A cross-cultural study of the use of metadiscourse markers in argumentative essays by Iranian and Chinese EFL students

References

• Beauvais, P. J. (1986). Metadiscourse in context: A speech act model of illocutionary content. Retrieved from http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/5470186
   Google Scholar
• Biria, R., & Yakhabi, M. (2013). Contrastive rhetorical analysis of argumentation techniques in the argumentative essays of English and Persian writers. Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation: (LCT), 2(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18, S41–S56. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, S. (2002). Multilingual writers and the academic community: Towards a critical relationship. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 29–44. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00007-3
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W. C. (2007). Some literature review on the comparison of the Chinese Qi-Cheng-Zhuan-He writing model and the Western problem-solution schema. WHAMPOA-An Interdisciplinary Journal, 52, 137–148.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, L. M. (2012). English language teacher education and contrastive rhetoric. Retrieved from http://www.elted.net/uploads/7/3/1/6/7316005/v15_1colombo.pdf doi:10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0999-PDN
   Google Scholar
• Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, U. (2012). New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), pages 493–510. doi:10.2307/3588238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crismore, A. (1983). Metadiscourse: what it is and how it is used in school and non-school social science texts. University of Illinois: Centre for the Study of Reading. Technical Report 273.
   Google Scholar
• Estaji, M., & Vafaeimehr, R. (2015). A comparative analysis of interactional metadiscourse markers in the introduction and conclusion sections of mechanical and electrical engineering research papers. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 37–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faghih, E., & Rahimpour, S. (2009). Contrastive rhetoric of English and Persian written texts: Metadiscourse in applied linguistics research articles. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, 92–107.
   Google Scholar
• Farrokhi, F., & Ashrafi, S. (2009). Textual meta discourse resources in research articles. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 52(212), 39–75. Retrieved from http://coeweb.fiu.edu/research_conference/ Florida International University.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, J. Z. (2008). Rhetorical clash between Chinese and Westerners. Intercultural Communication Studies, XVII, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133–151. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1–20. doi:10.1111/lang.1966.16.issue-1-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodabandeh, F., Jafarigohar, M., Soleimani, H., & Hemmati, F. (2013). Overall rhetorical structure of students’ English and Persian argumentative essays. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3, 4. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.4.684-690
   Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to post method. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Leki, I. (1997). Cross-talk: ESL issues and contrastive rhetoric. In C. Severino, J. Guerra, & J. Butler (Eds.), Writing in multicultural settings (pp. 234–245). New York: Modern Language Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T., & Wharton, S. (2012). Metadiscourse repertoire of L1 Mandarin undergraduates writing in English: A cross-contextual, cross-disciplinary study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 345–356. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2011). A genre analysis of English and Chinese research article abstracts in linguistics and chemistry (master‘s thesis). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.10/1128/Li_Yun.pdf?sequence=1 doi:10.1094/PDIS-01-11-0064
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. J. (2007). Placement of the thesis statement in English and Chinese argumentative essay: A study of contrastive rhetoric. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(1), 122–139.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P., & Huang, X. (2017). A study of interactional metadiscourse in English abstracts of Chinese economics research articles. Higher Education Studies, 7(3), 25. doi:10.5539/hes.v7n3p25
   Google Scholar
• Lucaites, J. L., Condit, C. M., & Caudill, S. (1999). Contemporary rhetorical theory: A reader. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matalene, C. (1985). Contrastive rhetoric: an American writing teacher in China. College English, 47(8), 789–808. doi:10.2307/376613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3–22. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I
   Google Scholar
• McClanahan, K., & Davis, K. A. (2005). Drawing on Theories of Critical Academic Literacies in the ELI 83 Classroom.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, B., & Lo, W. (1985). Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 515–534. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/3586276/epdf?r3_referer=wol&track
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu, C., Zhang, L. J., Ehrich, J., & Hong, H. (2015). The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 135–148. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorian, M., & Biria, R. (2010). Interpersonal metadiscourse in persuasive journalism: A study of texts by American and Iranian EFL columnists. Journal of Modern Languages, 20, 64–79.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. (2004). Aiding the reader: The use of metalinguistic devices in scientific discourse. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 18, 30–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rashidi, N., & Dastkhezr, Z. (2009). A comparison of English and Persian organizational patterns in the argumentative writing of Iranian EFL students. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education, 2(1), 131–152.
   Google Scholar
• Sabzevari, A., & Sadeghi, V. (2013). A contrastive rhetorical analysis of the news reports in Iranian and American case study of news reports in Tehran Times and New York Times. Iranian Journal of Research in English Language Teaching, 1(2), 12- 19.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, K. (2009). EFL learners and expression of voice: Response to `Ventriloquising the voice: Writing in the University‘. Record of Clinical-Philosophical Pedagogy, 10, 123-127.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, F. (1989). The classroom and the wider culture: Identity as a key to learning English composition. In L. Yang (Ed.), Contrastive rhetoric: A study of the rhetorical organization of Chinese and American students’ expository essays (pp. 459-466). Shanghai International Studies University. 2003. Reprinted in.
   Google Scholar
• Simin, S., & Tavangar, M. (2009). Metadiscourse knowledge and use in Iranian EFL writing. Asian EFL Journal, 11(1), 230–255.
   Google Scholar
• Sloane, T. O. (2001). Encyclopedia of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan, A. H. J. (2011). A contrastive study of metadiscourse in English and Arabic linguistics research articles. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 5(1), 28–41.
   Google Scholar
• VandeKopple, W. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82–93. doi:10.2307/357609. Reprinted in Quintana-Toledo, E. (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardy, R. (1996). The birth of rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato, and their successors. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M. (1981). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L. (2003). Contrastive Rhetoric: A Study of the Rhetorical Organization of Chinese and American Students’ Expository Essays. A Dissertation Presented to Shanghai International Studies University.
   Google Scholar
• Ying, H. G. (2000). The origin of contrastive rhetoric revisited. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 259-268.
   Google Scholar
• Zamel, V. (1997). Toward a model of transculturation. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 341–352. doi:10.2307/3588050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarei, G. H. R., & Mansoori, S. (2007). Metadiscourse in academic prose: A contrastive analysis of English and Persian research articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 3(2), 24–40.
   Google Scholar