21,691
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The impact of opinion-gap, reasoning-gap, and information-gap tasks on EFL learners’ speaking fluency

ORCID Icon, & | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1630150 | Received 27 Dec 2018, Accepted 06 Jun 2019, Published online: 20 Jun 2019

References

  • Abdallah, M., & Mansour, M. (2015). Virtual task-based situated language-learning with second life: Developing EFL pragmatic writing and technological self-efficacy. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 2, 150.
  • Ahmed, R. Z., & Bidin, S. J. B. (2016). The effect of task-based language teaching on writing skills of EFL learners in Malaysia. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 6, 207–16. doi:10.4236/ojml.2016.63022
  • Al Nashash, A. H. (2006). Designing a task- based program and measuring its effect on oral and written communicative skills among Jordanian EFL secondary stage students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Amman Arab University.
  • Aliakbari, M., & Jamalvandi, B. (2011). The impact of ‘role play’ on fostering EFL learners’ speaking ability: A task-based approach. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 15–29.
  • Aliakbari, M., & Mohsennejad, F. (2014). The effect of story retelling opinion gap task on Iranian EFL students’ speaking skill. Advances in English Language and Literature, 1(2), 7–15. www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/download/347/pdf347
  • Bailey, K. M. (2005). Practical English language teaching: Speaking. New York: The Mc Graw Hill Companies, Inc.
  • Breiner-Sanders, K. E., Lowe, P., Miles, J., & Swender, E. (2000). ACTFL proficiency guidelines-speaking. Foreign Language Annals, 33(1), 13–19. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2000.tb00885.x
  • Chambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? System, 25(4), 535–544. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00046-8
  • Ellis, R. (2004). Tasked-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
  • Fallahi, S., Aziz Malayeri, F., & Bayat, A. (2015). The effect of information-gap vs. opinion-gap tasks on Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(3), 170–181. http://www.ijeionline.com/attachments/article/40/IJEIonline_Vol.2_No.3_2015-3-17.pdf
  • Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In D. Kempler & W. S. Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85–102). New York: Academic Press.
  • Ganta, T. (2015). The strengths and weaknesses of task-based learning (TBL) approach. SRJIS, 3(14), 2760–2771.
  • Harmer, J. (2001). Practice of English language teaching. Edinburgh Gate: Longman.
  • Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English: An introduction to the practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Longman.
  • Hartmann, R. R. K., & Stork, F. C. (1976). Dictionary of language and linguistics. New York: Wiley.
  • Hassan, A. (2014). The effect of using task-based learning in teaching English on the oral performance of the secondary school students. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 3(2), 250–264. doi:10.12816/0003003
  • Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Huffman, K. (2009). Assessment of speech: Fluency. [Pamphlet]. Nashville: Tennessee Department of Education.
  • Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Marzban, A., & Hashemi, M. (2013). The impact of opinion-gap tasks on the speaking of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 943–948. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.142
  • Mizera, G. J. (2008). Working memory and L2 oral fluency. PhD Dissertation. University of Pittsburgh. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/129749943.pdf
  • Namaziandost, E., Abdy Saray, A., & Rahimi Esfahani, F. (2018). The effect of writing practice on improving speaking skill among pre-intermediate EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(2), 1690–1697. doi:10.17507/tpls.0812.16
  • Namaziandost, E., Rahimi Esfahani, F., Nasri, M., & Mirshekaran, R. (2018). The effect of gallery walk technique on pre-intermediate EFL learners’ speaking skill. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 8, 1–15.
  • Nunan, D. (2006). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nunan, D., & Keobke, K. (1995). Task difficulty from the learner’s perspective: Perceptions and reality. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 18, 1–12. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.129.8327&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford, England: Oxford University press.
  • Rabbanifar, A., & Mall-Amiri, B. (2017). The comparative effect of opinion gap and reasoning gap tasks on complexity, fluency, and accuracy of EFL learners’ speaking. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 16(4), 55–77. www.ijllalw.org/finalversion1646.pdf
  • Rouhi, A., & Marefat, H. (2006). Planning time effect on fluency, complexity and accuracy of L2 output. Pazhuheshe Zabanha-Ye Khareji, 27, 123–141. https://www.sid.ir/En/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=38878
  • Sarıcoban, A., & Karakurt, L. (2016). The use of task-based activities to improve listening and speaking skills in EFL context. Sino-US English Teaching, 13(6), 445–459. doi:10.17265/1539-8072/2016.06.003
  • Seyyedi, K., & Ismail, M. (2012). Task-based instruction. International Journal of Linguistic, 4(3), 110–128. doi:10.5296/ijl.v4i3.2203
  • Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00071
  • Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 439–473. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00446.x