Shrinkage of Value-Added Estimates and Characteristics of Students with Hard-to-Predict Achievement Levels

References

• Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., and Sander, W. (2007), “Teachers and Student Achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools,” Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 95–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Institutes for Research (2013), “Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2.0 Value-Added Model: Technical Report 2012–13,” Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
   Google Scholar
• American Institutes for Research (2014), “Baltimore City Public Schools Value-Added Model Technical Report,” Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
   Google Scholar
• Arellano, M. (1987), “Computing Robust Standard Errors for Within-Groups Estimators,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49, 431–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonaccorsi, J. P. (2010), Measurement Error: Models, Methods, and Applications, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/ CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J., and Rockoff, J. (2014), “Measuring the Impacts of Teachers I: Evaluating Bias in Teacher Value-Added Estimates,” American Economic Review, 104, 2593–2632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarino, C. M., Maxfield, M., Reckase, M. D., Thompson, P., and Wooldridge, J. M. (2015a), “An Evaluation of Empirical Bayes' Estimation of Value-Added Teacher Performance Measures,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 40, 190–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarino, C. M., Reckase, M. D., and Wooldridge, J. M. (2015b), “Can Value-Added Measures of Teacher Performance be Trusted?” Education Finance and Policy, 10, 117–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock, H., and Isenberg, E. (2012), Methods for Accounting for Co-Teaching in Value-Added Models, Working Paper No. 6, Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, E., and Hock, H. (2012), “Measuring School and Teacher Value Added in DC, 2011–2012 School Year,” Final Report Submitted to the Office of the State Superintendent of Education for the District of Columbia and the District of Columbia Public Schools, Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, E., and Walsh, E. (2014), “Measuring Teacher Value Added in DC, 2013-2014 School Year,” Final Report Submitted to the Office of the State Superintendent of Education for the District of Columbia and the District of Columbia Public Schools, Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, E., and Walsh, E. (2015), “Accounting for Co-Teaching: A Guide for Policymakers and Developers of Value-Added Models,” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8, 112–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., and Staiger, D. O. (2002), “The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Imprecise School Accountability Measures,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 91–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., and Staiger, D. O. (2008), Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achievement: An Experimental Evaluation, Working Paper No. 14607, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T., McCaffrey, D., Miller, T., and Staiger, D. (2013), Have we Identified Effective Teachers? Validating Measures of Effective Teaching Using Random Assignment, Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Koedel, C., Leatherman, R., and Parsons, E. (2012), Test Measurement Error and Inference from Value-Added Models, unpublished manuscript, Columbia, MO: University of Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, K.-Y., and Zeger, S. L. (1986), “Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized Linear Models,” Biometrika, 73, 13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louisiana's Value-Added Assessment Model as Specified in Act 54 (2013), “A Report to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, September 2013. Available at http://www.louisianabelieves.com/docs/teaching/2012 - 2013 - value - added - report.pdf?sfvrsn=8. Accessed March 31, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mihaly, K., McCaffrey, D. F., Staiger, D. O., and Lockwood, J. R. (2013), A Composite Estimator of Effective Teaching, Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, C. N. (1983), “Parametric Empirical Bayes Inference: Theory and Applications,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 47–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resch, A., and Deutsch, J. (2015), “Measuring School and Teacher Value Added in Charleston County School District, 2014–2015 School Year,” Final report submitted to the Charleston County School District. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.(Ce: Plz check this ref.)
   Google Scholar
• Resch, A., and Isenberg. E. (2014), “How Do Test Scores at the Floor and Ceiling Affect Value-Added Estimates?” Working paper 33. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, J. (2010), “Teacher Quality in Educational Production: Tracking, Decay, and Student Achievement,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 175–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotz, D., Johnson, M., and Gill, B. (2014), “Value-Added Models for the Pittsburgh Public Schools, 2012-13 School Year,” Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stacy, B., Guarino, C., Reckase, M., and Wooldridge, J. (2012), “Does the Precision and Stability of Value-Added Estimates of Teacher Performance Depend on the Types of Students They Serve?” preliminary draft, East Lansing, MI: Education Policy Center at Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L. (2004), “A Cautionary Note on Shrinkage Estimates of School and Teacher Effects,” Florida Journal of Educational Research, 42, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Value-Added Research Center (2010), NYC Teacher Data Initiative: Technical Report on the NYC Value-Added Model 2010, Madison, WI: Value-Added Research Center at Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2014), Hillsborough County Public Schools Value-Added Project: Year 3 Technical Report HCPS Value-Added Models 2013, Madison, WI: Value-Added Research Center at Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, E., Liu, A. Y., and Dotter, D. (2015), Measuring Teacher and School Value Added in Oklahoma, 2013–2014 School Year, final report submitted to the Office of Educator Effectiveness at the Oklahoma S.0.tate Department of Education. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar