Three conjectures about school effectiveness: An exploratory study

References

• Brophy, J. (2000). Educational practices series No. 1 ( International Academy of Education). Geneva: International Bureau of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Carrol, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools. The impact of communities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M. (2006). The importance and perspectives of international studies in educational effectiveness. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 499–511.10.1080/13803610600873978
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., & Reezigt, G. J. (2005). Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. The background and outline of the project. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 359–371.10.1080/09243450500234484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, P. (2005). Public accountability and the academic effectiveness of grant-aided catholic schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 367–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A. B., Dronkers, J., & Hofman, R. H. (1997). Verzuiling in het onderwijs. Actuele verklaringen en analyse [Different denominations in education. Recent explanations.]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Hannaway, J. (1991). The organization and management of public and catholic schools: Looking inside the ‘black box’. In E. Jemenez & M. E. Lockheed (Eds.), Private versus public education an international perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 15, 463–481.10.1016/0883-0355(91)90025-N
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2007). Education quality and economic growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.10.1596/prwp
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, L. (2008). Why does education differ across countries? Munich: CESifo; Frankfurt: CFS.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, R. H. (1995). Contextual influences on school effectiveness: The role of school boards. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 308–331.10.1080/0924345950060402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, R. H., & Dijkstra, B. J. (2010). Effective teacher professionalization in networks? Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1031–1040.10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, R. H., Hofman, W. H. A., & Gray, J. M. (2008). Comparing key dimensions of schooling: Towards a typology of European school systems. Comparative Education, 44, 93–110.10.1080/03050060701809508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, R. H., Hofman, W. H. A., Gray, J. M., & Daly, P. (2004). Institutional context of educational systems in Europe. A cross-country comparison on quality and equity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, W. H. A., Hofman, R. H., & Gray, J. M. (2010). Institutional contexts and international performances in schooling: Comparing patterns and trends over time in international surveys. European Journal of Education, 45, 153–173.10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, W. H. A., & Hofman, R. H. (2011). Smart management in effective schools: Effective management configurations in general and vocational education in the Netherlands. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 620–645.10.1177/0013161X11400186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2008). Using a multidimensional approach to measure the impact of classroom-level factors upon student achievement: A study testing the validity of the dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 183–205.10.1080/09243450802047873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockheed, M. E., & Verspoor, A. M. (1991). Improving primary education in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011a). Professional communities and student achievement—A meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22, 121–148.10.1080/09243453.2010.550467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011b). The relationship between departments as professional communities and student achievement in secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 722–731.10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (1991). Restructuring schools. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Patrinos, H. A., & Psacharopoulos, G. (2011). Education: Past, present and future challenges (Policy Research Working paper 5616). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2001). Monitoring school effectiveness in developing countries’. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 359–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2008). Een overzichtsstudie naar school- en instructie-effectiviteit [A review study into school and instruction effectiveness]. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Sugarman, S. D., & Kemerer, F. R. (1999). School choice and social controversy. Politics, policy and law. Washington, DC: Brookings Institutions Press.
   Google Scholar
• TALIS/OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments first results form TALIS. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, R. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willms, J. D., & Somer, M. A. (2001). Family, classroom, and school effects on childrens educational outcomes in Latin America. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 409–445.10.1076/sesi.12.4.409.3445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar