Digital governance and information technologies in local action groups (LAGs)

References

• Aagaard-Thuesen, A. (2010). Is LEADER elitist or inclusive? Composition of Danish LAG boards in the 2007–2013 rural development and fisheries programmes. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(1), 31–45. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, K., & Kovách, I. (2010). LAGging behind or LEADER in local democracy? An assessment of LEADER-type development projects as a tool for democratic integration in the contested countryside (3/2010 SSKH Notat–SSKH Reports and Discussion Papers). p. 34. Retrieved from http://sockom.helsinki.fi/info/notat/notat_1003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Angeon, V., & Lardon, S. (2008). Participation and governance in territorial development projects: The ‘territory game’ as a local project Leadership system. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 11(2–4), 262–281. doi:10.1504/IJSD.2008.026505
   Google Scholar
• Annibal, I., Liddle, J., & McElwee, G. (2013). Animating ‘bottom-up’ sustainable strategies in village settings. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 33(11–12), 742–761. doi:10.1108/IJSSP-03-2013-0036
   Google Scholar
• Arabatzis, G., Andreopoulou, Z., Koutroumanidis, T., & Manos, B. (2010). E-government for rural development: Classifying and ranking content characteristics of development agencies websites. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 11(3), 1138–1149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, N. P. (2005). An overview of the change management process in eGovernment. International Journal of Electronic Business, 3(1), 68–87. doi:10.1504/IJEB.2005.006389
   Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson, S. (2017). The realm of freedom in new rural governance: Micro-politics of democracy in Sweden. Geoforum, 79, 58–69. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmore, F. H., Farrington, J. H., & Skerratt, S. (2017). Community-led broadband in rural digital infrastructure development: Implications for resilience. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 408–425. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, P. A. (2010). International ideal and local practice–Access to environmental information and local government in Poland. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(1), 44–56. doi:10.1002/eet.528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(1), 78–91. doi:10.1108/17506161211214831
   Google Scholar
• Böcher, M. (2008). Regional governance and rural development in Germany: The implementation of LEADER+. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(4), 372–388. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bon, A., de Boer, V., Gyan, N. B., van Aart, C., De Leenheer, P., Tuyp, W., & Tangara, A. (2013). Use case and requirements analysis in a remote rural context in mali. In International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (pp. 331–346). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37422-7_24
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, G., Rizzo, F., Marquardt, D., Strijker, D., Haartsen, T., & Aagaard-Thuesen, A. (2016). Identifying social innovations in European local rural development initiatives. Innovation: the European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(4), 442–461. doi:10.1080/13511610.2016.1176555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpio, L. G. T. (2015). Cointegration to estimate long-term electricity prices in periods of rationing: The case of the brazilian hydrothermal system. Electric Power Systems Research, 121, 351–356. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2014.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, R., & Slaymaker, T. (2002). ICTs and rural development: Review of the literature, current interventions and opportunities for action (pp. 1–36). Eldis Programme, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Choudrie, J., Weerakkody, V., & Jones, S. (2005). Realising e-government in the UK: Rural and urban challenges. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(5), 568–585. doi:10.1108/17410390510624016
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, C. (2010). e-Participation experiences and local government in Catalonia: An explanatory analysis. In International Conference on Electronic Participation (pp. 82–94). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15158-3_7
   Google Scholar
• Convery, I., Soane, I., Dutson, T., & Shaw, H. (2010). Mainstreaming LEADER delivery of the RDR in Cumbria: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(4), 370–391. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00519.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristóvão, A., & Baptista, A. (2012). Local development associations: A study of their nature, missions and organizational challenges. Spanish Journal of Rural Development, 3(1), 39–52. doi:10.5261/2012.GEN1.03
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. (2007). The limits of partnership: An exit-action strategy for local democratic inclusion. Political Studies, 55(4), 779–800. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00677.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delin, M. (2012). The role of farmers in Local Action Groups: The case of the national network of the Local Action Groups in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics, 58(9), 433–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Puente, J. M., Montero, A. C., & de Los Ríos Carmenado, I. (2009). Empowering communities through evaluation: Some lessons from rural Spain. Community Development Journal, 44(1), 53–67. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsm008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, S. E., & Wegrich, K. (2016). The role of transparency in regulatory governance: Comparing US and EU regulatory systems. Journal of Risk Research, 19(9), 1141–1157. doi:10.1080/13669877.2015.1071868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1997). Building the European information society for us all (Final policy report of the high-level expert group). Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2001). White Paper on European Governance, Brussels, COM (2001, 428). Retrieved October 24, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/governance/white_paper/en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010a). Europe 2020 – A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, Brussels. p. 37. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_es.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010b). A digital agenda for Europe (pp. 42). Brussels. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). The EU explained: Digital agenda for Europe. http://europa.eu/pol/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). Cork 2.0 declaration ‘a better life in rural areas’. Retrieved from https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/cork-20-and-future-rural-development_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). Agriculture rural development. Leader+. Contact Point. Retrieved from https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/about_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Evaluating CLLD. Handbook for LAGs and FLAGs. FAME (Fisheries and Aquaculture Monitoring and Evaluation). Retrieved from https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/cms/farnet2/sites/farnet/files/publication/en_farnetguide15fsu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Economic and Social Committee. (2017a). EU public consultations in the digital age: Enhancing the role of the EESC and civil society organisations. Author. https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files/qe-07-17-001-en-n.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Economic and Social Committee. (2017b). The future evolution of civil society in the European Union by 2030. CNVOS Centre for Information Service Co-operation and Development of NGOs. Retrieved from https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files/qe-04-17-886-en-n.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Network for Rural Development. (2014). Community-led local development for local actors. Retrieved from https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/guidance_clld_local_actors_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Network for Rural Development. (2016). Rural responses to challenges in Europe (EU Rural Review 21). Retrieved from https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/publi-enrd-rr-21-2016-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fałkowski, J. (2013). Political accountability and governance in rural areas: Some evidence from the pilot programme LEADER+ in Poland. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 70–79. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.04.00
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Tabales, A., Foronda-Robles, C., Galindo-Pérez-de-Azpillaga, L., & García-López, A. (2017). Developing a system of territorial governance indicators for tourism destinations. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1–31. doi:10.1080/09669582.2016.1260136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fésüs, G. (2014). Reforming policies for regional development: The European perspective. Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(1), 57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Furmankiewicz, M., Janc, K., & Macken-Walsh, Á. (2016). The impact of eu governance and rural development policy on the development of the third sector in rural poland: A nation-wide analysis. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 225-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galindo-Pérez-de-Azpillaga, L., Foronda-Robles, C., & García-López, A. (2014). The value of trust: An analysis of social capital in natural areas. Social Indicators Research, 118(2), 673–694. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0427-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallent, N., Juntti, M., Kidd, S., & Shaw, D. (2008). Introduction to rural planning, natural and built environment series. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gkartzios, M., & Scott, M. (2014). Placing housing in rural development: Exogenous, endogenous and neo-endogenous approaches. Sociologia Ruralis, 54(3), 241–265. doi:10.1111/soru.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, S. (2000). Rural areas in the information society: Diminishing distance or increasing learning capacity? Journal of Rural Studies, 16(1), 13–21. doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00027-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High, C., & Nemes, G. (2007). Social learning in LEADER: Exogenous, endogenous and hybrid evaluation in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 47(2), 103–119. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00430.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, R., & Hoffmann, N. (2018). The leader programme as an impulse for new projects in rural areas. Quaestiones Geographicae, 37(2), 141–150. doi:10.2478/quageo-2018-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., Luo, Q., & Zou, C. (2013). A framework of new rural e-government and the related information resources integration. International Journal of U-And e-Service, Science and Technology, 6(6), 83–96. doi:10.14257/ijunesst.2013.6.6.09
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., & Woolley, J. (2014). The email-diary: A promising research tool for the 21st century? Qualitative Research, 31, 1–17. doi:10.1177/1468794114561347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovách, I. (2000). LEADER, a new social order, and the Central and East-European countries. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 181–189. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, T. W., & Reckhow, S. (2013). Network governance and regional equity: Shared agendas or problematic partners? Planning Theory, 12(2), 115–138. doi:10.1177/1473095212455189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopolito, A., Sisto, R., Barbuto, A., & Da Re, R. (2015). What is the impact of LEADER on the local social resources? Some insights on Local Action Group’s aggregative role. Rivista di Economia Agraria, 70(1), 55–75. doi:10.13128/REA-16977
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, A. S., & Johansson, A. (2017). Digital rurality: Producing the countryside in online struggles for rural survival. Journal of Rural Studies, 51, 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutgen, V., & Van der Linden, B. (2015). Regional equilibrium unemployment theory at the age of the Internet. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 53, 50–67. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAPAMA (Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente/Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment). (2017). Desarrollo Rural. Programas de Desarrollo Rural Cofinanciados por la UE. Periodo de Programación 2014–2020. Programas de Desarrollo Rural (PDR). Retrieved from http://www.mapama.gob.es/es/desarrollo-rural/temas/programas-ue/periodo-2014-2020/programas-de-desarrollo-rural/
   Google Scholar
• Mariën, I., Heyman, R., Salemink, K., & Van Audenhove, L. (2016). Digital by default. Consequences, casualties and coping strategies. In J. Servaes & T. Oyedemi (Eds.), Social inequalities, media and communication: Theory and roots, lexington books digital by default: Consequences, casualties and coping strategies..
   Google Scholar
• MINETAD (Ministry of Industry, Energy and Tourism). (2016). Broadband coverage in Spain in the first quarter of 2016. http://www.minetad.gob.es/telecomunicaciones/banda-ancha/cobertura/Documents/Cobertura-BA-1Trimestre2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Cañavate, A., & Hípola, P. (2011). Electronic administration in Spain: From its beginnings to the present. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 74–90. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardone, G., Sisto, R., & Lopolito, A. (2010). Social capital in the LEADER initiative: A methodological approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(1), 63–72. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, F. A., Woods, M., & Cejudo, E. (2015). The LEADER initiative has been a victim of its own success. The decline of the bottom‐up approach in rural development programmes. The cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(2), 270–288. doi:10.1111/soru.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho, Y. (2010). NGOs, the Internet and sustainable rural development: The case of Indonesia. Information, Communication & Society, 13(1), 88–120. doi:10.1080/13691180902992939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). The new rural paradigm: Policies and governance. Paris: Author. http://www.oecd.org/gov/regional-policy/thenewruralparadigmpoliciesandgovernance.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ottomano Palmisano, G., Govindan, K., Boggia, A., Loisi, R. V., De Boni, A., & Roma, R. (2016). Local Action Groups and rural sustainable development. A spatial multiple criteria approach for efficient territorial planning. Land Use Policy, 59, 12–26. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappalardo, G., Marquardt, D., & Pecorino, B. (2014). Assessing social relationships within Local Action Groups: A worthwhile tool for measuring lags’ effectiveness. Experiences from two Sicilian leader lags. In: B. de Gennaro & G. Nardone (eds.), Sustainability of the agri-food system: Strategies and Performances. Proceedings of the 50th SIDEA Conference. Lecce: Chiostro dei Domenicani. 2013, September 26–28. Retrieved from www.sidea.org/Lecce_2013_files/Atti%20Sidea_EBOOK.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parker, A. N. (1995). Decentralization: The way forward for rural development? (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1475). pp. 1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Pascoe, S., Tobin, R., Windle, J., Cannard, T., Marshall, N., Kabir, Z., & Flint, N. (2016). Developing a social, cultural and economic report card for a regional industrial harbour. PLoS one, 11(2), e0148271. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, L., Cottrill, C., Farrington, J., Williams, F., & Ashmore, F. (2017). The digital divide: Patterns, policy and scenarios for connecting the ‘final few’in rural communities across Great Britain. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 386–398. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picazo-Vela, S., Gutiérrez-Martínez, I., & Luna-Reyes, K. L. F. (2012). Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 504–511. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2010). Is e‐government leading to more accountable and transparent local governments? An overall view. Financial Accountability & Management, 26(1), 3–20. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.00488.x
   Google Scholar
• Pisani, E., & Christoforou, A. (2017). Evaluation of social capital in LEADER: What’s in and what’s out? In Springer (Ed.), Social capital and local development (pp. 109–134). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pisani, E., Franceschetti, G., Secco, L., & Da Re, R. (2014, June 25–27). Trust in the LEADER approach: The case study of the Veneto region in Italy. In 2014 Third Congress. Alghero, Italy: Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA). (No. 197453).
   Google Scholar
• Pollermann, K., Raue, P., & Schnaut, G. (2017, June 4–7). Input for and output of local governance in rural development. In Regional Studies Association, Annual Conference 2017: The Great Regional Awakening: New Directions. Ireland: Trinity College Dublin. [Conference:].
   Google Scholar
• Ray, C. (2000). Endogenous socio-economic development in the European Union—Issues of evaluation. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(4), 447–458. doi:10.1016/s0743–0167(00)00012–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddick, C. G., & Aikins, S. K. (2012). Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance. In Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance (pp. 1–7). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, E., Anderson, B. A., Skerratt, S., & Farrington, J. (2017). A review of the rural-digital policy agenda from a community resilience perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 372–385. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M. (2004). Building institutional capacity in rural Northern Ireland: The role of the partnership governance in the LEADER II programme. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 49–59. doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00042-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortall, S. (2008). Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation and social capital: Exploring the differences. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(4), 450–457. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisto, R., Lopolito, A., & van Vliet, M. (2018). Stakeholder participation in planning rural development strategies: Using backcasting to support Local Action Groups in complying with CLLD requirements. Land Use Policy, 70, 442–450. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Governance network research: Towards a second generation. In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (eds,), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 1–21). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spilanis, I., Kizos, T., & Giordano, B. (2016). The effectiveness of European Regional Development Fund projects in Greece: Views from planners, management staff and beneficiaries. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(2), 182–197. doi:10.1177/0969776413498761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, D. (1999). Issues of integration, participation and empowerment in rural development: The case of LEADER in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(3), 307–315. doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00073-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susarla, A., Oh, J. H., & Tan, Y. (2012). Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from youtube. Information Systems Research, 23(1), 23-41. doi: 10.2307/23207870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, L. (2015). Empowering rural youth with Facebook: Lessons from a local Swedish case-study. Community Development Journal, 5(3), 436–451. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsv024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talò, C. (2017). The role of intermediate institutions in community development. The case of LAGs. Perspectives on Rural Development, 2017(1), 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Teilmann, K. (2012). Measuring social capital accumulation in rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 28, 458–465. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tovey, H. (2008). Introduction: Rural sustainable development in the knowledge society era. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(3), 185–199. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00460.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volk, A., & Bojnec, Š. (2014). Local action groups and the LEADER co-financing of rural development projects in Slovenia. Agricultural Econ.–Czech, 60, 364–375. doi:10.17221/180/2013-AGRICECON
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Kuzmickaja, I., Stol, K. J., Abrahamsson, P., & Fitzgerald, B. (2014). Microblogging in open source software development: The case of drupal using twitter. IEEE Software, 31(4), 72–80. doi:10.1109/MS.2013.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371–391. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagüe, J. L., De Nicolas, V. L., & Martínez, J. L. (2013). Leader rural development program in Spain: Profile and functions of workers in local action groups. Rural Development, 6(1), 543–547.
   Google Scholar
• Yamaoka, K., Tomosho, T., Mizoguchi, M., & Sugiura, M. (2008). Social capital accumulation through public policy systems implementing paddy irrigation and rural development projects. Paddy Water Environ, 6, 115–128. doi:10.1007/s10333-008-0113-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeemering, E. S. (2014). International connections for local government sustainability initiatives: Networks linking Detroit and Windsor. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 119–140. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00648.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar