Saudi Arabian science and mathematics teachers’ attitudes toward integrating STEM in teaching before and after participating in a professional development program

References

• Al Ghamdi, A. H., & Al-Salouli, M. S. (2013). Saudi elementary school science teachers' beliefs: Teaching science in the new millennium. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 11(2), 501-21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Salami, M. K., Makela, C. J., & De-Miranda, M. A. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 63–88. doi:10.1007/s10798-015-9341-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almazroa, H., & Alshamrani, S. (2015). Saudi science teacher professional development: Trends, practices, and future directions. In N. Mansour and S. Alshamrani (Eds.), Science education in the Arab Gulf States: Visions, sociocultural contexts, and challenges. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Angell, K. L., Kreshka, M. A., McCoy, R., Donnelly, P., TurnerCobb, J. M., Graddy, K., Kraemer, H. C., & Koopman, C. (2003). Psychosocial intervention for rural women with breast cancer. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 499–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. D., & Mayo, M. (2010). “Refueling the U.S. innovation economy: Fresh approaches to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education,” The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, December 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Belfield, C. R., Morris, Z. S., Bullock, A. D., & Frame, J. W. (2001). The benefits and costs of continuing professional development (CPD) for general dental practice: A discussion. European Journal of Dental Education, 5, 47–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell, D. (2016). The reality of STEM education, design and technology teachers’ perceptions: A phenomenographic study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 61–79. doi:10.1007/s10798-015-9300-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettinger, E. (2010). To be or not to be: Major choices in budding scientists. In C. T. Clotfelter (Ed.), American universities in a global market (pp. 69–98). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• CaSE. (2014). Improving diversity in STEM. London, UK: Campaign for Science and Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Dearing, R., & King, L. (2006). Languages review. Nottingham, UK: Department for Education and Skills. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/7613/1/LanguageReview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Derri, V., Vasiliadou, O., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2015). The effects of a short-term professional development program on physical education teachers’ behavior and students’ engagement in learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 234–262. doi:10.1080/02619768.2014.947024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL, US: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A., & Fouts, J. (2001). Interdisciplinary curriculum: The research base. Music Educators Journal, 86(6), 22-26.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1–8. doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: A stand for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 185–189.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., & Felix, A. (2010). A project-based, STEM-integrated team challenge for elementary and middle school teachers in alternative energy. Retrieved from saintfrancisuniversity.edu, October 9th, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, P. R., Bodin, R., Elliott, J. W., Ibrahim, B., Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., Chen, T. W., & de Miranda, M. A. (2013). Connecting the STEM dots: Measuring the effect of an integrated engineering design intervention. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 107–120. doi:10.1007/s10798-013-9241-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, H., & Garimella, U. (2015). Beginner robotics for STEM: Positive effects on middle school teachers. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015–Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3227–3234). Las Vegas, NV: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/150537/
   Google Scholar
• Jung, Carl G. (1921 /71). Collected Works, Volume 6: Psychological Types, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, T., & Odell, M. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.
   Google Scholar
• King, K. P., & Wiseman, D. L. (2001). Comparing science efficacy beliefs of elementary education majors in integrated and non-integrated teacher education coursework. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(2), 143-153.
   Google Scholar
• Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (1998). Internal consistency reliability for the teachers’ attitudes toward information technology (TAT) questionnaire. In S. McNeil, J. Price, S. Boger-Mehall, B. Robin, & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education Annual Conference (pp. 831-836). Bethesda, MD: Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Koballa, T. R. (1988). Attitude and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72(2), 115-126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 27–50. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laboy-Rush, D. (2011). Whitepaper: integrated STEM education through project-based learning. Retrieved from http://www.learning.com/stem/whitepaper/
   Google Scholar
• Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Beede, D., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future. ESA issue brief #03-11. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Lauer, P. A., Christopher, D. E., Firpo-Triplett, R., & Buchting, F. (2014). The impact of short-term professional development on participant outcomes: A review of the literature. Professional Development in Education, 40(2), 207–227. doi:10.1080/19415257.2013.776619
   Google Scholar
• Lead States, N. G. S. S. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, B., Claxton, G. & Hanson, J. (2014). Thinking like an engineer: Implications for the education system. A Report for the Royal Academy of Engineering Standing Committee for Education and Training. Royal Academy of Engineers, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Madani, F. R. (2017). Teacher Perceptions of the New Mathematics and Science Curriculum: A Step Towards STEM Implementation in Saudi Arabia. Dissertation, The British University in Dubai
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Mensah, J., Okyere, M., & Kuranchie, A. (2013). Student attitude towards mathematics and performance: Does the teacher attitude matter? Journal of Education and Practice, 4(3), 132–139.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J., & Bartlett, B. (2009). STEM as a curriculum: An experimental approach. Retrieved from http://www.lab-aids.com/docs/stem/EdWeekArticleSTEM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. S. (2006). Attributes of STEM education. TIES STEM education monograph series. Baltimore, MD: Teaching Institute for Essential Science.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, H. (2006). The “severe grading” of MFL grades at GCSE and A level. London, UK: Association for Language Learning.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, NRC. (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/18613
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies policy report. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quang, D., Chen, Y., & Xie, X. (2015). Dann: A deep learning approach for annotating the pathogenicity of genetic variants. Bioinformatics, 31(5), 761–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riyadh Educational District. (2018). Professional development program on integrating STEM for science and mathematics teachers. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: King Saud University.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. (2016). A Case Study Exploring the Effects of Using an Integrative STEM Curriculum on Eighth Grade Students’ Performance and Engagement in the Mathematics Classroom. Dissertation, Georgia State University
   Google Scholar
• Rockland, R., Bloom, D. S., Carpinelli, J., Burr-Alexander, L., Hirsch, L. S., & Kimmel, H. (2010). Advancing the “E” in K-12 STEM education. Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J., & Hollander, S. (1975). A biology attitude scale. The American Biology Teacher, 37(5), 270-273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEM mania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A., & Martin, A., (2013). Perceived barriers to higher education in STEM among high-achieving underrepresented high school students of color. The American Educational Research Association annual conference in San Francisco, April 27-31, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Shrigley, R. L., Koballa, T. R., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Defining attitudes for science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), 659-678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, S., & Subramaniam, P. R. (1999). Student attitude toward physical education and physical activity: A review of measurement issues and outcomes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19, 97–125. doi:10.1123/jtpe.19.1.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. (2011). Staying in the science stream: Patterns of participation in A-level science subjects in the UK. Education Studies, 37, 59–71. doi:10.1080/03055691003729161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34. doi:10.5703/1288284314653
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). How school context and personal factors relate to teachers’ attitudes toward teaching integrated STEM. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 631–651.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, B., & Watters, J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development, 45, 42–53. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsupros, N., R. Kohler, and J. Hallinen, (2009). STEM education: A project to identify the missing components, Intermediate Unit 1 and Carnegie Mellon, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler-Wood, T., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2010). Instruments for assessing interest in STEM content and careers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 345-368.
   Google Scholar
• Vernengo, J., Farrell, S., Kadlowec, J., & Strobel, J. (2014). Enhancing the STEM curriculum through a multidisciplinary approach that integrates biology and engineering. American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 14
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2010). Discussion paper: 21st century skills. http://www.kennisnet.nl/uploads/ tx_kncontentelements/21st-Century-Skills.pdf. Accessed April 25, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1–13. doi:10.5703/1288284314636
   Google Scholar
• Weißenrieder, J., Roesken-Winter, B., Schueler, S., Binner, E., & Blömeke, S. (2015). Scaling CPD through professional learning communities: Development of teachers’ self-efficacy in relation to collaboration. ZDM, 1(47), 27–38. doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0673-8
   Google Scholar