Supervision experiences of postgraduate students at an ODL institution in South Africa

References

• Ali, P., Watson, R., & Dhingra, K. (2016). Postgraduate research students’ and their supervisors’ attitudes towards supervision. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 227–16. Retrieved May 12, 2019, from http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3541
   Google Scholar
• Alston, M., Allan, J., Bell, K., Brown, A., Dowling, J., Hamilton, P., McKinnon, J. (2005). “SERPS Up” support, engagement and retention of postgraduate students–A model of postgraduate support. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 45(2), 172–190.https://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/2895/
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, W. R. (1993). Transactional distance, interactive television, and electronic mail communication in graduate public health and nursing courses: Implications for professional education [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, W. R., Bisconer, S. W., Kooker, B. M., & Woods, L. C. (1996). Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649609526937
   Google Scholar
• Borders, D. L., Kelly, W. L., Granello, D. H., Chang, C. Y., Danica, H. G., Pepperell, J., & Spurgeon, S. L. (2012). Association for Counselor Education and Supervision guidelines for research mentorship: Development and implementation. Counselor Education and Supervision, 51(3), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2012.00012.x
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. F. (2010). Toward ‘hybridised’ faculty development for the twenty‐first century: Blending online communities of practice and face‐to‐face meetings in instructional and professional support programmes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.498177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffarella, R. S., & Barnett, B. G. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/030750700116000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, R. M., Carlisle, K., Kirk-Jenkins, A. J., Hill, T., & Polychronopoulos, G. B. (2013). Distance supervision in human services. Journal of Human Services, 33(1), 17–28. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/chs_pubs/27
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, C. (2016). Writing-centred supervision for postgraduate students [Published Doctoral Thesis]. University of the Witwatersrand Faculty of Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, R. A. (2006). Cyber supervision of entry level practicum supervisees: The effect on Aquisition of counselor competence and confidence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/bitstream/handle/1840.16/5097.etd.pdf?sequence+1
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-J. (2001a). Transactional distance in World Wide Web leaming environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290110074533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-J. (2001b). Dimensions of transactional distance in World Wide Web leaming environment: A factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clingerman, T. L., & Bernard, J. M. (2004). An investigation of the use of e‐mail as a supplemental modality for clinical supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44(2), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2004.tb01862.x
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, L. (2006). Countering isolation - Joining the research community. In C. Denholm & T. Evans (Eds.), Doctorates downunder: Keys to successful doctoral study in Australia and New Zealand (pp. 34–40). Acer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Devenish, R., Dyer, S., Jefferson, T., Linley, L., van Leeuwen, S., & Fazakerley, V. (2009). Peer to peer support: The disappearing work in the doctoral student experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubi, M., Raggi, M., & Reynolds, J. (2012). Distance supervision: The PIDIB model. Vistas online (pp. 21–25).
   Google Scholar
• Erichsen, E. A., Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2014). Student satisfaction with graduate supervision in doctoral programs primarily delivered in distance education settings. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (1995). Postgraduate research supervision in the emerging ‘open’ universities. Australian Universities’ Review, 38(2), 23–27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ523106.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fergie, G., Beeke, S., McKenna, C., & Crème, P. (2011). “It’s a lonely walk”: Supporting postgraduate researchers through writing. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 236–245. https://eric.edu.gov/?id=EJ946149
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, T. (2009). The ‘write’ skills and more: A thesis writing group for doctoral students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260902734968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourie-Malherbe, M., Aitchison, C., Blitzer, E., & Albertyn, R. (2016). (Re)Considering postgraduate education and supervision in the knowledge society. In M. Fourie-Malherbe, C. Aitchison, E. Blitzer, & R. Albertyn (Eds.), Postgraduate supervision - future foci for the knowledge society (pp. 1–12). SUN Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K. (2010). Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high- and low- completing departments: A qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11778970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v1i1.2
   Google Scholar
• Giossos, Y., Koutsouba, M., Lionarakis, A., & Skavantzos, K. (2009). Reconsidering Moore’s transactional distance theory. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 12(2), 1-6. Retrieved July 21, 2019, from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2009&halfyear=2&article=374
   Google Scholar
• Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005). A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 1–11. http://www.anitacrawley.net/Resources/Articles/Gorsky%2520and%2520Capsi%2520Critical%2520Analysis%2520Transactional%2520Distance%2520Theory.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guri-Rosenblit, S. (1999). Distance and campus universities: Tensions and interactions – A comparative study of five countries. Issues in higher education series. Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, M., Lingard, B., Rizvi, F., & Taylor, S. (2001). The OECD, globalisation and education policy. Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, D. R., Hodgson, P. K., Simari, R. D., & Nishimura, R. A. (2010). Mentoring: Making the transition from mentee to mentor. Circulation, 121(2), 336–340. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.798321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
   Google Scholar
• Isik, A. H., Rukiye, K., & Gnan, G. (2010). Postgraduate students’ attitudes towards distance learning (The case study of Gazi University). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 218–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.139
   Google Scholar
• Jung, D. I. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P. (2013). The science of words and the science of numbers: Research method in health - Foundations for evidence-based practice. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Littlefield, C. M., Taddei, L. M., & Radosh, M. E. (2015). Organic collaborative teams: The role of collaboration and peer to peer support for part-time doctoral completion. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.28945/2113
   Google Scholar
• Manville, B., & Foote, N. (1996). Strategy as if knowledge mattered. Fast Company, 2(1), 66https://www.fastcompany.com/26696/strategy-if-knowledge-mattered.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. (2012). Supervising doctorates at a distance: Three trans‐Tasman stories. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881211198239
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L. (2016). Why might you use narrative methodology? A story about narratives. Estonian Journal of Education, 4(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2016.4.1.02b
   Google Scholar
• McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIsaac, M. S., & Charlotte, N. G. (1996). Distance education: Handbook for research on educational communications and technology. In Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.), Association for educational communications and technology, (pp. 403–437). Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H. and Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in Education: Evidence-based inquiry, MyEducationlab Series. Midrand: Pearson
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. G. (1996). Distance education: A system view. Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Nasiri, F., & Mafakheri, F. (2015). Postgraduate research supervision at a distance: A review of challenges and strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1962–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, J., Hardcastle, L., & Richardson, B. (2009). Learning from a distance: The experience of remote students. Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 53–74. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/596/974
   Google Scholar
• Paul, H., Kimble, C., & Wright, P. (2000). Communities of practice in the distributed international environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 1367–3270 https://arxiv.org/ftp/cs/papers/0101/0101012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, C. L. A., & Akkary, R. K. (2010). A cohort, is a cohort, is a cohort … or is it? Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5(5), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277511000500501
   Google Scholar
• Radda, H., & Mandernach, J. B. (2012). Doctoral education online: Challenging the paradigm. Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1–8. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1102131.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saba, F., & Shearer, R. L. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526844
   Google Scholar
• Saleem, T., & Mehmood, N. (2018, December). Assessing the quality of supervision experiences in the different research stages at postgraduate level. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(2), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i2.1851
   Google Scholar
• Sindlinger, J. (2011). Doctoral students’ experience with using the reflecting team model of supervision [Doctoral dissertation]. Duquesne University. Retrieved July 12, 2019, from https://dsc.duq.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2214&context=etd
   Google Scholar
• Starke, E., and Kumar, V. (2014). Realising graduate attributes in the research degree: The role of peer support groups. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 616–629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stracke, E. (2010). Undertaking the journey together: Peer learning for a successful and enjoyable PhD experience. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 7(1), 8. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp.vol7/iss1/8
   Google Scholar
• Stracke, E., & Kumar, V. (2014). Realising graduate attributes in the research degree: The role of peer support groups. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 616–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.901955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063
   Google Scholar
• Tschang, T. (2001). The basic characteristics of skills and organizational capabilities in the Indian software industry (ADBI Research Paper Series).
   Google Scholar
• Tschang, T. F. (2001). Virtual universities and learning environments: Characterizing their emergence and design. In T. F. Tschang & T. G. Della Senta (Eds.), Access to knowledge: New information technologies and the emergence of the virtual university (pp. 17–52). Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccaro, N., and Glen, W. L. (2007). Computer-based counselor-in-training supervision: Ethical and practical implications for counselor educators and supervisors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 47(1), 46–57
   Google Scholar
• Vyncke, M. (2012). The concept and practice of critical thinking in academic writing: An investigation of international students’ perceptions and writing experiences [Published MA Thesis]. King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T., & Li, L. Y. (2011). ’Tell me what to do ’ vs ‘guide me through it’: Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411402438
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. C. (2003). Computer-based supervision: Implementing computer technology into the delivery of counseling supervision. Journal of technology in counseling, 3(1), 1–13
   Google Scholar
• Wiegman, R. (2013). What is a mentor? Retrieved July 04, 2019, Duke Graduate Scool: Duke University. from https://gradschool.duke.edu/professional-development/mentoring/what-mentor
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L., & Louw, I. (2018). Reconsidering postgraduate “supervision” from a participatory action learning and action research approach. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(4), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.20853/32-4-2562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelditch, M. (1990, March 16-18). Mentor roles. Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the Western Association of graduate schools.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, A. M. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction [Doctoral Dissertation]. Virginia Commonwealth University.
   Google Scholar