Distributed practice in classroom inquiry science learning

References

• Appleton-Knapp, S. L., Bjork, R. A., & Wickens, T. D. (2005). Examining the spacing effect in advertising: Encoding variability, retrieval processes, and their interaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 266–276. doi:10.1086/432236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, I. M., Martin, L. A., & Needham, D. R. (1992). Memory monitoring: How useful is self-knowledge about memory? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 195–218. doi:10.1080/09541449208406182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerant (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). New York, NY: Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A. (1978). The updating of human memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 12, pp. 235–259). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A., & Linn, M. C. (2006). The science of learning and the learning of science: Introducing desirable difficulties. APS Observer, 19(3), 49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Budé, L., Imbos, T., Wiel, M. W., & Berger, M. P. (2011). The effect of distributed practice on students’ conceptual understanding of statistics. Higher Education, 62(1), 69–79. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9366-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K., & Pashler, H. (2007). Testing beyond words: Using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 474–478. doi:10.3758/BF03194092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., & Cepeda, N. J. (2009). Using tests to enhance 8th grade students’ retention of us history facts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(6), 760–771. doi:10.1002/acp.1507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, J. L. (2010). Supporting students’ knowledge integration with technology-enhanced inquiry curricula (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, PhD). University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1965). Some statistical issues in psychological research. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of clinical psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, P. F., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., & Spirgel, A. (2010). Spacing and testing effects: A deeply critical, lengthy, and at times discursive review of the literature. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 53, 63–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellarosa, D., & Bourne, L. E. (1985). Surface form and the spacing effect. Memory & Cognition, 13(6), 529–537. doi:10.3758/BF03198324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, F. N. (1987). Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(2), 162. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627–634. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.8.627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, F. N. (1989). Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 309–330. doi:10.1007/BF01320097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don’t. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 795–805. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (jol) and the delayed-jol effect. Memory & Cognition, 20(4), 374–380. doi:10.3758/BF03210921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 779–788. doi:10.3758/BF03195868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P. E. (2013). Videography as production nexus: Digital film cameras, media management and the distribution of creativity in tv and film production (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Mälardalen University.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. doi:10.3102/0034654312457206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, J. A., & Corkill, A. J. (1987). Influence of paraphrased repetitions on the spacing effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(2), 198. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluckman, M., Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2014). Spacing simultaneously promotes multiple forms of learning in children’s science curriculum. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 266–273. doi:10.1002/acp.2997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager, W., & Hasselhorn, M. (1992). Memory monitoring and memory performance: Linked closely or loosely? Psychological Research, 54(2), 110–113. doi:10.1007/BF00937139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (1998). Multilevel modeling: When and why. Classification, Data Analysis, and Data Highways, 2000, 54–85.
   Google Scholar
• Janiszewski, C., Noel, H., & Sawyer, A. G. (2003). A meta-analysis of the spacing effect in verbal learning: Implications for research on advertising repetition and consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 138–149. doi:10.1086/374692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. doi:10.1007/BF02300500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kali, Y. (2006). Collaborative knowledge building using the design principles database. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 187–201. doi:10.1007/s11412-006-8993-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kali, Y., Linn, M. C., & Roseman, J. (2008). Designing coherent science education: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy. Columbia University: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapler, I. V., Weston, T., & Wiseheart, M. (2015). Spacing in a simulated undergraduate classroom: Long-term benefits for factual and higher-level learning. Learning and Instruction, 36, 38–45. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., & Bauernschmidt, A. (2011). Spaced retrieval: Absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerfoot, B. P., Kearney, M. C., Connelly, D., & Ritchey, M. L. (2009). Interactive spaced education to assess and improve knowledge of clinical practice guidelines: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Surgery, 249(5), 744–749. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819f6db8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, D. R., & Metcalfe, J. (2003). Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 918–929. doi:10.3758/BF03196445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., Castel, A., Eich, T., & Bjork, R. A. (2010). Spacing as the friend of both memory and induction in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25(2), 498–503. doi:10.1037/a0017807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(3), 609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küpper-Tetzel, C. E. (2014). Strong effects on weak theoretical grounds: Understanding the distributed practice effect. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 222, 71–81. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küpper-Tetzel, C. E. (2015). Understanding the distributed practice effect. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 222(2), 71-81.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 125–141. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3502_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C. (2010). Promoting cumulative learning. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 253-253). Chicago, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B.-S. (2011). Science learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., Lee, H., Hofstetter, C., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Assessing knowledge integration in science: Construct, measures, and evidence. Educational Assessment, 13(1), 23. doi:10.1080/10627190801968224
   Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., Ryoo, K., Sato, E., Svihla, V., & Linn, M. C. (2013, April 27-May 1). Designing assessment to measure cumulative learning of energy topics. Paper presented at the AERA, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, G., & Cornoldi, C. (1993). Strategies in study time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(1), 47. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, G., Cornoldi, C., & Marchitelli, G. (1990). Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation? Memory & Cognition, 18(2), 196–204. doi:10.3758/BF03197095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 349. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.3.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2007). Principles of cognitive science in education: The effects of generation, errors, and feedback. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 225–229. doi:10.3758/BF03194056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry‐based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. doi:10.1002/tea.v47:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. In Board on Science Education, & Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (Eds.), Committee on conceptual framework for the new K-12 science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O., & Leonesio, R. J. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the” labor-in-vain effect”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(4), 676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., Rohrer, D., Cepeda, N. J., & Carpenter, S. K. (2007). Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 187–193. doi:10.3758/BF03194050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4–11. doi:10.1080/00405840802577536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea, C. P., & Modigliani, V. (1985). The effect of expanded versus massed practice on the retention of multiplication facts and spelling lists. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications, 4(1), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135–147. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richland, L. E., Stigler, J. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Teaching the conceptual structure of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 189–203. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.667065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. (2006). Test-enhanced learning. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., III, & Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 242–248. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D. (2015). Student instruction should be distributed over long time periods. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 635–643. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9332-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryoo, K., & Linn, M. C. (2013). Automated feedback in a computer-based diagramming tool to help students distinguish among energy ideas in life science. Paper presented at the AERA, San Francisc.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrook, R., Brown, G., & Solity, J. (2005). Distributed and massed practice: From laboratory to classroom. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 107–122. doi:10.1002/acp.1066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotta, J., & Chi, M. (2006). The impact of ontology training on conceptual change: Helping students understand the challenging topics in science. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 261–289. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2402_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotta, J., & Linn, M. C. (2009). Wise science: Web-based inquiry in the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S., & Rothkopf, E. (1984). Contextual enrichment and distribution of practice in the classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 1(3), 341–358. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0103_4
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, H. S., Cepeda, N. J., & Kapler, I. V. (2010). Spacing effects in real world classroom vocabulary learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 763–767. doi:10.1002/acp.1747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, L. K., & Simon, D. A. (2012). Distributed learning: Data, metacognition, and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 379-399. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9206-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svihla, V. (2011). Formulating wise learning experiences. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting computer supported collaborative learning to policy and practice (Vol. I — Long Papers, pp. 232–239). Hong Kong: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Svihla, V., Gerard, L., Ryoo, K., Sato, E., Visintainer, T., Swanson, H., … Dorsey, C. (2010). Energy across the curriculum: Cumulative learning using embedded assessment results Learning in the disciplines. Chicago, IL: ISLS.
   Google Scholar
• Svihla, V., & Linn, M. C. (2012a). A design-based approach to fostering understanding of global climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 651–676. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.597453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svihla, V., & Linn, M. C. (2012b). Distributing practice: Challenges and opportunities for inquiry learning. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS2012): The Future of Learning, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Svihla, V., Wester, M., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Revisiting: An analytic for retention of coherent science learning. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(2), 74–100. doi:10.18608/jla.2015.22.7
   Google Scholar
• Toppino, T. C., Fearnow-Kenney, M. D., Kiepert, M. H., & Teremula, A. C. (2009). The spacing effect in intentional and incidental free recall by children and adults: Limits on the automaticity hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 37(3), 316–325. doi:10.3758/MC.37.3.316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkoeijen, P. P., & Bouwmeester, S. (2014). Is spacing really the “friend of induction”? Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2012). Distributing learning over time: The spacing effect in children’s acquisition and generalization of science concepts. Child Development, 83(4), 1137–1144. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01781.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlach, H. A., Sandhofer, C. M., & Kornell, N. (2008). The spacing effect in children’s memory and category induction. Cognition, 109(1), 163–167. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. L. (2011). Anglo and Hispanic college students performance and intent to graduate: A prospective examination of risk factors in two theoretical models (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, PhD). Texas Tech University.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—An embodied modeling approach. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 171–209. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. H., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1177–1198. doi:10.1002/tea.20443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar