The concept of holistic group liability

References

• Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1998). The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature, 393(6684), 470–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/30982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the republic: Lying in politics, civil disobedience on violence, thoughts on politics, and revolution. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, I., & Nalebuff, B. (2015). The rule of probabilities: A practical approach for applying Bayes’ rule to the analysis of DNA evidence. Stanford Law Review, 67(6), 1447–1503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabasi, A. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Perseus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beauvois, J.-L. (2000). Razprava o liberalni sužnosti: Analiza podrejanja. Krt.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1981). Brain of the firm: A development in management cybernetics (2nd ed.). Herder and Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2012). The role of risk in regulatory processes. In R. Baldwin, M. Cave, & M. Lodge (Eds.), The oxford handbook of regulation (Reprint ed., pp. 302–348). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bon, G. L. (2001). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Batoche Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bon, G. L. (2016). Psihologija množic: Študija vsakdanjega mišljenja. UMco.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, M. (2014). The power of others: Peer pressure, groupthink, and how the people around us shape everything we do (e-book). Oneworld Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Canetti, E. (1981). Crowds and power (C. Stewart, Trans.). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, R. (2012). Proving History: Bayes’s theorem and the quest for the historical jesus. Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chabris, C., & Simons, D. (2010). The invisible gorilla: And other ways our intuitions deceive us. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, H. F., & Romig, H. G. (1959). Sampling inspection tables: Single and double sampling. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, D. (2020). The return of collective intelligence: Ancient wisdom for a world out of balance. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, W. (1999). Decision science and technology: Reflections on the contributions of ward Edwards. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, W., Miles, R. F., Jr, & von Winterfeldt, D. (2007). Advances in decision analysis: From foundations to applications. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R. (2019). The wave principle. Lulu Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 47(2 Suppl.), 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., & Juslin, P. (Eds.). (2006). Information sampling and adaptive cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, M. O., & Fairley, W. B. (1970). A Bayesian approach to identification evidence. Harvard Law Review, 83(3), 489–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/1339656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, J. (Ed.). (1998). The politics of risk society. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (2007). Množična psihologija in analiza jaza. In Spisi o družbi in religiji (pp. 7–74). Društvo za teoretsko psihoanalizo.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, F. (1907). Vox Populi. Nature, 75(1949), 450–451. https://doi.org/10.1038/075450a0
   Google Scholar
• Green, M., & Brock, T. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narrative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (2001). An introduction to probability and inductive logic. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. (1998). Fenomenologija duha. Analecta.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Rothstein, H., & Baldwin, R. (2001). The government of risk: Understanding risk regulation regimes. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, H., & Elster, J. (Eds.). (2012). Collective wisdom: Principles and mechanisms. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malik, C. (2010). Ahead of change: How crowd psychology and cybernetics transform the way we govern. Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mcgloin, J. M., & Thomas, K. J. (2016). Incentives for collective deviance: Group size and changes in perceived risk, cost, and reward*. Criminology, 54(3), 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, P. (2016). Culture in Networks. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. (2021). Definition of accountability. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/accountability
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (2009). Obedience to authority: An experimental view (Reprint ed.). Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Molak, V. (1996). Fundamentals of risk analysis and risk management. CRC-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M., Barabási, A.-L., & Watts, D. J. (2011). The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1996). Public management occasional papers pay reform in the public service initial impact on pay dispersion in Australia, Sweden and the United Kingdom No. 10: Initial impact on pay dispersion in Australia, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Regulatory policy and governance: Supporting economic growth and serving the public interest.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Recommendation of the council on regulatory policy and governance. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, E. A., O’Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W. A., Funayama, E. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(5), 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900562552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (2008). Velika preobrazba: Politični in ekonomski viri našega časa. /* cf.
   Google Scholar
• Prechter, R. R. (1999). The wave principle of human social behavior and the new science of socionomics. New Classics Library.
   Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H. (1994). The prescriptive orientation of decision making: A synthesis of decision analysis, behavioral decision making, and game theory. In S. Ríos (Ed.), Decision theory and decision analysis: Trends and challenges (pp. 3–13). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. (1984). The St. Pauls’ riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/EJSP.2420140102
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, A. S. (2003). Social identity and self-categorization theories’ contribution to understanding identification, salience and diversity in teams and organizations. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 5, 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-0856(02)05011-9
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (Ed.). (2013). The oxford handbook of evidence-based management. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, E. G., & Neubauer, D. V. (2009). Acceptance sampling in quality control (Second ed.). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior (4th ed.). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1996). Risk perception and trust. In V. Molak (Ed.), Fundamentals of risk analysis and risk management. CRC-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stojčević, D., & Romac, A. (1989). Dicta et regulae iuris: Latinska pravna pravila, izreke i definicije sa prevodom i objašnjenjima. Savremena administracija.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, C., Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2017). On the role of a social identity analysis in articulating structure and collective action: The 2011 riots in Tottenham and Hackney. The British Journal of Criminology, 57(4), 964–981. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azw036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., & Reisch, L. A. (2019). Trusting Nudges. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds (Reprint ed.). Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks & Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (2010). Gabriel tarde on communication and social influence: Selected papers. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tovey, M. (Ed.). (2008). Collective intelligence: Creating a prosperous world at peace. Earth Intelligence Network.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., & Blader, S. (2013). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, D., & King, M. (2005). The disorderly crowd: From classical psychological reductionism to socio-contextual theory–the impact on public order policing strategies. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(5), 490–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2005.00393.x
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J. (2004). Six degrees: The science of a connected age. W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J. (2011). Everything is obvious: *Once you know the answer. Crown Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J. (2018). Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherill, G. B. (2013). Sampling inspection and quality control (Second ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, A. W., Aggarwal, I., & Malone, T. W. (2015). Collective intelligence and group performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 420–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415599543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 17, 237–307.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G. (2008). The lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. Random House Trade Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar