Contextual complexity: The professional learning experiences of seven classroom teachers when engaged in “quality teaching”

References

• Achinstein, B., Ogawa, R. T., & Speiglman, A. (2004). Are we creating separate and unequal tracks of teachers? The effects of state policy, local conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 557–603.10.3102/00028312041003557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. (n.d.). Australian Government Quality Teacher Program (AGQTP). Retrieved from http://www.aisnsw.edu.au/fundedprograms/agqtp/pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2012). Australian charter for the professional learning of teachers and school leaders. South Carlton: Education Services Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, L. (2007). Qualitative research proposals—Part II. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 34, 131–133.10.1097/01.WON.0000264823.57743.5f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidwell, C. E., & Yasumoto, J. Y. (1999). The collegial focus: Teaching fields, collegial relationships, and instructional practice in American high schools. Sociology of Education, 72, 234–256.10.2307/2673155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1998). Handbook of instructional leadership: How really good principals promote teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–15.10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Cardno, C. (2002). Team learning: Opportunities and challenges for school leaders. School Leadership and Management, 22, 211–223.10.1080/1363243022000007764
   Google Scholar
• Cardno, C. (2005). Leadership and professional development: The quiet revolution. International Journal of Educational Management, 19, 292–306.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2003). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 311–330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 507–536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, R., & Benne, K. D. (1976). General strategies for effecting changes in human systems. In W. G. Bennis, K. D. Benne, R. Chin, & K. E. Corey (Eds.), The planning of change (3rd ed., pp. 22–45). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2003). Commonwealth quality teacher programme: Updated client guidelines. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2005). Australian government quality teacher programme: Client guidelines, 2005 to 2009. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50, 213–229.10.1080/17508480902998421
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting: Mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76, 383–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad (p. 33). Stanford, CA: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2008). Strategies of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Doecke, B., Parr, G., & North, S. (2008). National mapping of teacher professional learning project: Final report (p. 276). Canberra: Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. Retrieved from http://apo.org.au/node/19031
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. New York, NY: Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Dinham, S. (2007a). Leadership for exceptional educational outcomes. Teneriffe: Post Pressed.
   Google Scholar
• Dinham, S. (2007b). How schools get moving and keep improving: Leadership for teacher learning, student success and school renewal. Australian Journal of Education, 51, 263–275.10.1177/000494410705100304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doeck, B., Parr, G., & North, S. (2008). National mapping of teacher professional learning project. Melbourne: DEEWR.
   Google Scholar
• Dooner, A.-M., Mandzuk, D., & Clifton, R. A. (2008). Stages of collaboration and the realities of professional learning communities. Teaching & Teacher Education, 24, 564–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edge, K. R. (2012a). “Playing it safe”: Quality teaching in expert teacher classrooms ( Unpublished Research Doctorate - Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)). The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle.
   Google Scholar
• Edge, K. R. (2012b). “Typical HSIE Pedagogy”—Quality teaching in NSW HSIE classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/papers/2012/Ken%20Edge-AARE%202012.pdf#zoom=85
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R. (2004, September). Critical factors for conducting school-based action learning. Paper presented at the Quality Teaching Action Learning Conference, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 695–728). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, C., Kennedy, A., Reid, L., & McKinney, S. (2007). Teachers’ continuing professional development: Contested concepts, understandings and models. Professional Development in Education, 33, 153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207–226.10.3102/00028312006002207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (1992). Teachers as transformative intellectuals. In J. M. Rich (Ed.), Innovations in education reformers and their critics (6th ed., pp. 83–88). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Glanz, J. (2007). On vulnerability and transformative leadership: An imperative for leaders of supervision. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10, 115–135.10.1080/13603120601097462
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 479–507.10.3102/00028312037002479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, J. M., & Ladwig, J. G. (2006). Professional development for pedagogical impact. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/06pap/gor06389.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942–1012.10.1111/tcre.2001.103.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundy, S., & Robison, J. (2004). Teacher professional development: Themes and trends in the recent Australian experience. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 146–166). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grushka, K., McLeod, J., & Reynolds, R. (2005). Reflecting upon reflection: Theory and practice in one Australian University teacher education program. Reflective Practice, 6, 239–246.10.1080/14623940500106187
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, D., Drysdale, L., & Mulford, B. (2007). Instructional leadership in three Australian schools. ISEA, 35, 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15, 5–12.10.3102/0013189X015005005
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., & Loucks, S. F. (1977). A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 263–276.10.3102/00028312014003263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 329–352.10.1080/0305764032000122005
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I. (2008). Competing priorities in professional development: An Australian study of teacher professional development policy and practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 277–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (1998). What’s worth fighting for out there. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 3–41.10.1177/0013161X05277975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Conference. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2003/4/
   Google Scholar
• Hoban, G. F. (2002). Teacher learning for educational change: A systems thinking approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M. (2012a). Having it both ways: Building the capacity of individual teachers and their schools. Harvard Educational Review, 82, 107–122.10.17763/haer.82.1.c8515831m501x825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M. (2012b). Build the capacity of teachers and their schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 94, 62–65.10.1177/003172171209400215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, P., & Williamson, M. (2002). Decentralisation of professional development: Teachers’ decisions and dilemmas. Journal of In-Service Education, 28, 409–426.10.1080/13674580200200224
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of In-Service Education, 31, 235–250.10.1080/13674580500200358
   Google Scholar
• Knight, P. (2002). A systemic approach to professional development: Learning as practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 229–241.10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00066-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. C. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2005). Teachers as leaders. The Educational Forum, 69, 151–162.10.1080/00131720508984679
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Kruse, S., & Marks, H. M. (1996). Schoolwide professional community. In F. M. Newmann & Associates (Eds.), Authentic achievement restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179–203). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106, 532–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757–798.10.3102/00028312033004757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D., Koretz, D. M., Lockwood, J. R., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Evaluating value-added models for teacher accountability. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, G., O’Hara, J., Lisi, P., & Davidsdottir, S. (2011). Operationalising self-evaluation in schools: Experiences from Ireland and Iceland. Irish Educational Studies, 30, 63–82.10.1080/03323315.2011.535977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney Simmie, G. (2007). Teacher design teams (TDTs)—Building capacity for innovation, learning and curriculum implementation in the continuing professional development of in-career teachers. Irish Educational Studies, 26, 163–176.10.1080/03323310701295914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulford, B. (2005). Quality evidence about leadership for organizational and student learning in schools. School Leadership & Management, 25, 321–330.
   Google Scholar
• Mulford, B., Kendall, D., Edmunds, B., Kendall, L., Ewington, J., & Silins, H. (2007). Successful school leadership: What is it and who decides? Australian Journal of Education, 51, 228–246.10.1177/000494410705100302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New South Wales Board of Studies. (2003a). Geography years 7–10: Syllabus. Retrieved from http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/syllabus_sc/pdf_doc/geography_710_syl.pdf
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Board of Studies. (2003b). History year 7–10: Syllabus. Retrieved from http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/syllabus_sc/pdf_doc/history_710_syl.pdf
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Department of Education & Training. (2003). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: A classroom practice guide. Retrieved from https://www.det.nsw.edu.au/proflearn/areas/qt/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Department of Education & Training. (2004). Professional learning policy for schools. Retrieved from https://www.det.nsw.edu.au/proflearn/areas/plp/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Department of Education & Training. (2011). Teacher assessment and review schedule: Instructions for the completion of the teacher assessment and review schedule. Retrieved from https://detwww.det.nsw.edu.au/media/downloads/intranet/lists/directoratesaz/ires/epac/tarsschedule.doc
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M., Varga-Atkins, T., Burton, D., Campbell, A., & Qualter, A. (2008). How are the perceptions of learning networks shaped among school professionals and headteachers at an early stage in their introduction? International Review of Education, 54, 211–242.10.1007/s11159-008-9084-1
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005). Teachers matter. Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, K. (2011). Essentials of qualitative interviewing. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4–15.10.3102/0013189X029001004
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. W. (1983). The ABC of action learning (2nd ed.). Kent: Chartwell-Bratt.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 305–337). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A. (1995). Strategies for enhancing teachers' beliefs in their effectiveness: Research on a school improvement hypothesis. Teachers College Record, 94, 227–251.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G., & Bernard, R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 769–802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2007). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Silins, H., & Mulford, B. (2002). Schools as learning organisations. Journal of Educational Administration, 40, 425–446.10.1108/09578230210440285
   Google Scholar
• Siskin, L. S. (1994). Realms of knowledge: Academic department in secondary schools. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., & Silver, E. A. (1999). The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard Educational Review, 69, 237–270.10.17763/haer.69.3.h2267130727v6878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511557842
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sugrue, C. (2004). Rhetorics and realities of CPD across Europe: From cacophy towards coherence. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), Teachers’ work (pp. 66–93). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A. (2002). Developing communities of instructional practice. Teachers College Record, 104, 1591–1626.10.1111/tcre.2002.104.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesch, R. (1990). The mechanics of interpretational qualitative analysis qualitative research: Analytic types and software tools (pp. 113–146). Lewes: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trotman, D. (2009). Networking for educational change: Concepts, impediments and opportunities for primary school professional learning communities. Professional Development in Education, 35, 341–356.10.1080/13674580802596626
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, R. (2002). Teachers’ meanings regarding educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 72, 577–625.10.3102/00346543072004577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt, R., Smyth, L. F., & Vandenberghe, R. (2001). Implementing educational policy at the school level: Organization dynamics and teacher concerns. Journal of Educational Administration, 39, 8–23.10.1108/09578230110366883
   Google Scholar
• Varga-Atkins, T., Qualter, A., & O’Brien, M. (2009). School professionals’ attitudes to professional development in a networked context: Developing the model of “believers, seekers and sceptics”. Professional Development in Education, 35, 321–340.10.1080/19415250902846815
   Google Scholar
• Warrican, S. J. (2006). Action research: A viable option for effecting change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 1–14.10.1080/00220270500175537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylimaki, R. (2007). Instructional leadership in challenging US schools. ISEA, 35, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. M. (2003). Teacher research as professional development for P–12 educators in the USA. Educational Action Research, 11, 301–326.10.1080/09650790300200211
   Google Scholar