Cognitive load theory in the context of second language academic writing

References

• Artino, A.R., Jr. (2008). Cognitive load theory and the role of learner experience: An abbreviated review for educational practitioners. AACE Journal, 16(4), 425–439.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, P. (2006). Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems. Learning and Instruction, 16, 389–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beare, S. (2000). Differences in Content Generating and Planning Processes of Adult L1 and L2 Proficient Writers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Beare, S., & Bourdages, J.S. (2007). Skilled writers‘ generating strategies in L1 and L2: An exploratory study. In G. Rijlaarsdam, M. Torrance., L. Van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Studies in writing, vol.20.Writing and cognition: research and applications Amsterdam (pp. 151–161). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bonoma, T.V. (1985). Case research in marketing: Opportunities, problems, and a process. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 199–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C.R., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C.R, Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2011). Efficiency in learning: Evidence based guidelines to manage cognitive load. New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A.D., & Brooks-Carson, A. (2001). Research on direct versus translated writing: Students’ strategies and their results. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 169–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, G. (1998, December). Research into cognitive load theory and instructional design at UNSW. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• DeLeeuw, K.E., & Mayer, R.E. (2008). A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derakhshan, A., & Karimi, E. (2015). The interference of first language and second language acquisition. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10, 2112–2117.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, C.N., & Nessel, D.D. (1983). Language experience approach to reading and writing: Language experience reading for second language learners. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A.T. (2002). A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods, 34, 455–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, B.A. (2009). Garner on language and writing. USA: American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., & Tetroe, J. (1987). Composing in a second language. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modelling production processes (pp. 34–57). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Jong, T.D. (2010). Cognitive load theory educational research and instructional design some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, B., & Duchon, D. (1988). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: A case study. MIS Quarterly, 12, 571–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuwaileh, A.A., & Shoumali, A.A. (2000). Writing errors: A study in writing ability of Arabic learners of academic English and Arabic at university. Language. Culture and Curriculum, 13(2), 174–183.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (1992). Effects of first language on second language writing: Translation versus direct composition. Language Learning, 42, 183–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, H, & Rinnert, C. (1994). Effects of first language on second language writing: translation versus direct composition. Language Learning, 42, 183-215. doi:10.1111/lang.1992.42.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapels, A.R. (1990). An overview of second language writing process research. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 37–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lott, D. (1983). Analysing and counteracting interference errors. ELT Journal, 37(3), 256–261.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.E. (2003). Elements of a science of e-learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 297–313.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minassian, A., Granholm, E., Verney, S., & Perry, W. (2004). Pupillary dilation to simple vs. complex tasks and its relationship to thought disturbance in schizophrenia patients. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 52, 53–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in cognitive load theory: Methodology and instructional design. Instructional Science, 32(1–2), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F.G.C. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plass, J.L., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (2010). Cognitive load theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ransdell, S., & Barbier, M.L. (2002). New directions for research in L2 Writing. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, R. (1996). The Composing Processes and Strategies of Four Adult Undergraduate Level Native Malay Speakers of ESL/EFL: Composing, English as a Second Language. Unpublished PhD thesis, Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki, M. (2002). Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners’ writing processes. In G. Rijlaarsdam, S. Ransdell, & M. Barbier (Eds.), Studies in writing volume 11: New directions for research in L2 Writing (pp. 49–80). Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki, M. (2004). A multiple-data analysis of the 3.5-year development of EFL student writers. Language Learning, 54(3), 525–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki, M., & Hirose, K. (1996). Explanatory variables for ESL students’ expository writing. Language Learning, 46(1), 137–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonen, R., van Gelderen, A., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2003). First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53, 165–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P.L., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J, Sweller, J, & Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J., & Paas, F.G.W.C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzawa, K., & Cumming, A. (1989). Writing strategies in Japanese as a foreign language: Lowering or keeping up the standards. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 46, 178–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Veerappan, V., Yusof, D.S., & Aris, A. (2013). Language-switching in L2 composition among ESL and EFL undergraduate writers. Linguistics Journal, 7(1), 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Waddill, D.D., & Marquardt, M.J. (2011). The E-HR advantage: The complete handbook for technology-enabled human resources. Boston & London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2003). Switching to first language among writers with differing second-language proficiency. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 347–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang., W., & Wen, Q. (2002). L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing Online, 11(3), 225–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijan, D.V., Bergh, H.V.D., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, G. (2009). L1 use during L2 writing: An empirical study of a complex phenomenon. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 235–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall, B.R. (2002). Language-switching: Using the first language while writing in a second. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar