“I want us to be a normal family”: Toward an understanding of the functions of anonymity among U.S. oocyte donors and recipients

References

• Adams, D. 2013. Conceptualising a child-centric paradigm: Do we have freedom of choice in donor conception reproduction? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10(3):369–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, S. 2012. Donor conception, secrecy and the search for information. Journal of Law and Medicine 19(4):631–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Almeling, R. 2011. Sex cells: The medical market for eggs and sperm. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Applegarth, L. D., N. L. Kaufman, M. Josephs-Sohan, P. J. Christos, and Z. Rosenwaks. 2016. Parental disclosure to offspring created with oocyte donation: Intentions versus reality. Human Reproduction 31(8):1809–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araya, R., J. Rouzier, J. Perrin, S. Carez, J. Saias-Magnan, A. Noizet, J. M. Grillo, and C. Metzler-Guillemain. 2011. Couples who procreate through sperm donation inform their children? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 40(6):503–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baetens, P., P. Devroey, M. Camus, A. C. Van Steirteghem, and I. Ponjaert-Kristoffersen. 2000. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: The decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 15(2):476–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, D. R., P. K. Jennings, and W. Kramer. 2011. Offspring searching for their sperm donors: How family type shapes the process. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 26(9):2415–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, L., P. Casey, J. Readings, V. Jadva, and S. Golombok. 2010. 'Daddy ran out of tadpoles': How parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7-year-olds understand. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 25(10):2527–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, E., M. Crawshaw, L. Frith, and C. Jones. 2012. Donor-conceived people's views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. Journal of Law Medicine 19:769–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blyth, E., and L. Frith. 2009. Donor-conceived people's access to genetic and biographical history: An analysis of provisions in different jurisdictions permitting disclosure of donor identity. International Journal of Law, Policy & Fam 23(2):174–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bracewell-Milnes, T., S. Saso, S. Bora, A. M. Ismail, M. Al-Memar, A. H. Hamed, H. Abdalla, and M.-Y. Thum. 2016. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update 22(4):450–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braverman, A., B. Steinbock, B. Wilder, F. Batzer, J. Robertson, L. Francis, M. Gibson, P. Amato, R. Brzyski, R. Rebar., et al. 2009. Interests, obligations, and rights of the donor in gamete donation. Fertil Steril 91:22–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewaeys, A., J. K. De Bruyn, L. A. Louwe, and F. M. Helmerhorst. 2005. Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients' choices. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 20(3):820–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, L. M., M. Sidebotham, and B. Lieberman. 2002. Egg donation-the donor's view: An aid to future recruitment. Human Fertility (Cambridge, England) 5(4):175–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cahn, N. 2012. The new kinship. The Georgetown Law Journal 100:367–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahn, N. 2009. Test tube families: why the fertility market needs legal regulation. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006a. Constructing grounded theory. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006b. My father was an anonymous sperm donor. Washington, DC: The Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and V. Braun. 2013. Teaching thematic analysis. Psychologist 26:120–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowden, M. 2012. No harm, no foul’: a child’s right to know their genetic parents. International Journal of Law Policy Family 26(1):102–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabb, S., and M. Augoustinos. 2008. Genes and families in the media: Implications of genetic discourse for constructions of the 'family. Health Sociology Review 17(3):303–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, I., S. Flyckt, G. Heeley, S. Layland, A. Thornhill, and E. Kelada. 2005. Will removal of anonymity influence the recruitment of egg donors? A survey of past donors and recipients. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10(3):325–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M. 2008. Prospective parents' intentions regarding disclosure following the removal of donor anonymity. Hum Fertil (Camb) 11:95–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., C. Gunter, C. Tidy, and F. Atherton. 2013. Working with previously anonymous gamete donors and donor-conceived adults: recent practice experiences of running the DNA-based voluntary information exchange and contact register, UK DonorLink. Human Fertility 16(1):26–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K. 2007. Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part 2: Oocyte donors. Hum Fertil (Camb) 10(4):223–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniels, K. R., V. M. Grace, and W. R. Gillett. 2011. Factors associated with parents' decisions to tell their adult offspring about the offspring's donor conception. Human Reproduction 26(10):2783–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Melo-Martín, I. (2014). The ethics of anonymous gamete donation: is there a right to know one's genetic origins? Hastings Center Studies 44(2):28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, D., S. Handley, L. Duqueno, S. Weaver, and S. Lui. 1998. Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: A follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 8(4):273–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., and S. Mckinnon. 2001. Relative values: Reconfiguring kinship studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, T. 2015. Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: An overview of the psychosocial evidence. Monash Bioethics Review 33(1):45–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., K. Bourne, V. Jadva, and V. Smith. 2014. Making connections contact between sperm donor relations. Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:270–95.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., and S. Golombok. 2012. Donor insemination: A follow-up study of disclosure decisions, family relationships and child adjustment at adolescence. Reprod Biomed Online 25(2):193–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., V. Jadva, W. Kramer, and S. Golombok. 2009. Gamete donation: Parents' experiences of searching for their child's donor siblings and donor. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 24(3):505–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., S. Zadeh, V. Smith, and S. Golombok. 2016. Disclosure of sperm donation: A comparison between solo mother and two-parent families with identifiable donors. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 33(5):592–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, L., E. Blyth, M. Crawshaw, and O. van den Akker. 2018. Secrets and disclosure in donor conception. Sociology of Health & Illness 40(1):188–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, L., E. Blyth, and A. Farrand. 2007. UK gamete donors' reflections on the removal of anonymity: Implications for recruitment. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 22(6):1675–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, L., N. Sawyer, and W. Kramer. 2012. Forming a family with sperm donation: A survey of 244 non-biological parents. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 24(7):709–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E., K. R. Allen. 2013. Donor, dad, or…? Young adults with lesbian parents' experiences with known donors. Family Process 52(2):338–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., L. Blake, P. Casey, G. Roman, and V. Jadva. 2013. Children born through reproductive donation: A longitudinal study of psychological adjustment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 54(6):653–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., J. Readings, L. Blake, P. Casey, A. Marks, and V. Jadva. 2011. Families created through surrogacy: Mother-child relationships and children's psychological adjustment at age 7. Development Psychological 47(6):1579–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., V. Jadva, T. Freeman, K. Ahuja, and S. Golombok. 2016. Being an identity-release donor: A qualitative study exploring the motivations, experiences and future expectations of current UK egg donors. Human Fertility 19(4):230–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfeld, D. A., D. G. Greenfeld, C. M. Mazure, D. L. Keefe, and D. L. Olive. 1998. Do attitudes toward disclosure in donor oocyte recipients predict the use of anonymous versus directed donation? Fertility and Sterility 70(6):1009–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfeld, D. A., and S. C. Klock. 2004. Disclosure decisions among known and anonymous oocyte donation recipients. Fertility and Sterility 81(6):1565–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfeld, D. A., C. M. Mazure, D. L. Olive, and D. L. Keefe. 1995. Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 12(2):118–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, A. 2005. Hello, I’m your sister. Our father is donor 150. The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, J. C., D. Kennett, D. Reisel. 2016. The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Human Reproduction 31(6):1135–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. 2009. Family, ancestry and self: What is the moral significance of biological ties. Adoption & Culture 2:91–122.
   Google Scholar
• Hershberger, P., S. C. Klock, and R. B. Barnes. 2007. Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: A phenomenological study. Fertility and Sterility 87(2):288–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz, R., M. K. Nelson, and W. Kramer. 2013. Donor conceived offspring conceive of the donor: The relevance of age, awareness, and family form. Social Science & Medicine 86:52–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, P. 2007. Miracles of love: The use of metaphor in egg donor ads. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(1):24–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, N., and L. Culley. 2014. Infertility, gamete donation and relatedness in British South Asian communities. Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities: 232–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, K., L. R. Rubin, A. Werner-Lin, M. Sagi, Y. Kemel, R. Stern, A. Phillips, I. Cholst, N. Kauff, K. Offit., et al. 2012. Incorporating information regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis into discussions concerning testing and risk management for BRCA1/2 mutations. Cancer 118(24):6270–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilioi, E., L. Blake, V. Jadva, G. Roman, and S. Golombok. 2017. The role of age of disclosure of biological origins in the psychological wellbeing of adolescents conceived by reproductive donation: a longitudinal study from age 1 to age 14. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 58(3):315–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., K. Dierickx, P. Schotsmans, K. R. Daniels, P. Rober, and T. D'hooghe. 2013. Factors contributing to parental decision-making in disclosing donor conception: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update 19(6):714–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C. 2006. Making muslim babies: IVF and gamete donation in sunni versus shi'a islam. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30(4):427–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson, S., G. Sydsjo, A. S. Svanberg, and C. Lampic. 2014. Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the swedish study on gamete donation. Fertility and Sterility 102:1160–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson, S., G. Sydsjö, A. Skoog Svanberg, and C. Lampic. 2012. Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: Follow-up at offspring age 1–4 years. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 27(10):2998–3007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., T. Freeman, W. Kramer, and S. Golombok. 2010. Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 20(4):523–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., T. Freeman, W. Kramer, and S. Golombok. 2011. Sperm and oocyte donors' experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring. Human Reproduction 26(3):638–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., N. Lamba, K. Kadam, and S. Golombok. 2015. Indian egg donors' characteristics, motivations and feelings towards the recipient and resultant child. Reprod Biomed Soc Online 1(2):98–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaiser, K. 2009. Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research 19(11):1632–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, N. J., and M. L. Mcgowan. 2010. Looking back: Egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle. Fertility and Sterility 93(2):455–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M., K. Bourne, J. Fisher, L. Johnson, and K. Hammarberg. 2014. Gamete donors expectations and experiences of contact with their donor offspring. Human Reproduction 29(4):731–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klock, S. C. 2013. Disclosure decisions among known and anonymous egg donor recipients. In Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation, ed. M. V. Sauer, 195–204. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Klock, S. C., and D. Greenfeld. 2004. Parents' knowledge about the donors and their attitudes toward disclosure in oocyte donation. Human Reproduction 19(7):1575–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz, M. 2013. Genetic knowledge and family identity: Managing gamete donation in Britain and Germany. Sociology-the Journal of the British Sociological Association 47(5):939–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, M. 2005. Nameless relations: Anonymity, melanesia and reproductive gift exchange between British ova donors and recipients. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs, G. T., S. Wise, and S. Finch. 2015. Functioning of families with primary school-age children conceived using anonymous donor sperm. Human Reproduction 28(2):375–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalos, A., C. Gottlieb, and O. Lalos. 2007. Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: A study of parental thinking. Human Reproduction 22(6):1759–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampic, C., A. S. Svanberg, and G. Sydsjo. 2014. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors. Human Reproduction 29(9):1978–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laruelle, C., I. Place, I. Demeestere, Y. Englert, and A. Delbaere. 2011. Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donation. Human Reproduction 26(2):382–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassalzede, T., M. Paci, J. Rouzier, S. Carez, A. Gnisci, J. Saias-Magnan, C. Deveze, J. Perrin, and C. Metzler-Guillemain. 2017. Sperm donor conception and disclosure to children: A 10-year retrospective follow-up study of parental attitudes in one french center for the study and preservation of eggs and sperm (CECOS). Fertility and Sterility 108(2):247–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 2000. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N.K. Denzin, & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research. (2nd ed.) pp. 163–188, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindheim, S. R., N. Porat, and A. S. Jaeger. 2011. Survey report of gamete donors' and recipients' preferences regarding disclosure of third party reproduction outcomes and genetic risk information. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 37(4):292–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett, E., K. Daniels, R. Curson, and S. Golombok. 2004. Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: a study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure. Fertility and Sterility 82(1):172–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccallum, F., and S. Golombok. 2007. Embryo donation families: Mothers' decisions regarding disclosure of donor conception. Human Reproduction 22(11):2888–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamo, L. 2007. Queering reproduction: achieving pregnancy in the age of technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, T., and I. Turkmendag. 2014. Kinship: born and bred (but also facilitated)? A commentary on ‘Donor conception: ethical aspects of information sharing’. Medical law review 22(3):422–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, C., and S. Golombok. 2003. To tell or not to tell: the decision-making process of egg-donation parents. Human Fertility (Cambridge, England) 6(2):89–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pennings, G. 2017. Disclosure of donor conception, age of disclosure and the well-being of donor offspring. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 32(5):969–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, G., J. de Mouzon, F. Shenfield, A. P. Ferraretti, T. Mardesic, A. Ruiz, and V. Goossens. 2014. Socio-demographic and fertility-related characteristics and motivations of oocyte donors in eleven European countries. Human Reproduction 29(5):1076–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettee, D., and L. N. Weckstein. 1993. A survey of parental attitudes toward oocyte donation. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 8(11):1963–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purewal, S., and O. B. A. Van Den Akker. 2009. Systematic review of oocyte donation: Investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Human Reproduction Update 15(5):499–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitsky, V. 2012. Conceived and deceived: the medical interests of donor-conceived individuals. Hastings Centre Reproduction 42(1):17–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Readings, J., L. Blake, P. Casey, V. Jadva, and S. Golombok. 2011. Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: Decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy. Reproduction Biomed Online 22(5):485–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, J. B., and D. Swink. 2010. You can't put the genie back in the bottle: Potential rights and obligations of egg donors in the cyberprocreation era. Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology 20:1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, M. 2014. A british history of collaborative reproduction and the rise of the genetic connection. Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities:21–43.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, L. R., I. de Melo-Martin, Z. Rosenwaks, and I. N. Cholst. 2015. Once you're choosing, nobody's perfect: Is more information necessarily better in oocyte donor selection? Reprod Biomed Online 30:311–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, J. L. 2009. Competing interests and gamete donation: the case for anonymity. Seton Hall Law Review 3(3):919–54.
   Google Scholar
• Schover, L. R., S. A. Rothmann, and R. L. Collins. 1992. The personality and motivation of semen donors: A comparison with oocyte donors. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) (4):575–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehab, D., J. Duff, L. A. Pasch, K. Mac Dougall, J. E. Scheib, and R. D. Nachtigall. 2008. How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: Contexts, influences, and couple dynamics. Fertility and Sterility 89(1):179–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström-Anttila, V. 1995. Follow-up study of finnish volunteer oocyte donors concerning their attitudes to oocyte donation. Human Reproduction 10:3073–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström-Anttila, V., A. Miettinen, A. Rotkirch, S. Nuojua-Huttunen, A.-K. Poranen, M. Sälevaara, and A.-M. Suikkari. 2016. Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors. Human Reproduction 31(3):597–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström-Anttila, V., M. Salevaara, and A. M. Suikkari. 2010. Increasing openness in oocyte donation families regarding disclosure over 15 years. Human Reproduction 25(10):2535–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerville, M. 2011. Donor conception and children's rights: “First, do no harm”. Canadian Medical Association Journal 183(2):280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., and J. M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart-Smith, S. J., J. A. Smith, and E. J. Scott. 2012. To know or not to know? Dilemmas for women receiving unknown oocyte donation. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 27(7):2067–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanberg, A. S., C. Lampic, A.-L. Geijerwall, J. Gudmundsson, P.-O. Karlstrom, N.-G. Solensten, and G. Sydsjo. 2012. Gamete donors' motivation in a swedish national sample: Is there any ambivalence? A descriptive study. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica 91(8):944–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallandini, M. A., L. Zanchettin, G. Gronchi, and V. Morsan. 2016. Parental disclosure of assisted reproductive technology (ART) conception to their children: a systematic and Meta-analytic review. Human Reproduction 31(6):1275–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkmendag, I., R. Dingwall, and M. Murphy. 2008. The removal of donor anonymity in the UK: The silencing of claims by Would-Be parents. International Journal of Law Policy Family 22(3):283–310.
   Google Scholar
• Broeck, V. D., U. Vandermeeren, M. Vanderschueren, D. Enzlin, P. Demyttenaere, K. D'hooghe. and T. 2013. A systematic review of sperm donors: Demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Human Reproduction Update 19:37–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman, J. D. 2005. Family history. Philosophical Papers 34(3):357–78.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, K.-A. 2017. Donor conception and “passing,” or; why australian parents of donor-conceived children want donors who look like them. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14(1):77–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyverkens, E., V. Provoost, A. Ravelingien, P. De Sutter, G. Pennings, and A. Buysse. 2014. Beyond sperm cells: A qualitative study on constructed meanings of the sperm donor in lesbian families. Human Reproduction 29(6):1248–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeiler, K., and A. Malmquist. 2014. Lesbian shared biological motherhood: the ethics of IVF with reception of oocytes from partner. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 17(3):347–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar