On the relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ reading fluency, their personality types and learning styles

References

• Ali, D. A., & Bano, D. (2012). Personality types and reading: A correlational study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(3), 254–19.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(Whole No. 211). doi:10.1037/h0093360
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, H. J., & Feldman, D. C. (1981). Social desirability response bias in self-report choice situations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 377–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadipiran, N. (2016). Identifying young learners’ learning styles among Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(7), 1444–1450. doi:10.17507/tpls.0607.16
   Google Scholar
• Asmali, M. (2014). The relationship between big five personality traits and language learning strategies. Balikesir University the Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 17(32), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri, M. S., & Faghih, M. (2012). The relationship between self-esteem, personality type and reading comprehension of Iranian EFL students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1641–1650. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.8.1641-1650
   Google Scholar
• Carrel, P. L., & Grabe, W. (2002). Reading. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 233–250). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1946). Description and measurement of personality. New York, NY: World Book. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.146
   Google Scholar
• Chavosh, M., & Davoudi, M. (2016). The relationship between perceptual learning styles and reading comprehension performance of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(3), 61–69. doi:10.5539/ijel.v6n3p61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary. (1987). Review by: Andrew Chesterman. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 88(4), 491–494.
   Google Scholar
• Concise Oxford English Dictionary. (2001). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acref/9780199571123.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, S. J. (2012). Remediating reading difficulties (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (1997). The five-factor model of personality and Holland’s RIASEC interest types. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(1), 87–103. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00004-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derakhshan, A., & Shakki, F. (2018). An investigation into the relationship between Iranian EFL high- and low-proficient learners and their learning styles. SAGE Open, 8, 215824401880940. doi:10.1177/2158244018809408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, R, & Griggs, S. (1988). Learning styles: Quiet revolution in ameriean secondory schools. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
   Google Scholar
• Esfandiari, R., & Radfar, S. (2017). An investigation into the relationship between personality traits and Iranian EFL learners performance on C-Test. Teaching English Language, 11(1), 167–188.
   Google Scholar
• Fazeli, S. H. (2011). The exploring nature of language learning strategies (LLSs) and their relationship with various variables with focus on personality traits in the current studies of second/foreign language learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1311–1320. doi:10.4304/tpls.1.10.1311-1320
   Google Scholar
• Fazeli, S. H. (2012). The relationship between the agreeableness trait and use of the English language learning strategies. The Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 8(1), 168–191.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. (1996). Matters of style. Prism (american Society of Engineering Education), 6(4), 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Fewell, N. (2010). Language learning strategies and English language proficiency: An investigation of Japanese EFL university students. TESOL Journal, 2, 159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Braun, M., & O’Connor, R. E. (2001). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 251–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner-O’Neale, L. D., & Harrison, S. (2013). An investigation of the learning styles and study habits of chemistry undergraduates in Barbados and their effect as predictors of Academic achievement in chemical group theory. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(2), 107–122.
   Google Scholar
• Heidari Soureshjani, K., & Naseri, N. (2012). Perceptual learning styles preferences of Iranian EFL learners in relation to their proficiency level. American Journal of Linguistics, 1(4), 70–74. doi:10.5923/j.linguistics.20120104.01
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. L. (1996). Exploring careers with atypology: What we have learned and some new directions. American Psychologist, 51(4), 397–406. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. L, & Gottfredson, G. D. (1976). Using a typology of persons and environments to explain careers: some extensions and clarifications. Counseling Psychologist, 6, 20–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, S, & Tzeng, B. (2000). The value of english picture story books. Elt Journal, 62(1), 47-55.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahimoglu, N., Unaldi, I., Samancioglu, M., & Baglibel, M. (2013). The relationship between personality traits and learning styles: A cluster analysis. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 2(3), 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Jahanbakhsh, A. A., & Ajideh, P. (2018). Changing the learning culture of Iranians: An interplay between method and educational policy. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 26(3), 1883–1904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy, S., & Kolb, D. (2009). Are there cultural differences in learning style. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(1), 69–85. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, A. (2009). The effect of a ‘learning theories’ unit on students’ attitudes toward learning. Australian Journal Of Teacher Education, 34(3). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2009v34n3.5
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1–17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
   Google Scholar
• Khademi, M., Motallebzadeh, K., & Ashraf, H. (2013). The relationship between Iranian EFL instructors’ understanding of learning styles and their students’ success in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(4), 134–142. doi:10.5539/elt.v6n4p134
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella, K. (1995). Understanding and empowering diverse learners in EFL classrooms. In J. M. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 170–194). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 20–34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikulecky, B. S. (2008). Teaching reading in a second language. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Thompson, H. B. (2006). How problems of reading fluency and comprehension are related to difficulties in syntactic awareness skills among fifth graders. Reading Research and Instruction, 46(1), 73–94. doi:10.1080/19388070609558461
   Google Scholar
• Mulalic, A., Shah, P. M., & Ahmad, F. (2009). Perceptual learning styles of ESL learners. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 101–113.
   Google Scholar
• Naserieh, F. (2009). The relationship between perceptual learning style preferences and skill-based learning strategies (Unpublished master’s thesis). Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. doi:10.1111/lang.2000.50.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’ Donnell, A., Reeve, J., & Smith, J. (2012). Educational psychology: Reflection for action (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Opstad, L., & Fallan, L. (2002). Student performance in principles of economics: The importance of gender and personality. International Review of Economics Education, 9(1), 76–92. doi:10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30059-1
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. (2005). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pikulski, J. J. (2006). Fluency: A developmental and language perspective. In S. J. Samuels & E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 70–93). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Pranata, M. S. A., & Junining, E. (2015). The effectiveness of using semantic mapping to Enrich EFL learner’s reading comprehension. Edisi, 2(2), 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Honolulu, Hi: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V. (2006). Reading fluency instruction: Moving beyond accuracy, automaticity and prosody. The Reading Teacher, 59(2), 704–706. doi:10.1598/RT.59.7.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. (1984). Perceptual learning styles preference questionnaire. Available from J. Reid, department of English (pp. 82070). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J. M. (1995). Preface. In J. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. viii–xvii). New York, NY: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D., Gabriel, N., Katchan, O., & Katchen, F. (1994). Personality and second language learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(1), 143–157. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90118-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, A. (1997). Identification of native complexes containing the yeast coactivator/repressor proteins. Biological Chemistry, 272(9), 5571–5578. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.9.5571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated reading. The Reading Teacher, 34(4), 403–408.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J. (2006). Toward a model of reading fluency. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 24–46). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sefcik, D., Prerost, F., & Arbet, S. (2009). Personality types and performance on aptitude and achievement tests: Implications for osteopathic medical education. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 109(6), 296–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shanahan, T. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading and writing development. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 171–183). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, C., & Yunfel, D. (2004). Effects of learning styles and class participation on students’ enjoyment level in distributed learning environments. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 45(2), 123–136. doi:10.2307/40323899
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washngton, DC: National Academy press.
   Google Scholar
• Sulaiman, S., & Sulaiman, T. (2010). Enhancing language teaching and learning by keeping individual differences in perspective. International Education Studies, 2(3), 134–142.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, L. J. (1995). Learning styles: A review of the literature. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/14/2b/55.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Too, S. W. (2009). Students’ learning style and their academic achievement for taxation course-a comparison study. Proceedings of the 2th International Conference of Teaching and Learning (ICTL), Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Wicklein, R. C., & Rojewski, J. W. (1995). The relationship between psychological type and professional orientation among technology education teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 7(3), 57–74. doi:10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.5
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, S. (2012). A comparison of the performance of analytic vs. holistic scoring rubrics to assess L2 writing. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 2(1), 59–92.
   Google Scholar
• Zafar, S, & Meenakshi, K. (2012). Individual learner differences and second language acquisition: a review. Journal Of Language Teaching and Research, 3, 639–646.
   Google Scholar
• Zahibi, R. (2011). Personality in English language proficiency and achievement. Continental Journal of Education Research, 4(3), 1–6.
   Google Scholar