Meta-analysis of political communication research on Twitter: Methodological trends

References

• Akerele-Popoola, O. E., Azeez, A. L., & Adeniyi, A. (2022). Twitter, civil activisms and EndSARS protest in Nigeria as a developing democracy. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2095744. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2095744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonakaki, D., Fragopoulou, P., & Ioannidis, S. (2021). A survey of Twitter research: Data model, graph structure, sentiment analysis and attacks. Expert Systems with Applications, 164, 114006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arroyo Barrigüete, J. L., Barcos, L., Bellón, C., & Corzo, T. (2022). One year of European premiers leadership and empathy in times of global pandemic: A Twitter sentiment analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2115693. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2115693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessi, A., & Ferrara, E. (2016). Social bots distort the 2016 US Presidential election online discussion. First Monday, 21(11–7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2019). The global disinformation order: 2019 global inventory of organised social media manipulation. University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2011septiembre8) New methodologies for researching news discussion on Twitter. In The Future of Journalism Cardiff University. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/46330/
   Google Scholar
• Bustamante, E. (2018). Informe sobre el estado de la Cultura en España. España y el espacio cultural iberoamericano. Libros de la Catarata: ISBN 978-84-9097-466-7
   Google Scholar
• Bustamante, E. (2019). La construcción del espacio iberoamericano de comunicación y cultura. Integraciones y des-integraciones. TSN Transatlantic Studies Network: Revista de Estudios Internacionales, 5(8), 117–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cadwalladr, C. (2017). The great British Brexit robbery: How our democracy was hijacked. The Guardian, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Campan, A., Atnafu, T., Truta, T. M., & Nolan, J. (2018). Is data collection through Twitter streaming API useful for academic research? 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 3638–3643. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2018.8621898
   Google Scholar
• Campos-Domínguez, E. (2017). Twitter y la comunicación política. El profesional de la información, 26(5), 785. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.01
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J. P., Rosa, H., Brogueira, G., & Batista, F. (2017). MISNIS: An intelligent platform for twitter topic mining. Expert Systems with Applications, 89, 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018). Research on political information and social media: Key points and challenges for the future. El profesional de la información, 27(5), 964. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.sep.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congosto, M., Basanta-Val, P., & Sanchez-Fernandez, L. (2017). T-Hoarder: A framework to process Twitter data streams. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 83, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.01.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deller, R. A. (2011). Twittering on: Audience research and participation using Twitter. Participations, 8(1), 216–245.
   Google Scholar
• Del Río, M. A. C., Pullaguari-Zaruma, K. P., & Prada-Espinel, O. A. (2019). Comparativa de la competencia mediática en comunicación política vía Twitter durante las campañas electorales de candidatos presidenciales en España, Ecuador y Colombia. Contratexto, 32(032), 41–70. https://doi.org/10.26439/contratexto2019.n032.4606
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, K. (2014). Working Within a Black Box: Transparency in the Collection and Production of Big Twitter Data. 20.
   Google Scholar
• Edo-Osagie, O., De La Iglesia, B., Lake, I., & Edeghere, O. (2020). A scoping review of the use of Twitter for public health research. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 122, 103770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Planells, A., Feixa Pampols, C., & Figueroas-Maz, M. (2013). 15-M en España: diferencias y similitudes en las prácticas comunicativas con los movimientos previos. Última década, 21(39), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22362013000200006
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media: A Critical Introduction. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, H. R., & Lynch, T. L. (2017). Into the Meta: Research methods for moving beyond social media surfacing. TechTrends, 61(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0140-6
   Google Scholar
• González-Oñate, C., Jiménez-Marìn, G., & Sanz-Marcos, P. (2020). Consumo televisivo y nivel de interacción y participación social en redes sociales: análisis de las audiencias millennials en la campaña electoral de España. Profesional de la información, 29(5). https://revista.profesionaldelainformacion.com/index.php/EPI/article/view/78304/62583
   Google Scholar
• Grynspan, R. (2021). «La Cumbre Iberoamericana de Jefes de Estado y de Gobierno y la cooperación del Espacio Cultural Iberoamericano». Monograma. Monograma Revista Iberoamericana de Cultura y Pensamiento, 9(9), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.36008/monograma.2021.09.2009
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Solé, F., Suárez-Gonzalo, S., Rovira, C., & Codina, L. (2020). Social media, context collapse and the future of data-driven populism. Profesional de la información, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haman, M., & Školník, M. (2021). Politicians on social media. The online database of members of national parliaments on Twitter. Profesional de la información, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.mar.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattem, D., & Lomicka, L. (2016). What the Tweets say: A critical analysis of Twitter research in language learning from 2009 to 2016. E-Learning and Digital Media, 13(1–2), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753016672350
   Google Scholar
• Hermida, A. (2010). Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512781003640703
   Google Scholar
• Hermida A. (2013). Journalism: Reconfiguring journalism research about Twitter, one tweet at a time. Digital Journalism, 1(3), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2013.808456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N., & Kollany, B. (2016). Bots, #strongerin and #brexit: Computational Propaganda during the UK-EU Referendum. Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Karami, A., Lundy, M., Webb, F., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). Twitter and research: A systematic literature review through text mining. Institute of Electrical and Electronics EngineersAccess, 8, 67698–67717. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983656
   Google Scholar
• López Abellán, M. (2012). Twitter como instrumento de comunicación política en campaña: Elecciones Generales de 2011. Cuadernos de Gestión de Información, 2(2), 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lytras, M. D., Visvizi, A., Daniela, L., Sarirete, A., & Ordonez De Pablos, P. (2018). Social networks research for sustainable smart education. Sustainability, 10(9), 2974. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10092974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marín Dueñas, P. P., Simancas González, E., & Berzosa Moreno, A. (2019). Uso e influencia de Twitter en la comunicación política: el caso del Partido Popular y Podemos en las elecciones generales de 2016. Cuadernos info, 45(45), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.45.1595
   Google Scholar
• Marr, B. (2018, may 21). How much data do we create every day? Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/05/21/how-much-data-do-we-create-every-day-the-mind-blowing-stats-everyone-should-read/
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, P., & Perrault, E. (2022). Of supranodes and socialwashing: Network theory and the responsible innovation of social media platforms. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2135236. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2135236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero Corrales, L. (2018). Facebook y Twitter: Un recorrido por las principales líneas de investigación. Revista Reflexiones, 97(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.15517/rr.v97i1.33283
   Google Scholar
• Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., & Liu, H. (2014). When is it biased?: Assessing the representativeness of twitter’s streaming API. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’14 Companion, 555–556. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2576952
   Google Scholar
• Noor, S., Guo, Y., Shah, S. H. H., Nawaz, M. S., & Butt, A. S. (2020). Research synthesis and thematic analysis of twitter through bibliometric analysis. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 16(3), 88–109. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSWIS.2020070106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2015). Political Communication. In E. J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition) (pp. 342–349). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.95025-6
   Google Scholar
• Nyoka, P., & Tembo, M. (2022). Dimensions of democracy and digital political activism on Hopewell Chin’ono and Jacob Ngarivhume Twitter accounts towards the July 31st demonstrations in Zimbabwe. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2024350. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.2024350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmedo-Neri, R. A. (2021). La comunicación política en Internet: el caso de #RedAMLO en México. Universitas-XXI, Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 34(34), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.17163/uni.n34.2021.05
   Google Scholar
• Percastre-Mendizábal, S., Pont-Sorribes, C., & Codina, L. (2017). A sample design proposal for the analysis of Twitter in political communication. El profesional de la información, 26(4), 579. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.jul.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaffenberger, F. (2016). Twitter als Basis wissenschaftlicher Studien. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14414-2
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., Mayer, K., & Morstatter, F. (2018). Tampering with Twitter’s Sample API. EPJ Data Science, 7(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0178-0
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Hoyos, C., Salmón, I. H., & Fernández-Díaz, E. (2015). Research on SNS and education: The state of the art and its challenges. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), Article 1 https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Soler, J. (2017). Twitter research for social scientists: A brief introduction to the benefits, limitations and tools for analysing Twitter data. Dígitos Revista de Comunicación Digital, 1(3). Art. 3. https://doi.org/10.7203/rd.v1i3.87.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado Andrade, E. (2021). Memes y procesos de semiosis de la pandemia en México. Comunicación y sociedad, 18. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2021.7906
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Zuluaga, U. H. (2017). Identificación de las condiciones para la promoción del mercado común iberoamericano de la cultura en el sector de las industrias creativas dentro del marco de la creación del Espacio Cultural Iberoamericano. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid. http://hdl.handle.net/10115/14824
   Google Scholar
• Sinnenberg, L., Buttenheim, A. M., Padrez, K., Mancheno, C., Ungar, L., & Merchant, R. M. (2017). Twitter as a tool for health research: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 107(1), e1–8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Splidsboel-Hansen, F., van der Noordaa, R., Bogen, Ø., & Sundbom, H. (2018). Kremlin Trojan Horses: Russian Influence in Denmark. Atlantic Council.
   Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, S., Mirbabaie, M., Ross, B., & Neuberger, C. (2018). Social media analytics – Challenges in topic discovery, data collection, and data preparation. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tromble, R., Storz, A., & Stockmann, D. (2017). We don’t know what we don’t know: When and how the use of twitter’s public APIs biases scientific inference. Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3079927
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2014). Big questions for social media big data: Representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. ICWSM ’14: Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1403.7400
   Google Scholar
• Ur Rehman, I. (2019). Facebook-Cambridge analytica data harvesting: What you need to know. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2019(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.12968/sece.2019.8.11
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, K., & Gumieny, C. (2020). Public police’s philanthropy and Twitter communications in Canada. Policing: An International Journal, 43(5), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-03-2020-0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, K. (2014). What do we get from twitter—and what not? A close look at twitter research in the social sciences. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, 41(3), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-3-238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., & Muñoz-Justicia, J. (2020a). A bibliometric overview of twitter-related studies indexed in web of science. Future Internet, 12(5), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12050091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., & Muñoz-Justicia, J. (2020b). Free and low-cost twitter research software tools for social science. Social Science Computer Review, 40(1), 124–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320904318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar