Agency within Structures and Warranted Resistance: Response to Commentators

References

• Althusser, Louis 1971. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, trans. Ben Brewster, London: New Left Books, http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth 1993. Value in Ethics and Economics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth 2001. Unstrapping the Straightjacket of ‘Preference’: A Comment on Amartya Sen’s Contributions of Philosophy and Economics, Economics and Philosophy 17: 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth 2014. Social Movements, Experiments in Living, and Moral Progress, Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas, https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/handle/1808/14787
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth 2020. Moral Apprehension and Cognition as a Social Skill, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/1: 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Andrada, Gloria 2020. Cognition as an Enculturated and Extended Social Skill, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/1: 71–75.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Lisa Feldman 2017. How Emotions are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain, New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Beeghly, Erin 2020. Embodiment and Oppression: Reflections on Haslanger, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/1: 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, Richard 1959. Ethical Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Ruth 2013. Commitments, Reasons, and the Will, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics Vol 8, ed. Russell Shafer-Landau, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 74–113.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, Sue, and Will Kymlicka 2013. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einsphar, Jennifer 2010. Structural Domination and Structural Freedom: A Feminist Perspective, Feminist Review 94/1: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge, Peter 2020. Coordination and the Need for Culture, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/1: 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Alan 1981. Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory, New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally 2016. What Is a Social Structural Explanation? Philosophical Studies 173: 113–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally 2017a. Critical Theory and Practice (The 2015 Spinoza Lectures), Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally 2017b. Injustice within Systems of Coordination and Cognition: Comments on Madva for Brains Blog, Brains Blog Ergo Symposium, ed. Aaron Henry, 6 March 2017, http://philosophyofbrains.com/2017/03/06/symposium-on-alex-madvas-a-plea-for-anti-anti-individualism.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally 2018. What is a Social Practice? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 82.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally 2019. Disciplined Bodies and Ideology Critique, Glass Bead Site 2. Dark Room: Somatic Reason and Synthetic Eros, https://www.glass-bead.org/article/disciplined-bodies-and-ideology-critique/?lang=enview.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally 2020. Cognition as a Social Skill, Australasian Philosophy Review 3/1: 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally Forthcoming. Practical Reason and Social Practices, in Routledge Handbook on Practical Reason, eds Ruth Chang and Kurt Sylvan, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, Joseph 2020. Giving Flesh to Culture: An Enactivist Interpretation of Haslanger, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/1: 81–85.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Karen, Francois Schroeter, and Laura Schroeter 2020. Mind-making, Affective Regulation, and Resistance, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/1: 86–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kapusta, Stephanie Julia 2020. Practice of Cognitive Estrangement, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/1: 90–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study, Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, Helen 1990. Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, Phillipa 2020. Another Cog in the Ideological Machine? Social Cognition, Ideology and the First-Personal Perspective, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/1: 95–99.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane and Aldon Morris 2001. Oppositional Consciousness: The Subjective Roots of Social Progress, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGeer, Victoria 2007. The Regulative Dimension of Folk Psychology, in Folk Psychology Re-Assessed, eds Daniel D. Hutto and Matthew Ratcliffe, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McGeer, Victoria 2020. Mindshaping is Inescapable, Social Injustice is Not: Reflections on Haslanger’s Project, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/1: 48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Charles 2020. Ideology and Social Cognition: The Challenge of Theorizing ‘Speciesism’, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/1: 60–70.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, Kate M. 2020. Why We Cannot Recognise Ideology, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/1: 100–103.
   Google Scholar
• Procyshyn, Alexei 2020. Social Coordination or Social Cooperation? Ambiguities of Haslanger’s Approach to Social Life, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/1: 104–108.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1953 (1980). Two Dogmas of Empiricism, in From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Railton, Peter 2014. The Affective Dog and its Rational Tale: Intuition and Attunement, Ethics 124/4: 813–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, John 1955. Two Concepts of Rules, Philosophical Review 64/1: 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Schapiro, Tamar 2001. Three Conceptions of Action in Moral Theory, Noûs 35/1: 93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapiro, Tamar 2003. Compliance, Complicity and the Nature of Nonideal Conditions, Journal of Philosophy 100/7: 329–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, William, Jr. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and Transformation, American Journal of Sociology 98/1: 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar