722
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
GEOGRAPHY

Managing learning outcomes with technology in Ghanaian higher education

ORCID Icon
Article: 2282507 | Received 25 Dec 2022, Accepted 08 Nov 2023, Published online: 27 Nov 2023

References

  • Al-Adwan, A. S., Albelbisi, N. A., Hujran, O., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Developing a holistic success model for sustainable e-learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 13(16), 9453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169453
  • Al-Adwan, A. S., Nofal, M., Akram, H., Albelbisi, N. A., & Al-Okaily, M. (2022). Towards a sustainable adoption of E-Learning systems: The role of self-directed learning. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 21, 245–23. https://doi.org/10.28945/4980
  • Almrashdeh, I. A., Sahari, N., Zin, N. A. M., & Alsmadi, M. (2011). Distance learning management system requirements from student’s perspective. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 24(1), 17–27.
  • Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conference environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
  • Asamoah, M. K., & Oheneba-Sakyi, Y. (2017). Constructivist tenets Applied in ICT-Mediated teaching and learning: Higher education perspectives. Africa Education Review, 14(3–4), 196–211. ISBN 1753-5921 (Online) ISBN 1814—6927 (Print) https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2017.1279956
  • Awuah, P. (2012). Pathway to a new Africa. Retrieved November 12, 2019 https://ssir.org/articles/entry/path_to_a_new_africa
  • Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors’ adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176008
  • Chen, P. Y., & Popovich, P. M. (2002). Correlation: Parametric and nonparametric measures. Sage Publications.
  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2016). Big data comes to school: Implications for learning, assessment, and research. AERA Open, 2(2), 2332858416641907. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416641907
  • Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom uses of technology since 1920. Teachers College Press.
  • Dennen, V. P., & Paulus, T. M. (2005). Researching “collaborative knowledge building” in formal distance learning environments. Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: Learning 2005, the next ten years (pp. 96–104), Taipei, Taiwan: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
  • Eastmond, D. V. (1995). Alone but together: Adult distance study through computer conferencing. Hampton Press.
  • Fuller, D., Norby, R. F., Pearce, K., & Strand, S. (2000). Internet teaching by style: Profiling the online professor. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 75–89.
  • Garrison, R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st Century: A framework for research and practice. 23.
  • Green, C. J., van Gyn, G. H., Moehr, J. R., Lau, F. Y., & Coward, P. M. (2004). Introducing a technology enabled problem-based learning approach into a health informatics curriculum. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 73(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.11.013
  • Hassini, E. (2006). Student-instructor communication: The role of E-mail. Computers & Education, 47(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.014
  • Hirschheim, R. (2005). The Internet-based education bandwagon: Look before you leap. Communications of the ACM, 48(7), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/1070838.1070844
  • Janicki, T., & Liegle, J. O. (2001). Development and evaluation of a framework for creating web-based learning modules: A pedagogical and systems approach. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i1.1887
  • Jolliffe, I. (2002). Principal component analysis. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Karaman, S., Kucuk, & Aydemir, M. (2013). Evaluation of an online continuing education program from the perspective of new graduate nurses. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 836–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.006
  • Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J. W., & Kreijns, K. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(3), 16–38. New York https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504675
  • Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562904271199
  • Naveh, G., Tubin, D., & Pliskin, N. (2012). Student satisfaction with learning management systems: A lens of critical success factors. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 21(3), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2012.720413
  • Ngnenbe, T. (2018) Poor education to affect Ghana’s human capital, graphic online, Retrieved November 12, 2019. November 6, 2018 https://www.graphic.com.gh/news/general-news/poor-education-to-affect-ghana-s-human-capital.html
  • Nikou, S., & Maslov, I. (2021). An analysis of students’ perspectives on e-learning participation–the case of COVID-19 pandemic. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-12-2020-0220
  • Noesgaard, S. S., & Ørngreen, R. (2015). The effectiveness of e-learning: An explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-learning effectiveness. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(4), 278–290.
  • Rapuano, S. (2006). A learning management system including laboratory experiments on measurement instrumentation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 55(5), 1757–1767. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2006.880309
  • Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51–70.
  • Ruberg, L. F., Moore, D. M., & Taylor, C. D. (1996). Student participation, interaction, and regulation, in a computer-mediated communication environment: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(3), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.2190/7PPF-FQBJ-1RJM-CACT
  • Shank, R. (1998). Horses for courses. Communication of the ACM, 41(7), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/278476.278482
  • Shaw, P. J. A. (2003) Multivariate statistics for the Environmental Sciences, Hodder-Arnold. ISBN 0-340-80763
  • Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interactivity, design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
  • Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & Maher, G. (2000). Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.2190/W4G6-HY52-57P1-PPNE
  • Tutu, R., Boateng, J., & Boateng, R. (2016). Technology mediated student-instructor interactions in a graduate course: Students’ perception and preferences in an African context. Report to CODESRIA, In press. 1–32.
  • Vrasidas, C. (2004 March, 14 -17). Issues of pedagogy and design in e-learning systems. The ACM symposium on applied computing, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2020). Appraising research on personalized learning: Definitions, theoretical alignment, advancements, and future directions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1747757
  • Wells, R. (1992). Computer-mediated communication for Distance Education: An international review of design, teaching, and Institutional issues (ACSDE monograph No. 6). University Park, PA The American Center for the Study of Distance Education.’