456
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY & COUNSELLING

Understanding the dis-embodied representation of continuity in terms of a strongly embodied representation

, &
Article: 2141516 | Received 22 Mar 2022, Accepted 25 Oct 2022, Published online: 04 Nov 2022

References

  • Abrahamson, D., Nathan, M. J., Williams-Pierce, C., Walkington, C., Ottmar, E. R., Soto, H., & Alibali, M. W. (2020). The Future of embodied design for mathematics teaching and learning. Frontiers in Education, 5, 147. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00147
  • Farsani, D., Lange, T., & Meaney, T. (2022). Gestures, systemic functional grammar and mathematics education. Mind, Culture and Activity, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2022.2060260
  • Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts. The role of sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310
  • Gordon, R., & Ramani, G. B. (2021). Integrating embodied cognition and information processing: A combined model of the role of gesture in children’s mathematical environments. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 650286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.65028
  • Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2019). Gesture as simulated action: Revisiting the framework. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(3), 721–752. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1548-0
  • Khatin-Zadeh, O. (2021). How does representational transformation enhance mathematical thinking? Axiomathes. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09602-2
  • Khatin-Zadeh, O., Banaruee, H., Eskandari, Z., & Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2019). Isomorphism: Abstract and concrete representations. Activitas Nervosa Superior, 61(3), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41470-019-00029-0
  • Khatin-Zadeh, O., Eskandari, Z., Cervera-Torres, S., Ruiz Fernández, S., Farzi, R., & Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2021). The strong versions of embodied cognition: Three challenges faced. Psychology & Neuroscience, 14(1), 16–33.
  • Khatin-Zadeh, O., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., & Trenholm, S. (2022). The role of motion‑based metaphors in enhancing mathematical thought: A perspective from embodiment theories of cognition. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-022-00247-6
  • Khatin-Zadeh, O., Yazdani-Fazlabadi, B., & Eskandari, Z. (2021). The grounding of mathematical concepts through fictive motion, gesture and the motor system. For the Learning of Mathematics, 41(3), 19–21.
  • Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs Jr (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17-38). Oxford University Press.
  • Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958
  • Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books.
  • Macedonia, M. (2019). Embodied learning: Why at school the mind needs the body. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2098. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02098
  • Marghetis, T., & Núñez, R. E. (2013). The motion behind the symbols: A vital role for dynamism in the conceptualization of limits and continuity in expert mathematics. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(2), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12013
  • Núñez, R., & Lakoff, G. (1998). What did Weierstrass really define? The cognitive structure of natural and δ-ε continuity. Mathematical Cognition, 4(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467998387343
  • Rosa, M., & Farsani, D. (2021). Two fish moving in their seas: How does the body language of teachers show itself who teach mathematical equations? Acta Scientiae, 23(4), 141–168. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6391
  • Rosa, M., Farsani, D., & Silva, C. (2020). Mathematics education, body and digital games: The perception of body-proper opening up horizons of mathematical knowledge constitution. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 12(2), 310–324.