Effects of graphic presentation on understanding medical risks and benefits among Japanese adults

References

• Carling, C. L., Kristoffersen, D. T., Flottorp, S., Fretheim, A., Oxman, A. D., Schunemann, H. J., Montori, V. M. (2009). The effect of alternative graphical displays used to present the benefits of antibiotics for sore throat on decisions about whether to seek treatment: A randomized trial. PLoS Medicine, 6(8), e1000140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P. A., & Shah, P. (1998). A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 4(2), 75–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.4.2.75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damman, O. C., Vonk, S. I., Van Den Haak, M. J., Van Hooijdonk, C. M. J., . M. J., & Timmermans, D. R. M. (2018). The effects of infographics and several quantitative versus qualitative formats for cardiovascular disease risk, including heart age, on people’s risk understanding. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(8), 1410. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieckmann, N. F., Slovic, P., & Peters, E. M. (2009). The use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy. Risk Analysis, 29(10), 1473–1488. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01279.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, J. G., Qian, F., & Veazie, P. J. (2012). How well do commonly used data presentation formats support comparative effectiveness evaluations?. Medical Decision Making, 32(6), 840–850. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X12445284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerlin, A., Wang, C., & Ubel, P. A. (2005). Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people’s health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics?. Medical Decision Making, 25(4), 398–405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X05278931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman-Stewart, D., Kocovski, N., McConnell, B. A., Brundage, M. D., & Mackillop, W. J. (2000). Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions. Medical Decision Making, 20(2), 228–238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X0002000208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., Brewer, N. T., & Downs, J. S. (2011). Communicating risks and benefits. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Galesic, M., Garcia-Retamero, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2009). Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy. Health Psychology, 28(2), 210–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2011). Effective communication of risks to young adults: using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 17(3), 270–287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R., & Galesic, M. (2009). Communicating treatment risk reduction to people with low numeracy skills: A cross-cultural comparison. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2196–2202. doi: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.160234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R., & Galesic, M. (2010). How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(12), 1323–1329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1484-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R., Galesic, M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Do icon arrays help reduce denominator neglect?. Medical Decision Making, 30(6), 672–684. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10369000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2007). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(2), 53–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawley, S. T., Zikmund-Fisher, B., Ubel, P., Jancovic, A., Lucas, T., & Fagerlin, A. (2008). The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(3), 448–455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard, J. H., Peters, E., Dixon, A., & Tusler, M. (2007). Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information. Medical Care Research and Review, 64(4), 379. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558707301630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M. (2007). Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Medical Decision Making, 27(5), 696–713. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X07307271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M., & Hollands, J. G. (1999). The visual communication of risk. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 25(25), 149–163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024191.
   Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M., Peters, E., Kimmick, G., Liotcheva, V., & Marcom, P. (2010). Breast cancer patients’ treatment expectations after exposure to the decision aid program adjuvant online: the influence of numeracy. Medical Decision Making, 30(4), 464–473. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X09360371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 37–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X0102100105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125–139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-47520200016-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak, J. G., Hartzler, A. L., Macleod, L. C., Izard, J. P., Dalkin, B. M., & Gore, J. L. (2016). Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools. Patient Education and Counseling, 99 (3), 448–454. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0738-3991(15)30075-6. [pii].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto, M., Kyutoku, Y., Sawada, M., Clowney, L., Watanabe, E., Dan, I., & Kawamoto, K. (2012). Health numeracy in Japan: measures of basic numeracy account for framing bias in a highly numerate population. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 12(1), 104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Otten, J. J., Cheng, K., & Drewnowski, A. (2015). Infographics and public policy: using data visualization to convey complex information. Health Affairs, 34(11), 1901. doi: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, E., Hart, P. S., & Fraenkel, L. (2011). Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions. Medical Decision Making, 31(3), 432–436. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10391672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407–413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer New York. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F. (2008). A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory. Medical Decision Making, 28(6), 850–865. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X08327066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 943–973. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Black, W. C., & Welch, H. G. (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(11), 966–972. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stellamanns, J., Ruetters, D., Dahal, K., Schillmoeller, Z., & Huebner, J. (2017). Visualizing risks in cancer communication: A systematic review of computer-supported visual aids. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(8), 1421–1431. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, A. R., Voepel-Lewis, T., Brennan-Martinez, C., McGonegal, M., & Levine, R. (2012). Using animated computer-generated text and graphics to depict the risks and benefits of medical treatment. The American Journal of Medicine, 125(11), 1103–1110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.04.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, A. R., Voepel-Lewis, T., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Fagerlin, A. (2010a). The effect of format on parents’ understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: A comparison between text, tables, and graphics. Journal of Health Communication, 15(5), 487–501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.492560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, A. R., Voepel-Lewis, T., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Fagerlin, A. (2010b). Presenting research risks and benefits to parents: Does format matter?. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 111(3), 718–723. doi: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e8570a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, Y., Sakai, M., Fukui, T., & Shimbo, T. (2011). Measuring the ability to interpret medical information among the Japanese public and the relationship with inappropriate purchasing attitudes of health-related goods. Asia-Pacific Journal Of Public Health / Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health, 23(3), 386–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539509344882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevena, L. J., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Edwards, A., Gaissmaier, W., Galesic, M., Han, P. K. J., & Woloshin, S. (2013). Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: A risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(Suppl S2), S7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tversky, B. (2001). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 79–112). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zikmund‐Fisher, B. J., Fagerlin, A., & Ubel, P. A. (2008). Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics. Cancer, 113(12), 3382–3390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Ubel, P. A., Smith, D. M., Derry, H. A., McClure, J. B., Stark, A., & Fagerlin, A. (2008). Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(2), 209–214. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipkin, D. A., Umscheid, C. A., Keating, N. L., Allen, E., Aung, K., Beyth, R., & Feldstein, D. A. (2014). Evidence-based risk communication: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 161(4), 270. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-0295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar