1,307
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Two centuries of Greek governments from a social network analysis perspective

ORCID Icon | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1951463 | Received 10 Dec 2020, Accepted 22 Jun 2021, Published online: 26 Jul 2021

References

  • Ahmed, W., & Lugovic, S. (2019). Social media analytics: Analysis and visualisation of news diffusion using NodeXL. Online Information Review, 43(1), 149–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2018-0093
  • Asako, Y., Iida, T., Matsubayashi, T., & Ueda, M., (2015). Dynastic politicians: Theory and evidence from japan. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S146810991400036X 
  • Barabasi, A. L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004). Network biology: Understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1272
  • Barabási, A. L., & Réka, A. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
  • Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2003). Pajek - analysis and visualization of large networks. In M. Juenger & P. Mutzel (Eds.), Graph drawing software (series mathematics and visualization) (pp. 77–103). Springer.
  • Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks, 19(3), 243–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00301-2
  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies.
  • Cadena, J., Korkmaz, G., Kuhlman, C. J., Marathe, A., Ramakrishnan, N., Vullikanti, A., & Preis, T. (2015). Forecasting social unrest using activity cascades. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0128879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128879
  • Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heider’s theory. Psychological Review, 63(5), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046049
  • Chase Dunn, R. (2019). You sir are a hypocrite: Responses to Pence’s MLK Day tweets as attention intervention. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 27(5), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1647206
  • Confessore, N. (2018, April 4). Cambridge analytica and Facebook: The scandal and the fallout so far. The New York Times.
  • Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695(5), 1–9. https://igraph.org/
  • Easly, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Network, crowds and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University Press.
  • Feathersone, K., & Papadimitriou, D. (2012). The Emperor has no clothes! Power and resources within the Greek core executive. Governance, 26(3), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01610.x
  • Folke, O., Persson, T., & Rickne, J. (2018). Dynastic political rents? Economic benefits to relatives of top politicians. The Economic Journal, 127(605), F495–F617. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12494
  • Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Empirical Press, Vancouver.
  • Friedlander, T., Mayo, A. E., Tlusty, T., Alon, U., & Rzhetsky, A. (2015). Evolution of Bow-Tie architectures in biology. PLOS Computational Biology, 11(3), e1004055. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004055
  • Geys, B., & Smith, D. (2017). Political dynasties in democracies: Causes, consequences and remaining puzzles. The Economic Journal, 127(605), F446–F454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12442
  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
  • Gruzd, A., & Tsyganova, K. (2015). Information wars and online activism during the 2013/2014 Crisis in Ukraine: Examining the social structures of Pro‐ and Anti‐Maidan groups. Policy & Internet, 7(2), 121–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.91
  • Hagberg, A. A., Schult, D. A., & Swart, P. J. 2008. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX, Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008), eds. G. Varoquaux, T. Vaught, & J. Millman, Pasadena, CA USA, pp. 11–15.
  • Hage, P., & Harary, F. (1983). Structural models in anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
  • Heaney, M. T., & MacClurg, S. D. (2009). Social networks and American politics. American Politics Research, 37(5), 727–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X09337771
  • Holme, P., & Saramäki, J. (2012). Temporal networks. Physics Reports, 519(3), 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.001
  • Humphries, M. D., & Gurney, K. (2008). Network small-world-ness: A quantitative method for determining canonical network equivalence. PLOS ONE, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002051
  • JafariAsbagh, M., Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2014). Clustering memes in social media streams. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 4(237), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-014-0237-x
  • Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
  • Karakatsanis, N. M. (2017). Review of the book Prime Ministers in Greece: The Paradox of Power by K. Featherstone and D. Papadimitriou (review). Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 35(2), 580–583. https://doi.org/10.1353/mgs.2017.0037
  • Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. Routledge
  • Keller, T. R., & Ulrike Klinger, U. (2019). Social bots in election campaigns: Theoretical, empirical, and methodological implications. Political Communication, 36(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1526238
  • Kydros, D., & Anastasiadis, A. (2017). Greek political language during the economic Crisis—A network analytic approach. Social Networking, 6(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.4236/sn.2017.62010
  • Kydros, D., & Trevlakis, N. (2012). A network analysis of the Greek parliament and some socio-economic issues. MIBES Transactions International Journal, 6(1), 27–38. http://mibes.uth.gr/vol6_2012/Kydros-Magoulios-Trevlakis.pdf
  • Misruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271
  • Morales, A. J., Borondo, J., Losada, J. C., & Benito, R. M. (2014). Efficiency of human activity on information spreading on Twitter. Social Networks, 39, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.03.007
  • Newman, M., Barabási, A. L., & Watts, D. (2006). The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press.
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(23), 8577–8696. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103
  • Patrikios, S., & Chatzikonstantinou, M. (2015). Dynastic politics: Family ties in the Greek Parliament, 2000–12. South European Society and Politics, 20(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2014.942989
  • Querubin, P. (2016). Family and politics: Dynastic persistence in the Philippines, quarterly. Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014182
  • Smith, M., Ceni, A., Milic-Frayling, N., Shneiderman, B., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Leskovec, J., & Dunne, C. (2010). NodeXL: A free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010/2013/2016, from the Social Media Research Foundation: https://www.smrfoundation.org
  • Sotiropoulos, D. A., & Bourikos, D. (2002). Ministerial elites in Greece, 1843-2001: A synthesis of old sources and new data. South European Society and Politics, 7(2), 153–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608740708539628
  • Ward, M. D., Stovel, M. D., & Sacks, A. (2011). Network analysis and political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040907.115949
  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, Series Number 8). Cambridge University Press.
  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918
  • Wellman, B. (1988). Thinking structurally. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structure: A network approach (pp. 1–15). Cambridge University Press.
  • Yaqub, U., Chun, S. A., Atluri, V., & Vaidya, J. (2017). Analysis of political discourse on twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.001
  • Zafiropoulos, K. (2012). Connectivity practices and activity of Greek political blogs. Future Internet, 4(3), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4030719
  • Zeri, P. (2014). Political blogosphere meets off-line public sphere: Framing the public discourse on the Greek Crisis. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1579–1595. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2012/1152
  • Żukiewicz, P., Zieliński, M., & Domagała, K. (2018). Social network analysis as a research method in political science. An attempt to use it in coalition research. Przegląd Politologiczny, 4, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2018.23.4.3