2,359
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Self-advocacy in Sweden—an analysis of impact on daily life and identity of self-advocates with intellectual disability

, & | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1304513 | Received 08 Jan 2017, Accepted 07 Mar 2017, Published online: 22 Mar 2017

References

  • Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
  • Anderson, S. (2013). “We just help them, be them really” Building positive, included identities: engagement in self advocacy groups by adults with an intellectual disability (Phd Thesis). Melbourne: La Troube University.
  • Anderson, S., & Bigby, C. (2015). Self-advocacy as a means to positive identities for people with intellectual disability: ‘We just help them, be them really’. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 1–12.
  • Angrosino, M. V. (2004). Participant observation and research on intellectual disabilities. In E. Emerson, C. Hatton, T. Thompson, & T. Parmenter (Eds.), The international handbook of applied research in intellectual disabilities. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Aspis, S. (1997). Self-advocacy for people with learning difficulties: Does it have a future? Disability & Society, 12, 647–654.10.1080/09687599727182
  • Bachke, C. C. (2006). Utviklingshemming: betegnelser i endring i Norden? En litteraturstudiei et terminologisk villnis [Mental retardation: Change of concepts in the Nordic countrys? A literature review in the terminological outback]. Specialpedagogikk, 71, 18–28.
  • Barron, K. (2004). Vem är jag? utvecklingsstörda kvinnor (re)konstruerar sin identitet [Who am I? Women with intellectual disability (re)construct their identity]. In I. K. Barron (Ed.), Genus och funktionshinder [Gender and disability]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Beart, S. (2005). ‘I won’t think of meself as a learning disability. But I have’: social identity and self-advocacy. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 128–131.10.1111/bld.2005.33.issue-3
  • Beart, S., Hardy, G., & Buchan, L. (2004). Changing selves: A grounded theory account of belonging to a self-advocacy group for people with intellectual disabilities1. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 91–100.10.1111/jar.2004.17.issue-2
  • Beart, S., Hardy, G., & Buchan, L. (2005). How people with intellectual disabilities view their social identity: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18, 47–56.10.1111/jar.2005.18.issue-1
  • Bhaskar, R., & Danermark, B. (2006). Metatheory, interdisciplinarity and disability research: A critical realist perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8, 278–297.10.1080/15017410600914329
  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage publications.
  • Buchanan, I., & Walmsley, J. (2006). Self advocacy in historical perspective. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 133–138.10.1111/bld.2006.34.issue-3
  • Burnard, P. (1996). Teaching the analysis of textual data: An experiential approach. Nurse Education Today, 16, 278–281.10.1016/S0260-6917(96)80115-8
  • Chapman, R. (2014). An exploration of the self-advocacy support role through collaborative research: ‘There should never be a them and us’. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27, 44–53.10.1111/jar.2014.27.issue-1
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.10.1086/228943
  • Danermark, B. (2001). Tvärvetenskapens förutsättningar och dynamik – exemplet Handikappforskning [Prerequisites and dynamics of interdisciplinary research - the example of disability Research]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 4, 288–305.
  • Dorozenko, K. P., Roberts, L. D., & Bishop, B. J. (2015). Imposed identities and limited opportunities: Advocacy agency staff perspectives on the construction of their clients with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 19, 282–299.10.1177/1744629515574210
  • Finlay, M., & Lyons, E. (1998). Social identity and people with learning difficulties: Implications for self-advocacy groups. Disability & Society, 13, 37–51.10.1080/09687599826902
  • Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2013). Sociology (7th ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
  • Goodley, D. (1997). Supporting people with learning difficulties in self-advocacy groups and models of disability. Health and Social Care in the Community, 6, 438–446.
  • Goodley, D. (2000). Self-advocacy in the lives of people with learning disabilities. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Goodley, D. (2005). Empowerment, self-advocacy and resilience. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 333–343.10.1177/1744629505059267
  • Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.10.1086/225469
  • Gustavsson, A. (2000). Tolkning och tolkningsteori 1 – introduktion [Interpretations and theory of interpretation 1: Introduction]. Stockholm: Department of Education, Stockholm University, Sweden.
  • Gustavsson, A. (2004). The role of theory in disability research – springboard or strait-jacket? Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6, 55–70.10.1080/15017410409512639
  • Honneth, A. (2012). The I and We: Studies in theory of recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Honneth, A., & Heidegren, C.-G. (2003). Erkännande: Praktisk-filosofiska studier [Recognition: Practical-philosophical studies]. Göteborg: Daidalos.
  • Jahoda, A., Wilson, A., Stalker, K., & Cairney, A. (2010). Living with stigma and the self-perceptions of people with mild intellectual disabilities. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 521–534.10.1111/josi.2010.66.issue-3
  • Kittelsaa, A. M. (2014). Self-presentations and intellectual disability. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 16, 29–44.10.1080/15017419.2012.761159
  • Klotz, J. (2004). Sociocultural study of intellectual disability: Moving beyond labelling and social constructionist perspectives. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 93–104.10.1111/bld.2004.32.issue-2
  • Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Llewellyn, P., & Northway, R. (2008). The views and experiences of people with intellectual disabilities concerning advocacy: A focus group study. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 12, 213–228.10.1177/1744629508095726
  • Mallander, O., Mineur, T., & Tideman, M. (in press). Self-advocacy associations for people with intellectual disability in Sweden-similarities and differences in characteristics.
  • Mineur, T., Tideman, M., & Mallander, O. (submitted). People with Intellectual Disability-Self-advocacy and influence on societal changes.
  • Poetz, C. l. (2003). Reflections on 30 years of involvement in self-advocacy. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 28, 84–86.10.1080/1366825031000086920
  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of America. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  • Ringsby Jansson, B., & Olsson, S. (2006). Outside the system: Life patterns of young adults with intellectual disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8, 22–37.10.1080/15017410500301122
  • Rojas Pernia, S. (2006). Self-determination and adults with intellectual disability. International Medical Review on Down Syndrome, 10, 45–48.10.1016/S2171-9748(06)70069-1
  • Shakespeare, T. (1993). Disabled people’s self-organisation: A new social movement? Disability, Handicap & Society, 8, 249–264.10.1080/02674649366780261
  • Svensson, O., & Lundgren, K. (2002). Mötesplats Tian - om att erövra ett stycke liv. Rapport om en försöksverksamhet, en mötesplats för unga vuxna med lindrig utvecklingsstörning [Meeting place Tenth - to conquer a piece of life. Report on a pilot project, a meeting place for young adults with mild intellectual disabilities]. Halmstad: The Wigforss-group, Halmstad University.
  • Svensson, O., & Tideman, M. (2007). Motvärn, motståndsidentitet och empowerment bland personer med intellektuella funktionshinder [Resist, resistance identity and empowerment of people with intellectual disabilities]. Socialmedicinsk tidskrift, 84, 193–204.
  • Szönyi, K. (2005). Särskolan som möjlighet och begränsning – elevperspektiv på delaktighet och utanförskap [School for students with intellectual disability as an opportunity and restriction – a student perspective on participation and exclusion] (PhD diss.). Stockholm: Stockholm University, Sweden.
  • Thomsson, H. (2010). Reflexiva intervjuer [Reflexive interviews]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Tideman, M., & Svensson, O. (2015). Young people with intellectual disability – The role of self-advocacy in a transformed Swedish welfare system. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 10, 25100. doi:10.3402/qhw.v10.25100
  • Ward, M. J., & Meyer, R. N. (1999). Self-determination for people with developmental disabilities and Autism: Two self-advocates’ perspectives. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 133–139.10.1177/108835769901400302