Sowing Q methodology in the rural global South: a review of challenges and good practices

References

• Akter, S., Rutsaert, P., Luis, J., Htwe, N. M., San, S. S., Raharjo, B., & Pustika, A. (2017). Women’s empowerment and gender equity in agriculture: A different perspective from Southeast Asia. Food Policy, 69, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, K. S., Parry, L., Thammavong, P., Sacklokham, S., Pasouvang, S., Connell, J. G., Jovanovic, T., Moglia, M., Larson, S., & Case, P. (2018). Rice farming systems in Southern Lao PDR: Interpreting farmers’ agricultural production decisions using Q methodology. Agricultural Systems, 160, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., & Jacobson, S. (2018). Barriers to environmental education: How do teachers’ perceptions in rural Ecuador fit into a global analysis? Environmental Education Research, 24(12), 1684–1696. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1477120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armey, L. E., & Hosman, L. (2016). The centrality of electricity to ICT use in low-income countries. Telecomm Policy, 40(7), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunachalam, S. (2017). Social justice in scholarly publishing: Open access is the only way. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(10), 15–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1366194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascher, W. (2021). Coping with intelligence deficits in poverty-alleviation policies in low-income countries. Policy Sciences, 54(2), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09412-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astari, A. J., & Lovett, J. C. (2019). Does the rise of transnational governance ‘hollow-out’ the state? Discourse analysis of the mandatory Indonesian sustainable palm oil policy. World Development, 117, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa, R. A., Domingues, C. H. d F., Silva, M. C. d., Foguesatto, C. R., Pereira, M. d A., Gimenes, R. M. T., & Borges, J. A. R. (2020). Using Q-methodology to identify rural women’s viewpoint on succession of family farms. Land Use Policy, 92, 104489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen, B. K., & Chan Lau, T. T. (2012). Writing direction affects how people map space onto time. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 109. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, J. (2016). Extension agents and conflict narratives: A case of Laikipia County, Kenya. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 22(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.997256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordt, M. (2018). Discourses in ecosystem accounting: A survey of the expert community. Ecological Economics, 144, 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannstrom, C. (2011). A Q-method analysis of environmental governance discourses in Brazil’s Northeastern Soy Frontier. The Professional Geographer, 63(4), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2011.585081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breman, J. (1985). Between accumulation and immiseration: The partiality of fieldwork in rural India. Journal of Peasant Studies, 13(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066158508438281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buil, I., de Chernatony, L., & Martínez, E. (2012). Methodological issues in cross-cultural research: An overview and recommendations. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 20(3-4), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2012.18
   Google Scholar
• Bumbudsanpharoke, W., Moran, D., & Hall, C. (2009). Exploring perspectives of environmental best management practices in Thai agriculture: an application of Q-methodology. Environment Conservation, 36(3), 225–234. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0376892909990397/type/journal_article
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammelli, F., Coudel, E., & de Freitas Navegantes Alves, L. (2019). Smallholders’ perceptions of fire in the Brazilian Amazon: Exploring implications for governance arrangements. Human Ecology, 47(4), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-00096-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmenta, R., Zabala, A., Daeli, W., & Phelps, J. (2017). Perceptions across scales of governance and the Indonesian peatland fires. Global Environmental Change, 46, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casale, M., Lane, T., Sello, L., Kuo, C., & Cluver, L. (2013). Conducting health survey research in a deep rural South African community: challenges and adaptive strategies. Health Research Policy and Systems, 11(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-11-14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chacko, E. (2004). Positionality and Praxis: Fieldwork Experiences in rural India. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 25(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0129-7619.2004.00172.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first (pp. 256). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (2017). Can we know better? Reflections for development (pp. 194). Practical Action Publishing. https://www.developmentbookshelf.com/doi/book/10.3362/9781780449449
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L., Kirsop, B., & Arunachalam, S. (2005). Open access archiving: the fast track to building research capacity in developing countries. SciDevNet. Retrieved June 19, 2020, from https://www.scidev.net/global/communication/feature/open-access-archiving-the-fast-track-to-building-r.html
   Google Scholar
• Cheema, A. R., Mehmood, A., & Khan, F. A. (2018). Challenges of research in rural poverty: lessons from large field surveys. Development in Practice, 28(5), 714–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2018.1467881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churruca, K., Ludlow, K., Wu, W., Gibbons, K., Nguyen, H. M., Ellis, L. A., & Braithwaite, J. (2021). A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01309-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, C. (2018). Answering for someone else: Proxy reports in survey research. In D. L. Vannette, & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of survey research (pp. 87–93). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_12
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., & Arieli, T. (2011). Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling. Journal of Peace Research, 48(4), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343311405698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, A. (2019). Rural development. In J. Midgley, R. Surender, & L. Alfers (Eds.), Handbook of social policy and development (pp. 169–187). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781785368424/9781785368424.00016.xml
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C., & Michelle, C. (2011). Q methodology in audience research: Bridging the qualitative/quantitative ‘divide. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 8(2), 559–593. https://www.participations.org/Volume 8/Issue 2/contents.htm
   Google Scholar
• Devkota, R., Pant, L. P., Gartaula, H. N., Patel, K., Gauchan, D., Hambly-Odame, H., Thapa, B., & Raizada, M. N. (2020). Responsible agricultural mechanization innovation for the sustainable development of Nepal’s hillside farming system. Sustainability, 12(1), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieteren, C. M., Patty, N. J. S., Reckers-Droog, V. T., & van Exel, J. (2023). Methodological choices in applications of Q methodology: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100404. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2590291123000098
   Google Scholar
• Dingkuhn, E. L., Wezel, A., Bianchi, F. J. J. A., Groot, J. C. J., Wagner, A., Yap, H. T., & Schulte, R. P. O. (2020). JA multi-method approach for the integrative assessment of soil functions: Application on a coastal mountainous site of the Philippines. Journal of Environmental Management, 264, 110461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner, J. C. (2001). Using Q-sorts in participatory processes: An introduction to the methodology. In Social analysis: Selected tools and techniques. (pp. 24–49). Social Development Family of the World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/568611468763498929/social-analysis-selected-tools-and-techniques
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & Berejikian, J. (1993). Reconstructive democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 87(1), 48–60. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400099068/type/journal_article https://doi.org/10.2307/2938955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziopa, F., & Ahern, K. (2011). A systematic literature review of the applications of Q-technique and its methodology. Methodology, 7(2), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easdale, M. H., Pérez León, N., & Aguiar, M. R. (2020). Strains in sustainability debates: Traditional ecological knowledge and western science through the lens of extension agents in a pastoral region. Rural Sociology, 85(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESSENCE on Health Research. (2014). Seven principles for strengthening research capacity in low- and middle-income countries: simple ideas in a complex world. ESSENCE Good practice document series. Report No.: TDR/ESSENCE/2.14. : https://www.who.int/tdr/publications/seven-principles/en/
   Google Scholar
• Fan, S., & Rue, C. (2020). The role of smallholder farms in a changing world. In S. Gomez y Paloma (Ed.), The role of smallholder farms in food and nutrition security (pp. 13–28). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42148-9_2
   Google Scholar
• Fan, S., Brzeska, J., Keyzer, M., & Halsema, A. (2013). From subsistence to profit: Transforming smallholder farms. IFPRI. http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/id/127763
   Google Scholar
• Forouzani, M., Karami, E., Zamani, G. H., & Moghaddam, K. R. (2013). Agricultural water poverty: Using Q-methodology to understand stakeholders’ perceptions. Journal of Arid Environments, 97, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frate, C. A., & Brannstrom, C. (2015). Will Brazil’s ethanol ambitions undermine its agrarian reform goals? A study of social perspectives using Q-method. Journal of Rural Studies, 38, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gc, R. K., & Hall, R. P. (2020). The commercialization of smallholder farming—A case study from the rural western middle Hills of Nepal. Agriculture, 10(5), 143. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/5/143 https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10050143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannichi, M. L., Dallimer, M., Baker, T. R., Mitchell, G., Bernasconi, P., & Ziv, G. (2018). Divergent Landowners’ expectations may hinder the uptake of a forest certificate trading scheme. Conservation Letters, 11(3), e12409. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, M., Barron, J., & Ünver, O. (2019). Water scarcity and challenges for smallholder agriculture. In C. Campanhola & S. Pandey (Eds.), Sustainable food and agriculture (pp. 75–94). FAO and Elsevier. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128121344000054
   Google Scholar
• Hamadou, I., Moula, N., Siddo, S., Issa, M., Marichatou, H., Leroy, P., & Antoine-Moussiaux, N. (2016). Mapping stakeholder viewpoints in biodiversity management: an application in Niger using Q methodology. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25(10), 1973–1986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1175-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazell P. B. R., & Rahman A. (Eds.). (2014). New directions for smallholder agriculture (pp. 574). Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689347.001.0001/acprof-9780199689347
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, F., Kok, K., Beers, P. J., & Veldkamp, T. (2012). Assessing sustainability perspectives in rural innovation projects using Q-methodology. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00554.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilhorst, D., Weijers, L., & van Wessel, M. (2012). Aid relations and aid legitimacy: mutual imaging of aid workers and recipients in Nepal. Third World Quarterly, 33(8), 1439–1457. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.698126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, G. W. K. (2017). Examining perceptions and attitudes: A review of Likert-type scales versus Q-methodology. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 39(5), 674–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945916661302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., You, F., & Luo, Q. (2018). Characterizing the attitudes of the grain-planting farmers of Huaihe Basin, China. Food Policy, 79, 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-H., & Yu, S.-C. (2013). A study of environmental perception patterns of the visually impaired and environmental design. Indoor and Built Environment, 22(5), 743–749. : https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X12456317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huaranca, L. L., Iribarnegaray, M. A., Albesa, F., Volante, J. N., Brannstrom, C., & Seghezzo, L. (2019). Land use change, and economic development in an expanding agricultural frontier in Northern Argentina. Ecological Economics, 165, 106424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugé, J., Vande Velde, K., Benitez-Capistros, F., Japay, J. H., Satyanarayana, B., Nazrin Ishak, M., Quispe-Zuniga, M., Mohd Lokman, B. H., Sulong, I., Koedam, N., Dahdouh-Guebas, F. (2016). Mapping discourses using Q methodology in Matang Mangrove Forest, Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 988–997. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301479716307083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intriago Zambrano, J. C. (2020). Results of semi-systematic literature review on the application of Q-methodology in the rural Global South, as part of the DARE-TU PhD project. DataverseNL. Retrieved July 20, 2020. https://doi.org/10.34894/K252KB
   Google Scholar
• Intriago, J. C., Ertsen, M., Diehl, J.-C., Michavila, J., & Arenas, E. (2018). Co-creation of affordable irrigation technology: The DARE-TU project. International Conference Water Science for Impact, Wageningen, The Netherlands (pp. 1). https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3Af512eafc-0b22-4c7f-9d3e-41d17377a88e?collection=research
   Google Scholar
• Jaung, W., Putzel, L., Bull, G. Q., & Kozak, R. (2016). Certification of forest watershed services: A Q methodology analysis of opportunities and challenges in Lombok, Indonesia. Ecosystem Services, 22, 51–59. fromhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212041616303345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffares, S., & Dickinson, H. (2016). Evaluating collaboration: The creation of an online tool employing Q methodology. Evaluation, 22(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015624195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jere, N. R., Thinyane, M., Boikhutso, T., & Ndlovu, N. (2013). An assessment of ICT challenges in rural areas: ICT experts vs rural users views. In Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference on – SAICSIT ‘13 (pp. 233). ACM Press. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2513456.2513496
   Google Scholar
• Jiren, T. S., Dorresteijn, I., Hanspach, J., Schultner, J., Bergsten, A., Manlosa, A., Jager, N., Senbeta, F., & Fischer, J. (2020). Alternative discourses around the governance of food security: A case study from Ethiopia. Global Food Security, 24, 100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100338
   Google Scholar
• Kopytko, N., & Pruneddu, A. (2018). Triple-win strategy? Why is not everyone doing it? A participant-driven research method to reveal barriers to crop rotation in Ukraine. Climatic Change, 149(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2229-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lairez, J., Lopez-Ridaura, S., Jourdain, D., Falconnier, G. N., Lienhard, P., Striffler, B., Syfongxay, C., & Affholder, F. (2020). Context matters: Agronomic field monitoring and participatory research to identify criteria of farming system sustainability in South-East Asia. Agricultural Systems, 182, 102830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laney, R., & Turner, B. L. (2015). The persistence of self-provisioning among smallholder farmers in Northeast Madagascar. Human Ecology, 43(6), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-015-9791-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, V. F., & Lingnau, H. (2015). Defining and measuring poverty and inequality post-2015. Journal of International Development, 27(3), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansing, D. M. (2013). Not all baselines are created equal: A Q methodology analysis of stakeholder perspectives of additionality in a carbon forestry offset project in Costa Rica. Global Environmental Change, 23(3), 654–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. (2019). Non-Latin scripts in multilingual environments: research data and digital humanities in area studies”. DhDBlog – Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigem Raum. Retrieved June 16, 2020, from https://blogs.fu-berlin.de/bibliotheken/2019/01/18/workshop-nls2018/
   Google Scholar
• Leite, S. K., Vendruscolo, G. S., Renk, A. A., & Kissmann, C. (2019). Perception of farmers on landscape change in southern Brazil: Divergences and convergences related to gender and age. Journal of Rural Studies , 69, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, C., & Lejano, R. (2016). Dec 3 Thick narratives and the persistence of institutions: using the Q methodology to analyse IWRM reforms around the Yellow River. Policy Sciences, 49(4), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9253-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, B. P. Y., & Ngan, Y. L. (2012). Developing mobile telecommunications to narrow digital divide in developing countries? Some lessons from China. Telecomm Policy, 36(10–11), 888–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayett-Moreno, Y., Villarraga-Flórez, L., & Rodríguez-Piñeros, S. (2017). Young farmers’ perceptions about forest management for ecotourism as an alternative for development, in Puebla, Mexico. Sustainability, 9(7), 1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Report No.: 07–066.
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, J. W., & Malik, S. J. (2017). The impact of growth in small commercial farm productivity on rural poverty reduction. World Development, 91, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moros, L., Corbera, E., Vélez, M. A., & Flechas, D. (2020). Pragmatic conservation: Discourses of payments for ecosystem services in Colombia. Geoforum, 108, 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazariadli, S. (2020). VQMethod. OSF. Retrieved June 16, 2020, from https://osf.io/d3wh6/
   Google Scholar
• Nazariadli, S., Morais, D. B., Supak, S., Baran, P. K., & Bunds, K. S. (2019). Assessing the visual Q method online research tool: A usability, reliability, and methods agreement analysis. Methodological Innovations, 12(1), 205979911983219. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2059799119832194
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, B. N., Boruff, B., & Tonts, M. (2018). Indicators of mining in development: A Q‐methodology investigation of two gold mines in Quang Nam province, Vietnam. Resources Policy, 57, 147–155. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301420717302040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhem, S., & Lee, Y. J. (2019). Using Q methodology to investigate the views of local experts on the sustainability of community-based forestry in Oddar Meanchey province, Cambodia. Forest Policy and Economics, 106, 101961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhem, S., & Lee, Y. J. (2020). Exploring perspectives in assessing the quality of governance of the reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) pilot project in Cambodia: Use of Q methodology. Journal of Mountain Science, 17(1), 95–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijnik, A., Nijnik, M., Kopiy, S., Zahvoyska, L., Sarkki, S., Kopiy, L., & Miller, D. (2017). Identifying and understanding attitudinal diversity on multi-functional changes in woodlands of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Climate Research, 73(1–2), 45–56. http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/cr/v73/n1-2/p45-56/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhagen, S., Pascual, U., & Drucker, A. G. (2017). Feeding the household, growing the business, or just showing off? Farmers’ motivations for crop diversity choices in Papua New Guinea. Ecological Economics, 137, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunan F., Clare B., & Sukanya K. (Eds.). The Routledge handbook on livelihoods in the global South (1st ed., pp. 525). Routledge. (2023). https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003014041
   Google Scholar
• Omary, M. B., Eswaraka, J., Kimball, S. D., Moghe, P. V., Panettieri, R. A., & Scotto, K. W. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and research shutdown: Staying safe and productive. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 130(6), 2745–2748. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI138646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod, K. J. (2017). Common sense principles governing potable water recycling in the southwestern US: Examining subjectivity of water stewards using Q methodology. Geoforum, 86, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. A., Fairweather, J. R., Woodford, K. B., & Nuthall, P. L. (2016). Assessing the diversity of values and goals amongst Brazilian commercial-scale progressive beef farmers using Q-methodology. Agricultural Systems, 144, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirard, R., Petit, H., Baral, H., & Achdiawan, R. (2016). Perceptions of local people toward pulpwood plantations: Insights from the Q-method in Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 18(2), 218–230. http://openurl.ingenta.com/content/xref?genre=article&issn=1465-5489&volume=18&issue=2&spage=218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, N. (2017). Smallholder agriculture and market participation (pp. 172). Practical Action Publishing; https://www.developmentbookshelf.com/doi/book/10.3362/9781780449401
   Google Scholar
• Potnis, D., & Gala, B. (2020). Best practices for conducting fieldwork with marginalized communities. Information Processing and Management, 57(3), 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Previte, J., Pini, B., & Haslam-McKenzie, F. (2007). Q Methodology and rural research. Sociol Ruralis, 47(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00433.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruneddu, A. (2011). Q-SORTWARE. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from http://www.qsortware.net/
   Google Scholar
• Raadgever, G. T., Mostert, E., & van de Giesen, N. C. (2008). Identification of stakeholder perspectives on future flood management in the Rhine basin using Q methodology. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12(4), 1097–1109. https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/1097/2008/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijneveld, R., & Marhaento, H. (2020). Stakeholders’ contradicting perceptions on the effects of agroforestry and monocropping systems on water use. Water Practice and Technology, 15(2), 365–373. https://iwaponline.com/wpt/article/15/2/365/73146/Stakeholders-contradicting-perceptions-on-the https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2020.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. (2005). Q methodology. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.). Encyclopedia of social measurement (pp. 209–215). Elsevier. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B012369398500356X
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, P., & Krueger, R. (2000). Beyond bias? The promise and limits of Q method in human geography. The Professional Geographer, 52(4), 636–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Piñeros, S., & Mayett-Moreno, Y. (2015). Forest owners’ perceptions of ecotourism: Integrating community values and forest conservation. Ambio, 44(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0544-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Piñeros, S., Focht, W., Lewis, D. K., & Montgomery, D. (2012). Incorporating values into community-scale sustainable forest management plans: An application of Q methodology. Small-Scale Forestry, 11(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9182-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Piñeros, S., Martínez-Cortés, O., Villarraga-Flórez, L., & Ruíz-Díaz, A. (2018). Timber market actors’ values on forest legislation: A case study from Colombia. Forest Policy and Economics, 88, 1–10. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1389934116303185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roser, M., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2018). Literacy. Our World in Data. Retrieved Jun 18, 2020, from https://ourworldindata.org/literacy
   Google Scholar
• Roser, M., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2018). Literacy. Our World in Data. Retrieved November 23, 2021. https://ourworldindata.org/literacy
   Google Scholar
• Rust, N. A. (2017). Can stakeholders agree on how to reduce human–carnivore conflict on Namibian livestock farms? A novel Q-methodology and Delphi exercise. Oryx, 51(2), 339–346. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0030605315001179/type/journal_article https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605315001179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, G. R., Lee, H.-C., Lim, R. S.-H., Fullerton, J., & Research, A. (2010). Recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy. Nursing & Health Sciences, 12(3), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00541.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaj, I., & Kiš-Glavaš, L. (2017). Perceptions of students with disabilities regarding their role in the implementation of education policy: A Q method study. Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja, 53, 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., Coudel, E., Cammelli, F., & Sablayrolles, P. (2015). Small-scale farmers’ needs to end deforestation: insights for REDD + in São Felix do Xingu (Pará, Brazil). International Forestry Review, 17(1), 124–142. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/10.1505/146554815814668963
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, S., Dokken, J.-V., Van Niekerk, D., & Loubser, R. A. (2018). Religious beliefs and climate change adaptation: A study of three rural South African communities. Jàmbá, 10(1), 1–12. https://jamba.org.za/index.php/jamba/article/view/509
   Google Scholar
• Serwadda, D., Ndebele, P., Grabowski, M. K., Bajunirwe, F., & Wanyenze, R. K. (2018). Open data sharing and the Global South—Who benefits? Science,. 359(6376), 642–643. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shucksmith M., & Brown D. L., (Eds.). (2016). Routledge international handbook of rural studies (pp. 697). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315753041
   Google Scholar
• Simons, J. (2013). An introduction to Q methodology. Nurse Researcher, 20(3), 28–32. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2%7B&%7Dsid=04142c8f-81ac-491e-ada6-524c41818567%7B%25%7D40sessionmgr107%7B&%7Dhid=118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slavchevska, V., Kaaria, S., & Taivalmaa, S. L. (2019). The feminization of agriculture. In T. Allan, B. Bromwich, M. Keulertz, & A. Colman (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of food, water and society (pp. 267–284). Oxford University Press. http://oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190669799.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190669799-e-55
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenner, P., Watts, S., & Worrell, M. (2017). Q Methodology. In C. Willig, W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 212–237). SAGE. https://books.google.nl/books?id=AAniDgAAQBAJ
   Google Scholar
• Stone, T. E., Maguire, J., Kang, S. J., & Cha, C. (2017). Practical issues of conducting a Q methodology study: Lessons learned from a cross-cultural study. Advances in Nursing Science, 40(3), 291–299. http://journals.lww.com/00012272-201707000-00006 https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoudmann, N., Waeber, P. O., Randriamalala, I. H., & Garcia, C. (2017). Perception of change: Narratives and strategies of farmers in Madagascar. Journal of Rural Studies, 56, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijker, D., Bosworth, G., & Bouter, G. (2020). Research methods in rural studies: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. Journal of Rural Studies, 78, 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumberg, J., Yeboah, T., Flynn, J., & Anyidoho, N. A. (2017). Young people’s perspectives on farming in Ghana: a Q study. Food Security, 9(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-016-0646-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SurveyMonkey. (2020). SurveyMonkey. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from https://surveymonkey.com/
   Google Scholar
• Szmigiera, M. (2015). The illiteracy rate among all adults (over 15-year-old) in 2019, by world region. Statista. Retrieved November 23, 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/262886/illiteracy-rates-by-world-regions/
   Google Scholar
• Taheri, F., Forouzani, M., Yazdanpanah, M., & Ajili, A. (2020). How farmers perceive the impact of dust phenomenon on agricultural production activities: A Q-methodology study. Journal of Arid Environments, 173, 104028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.104028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambe, S. (2022). SDGs and continued relevance of rural livelihoods. In Teaching and learning rural livelihoods: A guide for educators, students, and practitioners (1st ed.). Springer Cham. p. 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90491-3_3
   Google Scholar
• ten Klooster, P. M., Visser, M., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2008). Comparing two image research instruments: The Q-sort method versus the Likert attitude questionnaire. Food Quality and Preference, 19(5), 511–518. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950329308000360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theis, S., Lefore, N., Meinzen-Dick, R., & Bryan, E. (2018). What happens after technology adoption? Gendered aspects of small-scale irrigation technologies in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Tanzania. Agriculture and Human Values, 35(3), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-018-9862-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong, D. B., Binot, A., Peyre, M., Nguyen, N. H., Bertagnoli, S., & Goutard, F. L. (2017). A Q method approach to evaluating farmers’ perceptions of foot-and-mouth disease vaccination in Vietnam. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 4, 95. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2017.00095/full https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong, D. B., Doan, H. P., Doan Tran, V. K., Nguyen, V. C., Bach, T. K., Rueanghiran, C., Binot, A., Goutard, F. L., Thwaites, G., Carrique-Mas, J., & Rushton, J. (2019). Assessment of drivers of antimicrobial usage in poultry farms in the Mekong delta of Vietnam: A combined participatory epidemiology and Q-sorting approach. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6, 84. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2019.00084/full https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuokuu, F. X. D., Idemudia, U., Gruber, J. S., & Kayira, J. (2019). Linking stakeholder perspectives for environmental policy development and implementation in Ghana’s gold mining sector: Insights from a Q-methodology study. Environmental Science & Policy, 97, 106–115. (March): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2020). World economic situation and prospects 2020. United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/world-economic-situation-and-prospects-2020/
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2021). Ending poverty. Retrieved November 24, 2021, from https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/ending-poverty
   Google Scholar
• University of Birmingham. (2010). Welcome to POETQ. PoetQ. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from http://poetqblog.blogspot.com/
   Google Scholar
• Van Loon, J., Woltering, L., Krupnik, T. J., Baudron, F., Boa, M., & Govaerts, B. (2020). Scaling agricultural mechanization services in smallholder farming systems: Case studies from sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America. Agricultural Systems, 180, 102792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas, A., Diaz, D., & Aldana-Domínguez, J. (2019). Public discourses on conservation and development in a rural community in Colombia: an application of Q-methodology. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28(1), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1644-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vela-Almeida, D., Kolinjivadi, V., & Kosoy, N. (2018). The building of mining discourses and the politics of scale in Ecuador. World Development, 103, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villapol, M. E., Liu, W., Gutierrez, J., Qadir, J., Gordon, S., Tan, J., Chiaraviglio, L., Wu, J., and Zhang, W. (2018). A sustainable connectivity model of the internet access technologies in rural and low-income areas. In P. H. J. Chong, B. C. Seet, M. Chai, S. U. Rehman (Eds.), Smart grid and innovative frontiers in telecommunications (pp. 93–102). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Waarts, Y. R., Janssen, V., Aryeetey, R., Onduru, D., Heriyanto, D., Aprillya, S. T., N’Guessan, A., Courbois, L., Bakker, D., & Ingram, V. J. (2021). Multiple pathways towards achieving a living income for different types of smallholder tree-crop commodity farmers. Food Security, 13(6), 1467–1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01220-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Liu, Z. (2014). A bibliometric analysis on rural studies in human geography and related disciplines. Scientometrics, 101(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1388-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P, (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation (pp. 248). SAGE Publications Ltd. http://methods.sagepub.com/book/doing-q-methodological-research
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(1), 67–91. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088705qp022oa
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2007). Q methodology: The inverted factor technique. Irish Journal of Psychology, 28(1–2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2007.10446249
   Google Scholar
• Weldegiorgis, F. S., & Ali, S. H. (2016). Mineral resources and localised development: Q-methodology for rapid assessment of socioeconomic impacts in Rwanda. Resources Policy, 49, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood, D., & Griffiths, M. D. (2010). The role of structural characteristics in video-game play motivation: A Q-methodology study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(5), 581–585. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijaya, A., & Offermans, A. (2019). Public agricultural extension workers as boundary workers: identifying sustainability perspectives in agriculture using Q-methodology. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 25(1), 3–24. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1389224X.2018.1512875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodley, X. M., & Lockard, M. (2016). Womanism and snowball sampling: Engaging marginalized populations in holistic research. The Qualitative Report, 21(2), 321–329. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol21/iss2/9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeboah, T., Sumberg, J., Flynn, J., & Anyidoho, N. A. (2017). Perspectives on desirable work: Findings from a Q study with students and parents in Rural Ghana. The European Journal of Development Research, 29(2), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-016-0006-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala, A., & Pascual, U. (2016). Bootstrapping Q methodology to improve the understanding of human perspectives. PLOS One, 11(2), e0148087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala, A., Pascual, U., & García-Barrios, L. (2017). Payments for Pioneers? Revisiting the role of external rewards for sustainable innovation under heterogeneous motivations. Ecological Economics, 135, 234–245. : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala, A., Sandbrook, C., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research. Conservation Biology, 32(5), 1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachariah, R., Kumar, A. M. V., Reid, A. J., Van den Bergh, R., Isaakidis, P., Draguez, B., Delaunois, P., Nagaraja, S. B., Ramsay, A., Reeder, J. C., & Denisiuk, O. (2014). Open access for operational research publications from Lowand middle-income countries: who pays? Public Health Action, 4(3), 141–144. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/10.5588/pha.14.0028
   Google Scholar
• Zobeidi, T., Yazdanpanah, M., Forouzani, M., & Khosravipour, B. (2016). Climate change discourse among Iranian farmers. Climate Change, 138(3-4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1741-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar