Community practitioners supporting young men with borderline intellectual functioning in the criminal justice system: capability for voice and agency

References

• Arrigo, B. A., & Takahashi, Y. (2006). Recommunalization of the disenfranchised: A theoretical and critical criminological inquiry. Theoretical Criminology, 10(3), 307–336. doi:10.1177/1362480606065909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldry, E., Dowse, L., & Clarence, M. (2012). People with intellectual and other cognitive disability in the criminal justice system. Report for NSW Family and Community Services, Ageing, Disability and Home Care. Retrieved from www.indigenousjustice.gov.au
   Google Scholar
• Ballet, J., Dubois, J. L., & Regis-Mahieu, F. (2007). Responsibility for each other's freedom: Agency as the source of collective capability. Journal of Human Development, 8(2), 185–201. doi:10.1080/14649880701371000
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, L. R., Ferrer-Wreder, L., & Žukauskienė, R. (2015). Career outcomes of adolescents with below average IQ: Who succeeded against the odds? Intelligence, 52, 9–17. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasko, B. L., Friedmann, P. D., Giuranna Rhodes, A., & Taxman, F. S. (2015). The parolee-parole officer relationship as a mediator of criminal justice outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 42(7), 722–740. doi:10.1177/0093854814562642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonvin, J.-M., Dif-Pradalier, M., & Moachon, E. (2013). A capability approach to restructuring processes: Lessons from a Swiss and a French case study. International Journal of Manpower, 34(4), 382–396. doi:10.1108/IJM-05-2013-0096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., & O'Neil, P. (2009). A workplace view of drivers and barriers to developing human capability. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 34(1), 62–76.
   Google Scholar
• Catalano, G. (2018). Theorising the role of community practitioners supporting young men with mild to borderline intellectual functioning in re-entry (Doctor of Philosophy). The University of Queensland, Brisbane. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2018.444
   Google Scholar
• Chaplin, R., & Flynn, A. (2000). Adults with learning disability admitted to psychiatric wards. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 6, 128–134. doi:10.1192/apt.6.2.128
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2015). Teaching theory construction with initial grounded theory tools: A reflection on lessons and learning. Qualitative Health Research, 25(12), 1610–1622. doi:10.1177/1049732315613982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Munck, J., & Ferreras, I. (2013). Restructuring processes and capability for voice: Case study of Volkswagon, Brussels. International Journal of Manpower, 34(4), 397–412. doi:10.1108/IJM-05-2013-0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deering, J. (2011). Probation practice and the new penology: Practitioner reflections. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Deering, J. (2012). Overstating the case? The trials and tribulations of social work with offenders. Qualitative Social Work, 11(6), 677–690.
   Google Scholar
• Fougere, A., Thomas, S., & Daffern, M. (2013). A study of the multiple and complex needs of young Australian offenders. Australian Psychologist, 48(3), 188–195. doi:10.1111/j.1742-9544.2012.00083.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, A. (2015). Theorizing community integration as desistance-promotion. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 42(1), 82–94. doi:10.1177/0093854814550028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (2012). The relationship between lower intelligence, crime and custodial outcomes: A brief literary review of a vulnerable group. Vulnerable Groups and Inclusion, 3(1). doi:10.3402/vgi.v3i0.14834
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon, S., & Cornelius, N. (2000). Re-examining workplace equality: The capabilities approach. Human Resource Management Journal, 10(4), 68–87. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2000.tb00007.x
   Google Scholar
• Holland, S., & Persson, P. (2011). Intellectual disability in the Victorian prison system: Characteristics of prisoners with an intellectual disability released from prison in 2003–2006. Psychology, Crime and Law, 17(1), 25–41. doi:10.1080/10683160903392285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G., & Talbot, J. (2010). No one knows: The bewildering passage of offenders with learning disability and learning difficulty through the criminal justice system. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 20(1), 1–7. doi:10.1002/cbm.746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecourt, A.-J. (2013). Individual pathways of prior learning accreditation in France: From individual to collective responsibilities. International Journal of Manpower, 34(4), 362–381. doi:10.1108/IJM-05-2013-0095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, W. R., D., Carson, A. J., Holland, J. L., Taylor, G., O'Brien, & Wheeler, J. R. (2013). The impact of known criminogenic factors on offenders with intellectual disability: Previous findings and new results on ADHD. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26, 71–80. doi:10.1111/jar.12011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., Immarigeon, R., & LeBel, T. (2004). Ex-offender reintegration: Theory and practice. In S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon (Eds.), After crime and punishment, pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 3–26). Devon, UK and Oregon, USA: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, L. (2014). The capabilities approach and worker wellbeing. The Journal of Development Studies, 50(8), 1043–1054. doi:10.1080/00220388.2013.866220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, G., & Kumarevalu, G. (2008). Learning disability. Medicine, 36(9), 486–488.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, I., Hughes, M., Turney, D., Wilson, J., & Setterlund, D. (2006). Social work and social care practice. London, UK and Thousand Oaks, CA: New Dehli SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Orton, M. (2011). Flourishing lives: The capabilities approach as a framework for new thinking about employment, work and welfare in the 21st century. Work, Employment and Society, 25(2), 352–360. doi:10.1177/0950017011403848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queensland Corrective Services. (2016). Annual Report 2015–16. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Justice and Attorney-General, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2016). Capabilitarianism. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(3), 397–414. doi:10.1080/19452829.2016.1145631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronel, N., & Segev, D. (Eds.). (2015). Positive criminology. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999a). Commodities and capabilities. New Dehli, India: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999b). Individual freedom as a social commitment. In A. Sen (Ed.), Development as freedom (pp. 282–298). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2017). Collective choice and social welfare: An expanded edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, D., Verd, J. M., Vero, J., & Zimmermann, B. (2013). Bringing Sen's capability approach to work and human resources practices. International Journal of Manpower, 34(4), 292–304. doi:10.1108/IJM-05-2013-0092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M., & McLean, M. (2015). Professionals and public-good capabilities. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 60–82. doi:10.14426/cristal.v3i2.42
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. A. (2006). Social work in a risk society. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar