Understanding the legitimation of the EU-Ukraine action plan – a discourse historical approach to EU foreign policy on Ukraine after the orange revolution

References

• 6512/05: Note from the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union to the Permanent Representatives Committee. Subject: Draft “Council conclusions on Ukraine”. 17 February. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin-Dügzit, S. (2014). Critical discourse analysis in analysing European Union foreign policy: Prospects and challenges. Cooperation and Conflict, 49(3), 354–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713494999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzozowski, A. Euractiv (Website). https://www.euractiv.com.
   Google Scholar
• Dijk, V., & Teun, A. (2011). Discourse Studies – a Multidisciplinary Introduction. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, M., & Eriksson, G. “Press conferences,” 342–354. In: The Routledge Handbook of Politics and Langauge, Eds. Ruth Wodak & Bernhard Forchtner. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, F. S. (2006, June). The EU and Ukraine: Rhetorical entrapment? European Security, 15(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662830600903561
   Google Scholar
• Karatnycky, A. (2005, March). Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. Foreign Affairs, 84(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostagiannis, K. (2014). Hans Morgenthau and the tragedy of the nation-state. The International History Review, 36(3), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2013.828639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2013). Policy, policy communication and discursive shifts: Analysing EU policy discourses on climate change. In Piotr Cap & Urszula Okulska (Eds.), Analysing genres in political communication. Theory and practice (pp. 101–133). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Maresceau, M. (2004). EU enlargement and EU Common strategies on Russia and Ukraine. An ambiguous but yet unavoidable connection,” 181-219. In Christophe Hillion (Ed.), EU enlargement: A legal approach. Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Milliken, J. (1999). The study of discourse in International relations: A critique of research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5(2), 225–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). The new moral force of nationalistic universalism. In Knopf, A. (Eds.), Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (pp. 267–269).
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J. (2022). Joe Inwood and Steve Rosenberg. BBC News. website. https://www.bbc.com/news
   Google Scholar
• Popova, O., Prokopenko, A., & Yehorova, O. (2019). The concept of European integration in the EU-Ukraine perspective: Notional and interpretative aspects of language expression. On-Line Journal Modelling the New Europe, (29), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.24193/OJMNE.2019.29.03
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M. (2014). Argumentation analysis and the discourse-historical approach – a methodological framework. In Christopher Hart & Piotr Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 67–96). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M. (2017, July). The discourse-historical approach.In In John Flowerdew & John. E Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 44–59). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (Eds.), Methods for critical discourse analysis (2nd revised ed., pp. 87–121). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rheindorf, M., & Wodak, R. (2018). Borders, fences, and limits – protecting Austria from refugees: Metadiscursive negotiation of meaning in the Current refugee crisis. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(1–2), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1302032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, M. (2007, December). EU-Ukraine relations after the Orange Revolution: The role of the new member states. Perspectives on European Politics & Society, 8(4), 505–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850701641023
   Google Scholar
• Semeniy, O. (2007). Ukraine’s European policy as an alternative choice – achievements, mistakes and prospects. In Stephen Velychenko (Ed.), Ukraine, the EU and Russia – history, culture and international relations (pp. 123–137). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Simão, L. (2022). Unpacking the EU’s International Actorness: Debates, Theories and concepts. In Maria Raquel Freire & Paula Duarte Lopes (Eds.), EU global actorness in a world of contested leadership: Policies, instruments and perceptions (pp. 13–32). Daniela Nascimento and Licínia Simão.
   Google Scholar
• Solonenko, I. (2007). The EU’s impact on democratic transformation in Ukraine. In Stephen Velychenko (Ed.), Ukraine, the EU and Russia – history, culture and international relations (pp. 138–150). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–21). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2015). Chapter 1: Populism and Politics: Transgressing norms and taboos eds. Mila Steele, Jamer Piper . In The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean (pp. 1–21). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Zasenko, O. E. Encyclopædia Britannica (Website). https://www.britannica.com.
   Google Scholar