Evaluating today’s multi-dependencies in digital transformation, corporate governance and public international law triad

References

• Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2010). Comparative and international corporate governance. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.495525
   Google Scholar
• Arato, J. (2015). Corporations as lawmakers. Harvard International Law Journal, 56, 229–296. https://typeset.io/pdf/corporations-as-lawmakers-axibli2xdb.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A. (2012). The ‘public interest’ agency of international organizations? The case of the OECD principles of corporate governance. Review of International Political Economy, 19(3), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.552789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calamita, N. J. (2020). Handbook on obligations in international investment treaties. APEC Committee on Trade and Investment (CTI).
   Google Scholar
• Cao, S. S., Jiang, W., Yang, B., & Zhang, A. (2023). How to talk when a machine is listening: Corporate disclosure in the age of AI. The Review of Financial Studies, 36(9), 3603–3642. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3683802
   Google Scholar
• Claire Cutler, A. (1997). Artifice, ideology and paradox: The public/private distinction in international law. Review of International Political Economy, 4(2), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/096922997347788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• di Castri, S., Grasser, M., & Kulenkampff, A. (2020). The ‘DataStack’: A data and tech blueprint for financial supervision, innovation, and the data commons, BFA Global. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3595344
   Google Scholar
• Fredric, J. (1991). Postmodernism or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golia, A. J., Kettemann, M. C., & Kunz, R. (2022). Digital transformations in public international law: An introduction. In Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Max Planck Society (Ed.), Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht [Contributions to foreign public law and international law]. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748931638-11
   Google Scholar
• Humble, K. P. (2021). International law, surveillance and the protection of privacy. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1763315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inter and multidisciplinary links of the corporate governance concept. ( 2023). Investopedia Encyclopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corporategovernance.asp
   Google Scholar
• Jakab, A., Dyevre, A., & Itzcovich, G. (Eds.). (2017). Comparative constitutional reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen Calamita, N. (2020). Handbook on obligations in international investment treaties. APEC Committee on Trade and Investment (CTI).
   Google Scholar
• Kegel, G., & Schurig, K. (2004). Internationales Privatrecht [Private international law]. CH Beck 9th edn, § 23 I, pp. 1092-1096 (describing the principle of inapplicability of foreign public law and the territoriality principle).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H.-J. (2002). Toward the “best practice” model in a globalizing market: Recent developments in Korean corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 2(2), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2002.11419888
   Google Scholar
• Kritsiotis, D. (2012). Public international law and the concept of law applied. Transnational Legal Theory, 3(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.5235/TLT.3.2.189
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, M. (2020). Regulation, global governance and private international law: Squaring the triangle. Journal of Private International Law, 16(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2020.1744255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Giacco, L. (2023). Private entities shaping community interests: (Re)imagining the ‘publicness’ of public international law as an epistemic tool. Transnational Legal Theory, 14(3), 270–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2023.2232599
   Google Scholar
• Mann, F. A. (1943). The sacrosanctity of the foreign act of state. LQ Review, 59, 42–52.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, P., & Heuzé, V. (2004). Droit international privé [Private international law]. Montchrestien 8nd edn, pp. 67-70, nos. pp. 100-105 (describing the inapplicability and territoriality of tax law, criminal law and other rules as being the result of public international law).
   Google Scholar
• Melchiorre, T. (2022). The Akademik Lomonosov and the Arctic legal regime: Geopolitics versus international law? Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 30(4), 738–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2031130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, B., Goo, S.-H., & Osaulenko, S. (2020). The extra-territorial application of corporate governance standards in China. Transnational Legal Theory, 11(4), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2020.1744890
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2022, October). Digitalisation and corporate governance: Background note for the OECD-Asia roundtable on corporate governance. https://www.oecd.org/corporate/background-noteAsia-roundtable-digitalisation-and-corporate-governance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pargendler, M. (2021). The rise of international corporate law. Washington University Law Review, 98, 1765–1820. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol98/iss6/9
   Google Scholar
• Paul Joel, R. (1988). The isolation of private international law. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 7, 149–178.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, Z. (2008). Spaces of international law. Griffith Law Review, 17(2), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383621.2008.10854621
   Google Scholar
• Popa Tache, C. E. (2021a). Legal treatment standards for international investments. Heuristic aspects. Adjuris International Academic Publisher. http://www.adjuris.ro/reviste/ltsi/Legal%20treatment%20standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Popa Tache, C. E. (2021b). Ranking of treatment standards in international investments. International Investment Law Journal, 1(1), 79–87.
   Google Scholar
• Popa Tache, C. E. (2023). Le dynamisme du droit international public contemporain et la transdisciplinarité [The dynamism of contemporary public international law and transdisciplinarity] (Preface by F. Pasquier). L’Harmattan Paris. The collection "Le droit aujourd′hui".
   Google Scholar
• Popa Tache, C. E., & Săraru, C.-S. (2023). New transdisciplinary directions in international law? Lex Humana, 15(4), 86–109. https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2705 on 03.02.2024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochel, J. (2023). Error 404: Looking for trust in international law on digital technologies. Law, Innovation and Technology, 15(1), 148–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2023.2184139
   Google Scholar
• Săraru, C.-S. (2015). The state and the separation of powers. Juridical Tribune, 5(2), 274–280.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, A. S., & Mathews, J. (2019). Proportionality balancing and constitutional governance: A comparative and global approach. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Symeonides, S. C. (2014). Codifying choice of law around the world: An international comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmon, S. (2005). The constitutive versus the declaratory theory of recognition: Tertium non datur? British Yearbook of International Law, 75(1), 101–181, 105–148–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/75.1.101
   Google Scholar
• Temouri, Y., Pereira, V., Jones, C., Malik, A., & Rowley, C. (2022). Towards a new corporate responsibility and governance? Tax haven and other identity characteristics of Asia-Pacific multinational corporations. Asia Pacific Business Review, 28(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2022.2012990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, M. (2020). Public law adjudication, international uniformity and the foreign act of state doctrine. Journal of Private International Law, 16(3), 361–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2020.1846257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry Editor, F. (1996). Editorial: Corporate governance. Public Money & Management, 16(2), 3–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969609387912
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G. (2012). Verfassungsfragmente: Gesellschaftlicher Konstitutionalismus in der Globalisierung. Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• The White House Press Release. (2021, June 12). President Biden and G7 leaders launch build back better world (B3W) partnership. www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/06/12/fact-sheet-president-biden-and-g7-leaders-launch-build-back-better-world-b3w-partnership/ (emphasis added).
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC): Overview of the ROSC accounting and auditing program. ( 2004). https://cfrr.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/419550WP0ROSC11iew0321443B01PUBLIC1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ti-Chiang, C. (1951). The international law of recognition. Stevens & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. (2007). Bilateral investment treaties 1995 – 2006. Trends in Investment Rulemaking.
   Google Scholar
• Uwe Kischel. (2015). Rechtsvergleichung[Comparative law]. C.H. Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Viellechner, L. (2013). Transnationalisierung des Rechts [Transnationalisation of the law]. Velbrueck GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• von Bogdandy, A., Goldmann, M., & Venzke, I. (2017). From public international to international public law: Translating world public opinion into international public authority. European Journal of International Law, 28(1), 115–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolsey, T. D. (1872). An introduction to the study of international law (3rd rev. and added ed.). Scribner, Armstrong & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C.-H. (2021). Sovereignty fever: The territorial turn of global cyber order. Zeitschrift Für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht Und Völkerrecht / Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 81(3), 651–676. https://doi.org/10.17104/0044-2348-2021-3-651
   Google Scholar
• Zhengyu, W. (2018). Classical geopolitics, realism and the balance of power. Journal of Strategic Studies, 41(6), 786–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2017.1379398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar