Regulatory capture on emergency due process of law-making

References

• Aglietta, M. (1998). Capitalism at the turn of the century: Regulation theory and the challenge of social change. New Left Review, 232(1), 41–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al’afghani, M. M., & Bisariyadi, B. (2021). Konsep Regulasi Berbasis Risiko: Telaah Kritis dalam Penerapannya pada Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(1), 066–090. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1814
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, S. (2011). Constitutional conflicts, moral dilemmas, and legal solutions. Ratio Juris, 24(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00474.x
   Google Scholar
• Andi, F. (2021, November 29). Hilangnya Moralitas UU Cipta Kerja. kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2021/11/29/hilangnya-moralitas-uu-cipta-kerja
   Google Scholar
• Anton, A., & Fisk, M. (2000). Not for sale: In defense of public goods.
   Google Scholar
• Arter, D. (2006). Comparing the legislative performance of legislatures. Journal of Legislative Studies, 12(3/4), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• A’yun, R. Q., & Mudhoffir, A. M. (2022). Reproducing Indonesia’s illiberal legalism amid Covid-19: Public health crisis as a means of accumulation. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 22, 21.
   Google Scholar
• Balleisen, E. J., & Moss, D. A. (2009). Government and markets: Toward a new theory of regulation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartley, K. A. (2014). “They don’t know how we live”: Understanding collaborative management in Western Alaska.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, F. (2007). Regulatory capture revisited - Lessons from economics of corruption. Internet Centre for Corruption Research (ICGG). http://www.icgg.org/corruption.research.html
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D., & Moss, D. A. (2013). Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrigan, C., & Coglianese, C. (2015). George J. Stigler,“ The Theory of Economic Regulation”. The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Public Policy and Administration, 287, 292–293.
   Google Scholar
• Case No CCT12/05. (2006). Doctors for Life International v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others (Constitutional Court of South Africa August 17, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Chandranegara, I. S. (2019). Bentuk-Bentuk Perampingan dan Harmonisasi Regulasi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss3.art1
   Google Scholar
• Chandranegara, I. S. (2020a). Kompabilitas Penggunaan Metode Omnibus Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art2
   Google Scholar
• Chandranegara, I. S. (2020b). Komparasi Kebijakan Hukum dalam Penanggulangan Pandemi Covid-19 di Berbagai Negara: Penggunaan Keadaan dan Hukum Darurat atau Optimalisasi Instrumen Hukum yang Ada?. In A. Redi & I. S. Chandranegara (Eds.), Segi Hukum Terhadap Implikasi Covid-19 di Indonesia (pp. 22–34). Prenada Media.
   Google Scholar
• Chandranegara, I. S. (2021). Pengadopsian Mekanisme Fast-Track Legislation dalam Pengusulan Rancangan Undang-Undang oleh Presiden. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.V21.123-140
   Google Scholar
• Chandranegara, I. S. (2022a). Batasan dan Operasionalisasi Fast Track Legislation. In G. A. Taufik (Ed.), Regulasi yang baik: Teori, praktik dan evaluasi: Kumpulan pemikiran mengenai perundang-undangan Indonesia dari murid dan kolega Prof. Dr. Bagir Manan, S.H., M.C.L. Unpad Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandranegara, I. S. (2022b). Kuasa Modal dan Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. In Dekonstruksi Perundang-Undangan Indonesia: Menggapai Cita-Cita Ideal Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia dan ICLD.
   Google Scholar
• Chandranegara, I. S. (2023). Tiga Abad Doktrin Pemisahan Kekuasaan: Diantara memisahkan kekuasaan dan memisahkan kekuasaan yang sesungguhnya. UMJ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandranegara, I. S., & Cahyawati, D. P. (2023). Quality of legislative process during the time of the pandemic. Corporate Law and Governance Review, 5(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv5i2p11
   Google Scholar
• Cooter, R., & Ulen, T. (2012). Law and economics. Addison-Weshley.
   Google Scholar
• Cormacain, R. (2020). Keeping covid-19 emergency legislation socially distant from ordinary legislation: Principles for the structure of emergency legislation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 8(3), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1786272
   Google Scholar
• Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorantes, M., & Brooks, J. J. (2012). Visiting and listening: Meaningful participation for Alaska native peoples in conservation projects. Office of External Affairs and National Wildlife Refuge System. US Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, P. (2002). Moral Dilemmas: And other topics in moral philosophy. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frohnen, B. P., & Carey, G. W. (2017). Constitutional morality and the rise of Quasi-law. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardbaum, S. (2018). Due process of lawmaking revisited. U. Pa. J. Const. L., 21, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Ghodoosi, F. (2015). The concept of public policy in law: Revisiting the role of the public policy doctrine in the enforcement of private legal arrangements. Nebraska Law Review, 94, 685.
   Google Scholar
• Harijanti, S. D. (2020). Keterangan Ahli dalam Pengujian Formil Perkara No 60/PUU-XVIII/2020 tentang Pengujian Formil UU No 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Perubahan UU No 4 Tahun 2009 Tentang Mineral dan Batu Bara.
   Google Scholar
• Harijanti, S. D., Abdurrahman, A., & Perwira, I. (2019). Gagasan Etis Dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945 Dan Model Penerapannya.
   Google Scholar
• Harsono, N. (n.d). House approves revised Mining Law amid outcry—Business—The Jakarta Post. Retrieved December 1, 2022, from https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2020/05/12/house-approves-revised-mining-law-amid-outcry.html
   Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, N. (2020). Rationality, solidarity, and public goods. In Not for sale (pp. 69–92). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Indrati, M. F. (2020). Dapatkah Undang-Undang Omnibus menyelesaikan masalah tumpang tindihnya undang-undang?
   Google Scholar
• Jong, H. N. (n.d). With new law, Indonesia gives miners more power and fewer obligations. Retrieved December 1, 2022, from https://news.mongabay.com/2020/05/indonesia-mining-law-minerba-environment-pollution-coal/
   Google Scholar
• Karpen, U. (2016). Improving democratic development by Better Regulation. In Drafting legislation (pp. 151–164). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karpen, U., & Xanthaki, H. (2017). Legislation in Europe: A comprehensive guide for scholars and practitioners. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Keyzer, P. (2020). The Indonesian Omnibus Law: Opportunities and challenges.
   Google Scholar
• Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1991). The politics of government decision-making: A theory of regulatory capture. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1089–1127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, M. E., & Forrence, J. L. (1990). Regulatory capture, public interest, and the public agenda: Toward a synthesis. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 6, 167–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkai, T., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). In and out of the revolving door: Making sense of regulatory capture. Journal of Public Policy, 12(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00005006
   Google Scholar
• Milios, J., Dimoulis, D., & Economakis, G. (2018). Karl Marx and the classics: An essay on value, crises and the capitalist mode of production. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mochtar, Z. A., & Hiariej, E. O. S. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas dan Filsafat Hukum
   Google Scholar
• Mochtar, Z. A., & Rishan, I. (n.d). Autocratic legalism: The making of Indonesian Omnibus Law. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 11(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v11i1.59296
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. A., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). Conflict of interest and the intrusion of bias. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500002023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudhoffir, A. M., & A’yun, R. Q. (2021). Doing business under the framework of disorder: Illiberal legalism in Indonesia. Third World Quarterly, 42(11), 2651–2668. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1967738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. (2001). Bureaucracy: A final perspective. The Elgar Companion of Public Choice. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, I. (2004). Managing conflict of interest in the public service, 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ogus, A. I. (2004). Regulation: Legal form and economic theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Orentlicher, D. (2002). Conflicts of interest and the constitution. Washington & Lee Law Review, 59, 713.
   Google Scholar
• Petriella, Y. (2020, May 12). Menteri Arifin Berharap UU Minerba Bisa Menjawab Tantangan Industri Pertambangan. Bisnis.com. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20200512/44/1239679/menteri-arifin-berharap-uu-minerba-bisa-menjawab-tantangan-industri-pertambangan
   Google Scholar
• Redi, A., & Chandranegara, I. S. (2020). Omnibus Law: Diskursus Pengadopsiannya ke Dalam Sistem Perundang-undangan Nasional. Radjawali Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman, S., Egidy, S., & Fowkes, J. (2015). Due process of lawmaking. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sembiring, R., Fatimah, I., & Widyaningsih, G. A. (2020). Indonesia’s omnibus bill on job creation: A setback for environmental law? Chinese Journal of Environmental Law, 4(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1163/24686042-12340051
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sholikin, M. N. (2018). Penataan Kelembagaan Untuk Menjalankan Reformasi Regulasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pasar Modal, VIII, 79.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, R. (2010). Legal informatics–a personal appraisal of context and progress. Teoksessa: Paliwala, Abdul (Toim.), 119–145.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1999). The dignity of legislation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheare, K. C. (1951). Modern constitutions (Vol. 213). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wintgens, L. (2002). Legisprudence: A new theoretical approach to legislation. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wiratraman, R. H. P. (2007). Kekuasaan Tafsir dan Tafsir Kekuasaan dalam Hukum. Wacana Pembaruan Hukum di Indonesia, 67–70.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, H. (2017). The conspiracy of law. In Contemporary Anarchism (pp. 273–288). Routledge.
   Google Scholar