Feedback practice in lower secondary school: Exploring development of perceptions of feedback practice among students and teachers

References

• Andrade, H. L. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (Vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 450–19). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J.-A., Hopfenbeck, T., Newton, P., Stobart, G., & Steen-Utheim, A. (2014). State of the field review. Assessment and learning. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Education (case number 13/4697).
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 51, 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Assessment, learning theories and testing systems. In P. Murphy (Ed.), Learners, learning and assessment (pp. 118–135). Paul Chapman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969564X.2018.1441807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boistrup, L. B. (2010). Assessment discourses in mathematics classrooms: A multimodal semiotic study. Universitetsservice.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, M. (2013). Changing conceptions of feedback. Feedback in higher and professional education. Understanding it and doing it well. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Furtak, E., Shepard, L., & Yin, Y. (2012). Meta‐analytic methodology and inferences about the efficacy of formative assessment. Educational Measurements: Issues and Practice, 31(4), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1011/1745-3992.2012.00251.X
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expanding views about formative classroom assessment: A review of the literature. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice (pp. 43–62). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bueie, A. A. (2017). «Slike kommentarer er de som hjelper». Elevers forståelse og bruk av lærerkommentarer i norskfaget. Doctoral dissertation/ Ph.d. No 268. University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, C., Santos, J., Conboy, J., & Martins, D. (2014). Teachers’ feedback: Exploring differences in students’ perceptions. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159(December), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.351
   Google Scholar
• Clariana, R. B., Wagner, D., & Roher Murphy, L. C. (2000). Applying a connectionist description of feedback timing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, E. L., & Wærness, J. I. (2006). Vurdering og læring i en elevaktiv skole. [Assessment and learning in a student active school]. Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2011). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evens, M., Elen, J., & Depaepe, F. (2015). Developing pedagogical content knowledge: Lessons learned from intervention Studies. Education Research International, 2015 13 August 2015 , 1–23. Article ID 790417. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/790417
   Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Students’ perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 20(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212
   Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., & Munthe, E. (2014). Mapping the quality of feedback to support students’ learning in lower secondary classrooms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.855171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M. (2015). Feedback to support learning: Changes in teachers’ practice and beliefs. Teacher Development, 19(4), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1060254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., Kvinge, L. M., Smith, K., & Engelsen, K. S. (2019). Developing teachers’ responsive pedagogy in mathematics, does it lead to short-term effects on student learning? Cogent Education, 6(1), 1676568. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1676568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M. (2019). Mapping teaching through interactions and pupils’ learning in mathematics. Sage Open, 9(3), 215824401986148. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019861485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
   Google Scholar
• Haara, F. O., Engelsen, K. S., & Smith, K. (2020). Moving from traditional to responsive mathematics classrooms: A proposition of an intervention model. Teacher Development, 24(3), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1763443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, C. J., Könings, K. D., Schuwirth, L., Wass, V., & van der Vleuten, C. (2015). Barriers to the uptake and use of feedback in the context of summative assessment. Advances in Health Science Education, 20(1), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9524-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, C. J., Könings, K. D., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Wass, V., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2017). Changing the culture of assessment: The dominance of the summative assessment paradigm. BMC Medical Education, 17(73), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0912-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. NPJ Science of Learning, 1(16013), 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13
   Google Scholar
• Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(2012), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. B. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17(May), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). Identifying feedback that has impact. In M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, & E. Molloy (Eds.), The impact of feedback in higher education (pp. 50–62). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgen, J., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Mathematics inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the mathematics classroom. GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T., Throndsen, I., Lie, S., & Dale, E. L. (2012). Assessment with distinctly defined criteria: A research study of a national project. Policy Futures in Education, 10(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.4.421
   Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T., Tolo, A., Florez, T., & El Masri, Y. (2013). Balancing trust and accountability? The assessment for learning programme in Norway. A governing complex educational systems case study. OECD Education Working Papers No. 97. Report for OECD Paris, part of the Governing Complex Education Systems, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T., Petour, M. T. F., & Tolo, A. (2015). Balancing tensions in educational policy reforms: Large scale implementation of assessment for learning in Norway. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.996524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jónsson, I. R., Smith, K., & Geirsdóttir, G. (2018). Shared language of feedback and assessment. Perception of teachers and students in three Icelandic secondary schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56(March), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Sierra, G., García-García, J., Valle-Zequeida, M., & Dolores-Flores, C. (2020). High school mathematics teachers’ beliefs about assessment in mathematics and the connections to their mathematical beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09967-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. (2006). Forskrift til opplæringslova. Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. (2016). Stortingsmelding (White Paper) nr. 16. (2006–2007).… og ingen stod igjen [… and nobody was left behind]. Kunnskaps departementet.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. (2020a). Forskrift til opplæringslova. Kapittel 3. Individuell vurdering i grunnskolen og i vidaregåande opplæring. Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. (2020b). Knowledge Promotion (LK20). Kunnskapsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (NESH). (2018). Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences, the humanities, law and theology. https://www.forskningsetikk.no/en/about-us/our-committees-and-commission/nesh/about-nesh/
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nortvedt, G., & Pettersen, A. (2015). Matematikk. In M. Kjærnsli & F. Jensen (Eds.), Stø Kurs. Norske elevers kompetanse i naturfag, matematikk og lesing i PISA. Universitetsforlaget. http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-58080
   Google Scholar
• Nortvedt, G. A., Santos, L., & Pinto, J. (2016). Assessment for learning in Norway and Portugal: The case of primary school mathematics teaching. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(3), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1108900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2018). Observations on the national assessment for learning programme (2010–2018). Skills development in networks. Final report 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2020). Skoleporten. Elevundersøkelsen. https://[email protected]
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, E., Bearman, M., & Esterhazy, R. (2020). The conundrum of low achievement and feedback for learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1630363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International. WHAT IS NVIVO? Software that supports qualitative and mixed methods research. http://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/what-is-nvivo. Retrieved 13 February 2018
   Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830280103
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050104
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15–31). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K., Gamlem, S. M., Sandal, A. K., & Engelsen, K. S. (2016). Educating for the future: A conceptual framework of responsive pedagogy. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1227021
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Ministery of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2011). Using student assessment for professional learning: Focusing on students’ outcomes to identify teachers’ needs. State of Victoria (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development).
   Google Scholar
• Tveit, S. (2014). Educational assessment in Norway. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.830079
   Google Scholar
• Tveit, S. (2018). Ambitious and ambiguous: Shifting purposes of national testing in the legitimation of assessment policies in Norway and Sweden (2000–2017). Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1421522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg, M., Harskamp, E. G., & Suhre, C. J. M. (2016). Developing classroom formative assessment in Dutch primary mathematics education. Educational Studies, 42(4), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1193475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voerman, L., Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Simons, R. J. (2012). Types and frequencies of feedback interventions in classroom interaction in secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1107–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track. In F. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053–1098). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2007). A theoretical foundation for formative assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment theory into practice (pp. 29–42). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., & Boud, B. (2020). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, AHEAD-OF-PRINT, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, S., & Alexander, R. J. (2008). Argumentation and dialogic teaching: Alternative pedagogies for a changing world. FutureLab. http://www.robinalexander.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/wolfealexander.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. L. (2015). The fidelity of formative assessment implementation: Issues of breadth and quality. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(1), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969564X.2014.990416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar