CIRC and STAD in Iranian context: Through the five elements to cooperative learning of lexical collocations

References

• Bahns, J. (1993). Lexical collocations: A contrastive view. ELT Journal, 47(1), 56–17. doi:10.1093/elt/47.1.56
   Google Scholar
• Barbato, R. (2000). Policy implications of cooperative learning on the achievement and attitudes of secondary school mathematics students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York, NY: Fordham University.
   Google Scholar
• Barfield, A. (2002). Knowledge scaling of lexical verbs: Creating a database. Studies in Foreign Language Teaching, 24(3), 221–238.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, M., Benson, E., & Ilson, R. (1986). The BBI combinatory dictionary of English. A guide to word combinations. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, M., Benson, E., & Ilson, R. (1997). The BBI dictionary of English word combinations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publication Company.
   Google Scholar
• Čeh, Z. (2005). Crucial combinations. English Teaching Professional, 37(2), 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dollman, L. (2007). Improving social skills through the use of cooperative learning. M. A. Thesis. ERIC (ED496112), Saint Xavier University Chicago, Illinois. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467B
   Google Scholar
• Doymus, K., Karacop, A., & Simsek, U. (2010). Effects of jigsaw and animation techniques on students’ understanding of concepts and subjects in electrochemistry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 671–691. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9157-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, L. A. (2006). The effects of utilizing the cooperative learning approach (the STAD method) in enhancing writing skills and self concept of lower six students. Unpublished M. Ed thesis, School of Educational Studies, University Science Malaysia, Penang.
   Google Scholar
• Ghahari, S., & Farokhnia, F. (2017). Triangulation of language assessment modes: Learning benefits and socio-cognitive prospects. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 12(3), 275–294. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2017.1342540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi, Z., & Baradaran, A. (2018). The Comparative effect of student team-achievement division and cooperative integrated reading and composition on EFL learners’ speaking complexity. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 67–72. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.67
   Google Scholar
• Ghonsooli, B., Pishgaman, R., & Mahjoobi, F. (2008). The impact of collocational instruction on the writing skill of Iranians EFL learners: A case of product and process study. Iranian EFL Journal, 2(3), 36–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. (2000). Revising priorities: From grammatical failure to collocational success. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach (pp. 47–69). London: Language Teaching Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, J. (2002). Development in collocational proficiency in a workshop on English for general business purposes for Taiwanese college students. Pennsylvania: Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, J., & Chiu, C.H. (2008). Lexical collocations and their relation to speaking proficiency of the college efl learners in taiwan. Asian Efl Journals, 10(1), 181–204.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, J. Y. (2010). The effects of collocation instruction on the reading comprehension and vocabulary learning of Taiwanese college English majors. Asian EFL Journal, 12(1), 47–87.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, L. (2007). Knowledge of English collocations: An analysis of Taiwanese EFL learners. In C. Luke & B. Rubrecht (Eds.), Texas papers in foreign language education: Selected proceedings from the texas foreign language education conference (pp. 113–132). Austin, Texas: Texas University.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G. (2006). Cooperative learning and second language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jahanbakhsh, A. A. (2014). The comparative effect of student teams-achievement division and cooperative integrated reading and composition on EFL learners’ lexical collocation learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, Islamic Azad University at Central Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Jahanbakhsh, A. A., & Ajideh, P. (2018). Changing the learning culture of Iranians: An interplay between method and educational policy. Social Sciences and Humanities, 26(3), 1883–1904.
   Google Scholar
• Jalilifar, A. (2010). The effect of cooperative learning techniques on college students’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 96–108. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Social independence Theory and cooperative learning: The teacher’s role. In R. M. Gillies, A. Ashman, & J. Terwel (Eds.), Teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom (pp. 9–37). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8_1
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285–358. doi:10.3200/MONO.131.4.285-358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Retrieved from www.Clcrc.com/pages/clmethods.html
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, W. (2007). Cooperative learning in the classroom: Putting it into practice. London, GB: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. (2013). Kagan cooperative learning structure. San Clement, CA: Kagan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, G. N., & Inamullah, H. M. (2011). Effect of student’s team achievement division (STAD) on academic achievement of students. Asian Social Science, 7(12), 211–215. doi:10.5539/ass.v7n12p211
   Google Scholar
• Koç, Y. (2014). Informing science and technology teachers about cooperative learning model, application of the model in the classroom and evaluation of the obtained data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B, & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second-language writing: a corpus analysis of learners’ english. Language Learning, 61(2), 647-672. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. (2000). Teaching collocation: Further development in the lexical approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, N. (2004). Cooperative integrated reading and composition. Success for all foundation 200 W. Towsontown Blvd. Baltimore, MD, 21204(410), 616–2330. www.successforall.net
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, M., & Salimzadeh, R. (2009). The effect of cooperative learning strategy training on reading comprehension and motivation of EFL learners. Paper presented at 7th international conference TELLSI, Yazd, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Nagarajan, M. (2006). The effects of utilizing the STAD method on Tamil essay writing skills. Unpublished master’s thesis, University Science Malaysia, School of Educational Studies, Penang.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Omidvar, P., Chan, M. Y., Yap, N. T., & Boong, J. (2012). Learning culture of Iranian and Chinese-Malaysian undergraduate students. Social Sciences & Humanities, 20(3), 865–880.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Gallardo, R., Lopez- Cirugeda, I., & Moreno- Rubio, C. (2012). Influence of cooperative learning on students’ self –Perception on leadership skills: A case study in science education. Higher Education Studies, 2(4), 40–48. doi:10.5539/hes.v2n4p40
   Google Scholar
• Safitri, L. M. (2011). The influence of cooperative learning model type CIRC (Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition) for reading skill of the narrative essay grade SDN 03 morning building in south Jakarta. Unpublished master’s thesis, UHAMKA, Jakarta.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano, R, Stengers, H, & Housen, A. (2015). Acquisition of formulaic sequences in intensive and regular efl programmes. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 89-106. doi: 10.1177/1362168814541748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes and ethic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50, 241–271. doi:10.3102/00346543050002241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharan, Y. (2014). Learning to cooperate for cooperative learning. Anales De Psicología, 30(3), 802–807. doi:10.6018/analesps.30.3.201211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokouhi, H., & Mirsalari, G. H. (2010). Collocational knowledge versus general linguistic knowledge among Iranian EFL learners. Electronic Journal of English as a Second Language, 13(4), 1–24. Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume13/ej52/ej52a7/
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, Mass: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2010). Co-operative learning: what makes groupwork work? In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice (pp. 161–178). Paris: OECD
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. In (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 344-360). New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (2009). Two million children: Success for all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y. (2012). Application of cooperative learning in the college task-based English teaching. Journal of Exam Week, 27(2), 83–84.
   Google Scholar
• Sri Rengan, S. (2004). The effects of utilizing the STAD method on achievement and interest of students in general paper. Unpublished master’s thesis, School of Educational Studies, University Science Malaysia, Penang.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R. J., & Durkin, S. (1992). Using student team reading and student team writing in middle schools: Two evaluations (Report No. 36) Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Effective Schooling for Disadvantaged Students.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, F., & Sliter, R. (2005). Cracking the praxis (1st ed.). New York: The Princeton Review Publishing, L. L. C.
   Google Scholar
• Susanti, A. (2011). Development of cooperative learning model type CIRC to improve writing skills administration student’s diploma. Unpublished master’s thesis, Not. Surabaya. Faculty of Social Sciences. Surabaya State University.
   Google Scholar
• Tiantong, M., & Teemuangsai, S. (2013). Student team achievement divisions (STAD) technique through the moodle to enhance learning achievement. International Education Studies, 6(4), 85–92. doi:10.5539/ies.v6n4p85
   Google Scholar
• Tran, V. D. (2014). The effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement and knowledge retention. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 131–140. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p131
   Google Scholar
• Vasanthi, P. (2011). The effect of using the STAD method in reading comprehension among form four students. Unpublished master’s thesis, School of Educational Studies, University Science Malaysia, Penang.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (2008). Learning in small groups. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (pp. 203–211). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Y. (1999). Teaching collocations for productive vocabulary development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (New York, NY, March 9-13,1999). Retrieved from: http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED457690.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yuliana, A., & Sukoriyanto, S. (2013). The Application of CIRC model to improve student skill in resolving the matter of story material set on grade 7 of junior high school. Unpublished master’s thesis, Malang State University, Malang.
   Google Scholar
• Zarei, A. (2012). The Effects of STAD and CIRC on L2 reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 3, 161–173.
   Google Scholar
• Zarei, A., & Baniesmaili, N. (2010). Learnability of various patterns of lexical collocations by Iranian upper-intermediate learners of English. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 147–169.
   Google Scholar