Meaning-focused output and meaning-focused input: The case of passive and active vocabulary learning

References

• Alderson, J. C., & Banerjee, J. (2002). State of the art review: Language testing and assessment (part two). Language Teaching, 35(2), 79–29. doi:10.1017/S0261444802001751
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dortrecht, Neherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Bear, D. R., Helman, L., Templeton, S., Invernizzi, M. R., & Johnston, F. R. (2012). Words their way with English learners: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling (2 nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Berthold, M. (2011). Reliability of quick placement tests: How much faith can we place on quick paper or internet based placement tests. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 674–698.
   Google Scholar
• Blachowicz, C. L. Z., & Fisher, P. (2004). Vocabulary lessons. Educational Leadership, 61(6), 66–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2008). How cognitive linguistics can foster effective vocabulary teaching. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Applications of cognitive linguistics: Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 1–61). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). White Plains: New Yersey: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. (1998). Vocabulary: Applied linguistic perspectives. London and New York: Routledge. Nevada: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.). (2007). Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. N. (1989). Facilitating effects of marginal glosses on foreign language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 41–48. doi:10.1111/modl.1989.73.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Fuente, M. J. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 81–112. doi:10.1017/S0272263102001043
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. (1989). Second language vocabulary acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 92–106. doi:10.1017/S0267190500000829
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M. (1999). Discussion: Incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(3), 319–333. doi:10.1017/S0272263199002090
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Y. (2010). Learning strategies for vocabulary development. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 9(2), 105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Hashemi Shahraki, S., & Kassaian, Z. (2011). Effects of learner interaction, receptive and productive learning tasks on vocabulary acquisition: An Iranian case. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2165–2171. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.073
   Google Scholar
• Hill, N. E., & Taylor, L. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and children’s academic achievement pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 161–164. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamil, M. L., & Hiebert, E. H. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary: Perspectives and persistent issues. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73, 440–464. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. (1997). The development of L2 lexis in the expression of the advanced learner. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 440‐448.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary acquisition. Euro SLA Year Book, 5, 223–250.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–26. doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 33–51. doi:10.1177/026553229901600103
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, R., & Schmitt, N. (2015). Vocabulary. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 120–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., McCarten, J., & Sandiford, H. (2013). Touchstone (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mican, A. D., & Medina, L. C. (2015). Boosting vocabulary learning through self-assessment in an English language teaching context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2, 13–35.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Motallebzadeh, K., & Nematizadeh, S. (2011). Does gender play a role in the assessment of oral proficiency?. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 165–172. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n4p165
   Google Scholar
• Naeimi, M., & Foo, T. C. V. (2013). The study of direct vocabulary learning strategies in reading comprehension: The case of Iranian context. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 2((1)), 95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (1990). What is involved in learning a word?. In P. Nation (Ed.), Teaching and learning vocabulary (pp. 29–50). New York: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (1994). Review of working with words, Teaching and learning vocabulary, vocabulary in action, and vocabulary. System, 22, 283–287.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (2006). Language education-vocabulary. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 494–499)). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1–12. doi:10.2167/illt039.0
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 136–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P., & Carter, R. (Eds.). (1989). Vocabulary acquisition. Amsterdam: Free University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowbakht, M., & Shahnazari, M. (2015). The comparative effects of comprehensible input, output and corrective feedback on the receptive acquisition of L2 vocabulary items. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(4), 103–114.
   Google Scholar
• Paribakht, S., & Wesche, M. (1993). Reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada Journal, 11, 9–29. doi:10.18806/tesl.v11i1.623
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. (2004). Research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 146–161. doi:10.1017/S0267190504000078
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. J. (1993). The healthy inadequacy of contextual definition. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 203–212). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehension output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–252). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidelhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., & Casar, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children’s spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschirner, E. (2004). Breadth of vocabulary and advanced English study: An empirical investigation. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (2007). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 1–28. doi:10.1348/000709908X380772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, S. (2002). Investigating the effects of learning tasks on vocabulary knowledge( PhD thesis). Victoria University of Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 33–52. doi:10.1017/S0272263105050023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesche, M., & Paribakht, S. (eds.). (1999). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition: Theory, current research, and instructional implications [Special issue]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 285–300.
   Google Scholar
• Wistner, B., Sakai, H., & Abe, M. (2009). An analysis of the oxford placement test and the Michigan English placement test as L2 proficiency tests. Bulletin of the Faculty of Letters, Hosei University, 58, 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Historical trends in second language vocabulary instruction. In J. COADY & T. HUCKIN (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition. (pp. 5–14). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, K. (2005). Newly placed versus continuing students: Comparing vocabulary size. TESL Reporter, 38(1), 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Zu, F. (2009). Using lexical approach to teach vocabulary. US-China Foreign Language, 7(8), 44–47.
   Google Scholar