play to develop medical students' skills in breaking bad news. Journal of Cancer Education 29 (4):704–8.[https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0641-y]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, J. 3rd. 1980. Grief and the performing arts: A brief experiment in humanizing medical education. Journal of Medical Education 55 (3):215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tetel-Hanks, J. 1993. Drama in the medical school classroom. The actor as patient. North Carolina Medical Journal 54 (2):106–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trinidad, S. B., S. M. Fullerton, E. J. Ludman, G. P. Jarvik, E. B. Larson, and W. Burke. 2011. Response—The risks and benefits of re-consent. Science 332 (6027):306.[https://doi.org/10.1126/science.332.6027.306-b]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, C. H., B. S. Wilfond, and C. M. McBride. 2010. Effects of genetic risk information on children's psychosocial wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Genetics in Medicine 12 (6):317–26.[https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181de695c]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaffe, M. J. 1989. The medi-drama as an instrument to teach doctor–patient relationships. Medical Teacher 11 (3–4):321–29.[https://doi.org/10.3109/01421598909146420]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar