1,060
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Information & Communications Technology in Education

Evaluating the impact of quality antecedents on university students’ e-learning continuance intentions: A post COVID-19 perspective

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , &
Article: 2222654 | Received 17 Apr 2023, Accepted 02 Jun 2023, Published online: 14 Jun 2023

References

  • Al-Adwan, A. S., Albelbisi, N. A., Hujran, O., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Developing a holistic success model for sustainable e-learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 13(16), 9453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169453
  • Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Sinclair, J., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Computers in human behavior evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
  • Alkhawaja, M. I., Halim, M. S. A., Abumandil, M. S., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2022). System quality and student’s acceptance of the E-Learning system: The serial mediation of perceived usefulness and intention to use. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(2), 350. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11525
  • Al Muhem, A., & Wang, S. (2020). Investigating the effects of quality factors and organizational factors on university students’ satisfaction of e-learning system quality. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1787004. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1787004
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbin, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practise: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  • Chang, C. C. (2013). Exploring the determinants of e-learning systems continuance intention in academic libraries. Library Management, 34(1/2), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121311298261
  • Cheng, Y. M. (2014). Extending the expectation-confirmation model with quality and flow to explore nurses’ continued blended e-learning intention. Information Technology & People, 27(3), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2013-0024
  • Chitanana, L., Makaza, D., & Madzima, K. (2008). The current state of e-learning at universities in Zimbabwe: Opportunities and challenges. The International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 4(2), 5–15. http://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-current-state-of-e-learning-at-universities-in-Chitanana-Makaza/70ad52e2263d8ffddd0373d80cb4846f4a74cd30
  • Cidral, W., Aparicio, M., & Oliveira, T. (2020). Students’ long-term orientation role in e-learning success: A Brazilian study. Heliyon, 6(12), e05735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05735
  • Cooper, R. B., & Zmud, R. W. (1990). Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Science, 36(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.
  • Dangaiso, P., Makudza, F. (2022). The influence of electronic learning service quality on student satisfaction: Evidence from Zimbabwean public universities. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 9(1), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7474398
  • Dangaiso, P., Makudza, F., & Hogo, H. (2022). Modelling perceived e-learning service quality, student satisfaction and loyalty. A higher education perspective. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2145805. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.20222145805
  • Daultani, Y., Goswami, M., Kumar, A., & Pratap, S. (2021). Perceived outcomes of e-learning: Identifying key attributes affecting user satisfaction in higher education institutes. Measuring Business Excellence, 22(3), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-07-2020-0110
  • Davies, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Dehghan, A., Dugger, J., Dobrzykowski, D., & Balazs, A. (2014). The antecedents of student loyalty in online programs. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2013-0007
  • DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.1104574
  • DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2016). Information systems success. Measurement, Foundations and Trends in Information Systems, 135(2), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1561/2900000005
  • Dube, S., & Scott, E. (2017). A survey of university students’ perspectives about using digital technology in education: A Zimbabwean case. Journal of Education, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.5.107
  • Dzvimbo, P. K. (2020). National Context. Zimbabwe Council of Higher Education. 21 March 2023. www.zimche.ac.zw.Retrieved
  • Edelhauser, E., & Lupu Dima, L. (2020). Is Romania prepared for eLearning during the COVID-19 pandemic ? 12(13), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135438
  • Favale, T., Soro, F., Trevisan, M., Drago, I., & Mellia, M. (2020). Campus traffic and e-Learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Computer Networks, 176, 107290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107290
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-Technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Page, M., & Brunsveld, N. (2020). Essentials of business research methods. (4th ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203374
  • Islam, M. K., Sarker, M. F. H., & Islam, M. S. (2022). Promoting student-centred blended learning in higher education: A model. E-Learning & Digital Media, 19(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211027721
  • Jeyaraj, A. (2020). International journal of information management DeLone & McLean models of information system success: Critical meta- review and research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 54(April), 102139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102139
  • Khamis, N., Al, R., Aldarmasi, M., Al, A., Gaddoury, M., Albar, H. M., & Kamal, I. (2021). Journal of infection and public health medical students ’ acceptance and perceptions of e-learning during the covid-19 closure time in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 14(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.11.007
  • Kilburn, B., Kilburn, A., & Davis, D. (2016). Building collegiate e-loyalty: The role of perceived value in the quality-loyalty linkage in online higher education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 9(3), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v9i3.9704
  • Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (5th ed.). The Guilford Press.
  • Kuadey, N., Mahama, F., Ankora, C., Bensah, L., Maale, G. T., Agbesi, V. K., Adjei, L., & Adjei, L. (2022). Predicting students’ continuance use of learning management system at a technical university using machine learning algorithms. Interactive Technology & Smart Education, 20(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2021-0202
  • Kwon, T. H., & Zmud, R. W. (1987). Unifying the fragmented models if information systems implementation. John Wiley & Sons. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/54905.54915
  • Li, Y., Nishimura, N., Yagami, H., & Park, H.-S. An empirical study on online learners ’ continuance intentions in China. (2021). Sustainability, 13(2), 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020889
  • Lwoga, E. T., & Komba, M. (2015). Antecedents of continued usage intentions of web-based learning management system in Tanzania. Education + Training, 57(7), 738–756. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2014-0014
  • Lwoga, E. T., & Sife, A. S. (2018). Impacts of quality antecedents on faculty members ’ acceptance of electronic resources. Library Hi Tech, 36(2), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-01-2017-0010
  • Makudza, F. (2021). Augmenting customer loyalty through customer experience management in the banking industry. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 28(3), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-01-2020-0007
  • Malhotra, N. K., Nunan, D., Birks, D. F., & Malhotra, N. K. (2017). Marketing research. An applied approach (5th ed.). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315088754
  • Mamoodi, Z., Esmaelzadeh-Saeieh, S., Lofti, R., Eftekhari, M. B., Kamrani, M. A., Tourzani, Z. M., & Salehi, K. (2019). The evaluation of a virtual education system based on DeLone and McLean model: A path analysis. F1000research, 6(1), 1631. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12278.1
  • Marandu, E., Makudza, F., & Ngwenya, S. (2019). Predicting students intention and actual use of e-learning using the technology acceptance model: A case from Zimbabwe. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(6), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.6.7
  • Martínez-Argüelles, M. J., & Batalla-Busquets, J. M. (2016). Perceived service quality and student loyalty in an online university. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2518
  • Mukeredzi, T., Kokutse, F., & Dell, S. (2020). Student bodies say e-learning is elitist and unaffordable. www.universityworldnews.com
  • Mwiya, B., Siachinji, B., Bwalya, J., Sikombe, S., Chawala, M., Chanda, H., Kayekesi, M., Sakala, E., Muyenga, A., Kaulungombe, B., Wright, L. T., & Wright, L. T. (2019). Are there study mode differences in perceptions of university education service quality? Evidence from Zambia. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1579414
  • Naveed, Q. N., Alam, M. M., Qahmash, A. I., & Quadri, K. M. (2021). Exploring the determinants of service quality of cloud e-learning system for active system usage. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 4176. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094176
  • Obeng, A. Y., & Coleman, A. (2020). Evaluating the effects and outcome of technological innovation on a web-based e- learning system Evaluating the effects and outcome of technological innovation on a web-based e-learning system. Cogent Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1836729
  • Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2021). Effectiveness of e-learning: The mediating role of student engagement on perceived learning effectiveness. Information Technology & People, 34(7), 1840–1862. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2019-0380
  • Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? evidence from vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3
  • Ramayah, T., Ahmad, N., & Lo, M. C. (2010). The role of quality factors in intention to continue using an e-learning system in Malaysia. Procedia – Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5422–5426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.885
  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.
  • Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2018). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
  • Shanshan, S., & Wenfei, L. (2022). Understanding the impact of quality elements on MOOCs continuance intention. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 10949–10976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11063-y
  • Shehzadi, S., Nisar, Q., Hussain, M., Basheer, M., Hameed, W., & Chaudhry, N. I. (2020). The role of digital learning toward students’ satisfaction and university brand image at educational institutes of Pakistan: A post-effect of COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-04-2020-0063
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
  • UNESCO. (2020). Educational disruption and response. https://en.unesco.org/news/covid-19-educational-disruption-and-response
  • Wang, T., Lin, C. L., & Su, Y. S. (2021). Continuance intention of university students and online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic: A modified expectation-confirmation model perspective. Sustainability, 13(8), 4586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084586
  • WHO. (2023). Covid 19 statistical report: 19 March 2023: 06: 44 CET. www.who.int
  • ZIMCHE. (2020). Current state of online learning in Zimbabwean Universities. https://www.studentportal.news/zw/zimche-website
  • Zmud, R. W. (1982). Diffusion of modern software practices: Influence of centralization and formation. Management Science, 25(10), 966–979. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.25.10.966