Advanced search
Publication Cover
Cogent Social Sciences Volume 3, 2017 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
5,540
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Professional methods of assessments in architectural design projects: A focus on the relevant parametric measures in selected Nigerian universities

P.A. AderonmuArchitecture Department, College of Science and Technology, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, NigeriaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6212-5090View further author information
ORCID Icon,
P.O. AwoyeraCivil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Covenant University, PMB 1023, Ota, Ogun State, NigeriaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
A.B. SholankeArchitecture Department, College of Science and Technology, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, NigeriaView further author information
&
M.E. EreborArchitecture Department, College of Science and Technology, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, NigeriaView further author information
|
Farzad Pour RahimianUniversity of Strathclyde, UK
(Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1328793 | Received 26 Jan 2017, Accepted 08 May 2017, Published online: 16 May 2017

References

  • Aderonmu, P. A., Awoyera, P. O., Amole, S. A., Olofinnade, O. M., & Adekeye, A. W. (2016). Parametric measures for design workspace adequacy of selected institutions in Nigeria. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11, 2105–2119.
  • Alagbe, O., Aderonmu, P., Opoko, P., Adeboye, A., Akinjare, O., & Izobo-Martins, O. (2015). Comparison of design studio and jury systems in architectural schools in South-West Nigeria. Global Journal on Humanities and Social Sciences, 1, 430–435.
  • Amedeo, D., & Dyck, J. A. (2003). Activity-enhancing arenas of designs: A case study of the classroom layout. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 20, 323–343.
  • American Institute of Architectural Students (AIAS). (2002). AIAS studio culture task force report. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Anthony, K. H. (1991). Design juries on trial: The renaissance of the design studio. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Attoe, W. (1989). American urban architecture: Catalysts in the design of cities/Wayne Attoe and Donn Logan (vol. XV, p. 190). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Crisp, G. (2007). The e assessment handbook. New York, NY: Continuum.
  • Dorn, C. M., Madeja, S. S., & Sabol, F. R. (2004). Assessing expressive learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ekvall, G. (1991). The organizational culture of idea management: A creative climate for the management of ideas. In J. Henry & D. Walker (Eds.), Managing innovation (pp. 73–79). London: Sage.
  • Franz, J. (2003). Interior design criticism: Between excess and austerity. IDEA Journal, 2013, 11–22.
  • Gero, J. S. (1993). Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design. In M. L. Maher (Eds.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ilozor, B. D. (2006). Balancing jury critique in design reviews. Transactions, 3, 52–79.10.11120/tran.2006.03020052
  • Jackson, G. T., Dempsey, K. B., McNamara, D. S. (2010). The evolution of an automated reading strategy tutor: From the classroom to a game-enhanced automated system, new science of learning: Cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 283–306). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Lindström, L. (2006). Creativity: What is it? Can you assess it? Can it be taught? International Journal of Art Design Education, 25, 53–66.
  • Mahgoub, Y. (2010). Design courses and studio guidelines. Retrieved April 2016, from http://www.slideshare.net/ymahgoub/design-courses-studios-guidelines-yasser-mahgoub
  • OAPA. (2001). Program-based review and assessment; tools and techniques for program improvement (pp. 2–7). Amherst, MA: Office of Academic Planning and Assessment (OAPA Handbook), University of Massachusetts Amherst, UMASS. Retrieved from http://www.umass.edu/oapa
  • Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary (OALD). (2015). (8th ed.). Oxford: OUP.
  • Pressman, R. S. (1997). Software engineering: A practitioner’s approach (4th ed.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.
  • Salamah, A. (1995). New trends in architectural education: Designing the design studio. Raleigh, NC: Tailored Text and Unlimited Potential.
  • Schwarting, J. M. (1984). Beyond style: “Teaching style”; the first term at Columbia. The Journal of the Graduate School of Architecture and Planning, 5, 7.
  • Seidel, A. (1994). Knowledge needs the request of architects. Banking on Design: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the Environmental Design Research. Oklahoma, OK: Association-EDRA.
  • Utaberta, N., Hassanpour, B., & Bahar, M. A. (2013). An evaluation of criteria-based assessment and grading in architecture design. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5, 346–352.
  • Webster, H. (2006). Power, freedom and resistance: Excavating the design jury. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 25, 286–296.10.1111/jade.2006.25.issue-3
  • Wormelli, R. (2006). Fair isn’t always equal: Assessing and grading in the differentiated classroom (pp. 89–90). Portland, ME: Stenhouse. ISBN 10:1571104240 ISBN 13: 9781571104243, Softcover.
Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.