Philosophies and pedagogies that shape an integrated engineering programme

References

• Ambrose, S.A., Lovett, M., Bridges, M.W., DiPietro, M., & Norman, M.K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S.A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S.M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Barrows, H.S. (1992). The tutorial process. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University Medical School.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42. doi:10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• CBI. (2009). Future fit: Preparing graduates for the world of work. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., & Brodeur, D. (2007). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach. New York: Springer Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Graff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doppelt, Y. (2009). Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finelli, C., Bergom, I., & Mesa, V. (2011). Student teams in the engineering classroom and beyond: Setting up students for success. Ann Arbor, MI: Centre for Research on Learning and Teaching University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez Puente, S.M., Van Eijck, M., & Jochems, W. (2011). Towards characterising design-based learning in engineering education: A review of the literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(2), 137–149.
   Google Scholar
• Hanney, R., & Savin-Baden, M. (2013). The problem of projects: Understanding the theoretical underpinnings of project-led PBL. London Review of Education, 11(1), 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, N. (2002). Managing teams: A strategy for success. London: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J. (2015). Introduction to authentic learning. In V. Bozalek, D. Ng’ambi Wood, J. Herrington, J. Hardman, & A. Amory (Eds.), Activity theory, authentic learning, emerging technologies: Towards a transformative higher education pedagogy (pp. 61–67). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P., & O’Rourke, K. (2004). Guide to curriculum design: Enquiry-based learning. York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J.R., & Smith, D.K. (1993). The wisdom of teams. Boston: McKinsey and Company Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmos, A. (2002). Facilitating change to a problem-based model. The International Journal for Academic Development, 7(1), 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, D. (2014). Group dynamics for teams (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Litzinger, T., Lattuca, L.R., Hadgraft, R., & Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123–150.
   Google Scholar
• McMasters, J.H. (2004). Influencing engineering education: One (aerospace) industry perspective. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 353–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J.E., & Treagust, D.F. (2003). Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3, 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R., & Ion, S. (2014). The universe of engineering: A call to action. London: Royal Academy of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, D.C., USA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2008). Innovations in engineering education, curriculum, and infrastructure (IEECI) (NSF 08-542). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, B., Relder, R.M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centred Learning, 2, 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, J. (2013). Professor John Perkins’ review of engineering skills. London, UK: UK Department of Business Innovation and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Rath, T. (2007). StrengthsFinder 2.0: A new and upgraded edition of the online test from Gallup’s now discover your strengths. London: Gallup Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rauhut, B. (2007). Educating engineers for the 21st century. London: Royal Academy of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, K., Smith, M.S., Tilley, E., Marie, J., & Mitchell, J.E. (2017). How student-generated peer-assessment rubrics use affective criteria to evaluate teamwork. In Proceedings of the SEFI annual conference, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal. SEFI.
   Google Scholar
• Rugarcia, A., Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., & Stice, J.E. (2000). The Future of Engineering Education I. A vision for a new century. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Savery, J.R., & Duffy, T.M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational technology, 35(5), 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C.H. (2004). Foundations of problem-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Spinks, N., Silburn, N., & Birchall, D. (2006). Educating engineers for the 21st century: The industry view. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, B.C., Renaud, C.C., Savory, S.J., Romans, E.J., Mitrofanov, O., Rio, M., ... Mitchell, J.E. (2010). Introducing scenario based learning: experiences from an undergraduate electronic and electrical engineering course. Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, E., Peters, J., & Mitchell, J.E. (2017). Inclusion of teaching on self-awareness,. diversity and reflection to support an engineering curriculum augmented with problem and scenario-based learning: A work in progress. Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015) Sustainable development goals, http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Dyehouse, M., Weber, N., & Strobel, J. (2012). Conceptualizing authenticity in engineering education: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) annual conference and exposition, San Antonio, TX (AC 2012-3097)
   Google Scholar
• Woods, D.R., Felder, R.W., Rugarcia, A., & Stice, J.E. (2000). The future of engineering education III. Developing critical skills. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(2), 108–117.
   Google Scholar