Credibility at stake. A comparative analysis of different hate speech comments on journalistic credibility and support on climate protection measures

References

• Andı, S. (2020). How people access news about climate change. In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, K. Eddy, C. T. Robertson & R. Kleis Nielsen (Eds.), Digital News Report 2020 (pp. 1–19). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D., Xenos, M., & Ladwig, P. (2014). The “Nasty Effect:” Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelman, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Measuring message credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606057m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arce-García, S., Díaz-Campo, J., & Cambronero-Saiz, B. (2023). Online hate speech and emotions on Twitter: A case study of Greta Thunberg at the UN Climate Change Conference COP25 in 2019. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13(1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01052-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austrian National Election Study (AUTNES). (2018). AUTNES Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Post-Election Survey 2017. Questionnaire. https://cses.org/datacenter/module5/survey/AUT_2017_English.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bahador, B. (2023). Monitoring hate speech and the limits of current definition. In C. Strippel, S. Paasch-Colberg, M. Emmer, & J. Trebbe (Eds.), Challenges and perspectives of hate speech research (pp. 291–286). https://doi.org/10.48541/dcr.v12.17
   Google Scholar
• Beierlein, C., Kemper, C. J., Kovaleva, A., & Rammstedt, B. (2012). Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung politischer Kompetenz- und Einflussüberzeugungen. Political Efficacy Kurzskala (PEKS) [A measurement tool to assess political competence and influence beliefs. Political Efficacy Short Scale (PEKS)]. GESIS Working Papers 2012(18).
   Google Scholar
• Belotti, F., Donato, S., Bussoletti, A., & Comunello, F. (2022). Youth Activism for Climate on and Beyond Social media: Insights from FridaysForFuture-Rome. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(3), 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211072776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benikova, D., Wojatzki, M., & Zesch, T. (2018). What does this imply? Examining the impact of implicitness on the perception of hate speech. In G. Rehm & T. Declerck (Eds.), Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age (pp. 171–179). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfadelli, H., Fähnrich, B., Lüthje, C., Milde, J., Rhomberg, M., & Schäfer, M. S. (2017). Das Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation [The research field of science communication]. In H. Bonfadelli, B. Fähnrich, C. Lüthje, J. Milde, M. Rhomberg & M.S. Schäfer (Eds.), Das Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation (pp. 3–14). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of Western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugden, D. (2020). Does Climate Protest Work? Partisanship, Protest, and Sentiment Pools. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 6, 237802312092594. https://doi.org/10.1177/237802312092594
   Google Scholar
• Bundtzen, S. (2023). How mainstream and ‘alternative’ media news headlines frame climate activism. Institut for Strategic Dialogue. https://www.isdglobal.org/digital_dispatches/how-do-news-headlines-of-mainstream-and-alternative-media-talk-about-climate-activism/
   Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A., & Mohamad-Klotzbach, C. (2021). Populism and nature—the nature of populism: New perspectives on the relationship between populism, climate change, and nature protection. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 15(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-021-00492-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. (2024). The mediated circulation of the United Kingdom’s YouthStrike4Climate movement’s discourses and actions. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 27(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494231165645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Der Standard. (2023a). 42 Prozent in Österreich wünschen sich mehr Klimaschutzmaßnahmen [42 percent in Austria want more climate protection measures], Der Standard. https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000145044827/42-prozent-der-oesterreicherinnen-und-oesterreicher-wuenschen-sich-mehr-klimaschutz.
   Google Scholar
• Der Standard. (2023b). Zwei Drittel halten Klimawandel bereits für unbeherrschbar [Two thirds already consider climate change to be unmanageable], Der Standard. https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000192658/zwei-drittel-halten-klimawandel-bereits-fuer-unbeherrschbar.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2023). Special Eurobarometer 538: Climate change. https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/s2954_99_3_sp538_eng?locale=en.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a single market for digital services and amending directive 2000/31/EC. (Digital Services Act).
   Google Scholar
• Fawzi, N. (2019). Untrustworthy news and the media as “Enemy of the people?” How a populist worldview shapes recipients’ attitudes toward the media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218811981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Kovacheff, C. (2020). The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 1086–1111. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FPÖ. (2023). Es braucht die volle Härte des Gesetzes gegen die Klima-Terroristen! [The full force of the law is needed against the climate terrorists!]. FPOE. https://www.fpoe.at/artikel/es-braucht-die-volle-haerte-des-gesetzes-gegen-die-klima-terroristen/
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., & Lubarda, B. (2023). Scepticisms and beyond? A comprehensive portrait of climate change communication by the far right in the European Parliament. Environmental Politics, 32(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2048556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, R. S. (2024). Civil disobedience by environmental scientists: An experimental study of its influence on the impact and credibility of climate change research. Environmental Communication, 18(4), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2024.2302532
   Google Scholar
• Frischlich, L. (2022). H@te Online: Die Bedeutung digitaler Kommunikation für Hass und Hetze [H@te Online: The importance of digital communication for hate and agitation]. In G. Weitzel & S. Mündges (Eds.), Hate Speech. Definitionen, Ausprägungen, Lösungen (pp. 99–132). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35658-3_5
   Google Scholar
• Gadringer, S., Sparviero, S., Trappel, J., & Reichenberger, P. (2023). Digital News Report 2023 Detailergebnisse für Österreich 2023 [Digital News Report 2023 Detailed results for Austria 2023]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8008752
   Google Scholar
• Gallup. (2023). Wenig Verständnis für Proteste der Klimaaktivisten [Little understanding for climate activists’ protests]. Institut. https://www.gallup.at/fileadmin/documents/PDF/marktstudien/2023/Gallup_PA_Charts_Wenig_Verstaendnis_fuer_Proteste_der_Klimaaktivisten_14022023.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Global Witness. (2020). Defending tomorrow. The climate crisis and threats against land and environmental defenders. https://www.globalwitness.org/documents/19938/Defending_Tomorrow_EN_high_res_-_July_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Haim, M., & Maurus, K. (2021). Stereotypes and sexism? Effects of gender, topic, and user comments on journalists’ credibility. Journalism, 24(7), 1442–1461. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211063994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S., & O’Neill, S. (2021). The Greta effect: Visualising climate protest in UK media and the Getty images collections. Global Environmental Change, 71(2), 102392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102392
   Google Scholar
• Hellmueller, L., & Trilling, D. (2012). The credibility of credibility measures: A meta-analysis in leading communication journals, 1951 to 2011. In WAPOR Hong Kong 2012: paper presentation World Association for Public Opinion Research/Public Opinion Programme, The University of Hong Kong. http://wapor2012.hkpop.hk/doc/papers/ConcurrentSessionsV/VD/VD-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A., Greussing, E., & Eberl, J.-M. (2021). From populism to climate scepticism: the role of institutional trust and attitudes towards science. Environmental Politics, 31(7), 1115–1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1978200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jugendschutz.net. (2023). Hass gegen junge Klimaaktivist:innen. Herabsetzungen, Verschwörungs- und Gewaltfantasien in Social-Media-Kommentaren können Minderjährige verstören. [Hate against young climate activists. Disparagement, conspiracy and violence fantasies in social media comments can be disturbing to minors]. https://www.jugendschutz.net/fileadmin/daten/publikationen/praxisinfos_reports/report_hass_gegen_junge_klimaaktivist_innen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kalogeropoulos, A., Suiter, J., Udris, L., & Eisenegger, M. (2019). News Media Trust and News Consumption: Factors Related to Trust in News in 35 Countries. International Journal of Communication, 13, 3672–3693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmasin, M. (2020). The SDGs in a mediatized world. In Austrian Academy of Sciences, Global Sustainable Development Goals in a Mediatized World. International Symposium (pp. 11–17). Austrian Academy of Sciences. https://www.oeaw.ac.at/fileadmin/NEWS/2020/PDF/Webversion_AiD_18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karmasin, M., Pöschl, M., Prainsack, B., Punterscher-Riekmann, S., & Strauss, S. (2024). Akademie im Dialog – Forschung und Gesellschaft 6. Sind Soziale Medien eine Gefahr für unsere Demokratie? [Academy in Dialogue - Research and Society 6. Are social media a threat to our democracy?]. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Katsarou, K., Sunder, S., Woloszyn, V., & Semertzidis, K. (2021). Sentiment Polarization in Online Social Networks: The Flow of Hate Speech [Paper presentation]. Eighth International Conference on Social Network Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS), Gandia, Spain (pp. 01–08). https://doi.org/10.1109/SNAMS53716.2021.9732077
   Google Scholar
• Keilmann, J., & Koch, T. (2023). When environmental claims are empty promises: How greenwashing affects corporate reputation and credibility. Environmental Communication, 18(3), 266–284.), https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2267782
   Google Scholar
• Koerber, D. (2020). Mass media and their symbiotic relationship with crisis. In F. Frandsen & W. Johansen (Eds.), Crisis communication (pp. 493–508). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110554236-024
   Google Scholar
• Kümpel, A. S., & Rieger, D. (2019). Wandel der Sprach- und Debattenkultur in sozialen Online-Medien. Ein Literaturüberblick zu Ursachen und Wirkungen von inziviler Kommunikation [Changing language and debate culture in online social media. A literature review on the causes and effects of uncivil communication]. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Kurier. (2023). Salzburg: Ermittlungen gegen FPÖ-Abgeordneten wegen Verhetzung [Salzburg: Investigation against FPÖ Member of Parliament for incitement to hatred]. Kurier.at. https://kurier.at/chronik/oesterreich/salzburg-ermittlungen-gegen-fpoe-abgeordneten-wegen-verhetzung/402686362.
   Google Scholar
• Last Generation. (2023). Über die Letzte Generation [About the Last Generation]. https://letztegeneration.at/fragen-antworten.
   Google Scholar
• Mau, S., Lux, T., & Westheuser, L. (2023). Triggerpunkte. Konsens und Konflikt in der Gegenwartsgesellschaft [Trigger Points. Consensus and Conflict in Contemporary Society]. Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A., Dunlap, R. E., & Marquart-Pyatt, S. (2016). Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melischek, G., & Seethaler, J. (2023). Mediale Kommunikation während der Covid-19-Pandemie: Ein Scoping Review [Media communication during the Covid-19 pandemic: A scoping review]. In A. Bogner (Ed.), Nach Corona: Reflexionen für zukünftige Krisen (pp. 11–21). Verlag der ÖAW. https://doi.org/10.1553/978OEAW95696
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., & Mccann, R. M. (2003). Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Annals of the International Communication Association, 27(1), 293–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029
   Google Scholar
• Moor, J. d., Vydt, M. d., Uba, K., & Wahlström, M. (2021). New kids on the block: Taking stock of the recent cycle of climate activism. Social Movement Studies, 20(5), 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1836617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, H. E. (2021). Constructing the Millennial “Other” in United States Press Coverage of the Green New Deal. Environmental Communication, 15(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1812686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naab, T., Heinbach, D., Ziegele, M., & Grasberger, M.-T. (2020). Comments and credibility: How critical user comments decrease perceived news article credibility. Journalism Studies, 21(6), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1724181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neverla, I., & Schäfer, M. S. (Eds.). (2012). Einleitung: Der Klimawandel und das „Medien-Klima “[Introduction: Climate Change and the „Media Climate“]. In I. Neverla & M. S. Schäfer (Eds.), Das Medien-Klima: Fragen und Befunde der kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Klimaforschung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N. (2023). Executive Summary and Key Findings. In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, K. Eddy, C.T. Robertson & R. Kleis Nielsen (Eds.), Digital news report 2023 (pp. 9–30). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Noth, F., & Tonzer, L. (2022). Understanding climate activism: Who participates in climate marches such as “Fridays for Future” and what can we learn from it? Energy Research & Social Science, 84, 102360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORF. (2023). Der Umgang mit den Klimaprotesten. [Dealing with the climate protests.] ORF. https://religion.orf.at/stories/3217772/
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, M. T., Fromm, M., & Broda, E. (2021). Strategic clustering in right-wing-populism? ‘Green policies’ in Germany and France. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 15(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-021-00485-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prandner, D. (2022). Informationsverhalten und Glaubwürdigkeit von Medien in der Krise. In W. Aschauer. C. Glatz & D. Prandner (Eds.), Die österreichische Gesellschaft während der Corona-Pandemie: Ergebnisse aus sozialwissenschaftlichen Umfragen (pp. 325–348). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34491-7_4
   Google Scholar
• Prochazka, F., Weber, P., & Schweiger, W. (2018). Effects of civility and reasoning in user comments on perceived journalistic quality. Journalism Studies, 19(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1161497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhomberg, M. (2016). Climate change communication in Austria. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.449
   Google Scholar
• Rödder, S., & Pavenstädt, C. N. (2023). ‘Unite behind the Science!’ Climate movements’ use of scientific evidence in narratives on socio-ecological futures. Science and Public Policy, 50(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Climate Change and the Media. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 853–859). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.91079-1
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S., & Painter, J. (2021). Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change-related news around the world. WIREs Climate Change, 12(1)Article e675, 977. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.675
   Google Scholar
• Scharloth, J. (2021). Hässliche Wörter. Hatespeech als Prinzip der neuen Rechten [Ugly words. Hatespeech as a principle of the new right]. J.B. Metzer.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuch, E., Ortiz, M., Shreedhar, G., & Thomas-Walters, L. (2023). The Power of Protest in the Media: Examining Portrayals of Climate Activism in UK News. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6jtkn
   Google Scholar
• Schwertberger, U., & Rieger, D. (2021). Hass und seine vielen Gesichter: Eine sozial- und kommunikationswissenschaftliche Einordnung von Hate Speech [Hate and its Many Faces: A Social and Communication Studies Classification of Hate Speech]. In S. Wachs., B. Koch-Priewe & A. Zick (Eds.). Hate Speech – Multidisziplinäre Analysen und Handlungsoptionen (pp. 53–77). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31793-5_4
   Google Scholar
• Searles, K., Spencer, S., & Duru, A. (2020). Don’t read the comments: the effects of abusive comments on perceptions of women authors’ credibility. Information. Communication & Society, 23(7), 947–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1534985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanaah, S., Fritsche, I., & Osmundsen, M. (2024). Support for pro-climate and ecofascist extremism: Correlates and intersections. Democracy and Security, 20(1), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2023.2220111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeth-Keppler, D., Perkowitz, R., & Speiser, M. (2017). It’s a matter of trust: american judgments of the credibility of informal communicators on solutions to climate change. Environmental Communication, 11(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1062790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sponholz, L. (2022). Hate Speech in den Massenmedien: Journalist*innen als unfreiwillige Helfer*innen? [Hate Speech in the Mass Media: Journalists as Involuntary Helpers?] In G. Weitzel & S. Mündges (Eds.), Hate Speech. Definitionen, Ausprägungen, Lösungen (pp. 19–42). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35658-3_8
   Google Scholar
• Starkbaum, J., Auel, K., Bobi, V., Fuglsang, S., Grand, P., Griessler, E., König, T., Losi, L., Seiser, F., Tiemann, G., Taschwer, K., & Unger, M. (2023). Ursachenstudie zu Ambivalenzen und Skepsis in Österreich in Bezug auf Wissenschaft und Demokratie [Study on the causes of ambivalence and scepticism in Austria with regard to science and democracy]. Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS). https://irihs.ihs.ac.at/id/eprint/6660.
   Google Scholar
• Stern. (2023). Klima-Aktivisten getreten: Autofahrer zu Bewährungsstrafe verurteilt [Climate activists kicked: Motorist sentenced to suspended sentence]. Stern.de. https://www.stern.de/panorama/verbrechen/wien–autofahrer-nach-angriff-auf-klima-aktivisten-verurteilt-33574858.html.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Vliegenthart, R., & Lindholm, T. (2020). News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338
   Google Scholar
• Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ). (2023). Umfrage: Große Ablehnung für Methoden der Letzten Generation [Survey: Great rejection for methods of the Last Generation],. Sueddeutsche Zeitung. https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/demonstrationen-umfrage-grosse-ablehnung-fuer-methoden-der-letzten-generation-dpa.urn-newsml-dpa-com-20090101-230513-99-673081.
   Google Scholar
• SWR. (2023). Angriff auf Klimaaktivisten in Mannheim: Polizei nimmt Mann fest [Attack on climate activists in Mannheim: police arrest man]. SWR.de. https://www.swr.de/swraktuell/baden-wuerttemberg/mannheim/festnahme-nach-attacke-auf-letzte-generation-in-mannheim-100.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tagesschau. (2023a). Deutsche lehnen Straßenblockaden mehrheitlich ab [Majority of Germans reject road blockades]. Tagesschau. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/klima-proteste-umfrage-aktivisten-letzte-generation-100.html
   Google Scholar
• Tagesschau. (2023b). Lkw-Fahrer fährt Klimaaktivisten an und erntet Solidarität [Truck driver hits climate activists and earns solidarity]. Tagesschau. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/regional/mecklenburgvorpommern/ndr-lkw-fahrer-faehrt-klimaaktivisten-an-und-erntet-solidaritaet-100.html
   Google Scholar
• Thielsch, M. (2017). Toolbox zur kontinuierlichen Website-Evaluation und Qualitätssicherung (Version 2.1). Arbeitsbericht [Toolbox for continuous website evaluation and quality assurance (version 2.1). Work report]. Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA). https://doi.org/10.17623/BZGA:224-2.1
   Google Scholar
• Ulmke, N., Klackl, J., Hansen, J., Lempe, P., Finsterwalder, V., Hagedorn, L., Rosenzweig, T., Ramstetter, L., Hüppauf, T., & Jonas, E. (2023). Political value-congruent climate change communication: an efficacy study from Germany and Austria. PsyEcology, 14(2), 183–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2023.2204728
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
   Google Scholar
• von Zabern, L., & Tulloch, C. D. (2021). Rebel with a cause: the framing of climate change and intergenerational justice in the German press treatment of the Fridays for Future protests. Media, Culture & Society, 43(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720960923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, K. (2020). The Ecological Component of the ideology and legislative activity of the Freedom Party of Austria. In B. Forchtner (Ed.), The far right and the environment: Politics, discourse and communication (pp. 153–183). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2020). The politics of fear. The shameless normalization of far-right discourse. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Liu, Z., & Wong, J. C. S. (2022). Information seeking and information sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Communication Quarterly, 70(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2021.1995772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar