Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) of Responsible Data Sharing Involving Children in Genomics: A Systematic Literature Review of Reasons

References

• ACMG Board of Directors. 2017. Laboratory and clinical genomic data sharing is crucial to improving genetic health care: A position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genetics in Medicine 19:721–727. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, W., K. Bammann, S. de Henauw, J. Halford, A. Palou, I. Pigeot, A. Siani, and M. Sjöström. 2006. Understanding and preventing childhood obesity and related disorders-IDEFICS: A European multilevel epidemiological approach. Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases: NMCD 16 (4):302–8. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2006.01.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. J., and A. F. Merry. 2009. Data sharing for pharmacokinetic studies. Paediatric Anaesthesia 19 (10):1005–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03051.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2016. Data sharing pooling clinical details helps doctors to diagnose rare diseases: But More Sharing Is Needed. Nature 534:5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, C. L., J. Majewski, J. Schwartzentruber, M. E. Samuels, B. A. Fernandez, F. P. Bernier, M. Brudno, B. Knoppers, J. Marcadier, D. Dyment, et al. 2014. FORGE Canada consortium: Outcomes of a 2-year national rare-disease gene-discovery project. American Journal of Human Genetics 94 (6):809–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertier, G., K. Sénécal, P. Borry, and D. F. Vears. 2017. Unsolved challenges in pediatric whole-exome sequencing: A literature analysis. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences 54 (2):134–9. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2016.1275516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birmingham, K., and A. Doyle. 2009. Ethics and governance of a longitudinal birth cohort. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 23 (Suppl. 1):39–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00995.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. L., K. A. Strong, and D. P. Dimmock. 2017. Choices of incidental findings of individuals undergoing genome wide sequencing, a single center's experience. Clinical Genetics 91 (1):137–40. doi: 10.1111/cge.12829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boycott, K. M., D. A. Dyment, S. L. Sawyer, M. R. Vanstone, and C. L. Beaulieu. 2014. Identification of genes for childhood heritable diseases. Annual Review of Medicine 65:19–31. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-101712-122108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett, C. E., and I. J. Deary. 2014. Realising health data linkage from a researcher’s perspective: Following up the 6-day sample of the Scottish Mental Survey 1947. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 5 (3):283–98. doi: 10.14301/llcs.v5i3.266.
   Google Scholar
• Brothers, K. B., J. A. Lynch, S. A. Aufox, J. J. Connolly, B. D. Gelb, I. A. Holm, S. C. Sanderson, J. B. McCormick, J. L. Williams, W. A. Wolf, et al. 2014. Practical guidance on informed consent for pediatric participants in a biorepository. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 89 (11):1471–80. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.07.006.Practical.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brothers, K. B. 2011. Biobanking in pediatrics: The human nonsubjects approach. Personalized Medicine 8 (1):79. doi: 10.2217/pme.10.70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, W., A. H. M. Antommaria, R. Bennett, J. Botkin, E. W. Clayton, G. E. Henderson, I. A. Holm, G. P. Jarvik, M. J. Khoury, B. M. Knoppers, et al. 2013. Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! Genetics in Medicine 15 (11):854–9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, M. D., J. O. Robinson, S. G. Hilsenbeck, A. L. McGuire, and C. C. Lau. 2014. Pediatric data sharing in genomic research: Attitudes and preferences of parents. Pediatrics 133 (4):690–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Institutes of Health Research Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 2014. The Tri council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/documents/TCPS_2-2014_FINAL_Web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. S. 1997. Genetic dilemmas and the child’s right to an open future. The Hastings Center Report 27 (2):7–15. doi: 10.2307/3527620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. S. 2009. Parental investment factor and the child’s right to an open future. Hastings Center Report 39 (2):24–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decouchant, J., M. Fernandes, M. Völp, F. M. Couto, and P. Esteves-Veríssimo. 2018. Accurate filtering of privacy-sensitive information in raw genomic data. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 82:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, J. R., R. K. Wilson, J. Zhang, E. R. Mardis, C.-H. Pui, L. Ding, T. J. Ley, and W. E. Evans. 2012. The pediatric cancer genome project. Nature Genetics 44 (6):619–22. doi: 10.1038/ng.2287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowty, T., and D. Korff. 2009. Protecting the virtual child: The law and children’s consent to sharing personal data. http://medconfidential.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Protecting-the-virtual-child.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Driessnack, M., and A. M. Gallo. 2011. Stop, look, and listen: Revisiting the involvement of children and adolescents in genomic research. Annual Review of Nursing Research 29:133–49. doi: 10.1891/0739-6686.29.133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyke, Stephanie, O. M., Dove, E. S., and B. M. Knoppers. 2016. Sharing health-related data: A privacy test? Genome Medicine 1:16024. doi: 10.1038/npjgenmed.2016.24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, H., D. Hayn, M. Falgenhauer, M. Nitzlnader, G. Schleiermacher, R. Haupt, and G. Erminio. 2016. Piloting the European unified patient identity management (EUPID) concept to facilitate secondary use of neuroblastoma data from clinical trials and biobanking. In 10th Annual Conference on Health Informatics Meets EHealth, EHealth 2016, eds., E. Ammenwerth, G. Schreier, A. Horbst, and D. Hayn. Vienna, Austria: Schönbrunn Palace. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-645-3-31.
   Google Scholar
• Erlich, Y., T. Shor, I. Pe’er, and S. Carmi. 2018. Identity inference of genomic data using long-range familial searches. Science (New York, NY) 362 (6415):690–4. doi: 10.1126/science.aau4832.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. B., E. L. H. McCarthy, and E. L. Harrington. 2013. Ethics in prevention science involving genetic testing. Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research 14 (3):310–8. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0318-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. K., R. L. Bromley, and B. C. Mansfield. 2016. My retina TrackerTM: An on-line international registry for people affected with inherited orphan retinal degenerative diseases and their genetic relatives: A new resource. In Retinal degenerative disease, advances in experimental medicine and biology, ed. C. Bowes Rickman, 245–51. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• General Assembly of the United Nations. 1948. Universal declaration of human rights. Washington, DC: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Giesbertz, N. A. A., A. L. Bredenoord, and J. J. van Delden. 2015. Consent procedures in pediatric biobanks. European Journal of Human Genetics: EJHG 23 (9):1129–34. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH). 2016. Data sharing lexicon. https://www.ga4gh.org/wp-content/uploads/GA4GH_Data_Sharing_Lexicon_Mar15.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Golding, J. 2009. Data organisation and preparation for statistical analysis in a longitudinal birth cohort. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 23 (Suppl 1):219–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01019.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gostin, L. O. 1995. Genetic privacy. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics 23 (4):320–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.1995.tb01374.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gymrek, M., A. L. McGuire, D. Golan, E. Halperin, and Y. Erlich. 2013. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science (New York, NY) 339 (6117):321–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1229566.
   Google Scholar
• H.R.4144 116th Congress. 2019. Ending the Diagnostic Odyssey Act of 2019. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4144/text?format=txt.
   Google Scholar
• Heeney, C., N. Hawkins, J. de Vries, P. Boddington, and J. Kaye. 2011. Assessing the privacy risks of data sharing in genomics. Public Health Genomics 14 (1):17–25. doi: 10.1159/000294150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hens, K., H. Nys, J.-J. Cassiman, and K. Dierickx. 2009a. Genetic research on stored tissue samples from minors: A systematic review of the ethical literature. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 149A (10):2346–58. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hens, K., H. Nys, J.-J. Cassiman, and K. Dierickx. 2009b. Biological sample collections from minors for genetic research: A systematic review of guidelines and position papers. European Journal of Human Genetics: EJHG 17 (8):979–90. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hens, K., E. Lévesque, and K. Dierickx. 2011. Children and biobanks: A review of the ethical and legal discussion. Human Genetics 130 (3):403–13. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1031-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hens, K., H. Nys, J. J. Cassiman, and K. Dierickx. 2011. Risks, benefits, solidarity: A framework for the participation of children in genetic biobank research. The Journal of Pediatrics 158 (5):842–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.12.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hens, K., J. Wright, and K. Dierickx. 2009. Biobanks: Oversight offers protection. Science (New York, NY) 326 (5954):798–9. doi: 10.1126/science.326_798c.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A., J. Whittington, O. Cohen, L. Curfs, F. Delahaye, O. Dudley, B. Horsthemke, A.-C. Lindgren, C. Nourissier, N. Sharma, et al. 2009. The European Prader-Willi Syndrome clinical research database: An aid in the investigation of a rare genetically determined neurodevelopmental disorder. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR 53 (6):538–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01172.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, I. A. 2017. Pediatric issues in return of results and incidental findings: Weighing autonomy and best interests. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers 21 (3):155–8. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humbert, M., E. Ayday, J.-P. Hubaux, and A. Telenti. 2017. Quantifying interdependent risks in genomic privacy. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security 20 (1):1–31. doi: 10.1145/3035538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jernigan, T. L., T. T. Brown, D. J. Hagler, N. Akshoomoff, H. Bartsch, E. Newman, W. K. Thompson, C. S. Bloss, S. S. Murray, N. Schork, et al. 2016. The pediatric imaging, neurocognition, and genetics (PING) data repository. NeuroImage 124 (Pt B):1149–54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, J. 2012. The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 13:415–31. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoppers, B. M., K. Sénécal, J. Boisjoli, P. Borry, M. C. Cornel, C. V. Fernandez, J. Grewal, I. A. Holm, E. Nelson, W. Pinxten, et al. 2016. Recontacting pediatric research participants for consent when they reach the age of majority. IRB 38 (6):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lea, W. 2013. Information: To share or not to share? The Information Governance Review.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstrand, A., J. Eisfeldt, M. Pettersson, C. M. B. Carvalho, M. Kvarnung, G. Grigelioniene, B.-M. Anderlid, O. Bjerin, P. Gustavsson, A. Hammarsjö, et al. 2019. From cytogenetics to cytogenomics: Whole-genome sequencing as a first-line test comprehensively captures the diverse spectrum of disease-causing genetic variation underlying intellectual disability. Genome Medicine 11 (1):1–23. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0675-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, K., J. McGregor, A. John, N. Craddock, J. T. Walters, D. Linden, I. Jones, R. Bentall, R. A. Lyons, D. V. Ford, et al. 2015. A national population-based e-cohort of people with psychosis (PsyCymru) linking prospectively ascertained phenotypically rich and genetic data to routinely collected records: Overview, recruitment and linkage. Schizophrenia Research 166 (1–3):131–6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.05.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunshof, J. E., and D. Gurwitz. 2013. Guarding children’s genetic privacy. Nature Correspondance 494 (7438):430. doi: 10.1038/494430d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackley, M. P., B. Fletcher, M. Parker, H. Watkins, and E. Ormondroyd. 2017. Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 19 (3):283–293. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumder, M. A., C. J. Guerrini, J. M. Bollinger, R. Cook-Deegan, and A. L. Mcguire. 2017. Sharing data under the 21st century cures act. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 19 (12):1289–1294. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manhas, K. P., S. Page, S. X. Dodd, N. Letourneau, A. Ambrose, X. Cui, and S. C. Tough. 2016. Parental perspectives on consent for participation in large-scale, non-biological data repositories. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 12 (1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s40504-016-0034-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manolio, T. A., L. L. Rodriguez, L. Brooks, G. Abecasis, D. Ballinger, M. Daly, P. Donnelly, S. V. Faraone, K. Frazer, S. Gabriel, et al. 2007. New models of collaboration in genome-wide association studies: The genetic association information network. Nature Genetics 39 (9):1045–1051. doi: 10.1038/ng2127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascalzoni, D., A. Paradiso, and M. Hansson. 2014. Rare disease research: Breaking the privacy barrier. Applied & Translational Genomics 3 (2):23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2014.04.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mccabe, L. L., and E. R. B. Mccabe. 2011. Down syndrome: Issues to consider in a national registry, research database and biobank. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 104 (1–2):10–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.03.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccormack, P., S. Woods, A. Aartsma-Rus, L. Hagger, A. Herczegfalvi, E. Heslop, and J. Irwin. 2013. Guidance in social and ethical issues related to clinical, diagnostic care and novel therapies for hereditary neuromuscular rare diseases: ‘TRANSLATING’ the translational. PLoS Currents 10:5. doi: 10.1371/currents.md.f90b49429fa814bd26c5b22b13d773ec.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, M. L., C. A. Prows, M. DeJonckheere, W. B. Brinkman, L. Vaughn, and M. F. Myers. 2018. Adolescent and parental attitudes about return of genomic research results: Focus group findings regarding decisional preferences. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: Jerhre 13 (4):371–382. doi: 10.1177/15562646187766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, A. L., J. M. Oliver, M. J. Slashinski, J. L. Graves, T. Wang, P. A. Kelly, W. Fisher, C. C. Lau, J. Goss, M. Okcu, et al. 2011. To share or not to share: A randomized trial of consent for data sharing in genome research. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 13 (11):948–955. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182227589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, A. L., M. Basford, L. G. Dressler, S. M. Fullerton, B. A. Koenig, R. Li, C. A. McCarty, E. Ramos, M. E. Smith, C. P. Somkin, et al. 2011. Ethical and practical challenges of sharing data from genome-wide association studies: The EMERGE consortium experience. Genome Research 21 (7):1001–1007. doi: 10.1101/gr.120329.111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mefford, H. C., M. L. Batshaw, and E. P. Hoffman. 2012. Genomics, intellectual disability, and autism. The New England Journal of Medicine 366 (8):733–743. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1114194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Might, M., and M. Wilsey. 2014. The shifting model in clinical diagnostics: How next-generation sequencing and families are altering the way rare diseases are discovered, studied, and treated. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 16 (10):736–737. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nature Biotechnology. 2015. To share is human. Nature Biotechnology 33 (8):796–800. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooner, K. B., S. J. Colcombe, R. H. Tobe, M. Mennes, M. M. Benedict, A. L. Moreno, L. J. Panek, et al. 2012. The NKI-rockland sample: A model for accelerating the pace of discovery science in psychiatry. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pediatric Imaging. 2011. Neurocognition, and genetics (PING) study.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, I., P. Kaatsch, C. Spix, and R. Kollek. 2017. Return and disclosure of research results: Parental attitudes and needs over time in pediatric oncology. The Journal of Pediatrics 191:232–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrini, C., A. Olivieri, C. Corbetta, R. Cerone, G. D'Agnolo, and A. Bompiani. 2012. Common criteria among states for storage and use of dried blood spot specimens after newborn screening. Annali Dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita 48 (2):119–121. doi:10.4415/ANN.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, N., S. L. Volchenboum, A. D. Skol, L. Rhodes, A. Doan, C. Fein-Levy, J. Lipton, J. M. Cunningham, and K. Onel. 2015. Establishing a translational genomics infrastructure in pediatric cancer: The GREAT KIDS experience. Personalized Medicine 12 (3):221–229. doi: 10.2217/pme.14.90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, T., J. Platt, D. Thiel, and S. L. R. Kardia. 2017. Engaging a state: Facebook comments on a large population biobank. Journal of Community Genetics 8 (3):183–197. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0302-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, T., J. Platt, D. B. Thiel, N. Fisher, and S. L. R. Kardia. 2014. 'Cool! and creepy': Engaging with college student stakeholders in Michigan's biobank. Journal of Community Genetics 5 (4):349–362. doi: 10.1007/s12687-014-0190-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rahimzadeh, V., C. Schickhardt, B. M. Knoppers, K. Sénécal, D. F. Vears, C. V. Fernandez, S. Pfister, S. Plon, S. Terry, J. Williams, et al. 2018. Key implications of data sharing in pediatric genomics. JAMA Pediatrics 172 (5):476–481. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries, N. M., J. LeGrandeur, and T. Caulfield. 2010. Handling ethical, legal and social issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research: Responses from studies in six countries. BMC Medical Ethics 11:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, E. R., D. R. Azzariti, A. Niehaus, S. R. Goehringer, E. M. Ramos, L. L. Rodriguez, B. Knoppers, H. L. Rehm, C. L. Martin, and On behalf of the Clinical Genome Resource Education Working Group. 2019. Development of a consent resource for genomic data sharing in the clinical setting. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 21 (1):81–88. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0017-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. A. 2003. The $1000 genome: Ethical and legal issues in whole genome sequencing of individuals. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):W–IF1. doi: 10.1162/152651603322874762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SACHRP. 2018. Attachment A: Human subjects research implications of ‘big data’. 1–29. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sachrp-committee/recommendations/2015-april-24-attachment-a/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Said, M., Ben, L. Robel, B. Golse, and J. P. Jais. 2017. Strengthening data confidentiality and integrity protection in the context of a multi-centric information system dedicated to autism spectrum disorder. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 245:1133–1137. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-830-3-1133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. 2000. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health 23 (4):334–340. doi: 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, S. C., K. B. Brothers, N. D. Mercaldo, E. W. Clayton, A. H. M. Antommaria, S. A. Aufox, M. H. Brilliant, D. Campos, D. S. Carrell, J. Connolly, et al. 2017. Public attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobank research: A large multi-site experimental survey in the US. American Journal of Human Genetics 100 (3):414–427. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, P. N., J. Eppig, E. Huala, M. H. de Angelis, M. Harvey, D. Davidson, T. Weaver, S. Brown, D. Smedley, N. Rosenthal, et al. 2010. Research funding. Sustaining the data and bioresource commons. Science (New York, NY) 330 (6004):592–593. doi: 10.1126/science.1191506.
   Google Scholar
• Scholtens, S., N. Smidt, M. A. Swertz, S. J. L. Bakker, A. Dotinga, J. M. Vonk, F. van Dijk, S. K. R. van Zon, C. Wijmenga, B. H. R. Wolffenbuttel, et al. 2015. Cohort profile: LifeLines, a three-generation cohort study and biobank. International Journal of Epidemiology 44 (4):1172–1180. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofaer, N., and D. Strech. 2011. Reasons why post-trial access to trial drugs should, or need not be ensured to research participants: A systematic review. Public Health Ethics 4 (2):160–184. doi: 10.1093/phe/phr013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strech, D., and N. Sofaer. 2012. How to write a systematic review of reasons. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (2):121–126. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, S., G. Thangavel, J. Sujatha, and S. Indrani. 2005. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India. The National Medical Journal of India 18 (5):259–262. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-30944444199&partnerID=40&md5=9e9c512cb51310f577166ce4ef9e6e88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. M., B. J. Aronow, K. Tan, K. Bernt, N. Salomonis, C. S. Greene, A. Frolova, S. E. Henrickson, A. Wells, L. Pei, et al. 2019. The pediatric cell atlas: Defining the growth phase of human development at single-cell resolution. Developmental Cell 49 (1):10–29. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindana, P., S. Bull, L. Amenga-Etego, J. de Vries, R. Aborigo, K. Koram, D. Kwiatkowski, and M. Parker. 2012. Seeking consent to genetic and genomic research in a rural Ghanaian setting: A qualitative study of the MalariaGEN experience. BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, Z., Y. Vorobeychik, M. Kantarcioglu, and B. Malin. 2017. Controlling the signal: Practical privacy protection of genomic data sharing through beacon services. BMC Medical Genomics 10 (S2): 39. doi: 10.1186/s12920-017-0282-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wjst, M. 2010. Caught you: Threats to confidentiality due to the public release of large-scale genetic data sets. BMC Med Ethics 11 (1):21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. 2013. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Amended by the 64 General Assembly, Fotaleza, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, Y. A., Ankala, W. R. Wilcox, and M. R. Hegde. 2015. Solving the molecular diagnostic testing conundrum for Mendelian disorders in the era of next-generation sequencing: Single-gene, gene panel, or exome/genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine 17 (6):444–451. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar