Reflecting on sustainability: coproducing a critical framework for sustainable design in the architectural studio

References

• Allen, E. (1997). Second studio: A model for technical teaching. Journal of Architectural Education, 51(2), 92–95. doi:10.1080/10464883.1997.10734756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altomonte, S. (2009). Environmental education for sustainable architecture. Review of European Studies, 1(2), 12. doi:10.5539/res.v1n2p12
   Google Scholar
• Altomonte, S., Attia, S., Herde, A., & Dartevelle, O. (2010). EDUCATE state of the art of environmental sustainability in academic curricula and conditions for registration. Retrieved from Nottingham: www.educate-sustainability.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Banham, R. (1991). A black box: The secret profession of architecture. New Statesman and Society, 3, 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bashier, F. (2014). Reflections on architectural design education: The return of rationalism in the studio. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(4), 424–430. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2014.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, IV, V., Collins, B., & McInnes, B. (1997). Deep and surface learning: A simple or simplistic dichotomy? Accounting Education, 6(1), 1–12. doi:10.1080/096392897331587
   Google Scholar
• Biktimirov, E.N., & Nilson, L.B. (2006). Show them the money: Using mind mapping in the introductory finance course. Journal of Financial Education, 32, 72–86.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, R., & Fischer, J. (2013). Overcoming the technophilia/technophobia split in environmental discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(2), 235–254. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.730264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S.D. (1997). Assessing critical thinking. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(75), 17–29. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0717
   Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Action Research, 1(1), 9–28. doi:10.1177/14767503030011002
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham-Hatfield, S., & Evans, R. (1996). Sustainability and planning. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ceschin, F., & Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies, 47, 118–163. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clune, S. (2014). Design for sustainability and the design studio. Fusion Journal, 3, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer. Teaching in Higher Education,41.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S.J., & Golton, B. (1994). Sustainable development concepts and practice in the built environment – A UK perspective. Paper presented at the First Int. Conference of Sustainable Construction, Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Crysler, C.G. (1995). Critical pedagogy and architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 48(4), (1984-), 208–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douvlou, E. (2006). Effective teaching and learning: Integrating problem-based learning in the teaching of sustainable design. CEBE Transactions, 3(2), 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Dusch, B., Crilly, N., & Moultrie, J. (2010). Developing a framework for mapping sustainable design activities. Paper presented at the DRS International Conference: Design & Complexity, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, T.A. (1991). Voices in architectural education: Cultural politics and pedagogy. New York: JF Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• EDUCATE. (2012). Sustainable architectural education: White paper. Retrieved from Nottingham: https://www.educate-sustainability.eu/kb/
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N.J. (2013). Styles of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fenner, R.A., Ainger, C.M., Cruickshank, H.J., & Guthrie, P.M. (2005). Embedding sustainable development at Cambridge University engineering department. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(3), 229–241.
   Google Scholar
• Gelernter, M. (1988). Reconciling lectures and studios. Journal of Architectural Education, 41(2), 46–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., Hochman, H., & Dafni, I. (2010). The design studio “crit”: Teacher–Student communication. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24(03), 285–302.
   Google Scholar
• Gürel, M.Ö. (2010). Explorations in teaching sustainable design: A studio experience in interior design/architecture. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 184–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, S., & Farmer, G. (2001). Reinterpreting sustainable architecture: The place of technology. Journal of Architectural Education, 54(3), 140–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, S., & Moore, S.A. (2007). Sustainable architecture and the pluralist imagination. Journal of Architectural Education, 60(4), 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184.
   Google Scholar
• Hannigan, J. (2014). Environmental sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanpour, B., Alpar Atun, R., & Ghaderi, S. (2017). From words to action: Incorporation of sustainability in architectural education. Sustainability, 9(10), 1790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsath, T.L. (2017). Is architectural pedagogy prepared for buildings of the future? Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 139(1), 0110031–0110039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchey, P.H. (2008). Action research primer. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, C., Ferreira, J.-A., & Blomfield, J. (2016). Teaching sustainable development in higher education: Building critical, reflective thinkers through an interdisciplinary approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(3), 305–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, T., & Ravetz, J. (2000). City region 2020: Integrated planning for a sustainable environment. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Jamison, A. (2001). The making of green knowledge: Environmental politics and cultural transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jepson, E.J. (2004). Human nature and sustainable development: A strategic challenge for planners. CPL Bibliography, 19(1), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A.Y., & Kolb, D.A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D.A., & Goldman, M.B. (1973). Toward a typology of learning styles and learning environments: An investigation of the impact of learning styles and discipline demands on the academic performance, social adaptation and career choices of MIT seniors. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säaljö, R. (1976). On qualtitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, K. (2010). The design process-making it relevant for students. International Journal of Architectural Research, 4(2–3), 76–89.
   Google Scholar
• McClean, D. (2009). Embedding learner independence in architecture education: Reconsidering design studio pedagogy. (Doctoral dissertation), Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, A., Chatzopoulos, N., Politi, A., & Roz, J. (2007). Participatory action research: Collective reflections on gender, culture, and language. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 748–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J.D., & Cañas, A.J. (2006). The origins of the concept mapping tool and the continuing evolution of the tool. Information Visualization, 5(3), 175–184.
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan, T. (1989). The challenge for environmentalism. New Models in Geography, 1, 77.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver-Hoyo, M., & Allen, D. (2006). The use of triangulation methods in qualitative educational research. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(4), 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Olweny, M. (2018). Introducing sustainability into an architectural curriculum in East Africa. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(6), 1131–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, Ca: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D.W. (1993). Blueprint 3: Measuring sustainable development (Vol. 3). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1971). Structuralism. (C. Maschler & C. Maschler, Ed). London: Routledge and K. Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). Introduction to groundings. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: SAGE, (pp. 11-14).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R.R. (2001). Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 26(1), 37–57.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Institute of British Architects. (2010). RIBA validation criteria at part 1 and part 2. London: RIBA.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A. (1985). The design studio. London: RIBA Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton, A.K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Symons, J., & Karlsson, R. (2015). Green political theory in a climate-changed world: Between innovation and restraint. Environmental Politics, 24(2), 173–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Till, J. (2003). Lost judgement. EAAE Prize, 2005, 164–181.
   Google Scholar
• Tischner, U., & Verkuijl, M. (2006). Design for (social) sustainability and radical change. Paper presented at the perspectives on radical changes to sustainable consumption and production, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W.M.K. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twardy, C. (2004). Argument maps improve critical thinking. Teaching Philosophy, 27(2), 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Vezzoli, C.A., & Manzini, E. (2008). A new conceptual framework for sustainable development design for environmental sustainability. London: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Warburton, K. (2003). Deep learning and education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(1), 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, H. (2004). Facilitating critically reflective learning: Excavating the role of the design tutor in architectural education. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 2(3), 101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, W.F. (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 211–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1996). Emancipatory action research for organisational change and management development. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Eds.), New directions in action research. London: Falmer Press, (pp. 83–105).
   Google Scholar