6,112
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

An examination of the structural validity of the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire-Short Form (PSDQ–S) using the Rasch Measurement Model

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1571146 | Received 18 Sep 2018, Accepted 13 Jan 2019, Published online: 07 Feb 2019

References

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Arnadottir, G., & Fisher, A. (2008). Rasch analysis of the ADL scale of the A-ONE. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 51–28. doi:10.5014/ajot.62.1.51
  • Babic, M. J., Morgan, P. J., Plotnikoff, R. C., Lonsdale, C., White, R. L., & Lubans, D. R. (2014). Physical activity and physical self-concept in youth: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 44, 1589–1601. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0229-z
  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Brewer, W. A., & Olson, S. L. (2015). Are there relationships between perceived and actual measures of physical fitness and health for healthy young women? Comprehensive Psychology, 4, 2. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/06.CP.4.2
  • Brown, T. (2010). Construct validity: A unitary concept for occupational therapy assessment and measurement. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(1), 30–42. doi:10.1016/S1569-1861(10)70056-5
  • Cizek, G. J. (2016). Validating test score meaning and defending test score use: Different aims, different methods. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 23(2), 212–225. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2015.1063479
  • Cremeens, J., Eiser, C., & Blades, M. (2006). Characteristics of health-related self-report measures for children aged three to eight years: A review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 15, 739–754. doi:10.1007/s11136-005-4184-x
  • Crocker, P. R. E., Sabiston, C. M., Kowalski, K. C., McDonough, M. H., & Kowalski, N. (2006). Longitudinal assessment of the relationship between physical self-concept and health-related behavior and emotion in adolescent girls. Journal of Applied Sports Psychology, 18(3), 185–200. doi:10.1080/10413200600830257
  • de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Dishman, R. K., Hales, D. P., Almeida, M. J., Pfeiffer, K. A., Dowda, M., & Pate, R. R. (2006). Factorial validity and invariance of the physical self-description questionnaire among black and white adolescent girls. Ethnicity & Disease, 16(2), 551–558.
  • Dolenc, P. (2016). The short form of the physical self-description questionnaire: Validation study among Slovenian elementary and high school students. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 24(2), 58–74. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2014
  • Downing, S. M. (2003). Validity: On the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medical Education, 37(9), 830–837. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x
  • Ekeland, E., Heian, F., & Hagen, K. B. (2005). Can exercise improve self-esteem in children and young people: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. British Journal Sports Medicine, 39(11), 792–798. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2004.017707
  • Fisher, W. P., Jr. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 21, 1095. Retrieved from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt211.pdf
  • Goodwin, L. D. (2002). Changing conceptions of measurement validity: An update on the new standards. Journal of Nursing Education, 41(3), 100–106. doi:10.3928/0148-4834-20020301-05
  • Haapea, I., Haverinen, K., Honkalampi, K., Kuittinen, M., & Räty, H. (2016). The factor structure and reliability of the short form of the physical self-description questionnaire in a finnish adolescent athlete sample. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, published online. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2016.1266504
  • Klomsten, A. T., Skaalvik, E. M., & Espnes, G. A. (2004). Physical self-concept and sports: Do gender differences still exist? Sex Roles, 50(1–2), 119–127. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000011077.10040.9a
  • Lim, M., Rodger, S., & Brown, T. (2009). Using Rasch analysis for establishing the construct validity of rehabilitation assessment tools. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(5), 251–260. doi:10.12968/ijtr.2009.16.5.42102
  • Linacre, J. M. (2011). Winsteps (version 3.70.0) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.
  • Linacre, J. M. (2013). Misfit diagnosis: Infit outfit mean-square standardized. Retrieved from: http://www.winsteps.com/winman/index.htm?diagnosingmisfit.htm
  • Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1998). A user’s guide to bigsteps winsteps Rasch-Model computer program. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
  • Maïano, C., Morin, A. J., & Mascret, N. (2015). Psychometric properties of the short form of the physical self-description questionnaire in a French adolescent sample. Body Image, 12, 89–97. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.10.005
  • Marsh, H. (1999). Physical self-description questionnaire (complete) package. Oxford, UK: SELF Research Centre.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1996a). Construct validity of physical self-description questionnaire responses: Relations to external criteria. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 111–131. doi:10.1123/jsep.18.2.111
  • Marsh, H. W. (1996b). Physical self-description questionnaire: Stability and discriminant validity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(3), 249–264. doi:10.1080/02701367.1996.10607952
  • Marsh, H. W. (1997). The measurement of physical self-concept: A construct validation approach. In K. Fox (Ed.), The physical self-concept: From motivation to well-being (pp. 27–58). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Jackson, S. (2010). Introducing a short version of the physical self-description questionnaire: New strategies, short-form evaluative criteria, and applications of factor analyses. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(4), 438–482. doi:10.1123/jsep.32.4.438
  • Marsh, H. W., Richards, G. E., Johnson, S., Roche, L., & Tremayne, P. (1994). Physical self-description questionnaire: Psychometric properties and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of relations to existing instruments. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 270–305. doi:10.1123/jsep.16.3.270
  • Marsh, H. W., Tomás Marco, I., & Hülya Aþçý, F. (2002). Cross-cultural validity of the physical self-description questionnaire: Comparison of factor structures in Australia, Spain and Turkey. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73(3), 257–270. doi:10.1080/02701367.2002.10609019
  • Martin, J. J., & Whalen, L. (2012). Self-concept and physical activity in athletes with physical disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 5(3), 197–200. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.03.006
  • McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995). Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate. Quality of Life Research, 4, 293–307. doi:10.1007/BF01593882
  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13–104). New York, NY: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
  • Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
  • Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Patrick, D., Alonso, J., Stratford, P., Knol, D., … de Vet, H. C. W. (2006). Protocol of the COSMIN study: Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments. BMC Medical Research Methodololgy, 6(1), 2. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-2
  • Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Patrick, D., Alonso, J., Stratford, P., Knol, D., … de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
  • Newton, P. E., & Baird, J.-A. (2016). The great validity debate. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 23(2), 173–177. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2016.1172871
  • Newton, P. E., & Shaw, S. D. (2016). Disagreement over the best way to use the word ‘validity’ and options for reaching consensus. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 23(2), 178–197. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2015.1037241
  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Rios, J., & Wells, C. (2014). Validity evidence based on internal structure. Psicothema, 26(1), 108–116. doi:10.7334/psicothema2013.260
  • Simons, J., Capio, C. M., Adriaenssens, P., Delbroek, H., & Vandenbussche, I. (2012). Self-concept and physical self-concept in psychiatric children and adolescents. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(3), 874–881. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.12.012
  • Smith, R. M. (1992). Applications of Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
  • Smith, R. M., & Miao, C. Y. (1994). Assessing unidimensionality for Rasch measurement. In W. M. Greenwich (Ed.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 316–328). Norword, NJ: Ablex.
  • Streiner, D., Norman, G., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Teman, E. D. (2013). A Rasch analysis of the statistical anxiety rating scale. Journal of Applied Measurement, 14(4), 414–434.
  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Ulrika, A., Johan, P., & Guy, M. (2017). Correspondence between physical self-concept and participation in, and fitness change after, biweekly body conditioning classes in sedentary women. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(2), 451–461. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001721
  • Utesch, T., Dreiskämper, D., Naul, R., & Geukes, K. (2018). Understanding physical (in-) activity, overweight, and obesity in childhood: Effects of congruence between physical self-concept and motor competence. Scientific Reports, 8, 5908. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24139-y
  • Wang, C. K. J., Sun, Y., Liu, W. C., Yao, J., & Pyun, D. Y. (2015). Latent profile analysis of the physical self-description among Chinese adolescents. Current Psychology, 34(2), 282–293. doi:10.1007/s12144-014-9257-y
  • Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
  • Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94. doi:10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079