Analyzing the impact of the organization of Turkic states on the foreign trade of member countries

References

• Abazov, R. (1999). Policy of economic transition in Kyrgyzstan. Central Asian Survey, 18(2), 197–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634939995687
   Google Scholar
• Ağaç, G., & Birdoğan, B. (2016). Sağlık alanında çok kriterli karar verme teknikleri kullanımı: Literatür incelemesi. Hacettepe Sağlık İ daresi Dergisi, 19(3), 343–363.
   Google Scholar
• Akilli, E. (2019). Türksoy, Türk Keneşi ve Kültürel Diplomasi: İşlevselciliğin Yeniden Tahayyülü. Bilig, 91(91), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9101
   Google Scholar
• Aktaş, N., & Demirel, N. (2021). A hybrid framework for evaluating corporate sustainability using multi-criteria decision-making. Environment Development and Sustainability, 23(10), 15591–15618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01311-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktürk, Ş. (2006). Turkish–Russian relations after the cold war (1992–2002). Turkish Studies, 7(3), 337–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840600891034
   Google Scholar
• Alleyne, A., & Lorde, T. (2014). A gravity model approach to analyzing the trade performance of caricom members states. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 14(2), 145–160.
   Google Scholar
• Amirbek, A., Anuarbekuly, A., & Makhanov, K. (2017). Türk dili konuşan ülkeler entegrasy- onu: Tarihsel geçmişi ve kurumsallaşması. Bölgesel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(3), 164–204.
   Google Scholar
• Avikal, S., Singh, A. K., Kumar, K. N., & Badhotiya, G. K. (2021). A fuzzy-ahp and topsis based approach for selection of metal matrix composite used in design and structural applications. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 11050–11053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.161
   Google Scholar
• Aynagöz Çakmak, Ö., Eralp, A., & Tunçay, C. M. (2015). Trade facilitation and black sea economic cooperation organization: Analysis of turkey with the gravity model approach. The Macrotheme Review, 8(4), 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Baghirov, O. (2022). The organization of Turkic States’ economic potential and cooperation prospects among its members. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 27(1), 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Baki, P. M. (2014). From a cooperation process to a cooperation mechanism in Eurasia: Turkic council. Bilge Strateji, 6(11), 133–162.
   Google Scholar
• Batsaikhan, U., & Dabrowski, M. (2017). Central Asia—twenty-five years after the breakup of the USSR. Russian Journal of Economics, 3(3), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2017.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Beaufils, V., & Tomin, J. (2020). Stochastic approach to worldwide language classification: The signals and the noise towards long-range exploration.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut, E., & Şimşek, A. İ. (n.d.). Evaluation of financial performance of some technology companies traded in borsa Istanbul by topsis method. Fırat Üniversitesi Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 103–130.
   Google Scholar
• Çalışır, A. (2019). The cooperation council of Turkic speaking states: Regional cooperation and integration in central Asia [ Master’s thesis, Anadolu Üniversitesi-Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü].
   Google Scholar
• Çelikbilek, Y., & Tüysüz, F. (2020). An in-depth review of theory of the topsis method: An experimental analysis. Journal of Management Analytics, 7(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2020.1748528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, S. E. (1997). Undeclared war: The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict reconsidered. Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, 20, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• De Almeida, A. T., Alencar, M. H., Garcez, T. V., & Ferreira, R. J. P. (2017). A systematic literature review of multicriteria and multi-objective models applied in risk management. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 28(2), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpw021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Brito, M. M., & Evers, M. (2016). Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: A survey of the current state of the art. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16(4), 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1019-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, C. (2022). The organization of Turkic states: Implications for the regional balance of power. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 39–71. (Spec. Issu). https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.1104776
   Google Scholar
• Djanibekov, N., Rudenko, I., Lamers, J., & Bobojonov, I. (2010). Pros and cons of cotton production in Uzbekistan.
   Google Scholar
• Eicker, F. (1963). Asymptotic normality and consistency of the least squares estimators for families of linear regressions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(2), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704156
   Google Scholar
• Ekanayake, E., Mukherjee, A., & Veeramacheneni, B. (2010). Trade blocks and the gravity model: A study of economic integration among asian developing countries. Journal of Economic Integration, 25(4), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2010.25.4.627
   Google Scholar
• Erol, M. S., & Çelik, K. E. (2017). Dil ve Güvenlik: Avrupa Güvenlik ve İşbirliği Teşkilatı’nın Azınlık Dili Politikası. Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı, 15(23), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.348268
   Google Scholar
• Eygü, H. (2022). Panel data analysis in investigation the economic growth of Turkic states. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilgilerde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi (IJONASS), 6(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.38015/sbyy.1075022
   Google Scholar
• Geybullayev, G., & Kurubaş, E. (2002). Türk cumhuriyetlerinin entegrasyonu: Fırsatlar, sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 19–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gharleghi, B., & Popov, V. (2018). Changes in the geographical structure of trade in central Asia: Real flows in the 1989-2016 period versus gravity model predictions. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available at SSRN 3250746. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3250746
   Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatemi-J, A. (2002). Export performance and economic growth nexus in Japan: A bootstrap approach. Japan and the World Economy, 14(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0922-1425(01)00071-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hezer, S., Gelmez, E., & Özceylan, E. (2021). Comparative analysis of topsis, vikor and copras methods for the COVID-19 regional safety assessment. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 14(6), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humbatov, M., & Sari, K. (2017). Turkic Council countries: Infrastructure, trade, logistics and transportation. Mahir Humbatov.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Shahriar, S., & Arshad, H. (2017). A panel data analysis of china’s trade pattern with OPEC members: Gravity model approach. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2018.81.103.116
   Google Scholar
• Jadhav, S., & Ghosh, I. (2023). Future prospects of the gravity model of trade: A bibliometric review (1993–2021). Foreign Trade Review, 00157325221140154. https://doi.org/10.1177/00157325221140154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakaş, Ü. Ç., Karakaş, A., & Topal, S. (2019). Economic growth effects of economic integration: An economic analysis on Turkish economy in the context of the European Union and shanghai cooperation organization. Alphanumeric Journal, 7(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.604525
   Google Scholar
• Kawasaki, K., & Sato, K. (2021). A new assessment of economic integration in east asia: Application of an industry-specific g-ppp model. Japan and the World Economy, 60, 101105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2021.101105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaygusuz, Y. (2021). Kuruluşunun 10. yılında türk konseyi’nin türkiye ile diğer üye ülkeler arasındaki ticarette etkileri. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, 8(1), 199–236. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.748658
   Google Scholar
• Keser, A., Çütcü, İ., & Eren, V. M. (2021). Does country-level governance matter for national development? An analysis on the founding states of Turkic Council. Applied Economics, 54(5), 522–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1966373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilic, H. S., Demirci, A. E., & Delen, D. (2020). An integrated decision analysis methodology based on if-dematel and if-electre for personnel selection. Decision Support Systems, 137, 113360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilic, H. S., & Yalcin, A. S. (2021). Comparison of municipalities considering environmental sustainability via neutrosophic dematel based topsis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 75, 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavallée, E., & Lochard, J. (2015). The comparative effects of independence on trade. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(3), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, S. B. (1961). An essay on trade and transformation. Almqvist & Wiksell Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Lupo, T., & Bellomo, E. (2019). Dineserv along with fuzzy hierarchical topsis to support the best practices observation and service quality improvement in the restaurant context. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, 106046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maharramov, S. (2021). Econometric assessment of azerbaijan’s logistics capabilities in terms of relations with Turkic-speaking states. Economic Herald of Donbass. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2021-4(66)-45-52
   Google Scholar
• Masca, M. (2017). Economic performance evaluation of European Union countries by topsis method. North Economic Review, 1(1), 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Memari, A., Dargi, A., Jokar, M. R. A., Ahmad, R., & Rahim, A. R. A. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy topsis method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercan, M., & Azer, O. A. (2013). The relationship between economic growth and income distribution in turkey and the Turkish republics of central Asia and Caucasia: Dynamic panel data analysis with structural breaks. Eurasian Economic Review, 3, 165–182. https://doi.org/10.14208/eer.2013.03.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Mert, O. (2015). Türk konseyi (keneşi) türk üniversiteler birliği ve türk üniversiteler birliği i. genel kurulu. Atatürk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, 53(53), 273–273. https://doi.org/10.14222/Turkiyat1335
   Google Scholar
• Metin, I., & Tepe, G. (2021). Gravity model: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(1), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3183.2021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micale, R., La Fata, C. M., & La Scalia, G. (2019). A combined interval-valued electre tri and topsis approach for solving the storage location assignment problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradov, M. (2021). The Zangezur corridor. an Azerbaijani perspective. New Eastern Europe, 06(49), 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mustofaev, M. (2022). The organization of Turkic states: A new approach to global and regional challenges. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 27(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.37547/ot/vol-01issue-02-17
   Google Scholar
• Nakhchivan Agreement. (2009). https://www.turkkon.org/assets/pdf/temel belgeler/nakhchivan-agreement-on-the-establishment-of-the-copperation-council-of-turkic-speaking-states-1-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ngepah, N., & Udeagha, M. C. (2018). African regional trade agreements and intra-African trade. Journal of Economic Integration, 33(1), 1176–1199. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2018.33.1.1176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngepah, N., & Udeagha, M. C. (2019). Supplementary trade benefits of multi-memberships in African regional trade agreements. Journal of African Business, 20(4), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2019.1584719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 13–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöyhönen, P. (1963). A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Sakthivel, G., Ilangkumaran, M., & Gaikwad, A. (2015). A hybrid multi-criteria decision modeling approach for the best biodiesel blend selection based on anp-topsis analysis. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 6(1), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2014.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şanlı, B. (2008). Ekonomik entegrasyon teorisi çerçevesinde avrasya birliği’nin olabilirliği. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 22(1), 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Şanlı, F. B. (2004). Küreselleşme ve ekonomik entegrasyonlar. Fırat Üniversitesi Doğu Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 160–166.
   Google Scholar
• Sapiyev, Y. (2017). Kazakhstan’s role in strengthening the Turkic council and regional cooperation in central asia [ Doctoral dissertation, ISTANBUL AYDIN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES].
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, A., Ghosh, A., Karmakar, B., Shaikh, A., & Mondal, S. P. (2020). Application of fuzzy topsis algorithm for selecting best family car. 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA) (pp. 59–63).
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., Rohatgi, S., & Jasuja, D. (2022). Scientific mapping of gravity model of international trade literature: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research, 11(3), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.3.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, H.-S., Shyur, H.-J., & Lee, E. S. (2007). An extension of topsis for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45(7–8), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şimşek, T., & Destebaşi, E. (2020). The relationship between global economic integration, human capital investments and corruption in Turkic states. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 55(2), 808–827.
   Google Scholar
• Şimşek, H. A., & Şimşek, N. (2017). Regional integrations in globalization process: Lessons for Turkic speaking countries. Sosyoekonomi, 25, 161–172. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.345493
   Google Scholar
• Sobirov, J. (2020). Participation of Uzbekistan in the cooperation Council of Turkic speaking states 8th International Scientific and Practical Conference December 26, 2020 3 (InterConf)726–729 , Online.
   Google Scholar
• Soloaga, I., & Wintersb, L. A. (2001). Regionalism in the nineties: What effect on trade? The North American Journal of Economics & Finance, 12(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9408(01)00042-0
   Google Scholar
• Sonmez, F., Baysal, G., Baysal, I. A., & Bademcioglu, M. (2023). Determining the financial performances of BIST100 energy companies by topsis method. PressAcademia Procedia, 16. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1680
   Google Scholar
• Tahir, I. Z., Ramazan, M. M., & Shamistan, O. P. (2021). The geopolitical position of the Turkic world and the geography of transport and economic relationships. Scientific journal Vestnik NAS RK, 1(1), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.32014/2021.2518-1467.14
   Google Scholar
• Temurshoev, U. (2004). Key sectors in the Kyrgyzstan economy. Cerge-Ei Discussion Paper Series, 135.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy; suggestions for an international economic policy. The Economic Journal, 79, 301.
   Google Scholar
• Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2021). Estimating the trade-environmental quality relationship in SADC with a dynamic heterogeneous panel model. African Review of Economics and Finance, 13(1), 113–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2023). Green finance, fintech, and environmental sustainability: Fresh policy insights from the brics nations. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(6), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2183526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2021). The asymmetric effect of trade openness on economic growth in South Africa: A nonlinear ardl approach. Economic Change and Restructuring, 54(2), 491–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-020-09285-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watrobski, J., Baczkiewicz, A., Ziemba, E., & Salabun, W. (2022). Sustainable cities and communities assessment using the daria-topsis method. Sustainable Cities and Society, 83, 103926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watrobski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., & Ziolo, M. (2019). Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega, 86, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48(4), 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2014). World integrated trade solution. https://wits.worldbank.org
   Google Scholar
• Yalcin, A. S., Kilic, H. S., & Delen, D. (2022). The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamarik, S., & Ghosh, S. (2015). Broad versus regional integration: What matters more for economic development? The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 24(1), 43–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2013.868024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanık, L., & Eren, T. (2017). Borsa istanbul’da işlem gören otomotiv imalat sektörü fir- malarının finansal performanslarının ahp, topsis, electre ve vikor yöntemleri ile analizi. Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(13), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.17828/yalovasosbil.333899
   Google Scholar
• Zare, M., Pahl, C., Rahnama, H., Nilashi, M., Mardani, A., Ibrahim, O., & Ahmadi, H. (2016). Multi-criteria decision making approach in e-learning: A systematic review and classification. Applied Soft Computing, 45, 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2002). Multi-criteria decision aid in financial decision making: Methodologies and literature review. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11(4–5), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.333
   Google Scholar