Management model, leadership and autonomy in Portuguese and Spanish public schools: A comparative analysis

References

• Alves, M., José, I. C., & Bolívar, A. (2020). Lideranças, gestão escolar e melhoria das escolas: Recomendações para o desenvolvimento das políticas educativas. In I. Cabral & J. M. Alves (Eds.), Gestão Escolar e Melhoria das Escolas: O que nos diz a investigação (pp. 143–20). Fundação Manuel Leão.
   Google Scholar
• Ávalos-Bevan, B., & Assunção Flores, M. (2021). School-based teacher collaboration in chile and Portugal. Compare: a Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1854085
   Google Scholar
• Barrios-Arós, C., Camarero-Figuerola, M., Tierno-García, J. M., & Iranzo-García, P. (2015). Modelos y funciones de dirección escolar en España: El caso de Tarragona. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 67, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie670219
   Google Scholar
• Barroso, J. (2004). A autonomia das escolas: Uma ficção necessária. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 17 (2), 49–83 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=37417203. Braga, Portugal: Universidade do Minho
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, W. (2007). The challenges of leadership in the modern world. American Psychologist, 62(1), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogotch, I., & Shields, C. M., Eds. (2014). International handbook of social [in]justice and educational leadership. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bolívar, A. (2010). La autonomía de los centros educativos en España. CEE Participación Educativa, 13, 8–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bolívar, A. (2019). A Spanish framework for school principal and professional identity: context, development and implications. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27 (114) , 1–37. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4544
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, K., & Wohlstetter, P. (2003). Key elements of a successful school-based management strategy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 14(3), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.14.3.351.15840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral, I., & Alves, J. M. (Eds.). (2020). Gestão Escolar e Melhoria das Escolas: O que nos diz a investigação. Fundação Manuel Leão.
   Google Scholar
• CERI (Center for Educational Research and Innovation). (2019). Strategic Education Governance. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• CNE. (2016). Estado da Educação 2016. Conselho Nacional de Educação.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, M., James, C., & Fertig, M. (2017). The difference between educational management and educational leadership and the importance of educational responsibility. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(4), 504–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217745880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consejo Escolar del Estado. (2020) . Informe 2020 sobre el estado del sistema educativo. Curso 2018-2019. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional.
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, R., & Kazamias, A. M. (2009). International handbook of comparative education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crato, N. (2020). Curriculum and educational reforms in Portugal: an analysis on why and how students’ knowledge and skills improved. In F. M. Reimers (Ed.), Audacious education purposes. how governments transform the goals of education systems (pp. 209–230). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41882-3_8
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Qing, G., & Brown, E. (2010). 10 strong claims about successful school leadership. National College for School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Day, D. V., & Antonakis, J. (2011). The nature of leadership (2n edition ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dou, D., Devos, G., & Valcke, M. (2017). The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(6), 959–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216653975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission, European Education and Culture Executive Agency, Nathalie Baïdak and Agathina Sicurella. 2021a. Compulsory Education in Europe: 2021/22. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/659411
   Google Scholar
• European Commission/Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, and Eurydice. (2021b). Teachers in Europe: careers, development and well-being. eurydice report. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice (European Education and Culture Executive Agency), Nathalie Baïdak, Agathina Sicurella, Jari Matti Riiheläinen. 2020. The structure of the European education systems 2020/21: schematic diagrams. European Commission. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/39049
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A., & Lynne Derrington, M. (2017). School principals’ views of teacher evaluation policy: lessons learned from two empirical studies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(4), 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1094144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gairín, J. (2004). La dirección escolar como promotora de los planteamientos institucionales. Enseñanza, 22, 159–191.
   Google Scholar
• Gairín, J. (2020). L’Autonomia Dels Centres Educatius o l’Autonomia Institucional. Segona Part. Fórum, 51, 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Greany, T. (2022). Place-based governance and leadership in decentralised school systems: Evidence from England. Journal of Education Policy, 37(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.179255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R. L. (2017). Practicing the art of leadership: a problem-based approach to implementing the professional standards for educational leaders (5th Edition. ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How Principals Affect Students and Schools: A Systematic Synthesis of Two Decades of Research. The Wallace Foundation. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/principalsynthesis.
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 28 3 , 317–338 https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X000283006.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, D. (2015). A model of successful school leadership from the international successful school principalship project. Societies, 5(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5010136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2003). Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2009). Leadership for 21st century schools: from instructional leadership to leadership for learning. The Hong Kong Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Heisig, J. P., Elbers, B., & Solga, H. (2020). Cross-national differences in social background effects on educational attainment and achievement: absolute vs relative inequalities and the role of education systems. Compare: a Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1677455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbsta, M., & Wojciukb, A. (2017). Common legacy, different paths: The transformation of educational systems in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary and Poland. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2016.1153410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jara, C., Sánchez, M., & Cox, C. (2019). Liderazgo educativo y formación ciudadana: Visiones y prácticas de los autores. Calidad en la Educación, 51(51), 350–381. https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n51.687
   Google Scholar
• Jean-Marie, G., Normore, A. H., & Brooks, J. S. (2009). Leadership for social justice: preparing 21st century school leaders for a new social order. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 4(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277510900400102
   Google Scholar
• Jinlong, Z., Jiwen Song, L., Zhu, L., & Johnson, R. E. (2019). Visualising the landscape and evolution of leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei de bases do sistema educativo 1986. Diário da República n.° 237/1986, Série I de 1986-10-14.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: how leadership influences student learning. Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2012). The ontario leadership framework with a discussion of the research foundations. The Institute of Education Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership and Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiva, V., & Vásquez, C. (2019). Liderazgo pedagógico: De la supervisión al acompañamiento docente. Calidad en la Educación, 51(51), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n51.635
   Google Scholar
• Liebowitz, D., González, P., Hooge, E., & Lima, G. (2018). OECD. In Reviews of school resources: Portugal 2018. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L. Y., & Firkola, P. (2000). Methodological issues in cross-cultural management research: problems, solutions, and proposals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015493005484
   Google Scholar
• Lima, L. C. (2020). Autonomia e flexibilidade curricular: Quando as escolas são desafiadas pelo governo. Revista Portuguesa De Investigação Educacional, Especial, 172–192. https://doi.org/10.34632/investigacaoeducacional.2020.8505
   Google Scholar
• LOCE. (2002). “Ley Orgánica” 10/2002, de 23 de diciembre, de Calidad de la Educación ( de 24 de diciembre de 2002, Vol. 307). Published in BOE.
   Google Scholar
• LODE. (1985). “Ley Orgánica” 8/1985, de 3 de julio, reguladora del Derecho a la Educación ( de 04 de julio de, Vol. 159). Published in BOE.
   Google Scholar
• LOE. (2006). “Ley Orgánica” 2/2006, de 3 de Mayo, de Educación ( de 4 de Mayo de 2006, Vol. 106). Published in BOE.
   Google Scholar
• LOGSE. (1990). “Ley Orgánica” 1/1990, de 3 de octubre, de Ordenación General del Sistema Educativo ( de 4 de octubre de 1990, Vol. 238). Published in BOE.
   Google Scholar
• LOMCE. (2013). “Ley Orgánica” 8/2013(LOMCE), de 9 de diciembre, para la mejora de la calidad educativa ( de 10 de diciembre de 2013, Vol. 295). Published in BOE.
   Google Scholar
• LOMLOE. (2020). “Ley Orgánica” 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica: 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación ( de 30 de diciembre de 2020, Vol. 340). Published in BOE.
   Google Scholar
• López-Rupérez, F., & García-García, I. (2020). España vs. Portugal en educación. Una aproximación sistémica. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 84(1), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8414042
   Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J., Dempster, N., Frost, D., Johnson, G., & Swaffield, S. (2018). Strengthening the connections between leadership and learning challenges to policy, school and classroom practice. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, L. J., & Christie, G. (2016). Management and organisational behaviour, 11th ed. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2011) . “Pisa in focus” 9. París. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2016a). PISA 2015 results (volum i): excellence and equity in education. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2016b). PISA 2015 results (volume II): policies and practices for successful schools. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264267510-en
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2018a). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2018b. “Curriculum flexibility and autonomy in Portugal.” An OECD Review. https://bit.ly/33cX2jr
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2018c). How decentralised are education systems, and what does it mean for schools? In Education indicators in focus. Vol. 64. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e14575d5-en
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2019). Pisa 2018 results. In I. What students know and can do. Pisa. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2020). TALIS 2018 results. In II. teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. TALIS, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2021). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pont, B., Moorman, H., & Nusche, D. (2008). Improving school leadership: policy and practices. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Redondo, E. G. (2016). Governance in educational institutions in Portugal. New Approaches in Educational Research, 5(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2016.1.15 2254-7399
   Google Scholar
• Richard, M., & Wieczorek, O. (2022). In search of quality and equity: The United Kingdom and Germany in the struggle for PISA scores. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100165
   Google Scholar
• Ritacco, M. (2019). El modelo español de dirección escolar y sus implicaciones en el desarrollo del liderazgo pedagógico en Andalucía. Un estudio cualitativo. Educatio Siglo, 37(1 Mar–Jun), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.363441
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M., Hohepa, M. K., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes. Ministry of Education. Wellington, N.Z
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Gairín, J. (2017). Influence of the practices of pedagogical leadership in the educational pedagogical practices: case in chile of the pedagogical technical units. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 5(1), 6–29 https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2017.2469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancho, G., & Ángel, M. (2019). ¿Ha evolucionado el índice de autonomía en España? El blog de Sociedad y Educación. EFSE.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, Í., & Centeno, V. G. (2021). Inspirations from abroad: The impact of PISA on countries’ choice of reference societies in education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2021.1906206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savvides, N., Milhano, S., Mangas, C., Freire, C., & Lopes, S. (2021). ‘Failures’ in a failing education system: comparing structural and institutional risk factors to early leaving in England and Portugal. Journal of Education and Work, 34(7–8), 789–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2021.2002831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano Albendea, R. 2017. “Competencias clave de las direcciones escolares para un liderazgo eficaz.” PhD diss., Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
   Google Scholar
• SGEE-Subdirección General de Estadística y Estudios. (2021). Las cifras de la educación en España. In Curso 2018–2019. Edición 2021. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, J. M., Rodrigues, C., Silveirinha, C., Paulo Mineiro, J., & Paulo, F. (2016). La escuela portuguesa en el siglo XXI. Autonomía y participación. Educar, 52(1), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.736
   Google Scholar
• Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tintoré, M., Cunha, R. S., Cabral, I., & Alves, J. M. (2020a). A scoping review of problems and challenges faced by school leaders (2003–2019). Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 50(4), 536–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220942527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tintoré, M., Serrão Cunha, R., Cabral, I., & Matias Alves, J. (2020b). Giving voice to problems faced by school leaders in Portugal. School Leadership and Management, 40(4), 352–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1719400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2018). Activating policy levers for education 2030: the untapped potential of governance, school leadership, and monitoring and evaluation policies.
   Google Scholar
• Valdés, M., Ángel Sancho, M., & Esteban, M. (2021). Indicadores Comentados Sobre el Estado del Sistema Educativo Español 2021. Fundación Ramón Areces and European Foundation Society and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Villa, A. (2019). Liderazgo: Una clave para la innovación y el cambio educativo. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 37(2), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.37.2.365461
   Google Scholar
• Waldow, F., & Steiner-Khamsi, G., Eds. 2020. Understanding PISA’s Attractiveness. In Critical analyses in comparative policy studies. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar