Willingness to Write (WTW): Development of a model in EFL writing classrooms

References

• Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5
   Google Scholar
• Best, K., Jones‐Katz, L., Smolarek, B., Stolzenburg, M., & Williamson, D. (2015). Listening to our students: An exploratory practice study of ESL writing students’ views of feedback. Tesol Journal, 6(2), 332–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C. (1992). Classroom learning and motivation: Clarifying and expanding goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. Structural Equation Models: Present and Future. A Festschrift in Honor of Karl Jöreskog, 2(3), 139–168.
   Google Scholar
• Brick, J. (2004). China: A handbook in intercultural communication.
   Google Scholar
• Brindley, R., & Schneider, J. J. (2002). Writing instruction or destruction: Lessons to be learned from fourth-grade teachers’ perspectives on teaching writing. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustamante, A., & Eom, M. (2017). Linguistically diverse students’ attitudes towards writing in English. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 5(1), 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, S. (2012). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39(4), 468–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. JSTOR.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, R., & Balaa, L. (2011). Developing detailed rubrics for assessing critique writing: Impact on EFL university students’ performance and attitudes. TESOL Journal, 2(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.5054/tj.2011.244132
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning, 53(S1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.53222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2014). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, F. (1993). How examinations affect students’ approach to writing. Learning and Teaching in Hong Kong: What Is and What Might Be, 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C. (2006). The socio-educational model of second language acquisition: A research paradigm. Eurosla Yearbook, 6(1), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.6.14gar
   Google Scholar
• Gau, E., Hermanson, J., Logar, M., & Smerek, C. (2003). Improving student attitudes and writing abilities through increased writing time and opportunities.
   Google Scholar
• Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G. H., & Asadpour, S. F. (2012). Willingness to communicate in English among Iranian non–English major university students. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12438538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989). Improving learning disabled students’ skills at composing essays: Self-instructional strategy training. Exceptional Children, 56(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298905600305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr, Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hirvela, A. (1999). Collaborative writing instruction and communities of readers and writers. TESOL Journal, 8(2), 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr169oa
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional Science, 38(4), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400103
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2016). Methods and methodologies in second language writing research. System, 59, 116–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
   Google Scholar
• Johns, A. M. (2011). The future of genre in L2 writing: Fundamental, but contested, instructional decisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kear, D. J., Coffman, G. A., McKenna, M. C., & Ambrosio, A. L. (2000). Measuring attitude toward writing: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 54(1), 10–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khajavy, G. H., & Ghonsooly, B. (2017). Predictors of willingness to read in English: Testing a model based on possible selves and self-confidence. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(10), 871–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1284853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, B. (2001). Considerations for teaching an ESL/EFL writing course. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 3, 219–232.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. Tesol Quarterly, 48(1), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. (2015). Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students’ perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feedback. System, 55, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How Languages are Learned 4th edition-Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers. Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. (1997). Doing-English-lessons in secondary schools in Hong Kong: A sociocultural and discourse analytic study [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Z. (2013). Language teachers’ attitudes, beliefs, professional knowledge, and views on professional development: An exploratory study at a preschool TEFL setting. TESOL Journal, 4(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.52
   Google Scholar
• Lo, J., & Hyland, F. (2007). Enhancing students’ engagement and motivation in writing: The case of primary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2010). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchón, R. (2009). Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (Vol. 43). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Manchón, R. M., & Roca de Larios, J. (2011). Writing-to-learn in FL contexts. In Manchón R. M. ( a cura di), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 181–208). John Benjamin Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40(7), 812. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement.
   Google Scholar
• McMartin-Miller, C. (2014). How much feedback is enough?: Instructor practices and student attitudes toward error treatment in second language writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonca, C. O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745–769. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B. (2014). Genre and second-language academic writing. Language Teaching, 47(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J.-E. (2012). Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System, 40(2), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3701_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., & Hickson, M. (2002). Going public: A practical guide to public talk. Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. V., & Vinson, L. (1998). Relationship among willingness to listen, receiver apprehension, communication apprehension, communication competence, and dogmatism. International Journal of Listening, 12(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.1998.10499018
   Google Scholar
• Ruegg, R. (2018). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy. The Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.958190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr133oa
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (1974). Cross‐validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardy, C. M. (2011). The history and future of genre in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(20), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modelling [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the XLII SIS scientific meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., Martin, D., & Pleasants, K. (2011). Using self-and peer-assessment to enhance students’ future-learning in higher education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 8(1), 5.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. (2014). Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry. Assessing Writing, 19, 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J., & Condon, F. (2016). Translingualism in composition studies and second language writing: An uneasy alliance. TESL Canada Journal, 33(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v33i2.1234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Woodrow, L. (2011). College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39(4), 510–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. Tesol Quarterly, 19(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, H. (2014). Investigating teacher-supported peer assessment for EFL writing. ELT Journal, 68(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar