1,128
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reading housing satisfaction parameters over housing mobility in the redevelopment process: Sarigol, Istanbul, Turkey

ORCID Icon & | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1412915 | Received 06 Jul 2017, Accepted 30 Nov 2017, Published online: 22 Jan 2018

References

  • Amérigo, M., & Aragonés, J. I. (1997). A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(1), 47–57. doi:10.1006/jevp.1996.0038
  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well being: Americans perceptions of life quality. New York, NY: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4684-2253-5
  • Atkinson, R. (2005). Neighbourhoods and the impacts of social mix: Crime, tenure diversification and assisted mobility (CNR Paper, 29.a).
  • Berkoz, L., & Kellekci, O. (2005). Determining the factors that increase dwelling and environmental quality satisfaction in Istanbul. 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Land Use and Water Management in a Sustainable Network Society”, 23–27 August 2005. Amsterdam: The Netherlands.
  • Bridge, G., Butler, T., & Lees, L. (2012). Mixed communities: Gentrification by stealth? Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Byun, G., & Ha, M. (2016). The factors influencing residential satisfaction by public rental housing type. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 15(3), 535–542. doi:10.3130/jaabe.15.535
  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Political Science Quarterly, 91(3), 529. doi:10.2307/2148954
  • Francescato, G., Weidemann, S., & Anderson, J. R. (2017). Evaluating the built environment from the users’ perspective: Implications of attitudinal models of satisfaction. Building Performance Evaluation, 87–97. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_7
  • Gaziosmanpasa Municipality Report. (2014). Retrieved May 6, 2017, from http://www.bing.com/cr?IG=C745357336C443BBA52A613E05C6735F&CID=3033969E216566EE20809C6B206367D5&rd=1&h=VJm8m0IxduFVy88oFvojLcJHrxHRFubTdOU-q5_jTkY&v=1&r=http%3a%2f%2fwww.gaziosmanpasa.bel.tr%2f&p=DevEx,5063.1
  • Greasley, K., & Ashworth, P. (2007). The phenomenology of “approach to studying”: The university student’s studies within the lifework. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 819–843.10.1080/01411920701656977
  • Hur, M., & Morrow-Jones, H. (2008). Factors that influence residents satisfaction with neighborhoods. Environment and Behavior, 40(5), 619–635. doi:10.1177/0013916507307483
  • Ibem, E. O., Opoko, A. P., Adeboye, A. B., & Amole, D. (2013). Performance evaluation of residential buildings in public housing estates in Ogun State, Nigeria: Users satisfaction perspective. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2(2), 178–190. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2013.02.001
  • Kahraman, Z. (2013). Dimensions of housing satisfaction: A case study based on perceptions of rural migrants living in Dikmen. Metu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 30(01), doi:10.4305/metu.jfa.2013.1.1
  • Kleit, R. G., & Manzo, L. C. (2006). To move or not to move: Relationships to place and relocation choices in HOPE VI. Housing Policy Debate, 17(2), 271–308. doi:10.1080/10511482.2006.9521571
  • Manzo, L. C., & Devine-Wright, P. (2014). Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods, and applications. London: Routledge.
  • Marans, R. W. (2003). Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: the 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 73–83. doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00239-6.
  • Marans, R. W. (2014). Detroit area studies (DAS). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 1594–1596. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_714
  • Marans, R. W., & Rodgers, W. (1975). Toward an understanding of community satisfaction. In A. H. Hawley & V. P. Rock (Eds.), Metropolitan America in contemporary perspective (pp. 299–352). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Mohamed, M. F., Mohammad Yusoff, W. F., Iman Pratama, T. M., & Raman, S. N. (2014). Satisfaction perception of indoor environment of low-cost housing: A case study of Flat Taman Desa Sentosa. E3S Web of Conferences, 3, 01001. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20140301001
  • Mohit, M. A., & Raja, A. M. (2014). Residential satisfaction – Concept, theories and empirical studies. Planning Malaysia Journal, 12(3), doi:10.21837/pmjournal.v12.i3.131
  • Mulder, C. H., & Wagner, M. (2010). Union dissolution and mobility: Who moves from the family home after separation? Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1263–1273. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00763.x
  • Newman, K., & Wyly, E. K. (2006). The right to stay put, revisited: Gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York City. Urban Studies, 43(1), 23–57. doi:10.1080/00420980500388710
  • Oktay, D., & Marans, R. W. (2011). Neighbourhood satisfaction among diverse groups of inhabitants: Findings from Famagusta Area Study, Enhr Conference 2011 – 5–8 July, Toulouse, France.
  • Onibokun, A. G. (1974). Evaluating consumers satisfaction with housing: An application of a systems approach. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 40(3), 189–200. doi:10.1080/01944367408977468
  • Pinkster, F. M., & Boterman, W. R. (2017). When the spell is broken: Gentrification, urban tourism and privileged discontent in the Amsterdam canal district. cultural geographies, 24(3), 457–472. doi:10.1177/1474474017706176
  • Posthumus, H., Bolt, G., & van Kempen, R. (2013). Why do displaced residents move to socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods? Housing Studies, 28(2), 272–293.10.1080/02673037.2013.767886
  • Ranci, C. (2010). Social vulnerability in Europe: The new configuration of social risks. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230245778
  • Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Salleh, A. G. (2008). Neighbourhood factors in private low-cost housing in Malaysia. Habitat International, 32(4), 485–493. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.01.002
  • Satsangi, M., & Kearns, A. (1992). The use and interpretation of tenant satisfaction surveys in British social housing. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 10(3), 317–331. doi:10.1068/c100317
  • Sen, B. (2008). Kentsel Donusum: Kavramsal Karmasa ve Neoliberalizm, Iktisat Dergisi, No: 499.
  • Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–77. doi:10.1177/1558689806292430
  • Tieskens, K. F., & Musterd, S. (2013). Displacement and urban restructuring in Amsterdam; following relocatees after demolition of social housing. Urban Research & Practice, 6(2), 194–210. doi:10.1080/17535069.2013.808432
  • Turkun, A. (2014). Mulk, mahal, insan: İstanbul’da kentsel dönüşüm. Sisli: Istanbul Bilgi University.
  • Uitermark, J., Duyvendak, J. W., & Kleinhans, R. (2007). Gentrification as a governmental strategy: Social control and social cohesion in Hoogvliet, Rotterdam. Environment and Planning A, 39(1), 125–141. doi:10.1068/a39142
  • Varady, D. P., & Carrozza, M. A. (2000). Toward a better way to measure customer satisfaction levels in public housing: A report from Cincinnati. Housing Studies, 15(6), 797–825. doi:10.1080/02673030020002555
  • Yalçintan, M. C., Çaliskan, Ç. O., Çilgin, K., & Dündar, U.. (2014). Istanbul Dönüsüm Cografyasi . In A. Bartu Candan & C. Ozbay (Eds.), Yeni Istanbul Çalismalari: Sinirlar, Mücadeleler, Açilimlar (47–70). Istanbul: Metis Press.