Using concept inventories to measure understanding

References

• Bailey, J.M. , Johnson, B. , Prather, E.E. , & Slater, T.F. (2012). Development and validation of the star properties concept inventory. International Journal of Science Education , 34 (14), 2257–2286.10.1080/09500693.2011.589869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caleon, I. , & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and application of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students’ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education , 32 (7), 939–961.10.1080/09500690902890130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabay, R. , & Sherwood, B. (2008). Computational physics in the introductory calculus-based course. American Journal of Physics 76(4), 307–313. doi:10.1119/1.2835054 10.1119/1.2835054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• di Sessa, A. (1987). The third revolution in computers and education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 24 (4), 343–367. doi:10.1002/tea.3660240407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick-Perez, M. , Luxford, C.J. , Windus, T.L. , & Holme, T. (2016). A quantum chemistry concept inventory for physical chemistry classes. Journal of Chemical Education , 93 (4), 605–612.10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, H. (2017). Learning gain – Higher Education Funding Council for England . Hefce.ac.uk. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/lt/lg/
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. (2013). The calculus concept inventory – Measurement of the effect of teaching methodology in mathematics. Notices of the American Mathematical Society , 60 (8), 1018–1026.10.1090/noti/201308
   Google Scholar
• Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics , 66 , 64–74.10.1119/1.18809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, F. , & Treagust, D.F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education , 21 (3), 203–211.10.1080/00219266.1987.9654897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D. , & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller. The Physics Teacher , 33 , 502–506.
   Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D. , Wells, M. , & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher , 30 , 141–158.10.1119/1.2343497
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, D. , & Heller, P. (1995). What does the Force Concept Inventory actually measure? The Physics Teacher , 33 , 138–143.10.1119/1.2344171
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, S. (2012). Student engagement with assessment and feedback: Some lessons from short-answer free-text e-assessment questions. Computers & Education , 58 (2), 818–834.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorion, N. , Gane, B.D. , James, K. , Schroeder, L. , Dibello, L.V. , & Pellerino, J.W. (2015). An analytic framework for evaluating the validity of concept inventory claims. Journal of Engineering Education , 104 (4), 454–496.10.1002/jee.v104.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasry, N. , Rosenfield, S. , Dedic, H. , Dahan, A. , & Reshef, O. (2011). The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory. American Journal of Physics , 79 (9), 909–912.10.1119/1.3602073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, R.S. , Peak, E. , & Foster, T.M. (2007). Are they all created equal? A comparison of different concept inventory development methodologies .AIP conference proceedings 883, (pp.14–17). Syracuse, New York . https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2508680
   Google Scholar
• Lillian Christie McDermott . 2001. Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: “Physics Education Research—The Key to Student Learning”. American Journal of Physics. 69(11) 1127-1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, C. , Guerin, B. , Harte, E. , Frearson, M. , & Manville, C. (2015). Learning gain in higher education (1st ed., p. 7). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR996.html
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L. , Taylor ,C. , & Webb, K. (June 23 - 25, 2014). Leveraging open source principles for flexible concept inventory development . Proceedings of the 2014 conference on innovation & technology in computer science education,  (pp. 243–248). Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Reed-Rhoads, T. , & Imbrie, P.K. (2008).  Concept inventories in engineering education. Paper presented at the National Research Council’s Workshop on Linking Evidence to Promising Practices in STEM Undergraduate Education. (pp. 13–14). Washington, DC. October. Accessed from: https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_072625.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, P.M. , Coyle, H. , Miller, J.L. , Cook-Smith, N. , Dussault, M. , & Gould, R.R. (2009). The astronomy and space science concept inventory: Development and validation of assessment instruments aligned with the K-12 national science standards. Astronomy Education Review , 8 (1). doi:10.3847/AER2009024.
   Google Scholar
• Sands, D. (2013, August). Evidence for the applicability of dual processing theory in physics problem solving . Proceedings ICPE-EPEC, Prague. Retrieved from http://www.icpe2013.org/uploads/ICPE-EPEC_2013_ConferenceProceedings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sands, D. (2010). First year mechanics taught through modelling in VPython. New Directions , 6 , 47–50 Retrieved from https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/new-directions/article/view/383/388 10.11120/ndir.2010.00060047
   Google Scholar
• Sands, D. , & Marchant, A.L. (2012). Enhanced conceptual understanding in first year mechanics through modelling. New Directions , 8 , 22–26 Retrieved from https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/new-directions/article/view/490/487 10.11120/ndir.2012.00080022
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. , Peter, M. , & Harlow, A. (20-23 August, 2012). An electronics threshold-concept inventory . Proceedings of IEEE international conference on teaching, assessment, and learning for engineering. Hong Kong. doi:10.1109/TALE.2012.6360366
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. , Griffin, H. , & Stewart, G. (2007). Context sensitivity in the Force Concept Inventory. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research , 3 (1). https://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010102.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, C.S. , & Bailey ,J.M. (2010). Do concept inventories actually measure anything? Astronomy Education Review , 9 (1). http://access.portico.org/Portico/#!journalAUSimpleView/tab=PDF?cs=ISSN_15391515?ct=E-Journal%20Content?auId=ark:/27927/pgg3ztfdrhv
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. , & Bao, L. (2010). Analyzing Force Concept Inventory with item response theory. American Journal of Physics , 78 (10), 1064–1070.10.1119/1.3443565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar