Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: Views of Canadian Pregnant Women and Their Partners Regarding Pressure and Societal Concerns

References

• Ahmed, S., H. Jafri, Y. Rashid, G. Mason, Y. Ehsan, and M. Ahmed. 2017. Attitudes towards non-invasive prenatal diagnosis among obstetricians in Pakistan: A developing, Islamic country. Prenatal Diagnosis 37 (3):289–95. doi: 10.1002/pd.5008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benn, P., H. Cuckle, and E. Pergament. 2013. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects . Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 42 (1):15–33. doi: 10.1002/uog.12513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benn, P. A., and A. R. Chapman. 2010. Ethical challenges in providing noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology 22 (2):128–34. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283372352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birko, S., M. E. Lemoine, M. T. Nguyen, and V. Ravitsky. 2018. Moving towards routine non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): Challenges related to Women’s autonomy. OBM Genetics 2 (2):1. doi: 10.21926/obm.genet.1802018.
   Google Scholar
• Birko, S., V. Ravitsky, C. Dupras, J. Le Clerc-Blain, M. E. Lemoine, A. O. Affdal, H. Haidar, and A. M. Laberge. 2019. The value of non-invasive prenatal testing: Preferences of Canadian pregnant women, their partners, and health professionals regarding NIPT use and access. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 19 (1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2153-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler, J. 2005. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity GT. Political Theory 4:4–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, C. 2008. Sex, culture, and justice: The limits of choice. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 2004. Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deans, Z., and A. J. Newson. 2012. Ethical considerations for choosing between possible models for using NIPD for aneuploidy detection. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):614–618. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupras, C., S. Birko, A. Affdal, H. Haidar, M. E. Lemoine, and V. Ravitsky. 2018. Benefits, challenges and ethical principles associated with implementing noninvasive prenatal testing: A Delphi study. CMAJ Open 6 (4):E513–E519. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180083.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dupras, C., S. Birko, A. O. Affdal, H. Haidar, M.-E. Lemoine, and V. Ravitsky. 2020. Governing the futures of non-invasive prenatal testing: An exploration of social acceptability using the Delphi method. Social Science & Medicine. 112930. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112930.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farrimond, H. R., and S. E. Kelly. 2011. Public viewpoints on new non-invasive prenatal genetic tests. Public Understanding of Science 22 (6):730–744. doi: 10.1177/0963662511424359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2012. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2018. The dis/ability complex. DiGeSt. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies 5 (1):5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gregoire, T. G., and D. L. Affleck. 2018. Estimating desired sample size for simple random sampling of a skewed population. The American Statistician 72 (2):184–190. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2017.1290548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, B., S. Edwards, L. S. Chitty, and C. Lewis. 2018. Clinical, social and ethical issues associated with non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Journal of Psychosomatics Obstetrics and Gynaecology 39 (1):11–18. doi: 10.1080/0167482x.2017.1286643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidar, H., C. Dupras, and V. Ravitsky. 2016. Non-invasive prenatal testing: Review of ethical, legal and social implications. BioéthiqueOnline 5. doi: 10.7202/1044264ar.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A., A. Bostanci, and S. John. 2009. Ethical, legal and social issues arising from cellfree fetal DNA technologies. Appendix III to the report: Cell-free fetal nucleic acids for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Cambridge: PHG Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hewison, J. 2015. Psychological aspects of individualized choice and reproductive autonomy in prenatal screening. Bioethics 29 (1):9–18. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M., A. Barrett, M. Choolani, C. Lewis, J. Fisher, and L. S. Chitty. 2017. Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome? Prenatal Diagnosis 37 (13):1281–1290. doi: 10.1002/pd.5182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M., M. Karunaratna, C. Lewis, F. Forya, and L. Chitty. 2013. Views and preferences for the implementation of non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis for single gene disorders from health professionals in the United Kingdom. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 161 (7):1612–1618. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, B. 2002. Is there a technological imperative in health care? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 18 (3):675–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsting, J. M., S. R. Dlouhy, K. Hanson, K. Quaid, S. Bai, and K. A. Hines. 2014. Genetic counselors' experience with cell-free fetal DNA testing as a prenatal screening option for aneuploidy. Journal of Genetic Counseling 23 (3):377–400. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9673-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• How, B., A. Smidt, N. J. Wilson, R. Barton, and C. Valentin. 2019. ‘We would have missed out so much had we terminated’: What fathers of a child with down syndrome think about current non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities: JOID 23 (3):290–309. doi: 10.1177/1744629518787606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh, Y. E., J. Vosgerau, and C. K. Morewedge. 2014. Social defaults: Observed choices become choice defaults. Journal of Consumer Research 41 (3):746–760. doi: 10.1086/677315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaposy, C. 2013. A disability critique of the new prenatal test for Down syndrome. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 23 (4):299–324. doi: 10.1353/ken.2013.0017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kater-Kuipers, A., I. D. De Beaufort, R.-J H. Galjaard, and E. M. Bunnik. 2018. Ethics of routine: A critical analysis of the concept of 'routinisation' in prenatal screening. Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (9):626–631. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, G., L. Slattery, L. Hudgins, and K. Ormond. 2014. Attitudes of mothers of children with Down syndrome towards noninvasive prenatal testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling 23 (5):805–813. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9694-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. E., and H. R. Farrimond. 2012. Non-invasive prenatal genetic testing: A study of public attitudes. Public Health Genomics 15 (2):73–81. doi: 10.1159/000331254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, A. 2008. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: Public and patient perceptions. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 13 (2):109–112. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2007.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laberge, A.-M., S. Birko, M.-È. Lemoine, J. Le Clerc-Blain, H. Haidar, A. O. Affdal, C. Dupras, and V. Ravitsky. 2019. Canadian pregnant women's preferences regarding NIPT for Down syndrome: The information they want, how they want to get it, and with whom they want to discuss it. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal D'obstetrique et Gynecologie du Canada: JOGC 41 (6):782–791. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., M. Hill, and L. S. Chitty. 2014. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for single gene disorders: Experience of patients. Clinical Genetics 85 (4):336–42. doi: 10.1111/cge.12179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., C. Silcock, and L. S. Chitty. 2013. Non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome: Pregnant women's views and likely uptake. Public Health Genomics 16 (5):223–232. doi: 10.1159/000353523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippman, A. 1991. Prenatal genetic testing and screening: Constructing needs and reinforcing inequities. American Journal of Law & Medicine 17: 15–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteau, T. M., G. J. Hollands, and P. C. Fletcher. 2012. Changing human behavior to prevent disease: The importance of targeting automatic processes. Science (New York, N.Y.) 337 (6101):1492–1495. doi: 10.1126/science.1226918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoyd, J. L. 2010. Authoritative knowledge, the technological imperative and women's responses to prenatal diagnostic technologies. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 34 (4):590–614. doi: 10.1007/s11013-010-9189-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, M. E. 2016. Noninvasive prenatal testing to analyze the fetal genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (50):14173–14175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617112113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitsky, V. 2017. The shifting landscape of prenatal testing: Between reproductive autonomy and public health. The Hastings Center Report 47 Suppl 3 (Suppl 3):S34–S40. doi: 10.1002/hast.793.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sayres, L. C., M. Allyse, and M. K. Cho. 2012. Integrating stakeholder perspectives into the translation of cell-free fetal DNA testing for aneuploidy. Genome Medicine 4 (6):49. doi: 10.1186/gm348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seavilleklein, V. 2009. Challenging the rhetoric of choice in prenatal screening. Bioethics 23 (1):68–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00674.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P., P. M. Gollwitzer, and J. A. Bargh. 2013. Nonconscious processes and health. Health Psychology 32 (5):460–473. doi: 10.1037/a0029203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skirton, H., and C. Patch. 2013. Factors affecting the clinical use of non-invasive prenatal testing: A mixed methods systematic review. Prenatal Diagnosis 33 (6):532–541. doi: 10.1002/pd.4094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. C., D. G. Goldstein, and E. J. Johnson. 2013. Choice without awareness: Ethical and policy implications of defaults. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 32 (2):159–172. doi: 10.1509/jppm.10.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. 2019. Table 17-10-0008-01. Estimates of the components of demographic growth, Annual. doi:https://doi.org/10.25318/1710000801-eng
   Google Scholar
• Sumerau, J. E. 2017. “Some of us are good, god-fearing folks” justifying religious participation in an LGBT Christian Church. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 46 (1):3–29. doi: 10.1177/0891241614559142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tischler, R., L. Hudgins, Y. J. Blumenfeld, H. T. Greely, and K. E. Ormond. 2011. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: Pregnant women's interest and expected uptake. Prenatal Diagnosis 31 (13):1292–1299. doi: 10.1002/pd.2888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Heuvel, A., L. Chitty, E. Dormandy, A. Newson, Z. Deans, S. Attwood, S. Haynes, and T. M. Marteau. 2010. Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing erode informed choices? An experimental study of health care professionals. Patient Education and Counseling 78 (1):24–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Schendel, R. V., J. H. Kleinveld, W. J. Dondorp, E. Pajkrt, D. R. M. Timmermans, K. C. A. Holtkamp, M. Karsten, A. L. Vlietstra, A. M. A. Lachmeijer, and L. Henneman. 2014. Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening. European Journal of Human Genetics: EJHG 22 (12):1345–1350. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verweij, E. J., D. Oepkes, M. de Vries, M. E. van den Akker, E. S. van den Akker, and M. A. de Boer. 2013. Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: What women want and are willing to pay. Patient Education and Counseling 93 (3):641–5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verweij, E. J., D. Oepkes, and M. A. de Boer. 2013. Changing attitudes towards termination of pregnancy for trisomy 21 with non-invasive prenatal trisomy testing: a population-based study in Dutch pregnant women. Prenatal Diagnosis 33 (4):397–399. doi: 10.1002/pd.4063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wapner, R. J., J. E. Babiarz, B. Levy, M. Stosic, B. Zimmermann, S. Sigurjonsson, N. Wayham, A. Ryan, M. Banjevic, P. Lacroute, et al. 2015. Expanding the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing: Detection of fetal microdeletion syndromes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 212 (3):332.e1–332.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. 2015. Prenatal screening, reproductive choice, and public health. Bioethics 29 (1):26–35. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C. F., and H. Burton. 2009. The use of cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Human Reproduction Update 15 (1):139–151. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yotsumoto, J., A. Sekizawa, K. Koide, Y. Purwosunu, K. Ichizuka, R. Matsuoka, H. Kawame, and T. Okai. 2012. Attitudes toward non-invasive prenatal diagnosis among pregnant women and health professionals in Japan. Prenatal Diagnosis 32 (7):674–9. doi: 10.1002/pd.3886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar