968
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
LITERATURE, LINGUISTICS & CRITICISM

A probe into discourse structure of english relative clauses of Iranian EFL learners’ reading and writing performance: Centering theory in focus

ORCID Icon, , & | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1788841 | Received 20 May 2020, Accepted 23 Jun 2020, Published online: 09 Jul 2020

References

  • Castro, C. (2004). Lexical cohesion and chain interaction: How L1 Arabic, Japanese, and Spanish writers construct meaning in L2 English. Jurnal Bahasa Jendela Alam, 3, 289–23.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE Publication.
  • De Haan, P. (1987). Relative clauses in indefinite noun phrases 1. English Studies, 68(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00138388708598504
  • Di Eugenio, B. (1998). Centering in Italian. In M. A. Walker, A. K. Joshi, & E. F. Prince (Eds.), Centering theory in discourse (pp. 115–138). Clarendon Press.
  • Fais, L. (2004). Inferable centers, centering transitions, and the notion of coherence. Computational Linguistics, 30(2), 119–150. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120104323093267
  • Ferrari, A. (2005). Appositive relatives in text construction. Cuadernos de Filologia Italiana, 12, 9–32.
  • Frossard, M., Cardebat, D., & Nespoulous, J. L. (2001). Anaphoric resolution and discourse focus: The case of the French “hybrid” demonstrative pronoun. Psicologia: Reflexao E Critica, 14(2), 429–437. doi: 10.1590/S0102-7972200100016
  • Grodner, D., Gibson, E., & Watson, D. (2005). The influence of contextual contrast on syntactic processing: Evidence for strong-interaction in sentence comprehension. Cognition, 95(3), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.007
  • Grosz, B., Joshi, A., & Weinstein, S. (1983). Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics. Cambridge.
  • Grosz, B., Joshi, A., & Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: A framework for modeling local coherence in discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 203–225. http://repository.upenn.ed/ircs_reports/116
  • Grosz, B. J. (1977). The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. Technical Report No. 151, artificial intelligence center, SRI International.
  • Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1986). Attentions, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 175–204. htpp://nrs.harvard.edu./urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:2579648
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
  • Hedberg, N., & Dueck, S. (1999). Cakchiquel reference and Centering Theory. Proceedings of the workshop on structure and constituency in the languages of the Americas, University of British Columbia working papers in linguistics, 59–74. Canada.
  • Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. Routledge.
  • Iida, M. (1998). Discourse coherence and shifting centers in Japanese texts. In M. Walker, A. Joshi, & E. Prince (Eds.), Centering Theory in Discourse (pp. 161–182). Clarendon Press.
  • Joshi, A., & Weinstein, S. (1981). Control of inference: Role of some aspects of discourse structure: Centering. In 7th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp. 385–387. Vancouver.
  • Kameyama, M. (1998). Intrasentential Centering: A Case Study. In M. Walker, A. Joshi, & E. Prince (Eds.), Centering Theory in Discourse (pp. 89-114). Oxford University Press.
  • Kim, H., Cho, J. M., & Seo, J. (1999). Anaphora resolution using an extended Centering algorithm in a multi-modal dialogue system. Proceedings of the ACL workshop on the relation of discourse/dialogue structure and reference, 21–28. London.
  • Kuno, S. (1972). Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry, 3(3), 269–320. The MIT Press. http://www.Jstor.com/Stable4177715
  • Leedy, P., & Ormrod, J. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Loock, R. (2005). Appositive relative clauses in contemporary written and spoken English: Discourse functions and competitive structures [Doctoral dissertation], The University of Lille III.
  • Loock, R. (2006). Propositions relatives appositives et discours rapporté. In C. Delesse (Ed.), Journée d’études CERTA. Discours rapporté(s): Approche(s) linguistique et/ou traductologique (pp. 77–93). Presses de l’Université d’Artois.
  • Loock, R. (2007). Appositive relative clauses and their functions in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(2), 336–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.02.007
  • Loock, R. (2010a). Appositive relative clauses in English: Discourse functions and competing structures. John Benjamins.
  • Loock, R. (2010b). The ‘fame effect’ or how the syntactic choices of writers can be explained by their assumptions about their addressee’s states of knowledge: The case of relevance-choice oriented, non-restrictive noun modifier. Discourse, 7. http://doi.org/10.4000/discourse.8027
  • Loock, R., & O’Connor, K. M. (2013). The discourse functions of nonverbal appositives. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(4), 332–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424213502236
  • Louis, A., & Nenkova, A. (2010). Creating local coherence: An empirical assessment. In Human language technologies: The 2010 annual conference of the north american chapter of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 313–316).
  • Miltsakaki, E. (2001). Centering in Greek. In Proceedings of the 15th international symposium on theoretical and applied linguistics, Thessaloniki.
  • Miltsakaki, E. (2002). Toward an aposynthesis of topic continuity and intrasentential anaphora. Computational Linguistics, 28(3), 319–355. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120102760276009
  • Miltsakaki, E. (2003). The syntax-discourse interface: Effects of the main-subordinate distinction on attention structure [Unpublished Dissertation] University of Pennsylvania.
  • Miltsakaki, E. (2005). A centering analysis of relative clauses in English and Greek. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 11(1), 183–197. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwp/vol 11/iss 1/15
  • Miltsakaki, E. (2007). A rethink of the relationship between salience and anaphora resolution. In A. Branco (ed.), Proceedings of the 6th discourse anaphora and anaphor resolution colloquium, 91–96. Lago, Portugal.
  • Miltsakaki, E., & Kukich, K. (2004). Evaluation of text coherence for electronic essay scoring systems. Natural Language Engineering, 10(1), 25–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324903003206
  • Poesio, M., Cheng, H., Henschel, R., Hitzeman, J., Kibble, R., & Stevenson, R. (2000). Specifying the parameters of centering theory: A corpus-based evaluation using text from application-oriented domains. Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the association for (ACL), 400–407. Computational Linguistics. Hong kong.
  • Poesio, M., Stevenson, R., Di Eugenio, B., & Hitzeman, J. (2004a). Centering: A parametric theory and its instantiations. Computational Linguistics, 30(3), 309–363. doi: 10.1162/0891201041850911
  • Poesio, M., Stevenson, R., Eugenio, B. D., & Hitzeman, J. (2004b). Centering: A parametric theory and its instantiations. Computational Linguistics, 30(3), 309–363. doi: 10.1162/0891201041850911
  • Prasad, R., & Strube, M. (2000). Pronoun resolution in Hindi. In Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 6. The University of Pennsylvania.
  • Prince, E. F. (1990). Syntax and discourse: A look at resumptive pronouns. Proceedings of the Berkeley linguistics society, 16, 482–497. Berkeley, CA.
  • Renkema, J. (2004). Introduction to discourse studies. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Roh, J. E., & Lee, J.-H. (2006). Examining Cf-ranking methods for text structuring and pronominalization in Korean. International Journal of Computer Processing of Oriental Languages, 19(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219427906001402
  • Salkind, N. J. (2007). Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Sage Publications.
  • Strube, M., & Hahn, U. (1996, June). Functional centering. In Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (pp. 270–277). Association for Computational Linguistics. Santa Cruz, Cal.
  • Taboada, M. (2002). Centering and pronominal reference: In dialogue, in Spanish. Proceedings of the 6th workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue (EDILOG 2002), 177–184. Edinburgh.
  • Taboada, M. (2005). Anaphoric terms and focus of attention in English and Spanish. In C. S. Butler, M. Gómez González, & S. M. Doval-Suárez (Eds.), The dynamics of language use: Functional and contrastive perspectives (pp. 197–218). John Benjamins.
  • Taboada, M., & Hadic Zabala, L. (2008). Deciding on units of analysis within centering theory. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4(1), 63–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2008.003
  • Tetreault, J. R. (2001). A corpus-based evaluation of centering and pronoun resolution. Computational Linguistics, 27(4), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120101753342644
  • Thompson, S. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2005). The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054403
  • Tofiloski, M. (2009). Extending Centering Theory for the measure of entity coherence [MSc Thesis], Simon Fraser University.
  • Walker, M., Joshi, A., & Prince, E. F. (1998). Centering in naturally-occurring discourse: An overview. In M. Walker, A. Joshi, & E. Prince (Eds.), Centering theory in discourse (pp. 1–30). Clarendon Press.
  • Wang, Y., & Guo, M. (2014). A short analysis of discourse coherence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.460-465
  • Wiesemann, L. M. (2009). The function of Spanish and English relative clauses in discourse and their segmentation in Centering Theory [Doctoral dissertation], Simon Fraser University.